- 18 9月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We didn't protect the assignment of the target device, it might cause the problem that the super block update was skipped because we might find wrong size of the target device during the assignment. Fix it by moving the assignment sentences into the initialization function of the target device. And there is another merit that we can check if the target device is suitable more early. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
btrfs-transacion:5657 [stack snip] btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked() percpu_counter_inc(&fs_info->bio_counter) ###bio_counter > 0(A) __btrfs_bio_map() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###wait mutex(B) btrfs:32612 [stack snip] btrfs_dev_replace_start() btrfs_dev_replace_lock() mutex_lock(dev_replace->lock) ###hold mutex(B) btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() wait until percpu_counter_sum == 0 ###wait on bio_counter(A) This bug can be triggered quite easily by the following test script: http://pastebin.com/MQmb37Cy This patch will fix the ABBA problem by calling btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). The consistency of btrfs devices list and their superblocks is protected by device_list_mutex, not btrfs_dev_replace_lock/unlock(). So it is safe the move btrfs_dev_replace_unlock() before btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked(). Reported-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
there is no matching open parenthesis for the closing parenthesis Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
reproducer: reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]() which is WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices); The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when we replace the seed device with a writable device. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
when we replace the device its corresponding sysfs entry has to be replaced as well Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gui Hecheng 提交于
To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL, and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that there is an invalid argument. Signed-off-by: NGui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock, or we would make the tasks wait for a long time. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem: - We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those mapping of the new chunks. - We might get the mapping information which including the source device before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was based on that mapping information after we freed the source device. For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix the first bug. For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec @bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio and dec @bio_counter when ending bios. Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56 yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will fix it in the future. Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Holton 提交于
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink() and inc_nlink(). This doesn't belong in mainline. Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
For both balance and replace, cancelling involves changing the on-disk state and committing a transaction, which is not a good thing to do on read-only filesystems. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
free_device rcu callback, scheduled from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev, can be processed before btrfs_scratch_superblock is called, which would result in a use-after-free on btrfs_device contents. Fix this by zeroing the superblock before the rcu callback is registered. Cc: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is a left over of how we used to wait for ordered extents, which was to grab the inode and then run filemap flush on it. However if we have an ordered extent then we already are holding a ref on the inode, and we just use btrfs_start_ordered_extent anyway, so there is no reason to have an extra ref on the inode to start work on the ordered extent. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
The internal btrfs device id is a u64, hence make the constant BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID "unsigned long long" as well, so we no longer need a cast to print it. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
u64 is "unsigned long long" on all architectures now, so there's no need to cast it when formatting it using the "ll" length modifier. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
Sweep of the simple cases. Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 14 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The reason we introduce per-subvolume ordered extent list is the same as the per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we create a snapshot, we need flush all delalloc inodes in the fs, just flushing the inodes in the source tree is OK. So we introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported that it destroyed his filesystem. One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0). 0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923). 4918 num_stripes = map->num_stripes; 4919 max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map); 4920 4921 raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes, 4922 GFP_NOFS); 4923 if (!raid_map) { 4924 ret = -ENOMEM; 4925 goto out; 4926 } 4927 There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 20 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We forget to check the return value of btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes(), fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This adds a new file to the sources together with the header file and the changes to ioctl.h and ctree.h that are required by the new C source file. Additionally, 4 new functions are added to volume.c that deal with device creation and destruction. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-