Currently, in ext4_mb_init(), there's a loop like the following:

  do {
    ...
    offset += 1 << (sb->s_blocksize_bits - i);
    i++;
  } while (i <= sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1);

Note that the updated offset is used in the loop's next iteration only.

However, at the last iteration, that is at i == sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1,
the shift count becomes equal to (unsigned)-1 > 31 (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3))
and UBSAN reports

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2621:15
  shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff818c4d25>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
   [<ffffffff818c4c69>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
   [<ffffffff819411ab>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
   [<ffffffff81941cac>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
   [<ffffffff81941ab1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
   [<ffffffff814b6dc1>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x101/0x390
   [<ffffffff816fc13b>] ? ext4_mb_init+0x13b/0xfd0
   [<ffffffff814293c7>] ? create_cache+0x57/0x1f0
   [<ffffffff8142948a>] ? create_cache+0x11a/0x1f0
   [<ffffffff821c2168>] ? mutex_lock+0x38/0x60
   [<ffffffff821c23ab>] ? mutex_unlock+0x1b/0x50
   [<ffffffff814c26ab>] ? put_online_mems+0x5b/0xc0
   [<ffffffff81429677>] ? kmem_cache_create+0x117/0x2c0
   [<ffffffff816fcc49>] ext4_mb_init+0xc49/0xfd0
   [...]

Observe that the mentioned shift exponent, 4294967295, equals (unsigned)-1.

Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of offset is never used again.

Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, offset_incr, holding the
next increment to apply to offset and adjust that one by right shifting it
by one position per loop iteration.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently, in mb_find_order_for_block(), there's a loop like the following:

  while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) {
    ...
    bb += 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits - order);
  }

Note that the updated bb is used in the loop's next iteration only.

However, at the last iteration, that is at order == e4b->bd_blkbits + 1,
the shift count becomes negative (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3)) and UBSAN reports

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1281:11
  shift exponent -1 is negative
  [...]
  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff818c4d35>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
   [<ffffffff818c4c79>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
   [<ffffffff819411bb>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
   [<ffffffff81941cbc>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
   [<ffffffff81941ac1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
   [<ffffffff816e93a0>] ? ext4_mb_generate_from_pa+0x590/0x590
   [<ffffffff816502c8>] ? ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x598/0xe80
   [<ffffffff816e7b7e>] mb_find_order_for_block+0x1ce/0x240
   [...]

Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of bb is never used again.

Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, bb_incr, holding the next
increment to apply to bb and adjust that one by right shifting it by one
position per loop iteration.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Messages passed to ext4_warning() or ext4_error() don't need trailing
newlines, because these function add the newlines themselves.
Signed-off-by: NJakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>

Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are
charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if
current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no
free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet.
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Now, ext4_free_blocks() doesn't revoke data blocks of per-file data
journalled inode and it can cause file data inconsistency problems.
Even though data blocks of per-file data journalled inode are already
forgotten by jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() in advance of invoking
ext4_free_blocks(), we still need to revoke the data blocks here.
Moreover some of the metadata blocks, which are not found by
sb_find_get_block(), are still needed to be revoked, but this is also
missing here.
Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

This patch adds a line break for proc mb_groups display.
Signed-off-by: NHuaitong Han <huaitong.han@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>

Switch everything to the new and more capable implementation of abs().
Mainly to give the new abs() a bit of a workout.

Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The ext4_fsblk_t type is a long long, which should not be used
with abs(), as is done in ext4_mb_check_group_pa().

This patch modifies ext4_mb_check_group_pa() to use abs64()
instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When you repeatly execute xfstest generic/269 with bigalloc_1k option
enabled using the below command:

"./kvm-xfstests -c bigalloc_1k -m nodelalloc -C 1000 generic/269"

you can easily see the below bug message.

