This is just the infrastructure; there are no users yet.

This is modelled on CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM; a CONFIG_ symbol declares
the existence of <asm/hash.h>.

That file may define its own versions of various functions, and define
HAVE_* symbols (no CONFIG_ prefix!) to suppress the generic ones.

Included is a self-test (in lib/test_hash.c) that verifies the basics.
It is NOT in general required that the arch-specific functions compute
the same thing as the generic, but if a HAVE_* symbol is defined with
the value 1, then equality is tested.
Signed-off-by: NGeorge Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@macq.eu>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Cc: Alistair Francis <alistai@xilinx.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp

With netconsole (at least) the pr_err("...  disablingn") call can
recurse back into the dma-debug code, where it'll try to grab
free_entries_lock again.  Avoid the problem by doing the printk after
dropping the lock.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463678421-18683-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

the only case when we should skip the iterate_and_advance() guts
is when nothing's left in the iterator, _not_ just when requested
amount is 0.  Said guts will do nothing in the latter case anyway;
the problem we tried to deal with in the aforementioned commit is
that when there's nothing left *and* the amount requested is 0,
we might end up deferencing one iovec too many; the value we fetch
from there is discarded in that case, but theoretically it might
oops if the iovec array ends exactly at the end of page with the
next page not mapped.

Bailing out on zero size requested had an unexpected side effect -
zero-length segment in the beginning of iovec array ended up
throwing do_loop_readv_writev() into infinite spin; we do not
advance past the empty segment at all.  Reproducer is trivial:
echo '#include <sys/uio.h>' >a.c
echo 'main() {char c; struct iovec v[] = {{&c,0},{&c,1}}; readv(0,v,2);}' >>a.c
cc a.c && ./a.out </proc/uptime

which should end up with the process not hanging.  Probably ought to
go into LTP or xfstests...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

With VT=n, the kernel build fails with:

  drivers/built-in.o: In function `kgdboc_pre_exp_handler':
  kgdboc.c:(.text+0x7b5aa): undefined reference to `fg_console'
  kgdboc.c:(.text+0x7b5ce): undefined reference to `vc_cons'
  kgdboc.c:(.text+0x7b5d5): undefined reference to `vc_cons'

kgdboc.o is built when KGDB_SERIAL_CONSOLE is set.  So make
KGDB_SERIAL_CONSOLE depend on HW_CONSOLE which includes those symbols.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459412955-4696-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Reported-by: N"Jim Davis" <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The binary GCD algorithm is based on the following facts:
	1. If a and b are all evens, then gcd(a,b) = 2 * gcd(a/2, b/2)
	2. If a is even and b is odd, then gcd(a,b) = gcd(a/2, b)
	3. If a and b are all odds, then gcd(a,b) = gcd((a-b)/2, b) = gcd((a+b)/2, b)

Even on x86 machines with reasonable division hardware, the binary
algorithm runs about 25% faster (80% the execution time) than the
division-based Euclidian algorithm.

On platforms like Alpha and ARMv6 where division is a function call to
emulation code, it's even more significant.

There are two variants of the code here, depending on whether a fast
__ffs (find least significant set bit) instruction is available.  This
allows the unpredictable branches in the bit-at-a-time shifting loop to
be eliminated.

If fast __ffs is not available, the "even/odd" GCD variant is used.

I use the following code to benchmark:

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <stdlib.h>
	#include <stdint.h>
	#include <string.h>
	#include <time.h>
	#include <unistd.h>

	#define swap(a, b) \
		do { \
			a ^= b; \
			b ^= a; \
			a ^= b; \
		} while (0)

	unsigned long gcd0(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
	{
		unsigned long r;

		if (a < b) {
			swap(a, b);
		}

		if (b == 0)
			return a;

		while ((r = a % b) != 0) {
			a = b;
			b = r;
		}

		return b;
	}

	unsigned long gcd1(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
	{
		unsigned long r = a | b;

		if (!a || !b)
			return r;

		b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);

		for (;;) {
			a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
			if (a == b)
				return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);

			if (a < b)
				swap(a, b);
			a -= b;
		}
	}

	unsigned long gcd2(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
	{
		unsigned long r = a | b;

		if (!a || !b)
			return r;

		r &= -r;

		while (!(b & r))
			b >>= 1;

		for (;;) {
			while (!(a & r))
				a >>= 1;
			if (a == b)
				return a;

