Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 8月, 2017 8 次提交
  3. 25 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 14 7月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 12 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • V
      cpufreq: schedutil: Fix sugov_start() versus sugov_update_shared() race · ab2f7cf1
      由 Vikram Mulukutla 提交于 
      With a shared policy in place, when one of the CPUs in the policy is
hotplugged out and then brought back online, sugov_stop() and
sugov_start() are called in order.

sugov_stop() removes utilization hooks for each CPU in the policy and
does nothing else in the for_each_cpu() loop. sugov_start() on the
other hand iterates through the CPUs in the policy and re-initializes
the per-cpu structure _and_ adds the utilization hook.  This implies
that the scheduler is allowed to invoke a CPU's utilization update
hook when the rest of the per-cpu structures have yet to be
re-inited.

Apart from some strange values in tracepoints this doesn't cause a
problem, but if we do end up accessing a pointer from the per-cpu
sugov_cpu structure somewhere in the sugov_update_shared() path,
we will likely see crashes since the memset for another CPU in the
policy is free to race with sugov_update_shared from the CPU that is
ready to go.  So let's fix this now to first init all per-cpu
structures, and then add the per-cpu utilization update hooks all at
once.
Signed-off-by: NVikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ab2f7cf1
  9. 05 7月, 2017 6 次提交
  11. 04 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      Revert "sched/cputime: Refactor the cputime_adjust() code" · 3b9c08ae
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      This reverts commit 72298e5c.

As Peter explains:

> Argh, no... That code was perfectly fine. The new code otoh is
> convoluted.
>
> The old code had the following form:
>
>         if (exception1)
>           deal with exception1
>
>         if (execption2)
>           deal with exception2
>
>         do normal stuff
>
> Which is as simple and straight forward as it gets.
>
> The new code otoh reads like:
>
>         if (!exception1) {
>                 if (exception2)
>                   deal with exception 2
>                 else
>                   do normal stuff
>         }

So restore the old form.

Also fix the comment describing the logic, as it was confusing.
Requested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      3b9c08ae
  13. 30 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  15. 29 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      sched/numa: Hide numa_wake_affine() from UP build · ff801b71
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Stephen reported the following build warning in UP:

kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning: 'struct sched_domain' declared inside
parameter list
         ^
/home/sfr/next/next/kernel/sched/fair.c:2657:9: warning: its scope is only this
definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want

Hide the numa_wake_affine() inline stub on UP builds to get rid of it.

Fixes: 3fed382b ("sched/numa: Implement NUMA node level wake_affine()")
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      ff801b71
  17. 24 6月, 2017 4 次提交
  19. 23 6月, 2017 3 次提交
  21. 22 6月, 2017 2 次提交
  23. 20 6月, 2017 9 次提交
    • D
      sched/fair: WARN() and refuse to set buddy when !se->on_rq · c5ae366e
      由 Daniel Axtens 提交于 
      If we set a next or last buddy for a se that is not on_rq, we will
end up taking a NULL pointer dereference in wakeup_preempt_entity
via pick_next_task_fair.

Detect when we would be about to do that, throw a warning and
then refuse to actually set it.

This has been suggested at least twice:

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146651668921468&w=2
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/16/663

I recently had to debug a problem with these (we hadn't backported
Konstantin's patches in this area) and this would have saved a lot
of time/pain.

Just do it.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170510201139.16236-1-dja@axtens.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c5ae366e
    • I
      sched/debug: Fix SCHED_WARN_ON() to return a value on !CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG as well · 6d3aed3d
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      This definition of SCHED_WARN_ON():

 #define SCHED_WARN_ON(x)        ((void)(x))

is not fully compatible with the 'real' WARN_ON_ONCE() primitive, as it
has no return value, so it cannot be used in conditionals.

Fix it.

Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6d3aed3d
    • I
      sched/wait: Disambiguate wq_entry->task_list and wq_head->task_list naming · 2055da97
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      So I've noticed a number of instances where it was not obvious from the
code whether ->task_list was for a wait-queue head or a wait-queue entry.

Furthermore, there's a number of wait-queue users where the lists are
not for 'tasks' but other entities (poll tables, etc.), in which case
the 'task_list' name is actively confusing.

To clear this all up, name the wait-queue head and entry list structure
fields unambiguously:

	struct wait_queue_head::task_list	=> ::head
	struct wait_queue_entry::task_list	=> ::entry

For example, this code:

	rqw->wait.task_list.next != &wait->task_list

... is was pretty unclear (to me) what it's doing, while now it's written this way:

	rqw->wait.head.next != &wait->entry

... which makes it pretty clear that we are iterating a list until we see the head.

Other examples are:

	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->task_list, task_list) {
	list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.task_list, task_list) {

... where it's unclear (to me) what we are iterating, and during review it's
hard to tell whether it's trying to walk a wait-queue entry (which would be
a bug), while now it's written as:

	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &x->head, entry) {
	list_for_each_entry(wq, &fence->wait.head, entry) {

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2055da97
    • I
      sched/wait: Move bit_wait_table[] and related functionality from sched/core.c to sched/wait_bit.c · 5822a454
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      The key hashed waitqueue data structures and their initialization
was done in the main scheduler file for no good reason, move them
to sched/wait_bit.c instead.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5822a454
    • I
      sched/wait: Split out the wait_bit*() APIs from <linux/wait.h> into <linux/wait_bit.h> · 5dd43ce2
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      The wait_bit*() types and APIs are mixed into wait.h, but they
are a pretty orthogonal extension of wait-queues.