"JBD2 unexpected failure: jbd2_journal_revoke: !buffer_revoked(bh);"

This means that an already revoked buffer is erroneously revoked again
and it is caused by doing revoke for the buffer at the wrong position
in ext4_free_blocks(). We need to re-position the buffer revoke
procedure for an unspecified buffer after checking the cluster boundary
for bigalloc option. If not, some part of the cluster can be doubly
revoked.
Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>

Make the bitmap reaading routines return real error codes (EIO,
EFSCORRUPTED, EFSBADCRC) which can then be reflected back to
userspace for more precise diagnosis work.

In particular, this means that mballoc no longer claims that we're out
of memory if the block bitmaps become corrupt.
Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

This allows us to refactor the procfs code, which saves a bit of
compiled space.  More importantly it isolates most of the procfs
support code into a single file, so it's easier to #ifdef it out if
the proc file system has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_free_blocks is looping around the allocation request and mimics
__GFP_NOFAIL behavior without any allocation fallback strategy. Let's
remove the open coded loop and replace it with __GFP_NOFAIL. Without the
flag the allocator has no way to find out never-fail requirement and
cannot help in any way.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Making a function call with 20 arguments is rather expensive in both
stack and .text. In this case, doing the formatting manually doesn't
make it any less readable, so we might as well save 155 bytes of .text
and 112 bytes of stack.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Currently ext4_mb_good_group() only returns 0 or 1 depending on whether
the allocation group is suitable for use or not. However we might get
various errors and fail while initializing new group including -EIO
which would never get propagated up the call chain. This might lead to
an endless loop at writeback when we're trying to find a good group to
allocate from and we fail to initialize new group (read error for
example).

Fix this by returning proper error code from ext4_mb_good_group() and
using it in ext4_mb_regular_allocator(). In ext4_mb_regular_allocator()
we will always return only the first occurred error from
ext4_mb_good_group() and we only propagate it back  to the caller if we
do not get any other errors and we fail to allocate any blocks.

Note that with other modes than errors=continue, we will fail
immediately in ext4_mb_good_group() in case of error, however with
errors=continue we should try to continue using the file system, that's
why we're not going to fail immediately when we see an error from
ext4_mb_good_group(), but rather when we fail to find a suitable block
group to allocate from due to an problem in group initialization.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

Currently on the machines with page size > block size when initializing
block group buddy cache we initialize it for all the block group bitmaps
in the page. However in the case of read error, checksum error, or if
a single bitmap is in any way corrupted we would fail to initialize all
of the bitmaps. This is problematic because we will not have access to
the other allocation groups even though those might be perfectly fine
and usable.

Fix this by reading all the bitmaps instead of error out on the first
problem and simply skip the bitmaps which were either not read properly,
or are not valid.
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

With the planned cgroup writeback support, backing-dev related
declarations will be more widely used across block and cgroup;
unfortunately, including backing-dev.h from include/linux/blkdev.h
makes cyclic include dependency quite likely.

This patch separates out backing-dev-defs.h which only has the
essential definitions and updates blkdev.h to include it.  c files
which need access to more backing-dev details now include
backing-dev.h directly.  This takes backing-dev.h off the common
include dependency chain making it a lot easier to use it across block
and cgroup.

v2: fs/fat build failure fixed.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

The iput() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We must use GFP_NOFS instead GFP_KERNEL inside ext4_mb_add_groupinfo
and ext4_calculate_overhead() because they are called from inside a
journal transaction. Call trace:

ioctl
 ->ext4_group_add
   ->journal_start
   ->ext4_setup_new_descs
     ->ext4_mb_add_groupinfo -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->ext4_flex_group_add
     ->ext4_update_super
       ->ext4_calculate_overhead  -> GFP_KERNEL
   ->journal_stop
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Having done a full regression test, we can now drop the
DELALLOC_RESERVED state flag.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

The EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED flag was originally implemented
because it was too hard to make sure the mballoc and get_block flags
could be reliably passed down through all of the codepaths that end up
calling ext4_mb_new_blocks().

Since then, we have mb_flags passed down through most of the code
paths, so getting rid of EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED isn't as tricky
as it used to.

