- 10 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wright 提交于
Format string bug. Not exploitable, as this is only writable by root, but worth fixing all the same. Spotted-by: NIlja van Sprundel <ilja@netric.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 CHIKAMA masaki 提交于
If cpu specific cpufreq driver(i.e. longrun) has "setpolicy" function, governor object isn't set into cpufreq_policy object at "__cpufreq_set_policy" function in driver/cpufreq/cpufreq.c . This causes a null object access at "store_scaling_setspeed" and "show_scaling_setspeed" function in driver/cpufreq/cpufreq.c when reading or writing through /sys interface (ex. cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed) Addresses: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10654 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443354Signed-off-by: NCHIKAMA Masaki <masaki.chikama@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Acked-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lothar Waßmann 提交于
In drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c the function cpufreq_add_dev() takes the error exit 'err_out_unregister' from different places once with the 'cpu_policy_rwsem' lock held, once with the lock released: | if (ret) | goto err_out_unregister; | } | | policy->governor = NULL; /* to assure that the starting sequence is | * run in cpufreq_set_policy */ | | /* set default policy */ | ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); | policy->user_policy.policy = policy->policy; | policy->user_policy.governor = policy->governor; | | unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); | | if (ret) { | dprintk("setting policy failed\n"); | goto err_out_unregister; | } This leads to the following error message in case of a failing __cpufreq_set_policy() call: ===================================== [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] ------------------------------------- swapper/1 is trying to release lock (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)) at: [<c01b4564>] unlock_policy_rwsem_write+0x30/0x40 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by swapper/1: #0: (sysdev_drivers_lock){--..}, at: [<c018fd18>] sysdev_driver_register+0x74/0x130 stack backtrace: [<c002f588>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x14) from [<c00692fc>] (print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xc8/0x104) [<c0069234>] (print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0x0/0x104) from [<c006b7ac>] (lock_release_non_nested+0xc4/0x19c) r6:00000028 r5:c3c1ab80 r4:c01b4564 [<c006b6e8>] (lock_release_non_nested+0x0/0x19c) from [<c006b9e0>] (lock_release+0x15c/0x18c) r8:60000013 r7:00000001 r6:c01b4564 r5:c0541bb4 r4:c3c1ab80 [<c006b884>] (lock_release+0x0/0x18c) from [<c0061ba0>] (up_write+0x24/0x30) r8:c0541b80 r7:00000000 r6:ffffffea r5:c3c34828 r4:c0541b8c [<c0061b7c>] (up_write+0x0/0x30) from [<c01b4564>] (unlock_policy_rwsem_write+0x30/0x40) r4:c3c34884 [<c01b4534>] (unlock_policy_rwsem_write+0x0/0x40) from [<c01b4c40>] (cpufreq_add_dev+0x324/0x398) [<c01b491c>] (cpufreq_add_dev+0x0/0x398) from [<c018fd64>] (sysdev_driver_register+0xc0/0x130) [<c018fca4>] (sysdev_driver_register+0x0/0x130) from [<c01b3574>] (cpufreq_register_driver+0xbc/0x174) Signed-off-by: NLothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Travis 提交于
Change references from for_each_cpu_mask to for_each_cpu_mask_nr where appropriate Reviewed-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 20 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Travis 提交于
Change cpufreq_policy and cpufreq_governor pointer tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in the cpufreq subsystem. Also some minor complaints from checkpatch.pl fixed. Based on: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.gitSigned-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2008 6 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Currently, affected_cpus shows which CPUs need to have their frequency coordinated in software. When hardware coordination is in use, the contents of this file appear the same as when no coordination is required. This can lead to some confusion among user-space programs, for example, that do not know that extra coordination is required to force a CPU core to a particular speed to control power consumption. To fix this, create a "related_cpus" attribute that always displays the coordination map regardless of whatever coordination strategy the cpufreq driver uses (sw or hw). If the cpufreq driver does not provide a value, fall back to policy->cpus. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Cesar Eduardo Barros 提交于
If cpufreq_register_notifier is called before pure initcalls, init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list will overwrite whatever it did, causing notifiers to be ignored. Print some noise to the kernel log if that happens. Signed-off-by: NCesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Simplify this by moving the unlocking out of the error paths into the exit path. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
void * p -> void *p no space between function parameters removed excess whitespace Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
return is not a function. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Ravnborg 提交于
Fix the following warnings: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfe6711): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpufreq_unregister_driver() to the variable .cpuinit.data:cpufreq_cpu_notifier WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfe68af): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpufreq_register_driver() to the variable .cpuinit.data:cpufreq_cpu_notifier WARNING: vmlinux.o(.exit.text+0xc4fa): Section mismatch in reference from the function cpufreq_stats_exit() to the variable .cpuinit.data:cpufreq_stat_cpu_notifier The warnings were casued by references to unregister_hotcpu_notifier() from normal functions or exit functions. This is flagged by modpost as a potential error because it does not know that for the non HOTPLUG_CPU scenario the unregister_hotcpu_notifier() is a nop. Silence the warning by replacing the __initdata annotation with a __refdata annotation. Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
