- 17 8月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Becky Bruce 提交于
This file was protected by _PPC64_LMB_H, which is confusing, as the 32-bit code also uses the lmb these days. Changed to _ASM_POWERPC_LMB_H. Signed-off-by: NBecky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 22 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
In mm_init_ppc64() we calculate the location of the "IO hole", but then no one ever looks at the value. So don't bother. That's actually all mm_init_ppc64() does, so get rid of it too. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 07 2月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Prototypes aren't so useful without parameter names, add them to lmb.h based on the names in lmb.c Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE doesn't need to be part of the API, it's only used in lmb.c - so move it out of the header file. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Currently most callers of lmb_alloc() don't check if it worked or not, if it ever does weird bad things will probably happen. The few callers who do check just panic or BUG_ON. So make lmb_alloc() panic internally, to catch bugs at the source. The few callers who did check the result no longer need to. The only caller that did anything interesting with the return result was careful_allocation(). For it we create __lmb_alloc_base() which _doesn't_ panic automatically, a little messy, but passable. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
include/asm-ppc/ had #ifdef __KERNEL__ in all header files that are not meant for use by user space, include/asm-powerpc does not have this yet. This patch gets us a lot closer there. There are a few cases where I was not sure, so I left them out. I have verified that no CONFIG_* symbols are used outside of __KERNEL__ any more and that there are no obvious compile errors when including any of the headers in user space libraries. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 06 10月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
This brings in the ppc64 version of prom_init.c, prom.c and btext.c and makes them work for ppc32. This also brings in the new calling convention, where the first entry to the kernel (with r5 != 0) goes to the prom_init code, which then restarts from the beginning (with r5 == 0) after it has done its stuff. For now this also brings in the ppc32 version of setup.c. It also merges lmb.h. Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bob Picco 提交于
A new option for SPARSEMEM is ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME. Architecture platforms with a very sparse physical address space would likely want to select this option. For those architecture platforms that don't select the option, the code generated is equivalent to SPARSEMEM currently in -mm. I'll be posting a patch on ia64 ml which uses this new SPARSEMEM feature. ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME makes mem_section a one dimensional array of pointers to mem_sections. This two level layout scheme is able to achieve smaller memory requirements for SPARSEMEM with the tradeoff of an additional shift and load when fetching the memory section. The current SPARSEMEM -mm implementation is a one dimensional array of mem_sections which is the default SPARSEMEM configuration. The patch attempts isolates the implementation details of the physical layout of the sparsemem section array. ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME depends on 64BIT and is by default boolean false. I've boot tested under aim load ia64 configured for ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME. I've also boot tested a 4 way Opteron machine with !ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME and tested with aim. Signed-off-by: NAndy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> Signed-off-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
We no longer need the lmb code to know about abs and phys addresses, so remove the physbase variable from the lmb_property struct. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-