This commit plumbs in the last of what is required, and then adds a
WARN_ON check to make sure we haven't missed anything.  If this passes
a full regression test run, we can then drop
EXT4_STATE_DELALLOC_RESERVED.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

__this_cpu_ptr is being phased out use raw_cpu_ptr instead which was
introduced in 3.15-rc1.

Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

If we suffer a block allocation failure (for example due to a memory
allocation failure), it's possible that we will call
ext4_discard_allocated_blocks() before we've actually allocated any
blocks.  In that case, fe_len and fe_start in ac->ac_f_ex will still
be zero, and this will result in mb_free_blocks(inode, e4b, 0, 0)
triggering the BUG_ON on mb_free_blocks():

	BUG_ON(last >= (sb->s_blocksize << 3));

Fix this by bailing out of ext4_discard_allocated_blocks() if fs_len
is zero.

Also fix a missing ext4_mb_unload_buddy() call in
ext4_discard_allocated_blocks().

Google-Bug-Id: 16844242

Fixes: 86f0afd4Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

If there is a failure while allocating the preallocation structure, a
number of blocks can end up getting marked in the in-memory buddy
bitmap, and then not getting released.  This can result in the
following corruption getting reported by the kernel:

EXT4-fs error (device sda3): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:758: group 1126,
12793 clusters in bitmap, 12729 in gd

In that case, we need to release the blocks using mb_free_blocks().

Tested: fs smoke test; also demonstrated that with injected errors,
	the file system is no longer getting corrupted

Google-Bug-Id: 16657874
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

As the member fe_len defined in struct ext4_free_extent is expressed as
number of clusters, the variable "size" computation is wrong, we need to
first translate fe_len to block number, then to bytes.
Signed-off-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

Commit 27dd4385 ("ext4: introduce reserved space") reserves 2% of
the file system space to make sure metadata allocations will always
succeed.  Given that, tracking the reservation of metadata blocks is
no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We are spending a lot of time explaining to users what this error
means.  Let's try to improve the message to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

We should decrement free clusters counter when block bitmap is marked
as corrupt and free inodes counter when the allocation bitmap is
marked as corrupt to avoid misunderstanding due to incorrect available
size in statfs result.  User can get immediately ENOSPC error from
write begin without reaching for the writepages.

Cc: Darrick J. Wong<darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reported-by: NAmit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NNamjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com>

aops->write_begin may allocate a new page and make it visible only to have
mark_page_accessed called almost immediately after.  Once the page is
visible the atomic operations are necessary which is noticable overhead
when writing to an in-memory filesystem like tmpfs but should also be
noticable with fast storage.  The objective of the patch is to initialse
the accessed information with non-atomic operations before the page is
visible.

The bulk of filesystems directly or indirectly use
grab_cache_page_write_begin or find_or_create_page for the initial
allocation of a page cache page.  This patch adds an init_page_accessed()
helper which behaves like the first call to mark_page_accessed() but may
called before the page is visible and can be done non-atomically.

The primary APIs of concern in this care are the following and are used
by most filesystems.

	find_get_page
	find_lock_page
	find_or_create_page
	grab_cache_page_nowait
	grab_cache_page_write_begin

All of them are very similar in detail to the patch creates a core helper
pagecache_get_page() which takes a flags parameter that affects its
behavior such as whether the page should be marked accessed or not.  Then
old API is preserved but is basically a thin wrapper around this core
function.

Each of the filesystems are then updated to avoid calling
mark_page_accessed when it is known that the VM interfaces have already
done the job.  There is a slight snag in that the timing of the
mark_page_accessed() has now changed so in rare cases it's possible a page
gets to the end of the LRU as PageReferenced where as previously it might
have been repromoted.  This is expected to be rare but it's worth the
filesystem people thinking about it in case they see a problem with the
timing change.  It is also the case that some filesystems may be marking
pages accessed that previously did not but it makes sense that filesystems
have consistent behaviour in this regard.

The test case used to evaulate this is a simple dd of a large file done
multiple times with the file deleted on each iterations.  The size of the
file is 1/10th physical memory to avoid dirty page balancing.  In the
async case it will be possible that the workload completes without even
hitting the disk and will have variable results but highlight the impact
of mark_page_accessed for async IO.  The sync results are expected to be
more stable.  The exception is tmpfs where the normal case is for the "IO"
to not hit the disk.

