- 08 11月, 2017 11 次提交
-
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Export these functions so that drivers can explicitly use these when setting up their IRQ domain. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Currently GPIO drivers are required to add the GPIO chip and its corresponding IRQ chip separately, which can result in a lot of boilerplate. Use the newly introduced struct gpio_irq_chip, embedded in struct gpio_chip, that drivers can fill in if they want the GPIO core to automatically register the IRQ chip associated with a GPIO chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
In order to consolidate the multiple ways to associate an IRQ chip with a GPIO chip, move more fields into the new struct gpio_irq_chip. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
This new structure will be used to group all fields related to interrupt handling in a GPIO chip. Doing so will properly namespace these fields and make it easier to distinguish which fields are used for IRQ support. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The vtable call pin2mask() was introducing a vtable function call in every gpiochip callback for a generic MMIO GPIO chip. This was not exactly efficient. (Maybe link-time optimization could get rid of it, I don't know.) After removing all external calls into this API we can make it a boolean flag in the struct gpio_chip call and sink the function into the gpio-mmio driver yielding encapsulation and potential speedups. Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 20 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Wunner 提交于
SPI-attached GPIO controllers typically read out all inputs in one go. If callers desire the values of multipe inputs, ideally a single readout should take place to return the desired values. However the current driver API only offers a ->get callback but no ->get_multiple (unlike ->set_multiple, which is present). Thus, to read multiple inputs, a full readout needs to be performed for every single value (barring driver-internal caching), which is inefficient. In fact, the lack of a ->get_multiple callback has been bemoaned repeatedly by the gpio subsystem maintainer: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg10571.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg121734.html Introduce the missing callback. Add corresponding consumer functions such as gpiod_get_array_value(). Amend linehandle_ioctl() to take advantage of the newly added infrastructure. Update the documentation. Cc: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> Signed-off-by: NLukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于
Hence, the last user of irq_base field was removed by commit b4c495f0 ("gpio: mockup: use irq_sim") it can be removed safely. Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 14 8月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
The cell count for GPIO specifiers can never be negative, so make the field unsigned. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Add descriptions for missing fields and fix up some parameter references to match the code. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Some kerneldoc has become stale or wasn't quite correct from the outset. Fix up the most serious issues to silence warnings when building the documentation. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 29 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Charles Keepax 提交于
Add new flags to allow users to specify that they are not concerned with the status of GPIOs whilst in a sleep/low power state. Signed-off-by: NCharles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
Interrupt numbers are never negative, zero serves as the special invalid value. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 26 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Currently we already have two pin configuration related callbacks available for GPIO chips .set_single_ended() and .set_debounce(). In future we expect to have even more, which does not scale well if we need to add yet another callback to the GPIO chip structure for each possible configuration parameter. Better solution is to reuse what we already have available in the generic pinconf. To support this, we introduce a new .set_config() callback for GPIO chips. The callback takes a single packed pin configuration value as parameter. This can then be extended easily beyond what is currently supported by just adding new types to the generic pinconf enum. If the GPIO driver is backed up by a pinctrl driver the GPIO driver can just assign gpiochip_generic_config() (introduced in this patch) to .set_config and that will take care configuration requests are directed to the pinctrl driver. We then convert the existing drivers over .set_config() and finally remove the .set_single_ended() and .set_debounce() callbacks. Suggested-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 19 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The helper function for adding a GPIO chip compiles in a lockdep key for debugging, the same key is needed for nested chips as well. The macro construction is unreadable, replace this with two static inlines instead. The _gpiochip_irqchip_add prefixed function is not helpful, rename it with gpiochip_irqchip_add_key() that tell us what the function is actually doing. Fixes: d245b3f9 ("gpio: simplify adding threaded interrupts") Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Reported-by: NClemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> Reported-by: NRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Reported-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Tested-by: NClemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> Tested-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 25 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This tries to simplify the use of CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP when using threaded interrupts: add a new call gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() to indicate that we're dealing with a nested rather than a chained irqchip, then create a separate gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip() to mirror the gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip() call to connect the parent and child interrupts. In the nested case gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip() does nothing more than call irq_set_parent() on each valid child interrupt, which has little semantic effect in the kernel, but this is probably still formally correct. Update all drivers using nested interrupts to use gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() so we can now see clearly which these users are. The DLN2 driver can drop its specific hack with .irq_not_threaded as we now recognize whether a chip is threaded or not from its use of gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() signature rather than from inspecting .can_sleep. We rename the .irq_parent to .irq_chained_parent since this parent IRQ is only really kept around for the chained interrupt handlers. Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de> Cc: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com> Cc: Bin Gao <bin.gao@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ajay Thomas <ajay.thomas.david.rajamanickam@intel.com> Cc: Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@globallogic.com> Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Cc: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 24 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anthony Best 提交于
It should have been @reg_clr instead of @reg_clk Signed-off-by: NAnthony Best <anthonybest@bestanthony.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
Kernel source files need not include <linux/kconfig.h> explicitly because the top Makefile forces to include it with: -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h This commit removes explicit includes except the following: * arch/s390/include/asm/facilities_src.h * tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/kernel.h These two are used for host programs. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473656164-11929-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.comSigned-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