refactor to use gotos instead of explicit exit paths Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
refactor to use gotos instead of explicit exit paths Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Balaji Rao 提交于
The cpufreq core should not take an extra kobject reference count for no reason, and then refuse to release it. This has been reported as keeping machines from properly powering down all the way. Signed-off-by: NBalaji Rao <balajirrao@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 07 2月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Venki Pallipadi 提交于
Eliminate cpufreq_userspace scaling_setspeed deadlock. Luming Yu recently uncovered yet another cpufreq related deadlock. One thread that continuously switches the governors and the other thread that repeatedly cats the contents of cpufreq directory causes both these threads to go into a deadlock. Detailed examination of the deadlock showed the exact flow before the deadlock as: Thread 1 Thread 2 ________ ________ cats files under /sys/devices/.../cpufreq/ Set governor to userspace Adds a new sysfs entry for scaling_setspeed cats files under /sys/devices/.../cpufreq/ Set governor to performance Holds cpufreq_rw_sem in write mode Sends a STOP notify to userspace governor cat /sys/devices/.../cpufreq/scaling_setspeed Gets a handle on the above sysfs entry with sysfs_get_active Blocks while trying to get cpufreq_rw_sem in read mode Remove a sysfs entry for scaling_setspeed Blocks on sysfs_deactivate while waiting for earlier get_active (on other thread) to drain At this point both threads go into deadlock and any other thread that tries to do anything with sysfs cpufreq will also block. There seems to be no easy way to avoid this deadlock as long as cpufreq_userspace adds/removes the sysfs entry under same kobject as cpufreq. Below patch moves scaling_setspeed to cpufreq.c, keeping it always and calling back the governor on read/write. This is the cleanest fix I could think of, even though adding two callbacks in governor structure just for this seems unnecessary. Note that the change makes scaling_setspeed under /sys/.../cpufreq permanent and returns <unsupported> when governor is not userspace. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yi Yang 提交于
The function __cpufreq_set_policy in file drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c has a very obvious error: if (policy->min > data->min && policy->min > policy->max) { ret = -EINVAL; goto error_out; } This condtion statement is wrong because it returns -EINVAL only if policy->min is greater than policy->max (in this case, "policy->min > data->min" is true for ever.). In fact, it should return -EINVAL as well if policy->max is less than data->min. The correct condition should be: if (policy->min > data->max || policy->max < data->min) { The following test result testifies the above conclusion: Before applying this patch: [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies 2394000 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# echo 1596000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# echo "2000000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# echo "1595000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# After applying this patch: [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies 2394000 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# echo 1596000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1596000 [root@yangyi-dev /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq 1596000 [root@localhost /]# echo "2000000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq 1596000 [root@localhost /]# echo "0" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# echo "1595000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@localhost /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 1596000 [root@localhost /]# echo "1596000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@localhost /]# echo "2394000" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq [root@localhost /]# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq 2394000 [root@localhost /] Signed-off-by: NYi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 25 1月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
There is no need for kobject_unregister() anymore, thanks to Kay's kobject cleanup changes, so replace all instances of it with kobject_put(). Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
Stop using kobject_register, as this way we can control the sending of the uevent properly, after everything is properly initialized. Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 18 12月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Ingo hit some BUG_ONs that were probably caused by these missing unlocks causing an unbalance. He couldn't reproduce the bug reliably, so it's unknown that it's definitly fixing the problem he hit, but it's a fairly good chance, and this fixes an obvious bug. [ Dave: "Ingo followed up that he hit some lockdep related output with this applied, so it may not be right. I'll look at it after xmas if no-one has it figured out before then." Akpm: "It looks pretty correct to me though." ] Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
A number of different drivers incorrect access the kobject name field directly. This is not correct as the name might not be in the array. Use the proper accessor function instead.