Furthermore, only about 50 kernel files use these APIs, while
over 1000 use the regular wait-queue functionality.

So clean up the main wait.h by moving the wait-bit functionality
out of it, into a separate .h and .c file:

  include/linux/wait_bit.h  for types and APIs
  kernel/sched/wait_bit.c   for the implementation

Update all header dependencies.

This reduces the size of wait.h rather significantly, by about 30%.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      5dd43ce2
    • I
      sched/wait: Standardize wait_bit_queue naming · 76c85ddc
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      So wait-bit-queue head variables are often named:

	struct wait_bit_queue *q

... which is a bit ambiguous and super confusing, because
they clearly suggest wait-queue head semantics and behavior
(they rhyme with the old wait_queue_t *q naming), while they
are extended wait-queue _entries_, not heads!

They are misnomers in two ways:

 - the 'wait_bit_queue' leaves open the question of whether
   it's an entry or a head

 - the 'q' parameter and local variable naming falsely implies
   that it's a 'queue' - while it's an entry.

This resulted in sometimes confusing cases such as:

	finish_wait(wq, &q->wait);

where the 'q' is not a wait-queue head, but a wait-bit-queue entry.

So improve this all by standardizing wait-bit-queue nomenclature
similar to wait-queue head naming:

	struct wait_bit_queue   => struct wait_bit_queue_entry
	q			=> wbq_entry

Which makes it all a much clearer:

	struct wait_bit_queue_entry *wbq_entry

... and turns the former confusing piece of code into:

	finish_wait(wq_head, &wbq_entry->wq_entry;

which IMHO makes it apparently clear what we are doing,
without having to analyze the context of the code: we are
adding a wait-queue entry to a regular wait-queue head,
which entry is embedded in a wait-bit-queue entry.

I'm not a big fan of acronyms, but repeating wait_bit_queue_entry
in field and local variable names is too long, so Hopefully it's
clear enough that 'wq_' prefixes stand for wait-queues, while
'wbq_' prefixes stand for wait-bit-queues.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      76c85ddc
    • I
      sched/wait: Standardize 'struct wait_bit_queue' wait-queue entry field name · 21417136
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      Rename 'struct wait_bit_queue::wait' to ::wq_entry, to more clearly
name it as a wait-queue entry.

Propagate it to a couple of usage sites where the wait-bit-queue internals
are exposed.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      21417136
    • I
      sched/wait: Standardize internal naming of wait-queue heads · 9d9d676f
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      The wait-queue head parameters and variables are named in a
couple of ways, we have the following variants currently:

	wait_queue_head_t *q
	wait_queue_head_t *wq
	wait_queue_head_t *head

In particular the 'wq' naming is ambiguous in the sense whether it's
a wait-queue head or entry name - as entries were often named 'wait'.

( Not to mention the confusion of any readers coming over from
  workqueue-land. )

Standardize all this around a single, unambiguous parameter and
variable name:

	struct wait_queue_head *wq_head

which is easy to grep for and also rhymes nicely with the wait-queue
entry naming:

	struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry

Also rename:

	struct __wait_queue_head => struct wait_queue_head

... and use this struct type to migrate from typedefs usage to 'struct'
usage, which is more in line with existing kernel practices.

Don't touch any external users and preserve the main wait_queue_head_t
typedef.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9d9d676f
    • I
      sched/wait: Standardize internal naming of wait-queue entries · 50816c48
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      So the various wait-queue entry variables in include/linux/wait.h
and kernel/sched/wait.c are named in a colorfully inconsistent
way:

	wait_queue_entry_t *wait
	wait_queue_entry_t *__wait	(even in plain C code!)
	wait_queue_entry_t *q		(!)
	wait_queue_entry_t *new		(making anyone who knows C++ cringe)
	wait_queue_entry_t *old

I think part of the reason for the inconsistency is the constant
apparent confusion about what a wait queue 'head' versus 'entry' is.

( Some of the documentation talks about a 'wait descriptor', which is
  the wait-queue entry itself - further adding to the confusion. )

The most common name is 'wait', but that in itself is somewhat
ambiguous as well, as it does not really make it clear whether
it's a wait-queue entry or head.

To improve all this name the wait-queue entry structure parameters
and variables consistently and push through this naming into all
the wait.h and wait.c code:

	struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry

The 'wq_' prefix makes it easy to grep for, and we also use the
opportunity to move away from the typedef to a plain 'struct' naming:
in the kernel we typically reserve typedefs for cases where a
C structure is really small and somewhat opaque - such as pte_t.

wait-queue entries are neither small nor opaque, so use the more
standard 'struct xxx_entry' list management code nomenclature instead.

( We don't touch external users, and we preserve the typedef as well
  for actual wait-queue users, to reduce unnecessary churn. )

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      50816c48