			if (a < b)
				swap(a, b);
			a -= b;
			a >>= 1;
			if (a & r)
				a += b;
			a >>= 1;
		}
	}

	unsigned long gcd3(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
	{
		unsigned long r = a | b;

		if (!a || !b)
			return r;

		b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
		if (b == 1)
			return r & -r;

		for (;;) {
			a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
			if (a == 1)
				return r & -r;
			if (a == b)
				return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);

			if (a < b)
				swap(a, b);
			a -= b;
		}
	}

	unsigned long gcd4(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
	{
		unsigned long r = a | b;

		if (!a || !b)
			return r;

		r &= -r;

		while (!(b & r))
			b >>= 1;
		if (b == r)
			return r;

		for (;;) {
			while (!(a & r))
				a >>= 1;
			if (a == r)
				return r;
			if (a == b)
				return a;

			if (a < b)
				swap(a, b);
			a -= b;
			a >>= 1;
			if (a & r)
				a += b;
			a >>= 1;
		}
	}

	static unsigned long (*gcd_func[])(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) = {
		gcd0, gcd1, gcd2, gcd3, gcd4,
	};

	#define TEST_ENTRIES (sizeof(gcd_func) / sizeof(gcd_func[0]))

	#if defined(__x86_64__)

	#define rdtscll(val) do { \
		unsigned long __a,__d; \
		__asm__ __volatile__("rdtsc" : "=a" (__a), "=d" (__d)); \
		(val) = ((unsigned long long)__a) | (((unsigned long long)__d)<<32); \
	} while(0)

	static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
								unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
	{
		unsigned long long start, end;
		unsigned long long ret;
		unsigned long gcd_res;

		rdtscll(start);
		gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
		rdtscll(end);

		if (end >= start)
			ret = end - start;
		else
			ret = ~0ULL - start + 1 + end;

		*res = gcd_res;
		return ret;
	}

	#else

	static inline struct timespec read_time(void)
	{
		struct timespec time;
		clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time);
		return time;
	}

	static inline unsigned long long diff_time(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
	{
		struct timespec temp;

		if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
			temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
			temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000ULL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
		} else {
			temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
			temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
		}

		return temp.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + temp.tv_nsec;
	}

	static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
								unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
	{
		struct timespec start, end;
		unsigned long gcd_res;

		start = read_time();
		gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
		end = read_time();

		*res = gcd_res;
		return diff_time(start, end);
	}

	#endif

	static inline unsigned long get_rand()
	{
		if (sizeof(long) == 8)
			return (unsigned long)rand() << 32 | rand();
		else
			return rand();
	}

	int main(int argc, char **argv)
	{
		unsigned int seed = time(0);
		int loops = 100;
		int repeats = 1000;
		unsigned long (*res)[TEST_ENTRIES];
		unsigned long long elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
		int i, j, k;

		for (;;) {
			int opt = getopt(argc, argv, "n:r:s:");
			/* End condition always first */
			if (opt == -1)
				break;

			switch (opt) {
			case 'n':
				loops = atoi(optarg);
				break;
			case 'r':
				repeats = atoi(optarg);
				break;
			case 's':
				seed = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
				break;
			default:
				/* You won't actually get here. */
				break;
			}
		}

		res = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * TEST_ENTRIES * loops);
		memset(elapsed, 0, sizeof(elapsed));

		srand(seed);
		for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
			unsigned long a = get_rand();
			/* Do we have args? */
			unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
			unsigned long long min_elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
			for (k = 0; k < repeats; k++) {
				for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
					unsigned long long tmp = benchmark_gcd_func(gcd_func[i], a, b, &res[j][i]);
					if (k == 0 || min_elapsed[i] > tmp)
						min_elapsed[i] = tmp;
				}
			}
			for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
				elapsed[i] += min_elapsed[i];
		}

		for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
			printf("gcd%d: elapsed %llu\n", i, elapsed[i]);

		k = 0;
		srand(seed);
		for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
			unsigned long a = get_rand();
			unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
			for (i = 1; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
				if (res[j][i] != res[j][0])
					break;
			}
			if (i < TEST_ENTRIES) {
				if (k == 0) {
					k = 1;
					fprintf(stderr, "Error:\n");
				}
				fprintf(stderr, "gcd(%lu, %lu): ", a, b);
				for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
					fprintf(stderr, "%ld%s", res[j][i], i < TEST_ENTRIES - 1 ? ", " : "\n");
			}
		}

		if (k == 0)
			fprintf(stderr, "PASS\n");

