- 03 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chen Yucong 提交于
- Use the more current logging style pr_<level>(...) instead of the old printk(KERN_<LEVEL> ...). - Convert pr_warning() to pr_warn(). Signed-off-by: NChen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454384702-21707-1-git-send-email-slaoub@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 06 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
As requested by Linus add explicit __visible to the asmlinkage users. This marks all functions visible to assembler. Tree sweep for arch/x86/* Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398984278-29319-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
-
- 21 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于
[Purpose of this patch] As Vaibhav explained in the thread below, tracepoints for irq vectors are useful. http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg85707.html <snip> The current interrupt traces from irq_handler_entry and irq_handler_exit provide when an interrupt is handled. They provide good data about when the system has switched to kernel space and how it affects the currently running processes. There are some IRQ vectors which trigger the system into kernel space, which are not handled in generic IRQ handlers. Tracing such events gives us the information about IRQ interaction with other system events. The trace also tells where the system is spending its time. We want to know which cores are handling interrupts and how they are affecting other processes in the system. Also, the trace provides information about when the cores are idle and which interrupts are changing that state. <snip> On the other hand, my usecase is tracing just local timer event and getting a value of instruction pointer. I suggested to add an argument local timer event to get instruction pointer before. But there is another way to get it with external module like systemtap. So, I don't need to add any argument to irq vector tracepoints now. [Patch Description] Vaibhav's patch shared a trace point ,irq_vector_entry/irq_vector_exit, in all events. But there is an above use case to trace specific irq_vector rather than tracing all events. In this case, we are concerned about overhead due to unwanted events. So, add following tracepoints instead of introducing irq_vector_entry/exit. so that we can enable them independently. - local_timer_vector - reschedule_vector - call_function_vector - call_function_single_vector - irq_work_entry_vector - error_apic_vector - thermal_apic_vector - threshold_apic_vector - spurious_apic_vector - x86_platform_ipi_vector Also, introduce a logic switching IDT at enabling/disabling time so that a time penalty makes a zero when tracepoints are disabled. Detailed explanations are as follows. - Create trace irq handlers with entering_irq()/exiting_irq(). - Create a new IDT, trace_idt_table, at boot time by adding a logic to _set_gate(). It is just a copy of original idt table. - Register the new handlers for tracpoints to the new IDT by introducing macros to alloc_intr_gate() called at registering time of irq_vector handlers. - Add checking, whether irq vector tracing is on/off, into load_current_idt(). This has to be done below debug checking for these reasons. - Switching to debug IDT may be kicked while tracing is enabled. - On the other hands, switching to trace IDT is kicked only when debugging is disabled. In addition, the new IDT is created only when CONFIG_TRACING is enabled to avoid being used for other purposes. Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C323ED.5050708@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-
由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于
When implementing tracepoints in interrupt handers, if the tracepoints are simply added in the performance sensitive path of interrupt handers, it may cause potential performance problem due to the time penalty. To solve the problem, an idea is to prepare non-trace/trace irq handers and switch their IDTs at the enabling/disabling time. So, let's introduce entering_irq()/exiting_irq() for pre/post- processing of each irq handler. A way to use them is as follows. Non-trace irq handler: smp_irq_handler() { entering_irq(); /* pre-processing of this handler */ __smp_irq_handler(); /* * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers * in a vector. */ exiting_irq(); /* post-processing of this handler */ } Trace irq_handler: smp_trace_irq_handler() { entering_irq(); /* pre-processing of this handler */ trace_irq_entry(); /* tracepoint for irq entry */ __smp_irq_handler(); /* * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers * in a vector. */ trace_irq_exit(); /* tracepoint for irq exit */ exiting_irq(); /* post-processing of this handler */ } If tracepoints can place outside entering_irq()/exiting_irq() as follows, it looks cleaner. smp_trace_irq_handler() { trace_irq_entry(); smp_irq_handler(); trace_irq_exit(); } But it doesn't work. The problem is with irq_enter/exit() being called. They must be called before trace_irq_enter/exit(), because of the rcu_irq_enter() must be called before any tracepoints are used, as tracepoints use rcu to synchronize. As a possible alternative, we may be able to call irq_enter() first as follows if irq_enter() can nest. smp_trace_irq_hander() { irq_entry(); trace_irq_entry(); smp_irq_handler(); trace_irq_exit(); irq_exit(); } But it doesn't work, either. If irq_enter() is nested, it may have a time penalty because it has to check if it was already called or not. The time penalty is not desired in performance sensitive paths even if it is tiny. Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C3238D.9040706@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Interrupts notify the idle exit state before calling irq_enter(). But the notifier code calls rcu_read_lock() and this is not allowed while rcu is in an extended quiescent state. We need to wait for irq_enter() -> rcu_idle_exit() to be called before doing so otherwise this results in a grumpy RCU: [ 0.099991] WARNING: at include/linux/rcupdate.h:194 __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xd2/0x110() [ 0.099991] Hardware name: AMD690VM-FMH [ 0.099991] Modules linked in: [ 0.099991] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.0.0-rc6+ #255 [ 0.099991] Call Trace: [ 0.099991] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81051c8a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81051cd5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff817d6fa2>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xd2/0x110 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff817d6ff1>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81001873>] exit_idle+0x43/0x50 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81020439>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x39/0xa0 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff817da253>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 0.099991] <EOI> [<ffffffff8100ae67>] ? default_idle+0xa7/0x350 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff8100ae65>] ? default_idle+0xa5/0x350 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff8100b19b>] amd_e400_idle+0x8b/0x110 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff810cb01f>] ? rcu_enter_nohz+0x8f/0x160 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff810019a0>] cpu_idle+0xb0/0x110 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff817a7505>] rest_init+0xe5/0x140 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff817a7468>] ? rest_init+0x48/0x140 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81cc5ca3>] start_kernel+0x3d1/0x3dc [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81cc5321>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x131/0x135 [ 0.099991] [<ffffffff81cc5412>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xed/0xf4 Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andy Henroid <andrew.d.henroid@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
- 29 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Enable the 64bit MCE_INTEL code (CMCI, thermal interrupts) for 32bit NEW_MCE. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Impact: build fix The APIC code rewrite in the x86 tree broke the x86/mce branch: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c: In function ‘mce_threshold_interrupt’: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ack_APIC_irq’ Also tidy up the file a bit while at it. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 25 2月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Impact: minor bugfix The threshold handler on AMD (and soon on Intel) could be theoretically reentered by the hardware. This could lead to corrupted events because the machine check poll code assumes it is not reentered. Move the APIC ACK to the end of the interrupt handler to let the hardware avoid that. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Impact: cleanup; preparation for feature The mce_amd_64 code has an own private MC threshold vector with an own interrupt handler. Since Intel needs a similar handler it makes sense to share the vector because both can not be active at the same time. I factored the common APIC handler code into a separate file which can be used by both the Intel or AMD MC code. This is needed for the next patch which adds an Intel specific CMCI handler. This patch should be a nop for AMD, it just moves some code around. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-