1. 30 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 19 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 14 5月, 2014 8 次提交
  4. 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 28 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 20 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  8. 01 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 13 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  10. 05 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      cfg80211: fix channel configuration in IBSS join · fe94f3a4
      Antonio Quartulli 提交于
      When receiving an IBSS_JOINED event select the BSS object
      based on the {bssid, channel} couple rather than the bssid
      only.
      With the current approach if another cell having the same
      BSSID (but using a different channel) exists then cfg80211
      picks up the wrong BSS object.
      The result is a mismatching channel configuration between
      cfg80211 and the driver, that can lead to any sort of
      problem.
      
      The issue can be triggered by having an IBSS sitting on
      given channel and then asking the driver to create a new
      cell using the same BSSID but with a different frequency.
      By passing the channel to cfg80211_get_bss() we can solve
      this ambiguity and retrieve/create the correct BSS object.
      All the users of cfg80211_ibss_joined() have been changed
      accordingly.
      
      Moreover WARN when cfg80211_ibss_joined() gets a NULL
      channel as argument and remove a bogus call of the same
      function in ath6kl (it does not make sense to call
      cfg80211_ibss_joined() with a zero BSSID on ibss-leave).
      
      Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
      Cc: Bing Zhao <bzhao@marvell.com>
      Cc: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi>
      Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org
      Acked-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAntonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
      [minor code cleanup in ath6kl]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      fe94f3a4
    • J
      cfg80211: make connect ie param const · 4b5800fe
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      This required liberally sprinkling 'const' over brcmfmac
      and mwifiex but seems like a useful thing to do since the
      pointer can't really be written.
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      4b5800fe
  11. 17 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 07 1月, 2014 5 次提交
  13. 03 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 02 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 26 11月, 2013 2 次提交
    • L
      cfg80211: move regulatory flags to their own variable · a2f73b6c
      Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
      We'll expand this later, this will make it easier to
      classify and review what things are related to regulatory
      or not.
      
      Coccinelle only missed 4 hits, which I had to do manually,
      supplying the SmPL in case of merge conflicts.
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_CUSTOM_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_CUSTOM_REG
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_STRICT_REGULATORY
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_STRICT_REG
      
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      expression e;
      @@
      -e->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +e->regulatory_flags |= REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags &= ~WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags &= ~REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      @@
      struct wiphy *wiphy;
      @@
      -wiphy->flags & WIPHY_FLAG_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      +wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_DISABLE_BEACON_HINTS
      
      Generated-by: Coccinelle SmPL
      Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
      Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
      Cc: Mihir Shete <smihir@qti.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Henri Bahini <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Cc: Tushnim Bhattacharyya <tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      [fix up whitespace damage, overly long lines]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      a2f73b6c
    • L
      cfg80211: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flags · 8fe02e16
      Luis R. Rodriguez 提交于
      These two flags are used for the same purpose, just
      combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating
      radiation is allowed.
      
      Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as
      the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we
      also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags.
      Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels.
      
      Update all places in the tree using these flags with the
      following semantic patch:
      
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR)
      +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
      @@
      @@
      -(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR)
      +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
      
      Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to
      remove duplicates and to fix some indentation.
      Signed-off-by: NLuis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
      [do all the driver updates in one go]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      8fe02e16
  16. 16 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 12 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  18. 10 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 27 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      brcmfmac: inform cfg80211 about disconnect when device is unplugged · a538ae31
      Arend van Spriel 提交于
      When the brcmfmac device is physically removed cfg80211 gives a
      warning upon unregistering the net device (see below).
      
      [23052.390197] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 30 at net/wireless/core.c:937 cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x164/0x600 [cfg80211]()
      [23052.400843] Modules linked in: brcmfmac(O) brcmutil(O) cfg80211(O) pl2303 usbserial binfmt_misc snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd psmouse mfd_core serio_raw soundcore snd_page_alloc intel_ips dell_laptop dell_wmi sparse_keymap dcdbas nouveau ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit mxm_wmi ahci libahci sdhci_pci firewire_ohci firewire_core sdhci crc_itu_t mmc_core intel_agp intel_gtt e1000e ptp pps_core agpgart video [last unloaded: brcmfmac]
      [23052.452987] CPU: 0 PID: 30 Comm: khubd Tainted: G           O 3.11.0-rc1-wl-testing-lockdep-00002-g41cc093-dirty #1
      [23052.463480] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E6410/07XJP9, BIOS A07 02/15/2011
      [23052.470852]  00000000 00000000 f4efdc18 c1522e3d f845bed2 f4efdc48 c103fbe4 c16a9254
      [23052.478762]  00000000 0000001e f845bed2 000003a9 f841da44 f841da44 f3790004 f25539c0
      [23052.486741]  e2700200 f4efdc58 c103fc22 00000009 00000000 f4efdcc0 f841da44 00000002
      [23052.494712] Call Trace:
      [23052.497165]  [<c1522e3d>] dump_stack+0x4b/0x66
      [23052.501685]  [<c103fbe4>] warn_slowpath_common+0x84/0xa0
      [23052.507085]  [<f841da44>] ? cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x164/0x600 [cfg80211]
      [23052.514542]  [<f841da44>] ? cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x164/0x600 [cfg80211]
      [23052.521981]  [<c103fc22>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x30
      [23052.527191]  [<f841da44>] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x164/0x600 [cfg80211]
      [23052.534494]  [<c150abe8>] ? packet_notifier+0xc8/0x1d0
      [23052.539703]  [<c150abfc>] ? packet_notifier+0xdc/0x1d0
      [23052.544880]  [<c150ab20>] ? packet_seq_stop+0x30/0x30
      [23052.550002]  [<c152d655>] notifier_call_chain+0x45/0x60
      [23052.555298]  [<c106839f>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x1f/0x30
      [23052.560963]  [<c143c693>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x33/0x70
      [23052.567153]  [<c1459869>] ? qdisc_destroy+0x99/0xb0
      [23052.572116]  [<c143c6e3>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x13/0x20
      [23052.577861]  [<c143df93>] rollback_registered_many+0xf3/0x1d0
      [23052.583687]  [<c1524cfc>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x25c/0x350
      [23052.589150]  [<c143e0f4>] rollback_registered+0x24/0x40
      [23052.594445]  [<c143e15f>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x4f/0xb0
      [23052.600344]  [<c143e299>] unregister_netdev+0x19/0x30
      [23052.605484]  [<f865b38f>] brcmf_del_if+0xbf/0x160 [brcmfmac]
      [23052.611223]  [<f865b7ae>] brcmf_detach+0x5e/0xd0 [brcmfmac]
      [23052.616881]  [<f8667413>] brcmf_usb_disconnect+0x63/0xa0 [brcmfmac]
      [23052.623217]  [<c13e09aa>] usb_unbind_interface+0x4a/0x180
      
      When the device is physically connected the driver sends a disassoc
      command to the device and response triggers the driver to inform cfg80211
      about it. However, with the device removed the disassoc command fails.
      This patch adds a call to cfg80211_disconnected() when that command fails.
      
      The warning was added by commit below and also cleans up, but better
      doing it in the driver if only to get rid of the warning.
      
      commit f9bef3df
      Author: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
      Date:   Wed Jun 19 14:06:26 2013 -0700
      
          wireless: check for dangling wdev->current_bss pointer
      
      Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: NArend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      a538ae31
  20. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 11 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  22. 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交