When using GPIO irqchip helpers to setup irqchip for a gpiolib based driver, it is not possible to select which GPIOs to add to the IRQ domain. Instead it just adds all GPIOs which is not always desired. For example there might be GPIOs that for some reason cannot generated normal interrupts at all. To support this we add a flag irq_need_valid_mask to struct gpio_chip. When this flag is set the core allocates irq_valid_mask that holds one bit for each GPIO the chip has. By default all bits are set but drivers can manipulate this using set_bit() and clear_bit() accordingly. Then when gpiochip_irqchip_add() is called, this mask is checked and all GPIOs with bit is set are added to the IRQ domain created for the GPIO chip. Suggested-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
Most shared headers in include/linux don't need to know what the internals of a struct module are; all they care about is that it is a struct and hence they may require a pointer to one. The advantage in this is that module.h is including a lot of stuff itself, and an otherwise empty C file that just contains module.h will result in ~750kB from CPP (compared to say 12kB from init.h) So we have approximately 50 instances of "struct module;" in the various include/linux headers already that help us keep module.h out of other headers; here we do the same for gpio. Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Some GPIO controllers has a special hardware bit we can flip to support open drain / source. This means that on these hardwares we do not need to emulate OD/OS by setting the line to input instead of actively driving it high/low. Add an optional vtable callback to the driver set_single_ended() so that driver can implement this in hardware if they have it. We may need a pinctrl_gpio_set_config() call at some point to propagate this down to a backing pin control device on systems with split GPIO/pin control. Reported-by: NMichael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laxman Dewangan 提交于
Add device managed APIs devm_gpiochip_add_data() and devm_gpiochip_remove() for the APIs gpiochip_add_data() and gpiochip_remove(). This helps in reducing code in error path and sometimes removal of .remove callback for driver unbind. Signed-off-by: NLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The gpio_chip label is useful for userspace to understand what kind of GPIO chip it is dealing with. Let's store a copy of this label in the gpio_device, add it to the struct passed to userspace for GPIO_GET_CHIPINFO_IOCTL and modify lsgpio to show it. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 16 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
My left hand merges code to privatize the descriptor handling while my right hand merges drivers that poke around and disrespect with the same gpiolib internals. So let's expose the proper APIs for drivers to ask the gpiolib core if a line is marked as open drain or open source and get some order around things so this driver compiles again. Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nicolassaenzj@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
We move to manage this pointer under gpiolib control rather than leave it in the subdevice's gpio_chip. We can not NULL it after gpiochip_remove so at to keep things tight. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Instead of keeping this reference to the pin ranges in the client driver-supplied gpio_chip, move it to the internal gpio_device as the drivers have no need to inspect this. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 12 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This kind of hacks disturbs the refactoring of the gpiolib. The descriptor table belongs to the gpiolib, if we want to know something about something in it, use or define the proper accessor functions. Let's add this gpiochip_lins_is_irq() to do what the sunxi driver is trying at so we can privatize the descriptors properly. Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
We need gpio_device to hold the descriptors so that they can be lifecycled with the struct gpio_device held from userspace. Move the descriptor array into gpio_device. Also rename it from "desc" (singularis) to "descs" (pluralis) to reflect the fact that it is an array. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
Since gpio_device is the struct that survives if the backing gpio_chip is removed, move the sysfs mock device to this state container so it becomes part of the dangling state of the GPIO device on removal. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 09 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
GPIO chips have been around for years, but were never real devices, instead they were piggy-backing on a parent device (such as a platform_device or amba_device) but this was always optional. GPIO chips could also exist without any device at all, with its struct device *parent (ex *dev) pointer being set to null. When sysfs was in use, a mock device would be created, with the optional parent assigned, or just floating orphaned with NULL as parent. If sysfs is active, it will use this device as parent. We now create a gpio_device struct containing a real struct device and move the subsystem over to using that. The list of struct gpio_chip:s is augmented to hold struct gpio_device:s and we find gpio_chips:s by first looking up the struct gpio_device. The struct gpio_device is designed to stay around even if the gpio_chip is removed, so as to satisfy users in userspace that need a backing data structure to hold the state of the session initiated with e.g. a character device even if there is no physical chip anymore. From this point on, gpiochips are devices. Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org> Cc: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
Board files that define their own bgpio_pdata are broken when CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC is disabled and the bgpio_pdata structure definition is hidden by the #ifdef: arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c:148:15: error: variable 'autcpu12_mmgpio_pdata' has initializer but incomplete type static struct bgpio_pdata autcpu12_mmgpio_pdata __initdata = { arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c:149:2: error: unknown field 'base' specified in initializer .base = AUTCPU12_MMGPIO_BASE, Since the board files should generally not care what drivers are enabled, this makes the structure definition visible again. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: 0f4630f3 ("gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct") Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 05 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several steps of dereferencing necessary. Make things simpler: include the fields directly into <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper kerneldoc while we're at it. Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data(). Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Acked-by: NGregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com> Acked-by: NLiviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> Acked-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
由 Linus Walleij 提交于
This adds a void * pointer to gpio_chip so that driver can assign and retrieve some states. This is done to get rid of container_of() calls for gpio_chips embedded inside state containers, so we can remove the need to have the gpio_chip or later (planned) struct gpio_device be dynamically allocated at registration time, so that its struct device can be properly reference counted and not bound to its parent device (e.g. a platform_device) but instead live on after unregistration if it is opened by e.g. a char device or sysfs. The data is added with the new function gpiochip_add_data() and for compatibility we add static inline wrapper function gpiochip_add() that will call gpiochip_add_data() with NULL as argument. The latter will be removed once we have exorcised gpiochip_add() from the kernel. gpiochip_get_data() is added as a static inline accessor for drivers to quickly get their data out. Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 27 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Zapolskiy 提交于
Since gpiochip .get() callback may return a negative error value, it strictly limits the range of possible non-error returned values to a subset of [30:0] bitmask, however on practice on success all gpiochip drivers return either 0 for low signal or 1 for high signal, this is assured by "gpio: *: Be sure to clamp return value" series of changes. To avoid any confusion, misinterpretation and potential errors while developing gpiochip drivers in future convert this implicit assumption to a mandatory rule. For output signals with unknown output signal state gpiochip drivers should return a negative error instead of 0. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-