		free(res);

		return 0;
	}

Compiled with "-O2", on "VirtualBox 4.4.0-22-generic #38-Ubuntu x86_64" got:

  zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
  gcd0: elapsed 10174
  gcd1: elapsed 2120
  gcd2: elapsed 2902
  gcd3: elapsed 2039
  gcd4: elapsed 2812
  PASS
  zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
  gcd0: elapsed 9309
  gcd1: elapsed 2280
  gcd2: elapsed 2822
  gcd3: elapsed 2217
  gcd4: elapsed 2710
  PASS
  zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
  gcd0: elapsed 9589
  gcd1: elapsed 2098
  gcd2: elapsed 2815
  gcd3: elapsed 2030
  gcd4: elapsed 2718
  PASS
  zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
  gcd0: elapsed 9914
  gcd1: elapsed 2309
  gcd2: elapsed 2779
  gcd3: elapsed 2228
  gcd4: elapsed 2709
  PASS

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid #defining a CONFIG_ variable]
Signed-off-by: NZhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NGeorge Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now that the shift amount is stored in the node, radix_tree_descend()
can calculate offset itself from index, which removes several lines of
code from each of the tree walkers.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

In addition to replacing the entry, we also clear all associated tags.
This is really a one-off special for page_cache_tree_delete() which had
far too much detailed knowledge about how the radix tree works.

For efficiency, factor node_tag_clear() out of radix_tree_tag_clear() It
can be used by radix_tree_delete_item() as well as
radix_tree_replace_clear_tags().
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1. Rename the existing variable 'slot' to 'child'.
2. Introduce a new variable called 'slot' which is the address of the
   slot we're dealing with.  This lets us simplify the tree insertion,
   and removes the recalculation of 'slot' at the end of the function.
3. Using 'slot' in the sibling pointer insertion part makes the code
   more readable.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Convert radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged to name the nodes parent, node
and child instead of node & slot.

Use parent->offset instead of playing games with 'upindex'.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Convert radix_tree_next_chunk to use 'child' instead of 'slot' as the
name of the child node.  Also use node_maxindex() where it makes sense.

The 'rnode' variable was unnecessary; it doesn't overlap in usage with
'node', so we can just use 'node' the whole way through the function.

Improve the testcase to start the walk from every index in the carefully
constructed tree, and to accept any index within the range covered by
the entry.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the more standard 'node' and 'child' instead of 'to_free' and
'slot'.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

As with indirect_to_ptr(), ptr_to_indirect() and
RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR, change radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr() to
radix_tree_is_internal_node().
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Mirrors the earlier commit introducing node_to_entry().

Also change the type returned to be a struct radix_tree_node pointer.
That lets us simplify a couple of places in the radix tree shrink &
extend paths where we could convert an entry into a pointer, modify the
node, then convert the pointer back into an entry.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ptr_to_indirect() was a bad name.  What it really means is "Convert this
pointer to a node into an entry suitable for storing in the radix tree".
So node_to_entry() seemed like a better name.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The name RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR doesn't really match the meaning.
RADIX_TREE_INTERNAL_NODE is a better name.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The only remaining references to root->height were in extend and shrink,
where it was updated.  Now we can remove it entirely.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If radix_tree_shrink returns whether it managed to shrink, then
__radix_tree_delete_node doesn't ned to query the tree to find out
whether it did any work or not.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

node->shift represents the shift necessary for looking in the slots
array at this level.  It is equal to the old (node->height - 1) *
RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Neither piece of information we're storing in node->path can be larger
than 64, so store each in its own unsigned char instead of shifting and
masking to store them both in an unsigned int.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Typos, whitespace, grammar, line length, using the correct types, etc.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The multiorder support is a sufficiently large feature to be worth
adding copyrigt lines for.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

 - Print which indices are covered by every leaf entry
 - Print sibling entries
 - Print the node pointer instead of the slot entry
 - Build by default in userspace, and make it accessible to the test-suite
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I had previously decided that tagging a single multiorder entry would
count as tagging 2^order entries for the purposes of 'nr_to_tag'.  I now
believe that decision to be a mistake, and it should count as a single
entry.  That's more likely to be what callers expect.

When walking back up the tree from a newly-tagged entry, the current
code assumed we were starting from the lowest level of the tree; if we
have a multiorder entry with an order at least RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT in
size then we need to shift the index by 'shift' before we start walking
back up the tree, or we will end up not setting tags on higher entries,
and then mistakenly thinking that entries below a certain point in the
tree are not tagged.