-
- 10 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
I don't see any reason to take an expensive lock in cpufreq_quick_get() Reading policy->cur is a single atomic operation and after the lock is dropped again the state could change any time anyways. So don't take the lock in the first place. This also makes this function interrupt safe which is useful for some code of mine. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Satyam Sharma 提交于
The notifier_block is already __cpuinitdata, thereby allowing us to safely mark the callback function as __cpuinit also, thereby saving space when HOTPLUG_CPU=n. Signed-off-by: NSatyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Depending on the transition latency of the HW for cpufreq switches, the ondemand or conservative governor cannot be used with certain cpufreq drivers. Still the ondemand should be the default governor on a wide range of systems. This patch allows this and lets the governor fallback to the performance governor at cpufreq driver load time, if the driver does not support fast enough frequency switching. Main benefit is that on e.g. installation or other systems without userspace support a working dynamic cpufreq support can be achieved on most systems by simply loading the cpufreq driver. This is especially essential for recent x86(_64) laptop hardware which may rely on working dynamic cpufreq OS support. Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Negative side effect: needs NR_CPUs pointer array of memory in CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU case. Still needs userspace track keeping and rewriting of governors if governors change while a CPU is not active (always the governor at CPU remove time is restored). Move of policy->user_policy.governor assignment is just a minor cleanup. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8671Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Peter Oruba 提交于
There is a frequency scaling issue that I encountered with the performance governor in combination with CPU hotplug. In cpufreq.c CPU frequency is reduced to its minimum before the CPU gets unregistered and set offline. Does that have a particular reason? Since the (k8-)governor does not monitor CPU frequency that setting also applies then to the remaining CPU as well and lets the system run on the lowest frequency although performance is chose as the policy. Signed-off-by: NPeter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Klauser 提交于
Commit 0a4b2ccc in cpufreq.git eliminates the build warnings but does not pass on the error code of sysfs_create_file to the function calling cpufreq_add_dev. Instead some previous value of ret would be returned. Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Eliminate build warning (sysfs_create_file return value must be checked) Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since nonboot CPUs are now disabled after tasks and devices have been frozen and the CPU hotplug infrastructure is used for this purpose, we need special CPU hotplug notifications that will help the CPU-hotplug-aware subsystems distinguish normal CPU hotplug events from CPU hotplug events related to a system-wide suspend or resume operation in progress. This patch introduces such notifications and causes them to be used during suspend and resume transitions. It also changes all of the CPU-hotplug-aware subsystems to take these notifications into consideration (for now they are handled in the same way as the corresponding "normal" ones). [oleg@tv-sign.ru: cleanups] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 4月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/performance write support Writing to /proc/acpi/processor/xy/performance interferes with sysfs cpufreq interface. Also removes buggy cpufreq_set_policy exported symbol. Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231107 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264077 Fix limited cpufreq when booted on battery If booted on battery: cpufreq_set_policy (evil) is invoked which calls verify_within_limits. max_freq gets lowered and therefore users_policy.max, which is used to restore higher freqs via update_policy later is set to the already limited frequency -> you can never go up again, even BIOS allows higher freqs later. Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venki Pallipadi 提交于
Ingo reported it on lkml in the thread "2.6.21-rc5: maxcpus=1 crash in cpufreq: kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:82!" This check added to remove_dev is symmetric to one in add_dev and handles callbacks for offline cpus cleanly. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit aeeddc14, which was half-baked and broken. It just resulted in compile errors, since cpufreq_register_driver() still changes the 'driver_data' by setting bits in the flags field. So claiming it is 'const' _really_ doesn't work. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Not all cases are possible due to ->flags being set at runtime on some drivers. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Venkatesh Pallipadi 提交于
Yet another attempt to resolve cpufreq and hotplug locking issues. Patchset has 3 patches: * Rewrite the lock infrastructure of cpufreq using a per cpu rwsem. * Minor restructuring of work callback in ondemand driver. * Use the new cpufreq rwsem infrastructure in ondemand work. This patch: Convert policy->lock to rwsem and move it to per_cpu area. This rwsem will protect against both changing/accessing policy related parameters and CPU hot plug/unplug. [malattia@linux.it: fix oops in kref_put()] Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
The hotplug CPU locking in cpufreq is horrendous. No-one seems to care enough to fix it, so just remove it so that the 99.9% of the real world users of this code can use cpufreq without being bothered by warnings. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ahmed S. Darwish 提交于
Trivial patch to check sysfs_create_link return values. Fail gracefully if needed. Signed-off-by: NAhmed Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-