The test machine was single socket and UMA to avoid any scheduling or NUMA
artifacts.  Throughput and wall times are presented for sync IO, only wall
times are shown for async as the granularity reported by dd and the
variability is unsuitable for comparison.  As async results were variable
do to writback timings, I'm only reporting the maximum figures.  The sync
results were stable enough to make the mean and stddev uninteresting.

The performance results are reported based on a run with no profiling.
Profile data is based on a separate run with oprofile running.

async dd
                                    3.15.0-rc3            3.15.0-rc3
                                       vanilla           accessed-v2
ext3    Max      elapsed     13.9900 (  0.00%)     11.5900 ( 17.16%)
tmpfs	Max      elapsed      0.5100 (  0.00%)      0.4900 (  3.92%)
btrfs   Max      elapsed     12.8100 (  0.00%)     12.7800 (  0.23%)
ext4	Max      elapsed     18.6000 (  0.00%)     13.3400 ( 28.28%)
xfs	Max      elapsed     12.5600 (  0.00%)      2.0900 ( 83.36%)

The XFS figure is a bit strange as it managed to avoid a worst case by
sheer luck but the average figures looked reasonable.

        samples percentage
ext3       86107    0.9783  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
ext3       23833    0.2710  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext3        5036    0.0573  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
ext4       64566    0.8961  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
ext4        5322    0.0713  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
ext4        2869    0.0384  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs        62126    1.7675  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
xfs         1904    0.0554  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
xfs          103    0.0030  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
btrfs      10655    0.1338  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
btrfs       2020    0.0273  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
btrfs        587    0.0079  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed
tmpfs      59562    3.2628  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-vanilla        mark_page_accessed
tmpfs       1210    0.0696  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 init_page_accessed
tmpfs         94    0.0054  vmlinux-3.15.0-rc4-accessed-v3r25 mark_page_accessed

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: don't run init_page_accessed() against an uninitialised pointer]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: NPrabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The variable "size" is expressed as number of blocks and not as
number of clusters, this could trigger a kernel panic when using
ext4 with the size of a cluster different from the size of a block.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NMaurizio Lombardi <mlombard@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Make them more consistently
Signed-off-by: Nxieliang <xieliang@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Caches from 'ext4_groupinfo_caches' may be in use by other mounts,
which have already existed.  So, it is incorrect to destroy them when
newly requested mount fails.

Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

This fixes the following sparse warning:

     CHECK   fs/ext4/mballoc.c
   fs/ext4/mballoc.c:5019:9: warning: context imbalance in
   'ext4_trim_extent' - unexpected unlock
Signed-off-by: N"Jon Ernst" <jonernst07@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

Return ENOMEM rather than EIO when find_get_page() fails in
ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() and find_or_create_page() fails in
ext4_mb_load_buddy().
Signed-off-by: NYounger Liu <younger.liucn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

When looking at a bug report with:

> kernel: EXT4-fs: 0 scanned, 0 found

I thought wow, 0 scanned, that's odd?  But it's not odd; it's printing
a variable that is initialized to 0 and never touched again.

It's never been used since the original merge, so I don't really even
know what the original intent was, either.

If anyone knows how to hook it up, speak now via patch, otherwise just
yank it so it's not making a confusing situation more confusing in
kernel logs.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>

The lowest levels of mballoc set all of the fields of struct
ext4_free_extent except for fe_logical, since they are just trying to
find the requested free set of blocks, and the logical block hasn't
been set yet.  This makes some static code checkers sad.  Set it to
various different debug values, which would be useful when
debugging mballoc if these values were to ever show up due to the
parts of mballoc triyng to use ac->ac_b_ex.fe_logical before it is
properly upper layers of mballoc failing to properly set, usually by
ext4_mb_use_best_found().

Addresses-Coverity-Id: #139697
Addresses-Coverity-Id: #139698
Addresses-Coverity-Id: #139699
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>