Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 7月, 2012 31 次提交
  3. 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      Make wait_for_device_probe() also do scsi_complete_async_scans() · eea03c20
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Commit a7a20d10 ("sd: limit the scope of the async probe domain")
make the SCSI device probing run device discovery in it's own async
domain.

However, as a result, the partition detection was no longer synchronized
by async_synchronize_full() (which, despite the name, only synchronizes
the global async space, not all of them).  Which in turn meant that
"wait_for_device_probe()" would not wait for the SCSI partitions to be
parsed.

And "wait_for_device_probe()" was what the boot time init code relied on
for mounting the root filesystem.

Now, most people never noticed this, because not only is it
timing-dependent, but modern distributions all use initrd.  So the root
filesystem isn't actually on a disk at all.  And then before they
actually mount the final disk filesystem, they will have loaded the
scsi-wait-scan module, which not only does the expected
wait_for_device_probe(), but also does scsi_complete_async_scans().

[ Side note: scsi_complete_async_scans() had also been partially broken,
  but that was fixed in commit 43a8d39d ("fix async probe
  regression"), so that same commit a7a20d10 had actually broken
  setups even if you used scsi-wait-scan explicitly ]

Solve this problem by just moving the scsi_complete_async_scans() call
into wait_for_device_probe().  Everybody who wants to wait for device
probing to finish really wants the SCSI probing to complete, so there's
no reason not to do this.

So now "wait_for_device_probe()" really does what the name implies, and
properly waits for device probing to finish.  This also removes the now
unnecessary extra calls to scsi_complete_async_scans().
Reported-and-tested-by: NArtem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@mailcity.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      eea03c20
  5. 08 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 07 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      qla2xxx: print the right array elements in qlt_async_event · 4f1d0f19
      由 Alan Cox 提交于 
      Based upon Alan's patch from Coverity scan id 793583, these debug
messages in qlt_async_event() should be starting from byte 0, which is
always the Asynchronous Event Status Code from the parent switch statement.

Also, rename reason_code -> login_code following the language used in
2500 FW spec for Port Database Changed (0x8014) -> Port Database Changed
Event Mailbox Register for mailbox[2].
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@qlogic.com>
Cc: Giridhar Malavali <giridhar.malavali@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: NNicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
      4f1d0f19
  9. 23 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      SCSI & usb-storage: add try_rc_10_first flag · 6a0bdffa
      由 Alan Stern 提交于 
      Several bug reports have been received recently for USB mass-storage
devices that don't handle READ CAPACITY(16) commands properly.  They
report bogus sizes, in some cases becoming unusable as a result.

The bugs were triggered by commit
09b6b51b (SCSI & usb-storage: add
flags for VPD pages and REPORT LUNS), which caused usb-storage to stop
overriding the SCSI level reported by devices.  By default, the sd
driver will try READ CAPACITY(16) first for any device whose level is
above SCSI_SPC_2.

It seems likely that any device large enough to require the use of
READ CAPACITY(16) (i.e., 2 TB or more) would be able to handle READ
CAPACITY(10) commands properly.  Indeed, I don't know of any devices
that don't handle READ CAPACITY(10) properly.

Therefore this patch (as1559) adds a new flag telling the sd driver
to try READ CAPACITY(10) before READ CAPACITY(16), and sets this flag
for every USB mass-storage device.  If a device really is larger than
2 TB, sd will fall back to READ CAPACITY(16) just as it used to.

This fixes Bugzilla #43391.
Signed-off-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
CC: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      6a0bdffa
  11. 13 6月, 2012 4 次提交