If the first index we examine is a sibling entry of a tagged multiorder
entry, we were not tagging it.  We need to examine the canonical entry,
and the easiest way to do that is to use radix_tree_descend().  We then
have to skip over sibling slots when looking for the next entry in the
tree or we will end up walking back to the canonical entry.

Add several tests for radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged().
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite
radix_tree_locate_item().  Modify the locate tests to test multiorder
entries too.

[hughd@google.com: radix_tree_locate_item() is often returning the wrong index]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1605012108490.1166@eggly.anvilsSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If the radix tree user attempted to insert a colliding entry with an
existing multiorder entry, then radix_tree_create() could encounter a
sibling entry when walking down the tree to look for a slot.  Use
radix_tree_descend() to fix the problem, and add a test-case to make
sure the problem doesn't come back in future.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite
radix_tree_tag_get()
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite
radix_tree_tag_clear()
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite
radix_tree_tag_set()
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This enables the macros radix_tree_for_each_slot() and friends to be
used with multi-order entries.

The way that this works is that we treat all entries in a given slots[]
array as a single chunk.  If the index given to radix_tree_next_chunk()
happens to point us to a sibling entry, we will back up iter->index so
that it points to the canonical entry, and that will be the place where
we start our iteration.

As we're processing a chunk in radix_tree_next_slot(), we process
canonical entries, skip over sibling entries, and restart the chunk
lookup if we find a non-sibling indirect pointer.  This drops back to
the radix_tree_next_chunk() code, which will re-walk the tree and look
for another chunk.

This allows us to properly handle multi-order entries mixed with other
entries that are at various heights in the radix tree.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

These BUG_ON tests are to ensure that all the tags are clear when
inserting a new entry.  If we insert a multiorder entry, we'll end up
looking at the tags for a different node, and so the BUG_ON can end up
triggering spuriously.

Also, we now have three tags, not two, so check all three are clear, and
check all the root tags with a single call to BUG_ON since the bits are
stored contiguously.

Include a test-case to ensure this problem does not reoccur.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite __radix_tree_lookup()
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Setting the indirect bit on the user data entry used to be unambiguous
because the tree walking code knew not to expect internal nodes in the
last level of the tree.  Multiorder entries can appear at any level of
the tree, and a leaf with the indirect bit set is indistinguishable from
a pointer to a node.

Introduce a special entry (RADIX_TREE_RETRY) which is neither a valid
user entry, nor a valid pointer to a node.  The radix_tree_deref_retry()
function continues to work the same way, but tree walking code can
distinguish it from a pointer to a node.

Also fix the condition for setting slot->parent to NULL; it does not
matter what height the tree is, it only matters whether slot is an
indirect pointer.  Move this code above the comment which is referring
to the assignment to root->rnode.

Also fix the condition for preventing the tree from shrinking to a
single entry if it's a multiorder entry.

Add a test-case to the test suite that checks that the tree goes back
down to its original height after an item is inserted & deleted from a
higher index in the tree.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The current code will insert entries at each level, as if we're going to
add a new entry at the bottom level, so we then get an -EEXIST when we
try to insert the entry into the tree.  The best way to fix this is to
not check 'order' when inserting into an empty tree.

We still need to 'extend' the tree to the height necessary for the maximum
index corresponding to this entry, so pass that value to
radix_tree_extend() rather than the index we're asked to create, or we
won't create a tree that's deep enough.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

All the tree walking functions start with some variant of this code;
centralise it in one place so we're not chasing subtly different bugs
everywhere.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now that sibling pointers are handled explicitly, there is no purpose
served by restricting the order to be >= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If we deleted an entry through an index which looked up a sibling
pointer, we'd end up zeroing out the wrong slots in the node.  Use
get_slot_offset() to find the right slot.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The subtraction was the wrong way round, leading to undefined behaviour
(shift by an amount larger than the size of the type).
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The code I previously added to enable multiorder radix tree entries was
untested and therefore buggy.  This commit adds the support functions
that Ross and I decided were necessary over a four-week period of
iterating various designs.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I've been receiving increasingly concerned notes from 0day about how
much my recent changes have been bloating the radix tree.  Make it
happier by only including multiorder support if
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES is set.

This is an independent Kconfig option, so other radix tree users can
also set it if they have a need.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There is no point in keeping an address in the file since it's subject
to change.

While here, update Intel Copyright years.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>