Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 19 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 31 3月, 2018 3 次提交
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Selftest for sys_connect hooks · 622adafb
      由 Andrey Ignatov 提交于 
      Add selftest for BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT and BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT
attach types.

Try to connect(2) to specified IP:port and test that:
* remote IP:port pair is overridden;
* local end of connection is bound to specified IP.

All combinations of IPv4/IPv6 and TCP/UDP are tested.

Example:
  # tcpdump -pn -i lo -w connect.pcap 2>/dev/null &
  [1] 478
  # strace -qqf -e connect -o connect.trace ./test_sock_addr.sh
  Wait for testing IPv4/IPv6 to become available ... OK
  Load bind4 with invalid type (can pollute stderr) ... REJECTED
  Load bind4 with valid type ... OK
  Attach bind4 with invalid type ... REJECTED
  Attach bind4 with valid type ... OK
  Load connect4 with invalid type (can pollute stderr) libbpf: load bpf \
    program failed: Permission denied
  libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
  libbpf:
  0: (b7) r2 = 23569
  1: (63) *(u32 *)(r1 +24) = r2
  2: (b7) r2 = 16777343
  3: (63) *(u32 *)(r1 +4) = r2
  invalid bpf_context access off=4 size=4
  [ 1518.404609] random: crng init done

  libbpf: -- END LOG --
  libbpf: failed to load program 'cgroup/connect4'
  libbpf: failed to load object './connect4_prog.o'
  ... REJECTED
  Load connect4 with valid type ... OK
  Attach connect4 with invalid type ... REJECTED
  Attach connect4 with valid type ... OK
  Test case #1 (IPv4/TCP):
          Requested: bind(192.168.1.254, 4040) ..
             Actual: bind(127.0.0.1, 4444)
          Requested: connect(192.168.1.254, 4040) from (*, *) ..
             Actual: connect(127.0.0.1, 4444) from (127.0.0.4, 56068)
  Test case #2 (IPv4/UDP):
          Requested: bind(192.168.1.254, 4040) ..
             Actual: bind(127.0.0.1, 4444)
          Requested: connect(192.168.1.254, 4040) from (*, *) ..
             Actual: connect(127.0.0.1, 4444) from (127.0.0.4, 56447)
  Load bind6 with invalid type (can pollute stderr) ... REJECTED
  Load bind6 with valid type ... OK
  Attach bind6 with invalid type ... REJECTED
  Attach bind6 with valid type ... OK
  Load connect6 with invalid type (can pollute stderr) libbpf: load bpf \
    program failed: Permission denied
  libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
  libbpf:
  0: (b7) r6 = 0
  1: (63) *(u32 *)(r1 +12) = r6
  invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=4

  libbpf: -- END LOG --
  libbpf: failed to load program 'cgroup/connect6'
  libbpf: failed to load object './connect6_prog.o'
  ... REJECTED
  Load connect6 with valid type ... OK
  Attach connect6 with invalid type ... REJECTED
  Attach connect6 with valid type ... OK
  Test case #3 (IPv6/TCP):
          Requested: bind(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) ..
             Actual: bind(::1, 6666)
          Requested: connect(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) from (*, *)
             Actual: connect(::1, 6666) from (::6, 37458)
  Test case #4 (IPv6/UDP):
          Requested: bind(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) ..
             Actual: bind(::1, 6666)
          Requested: connect(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) from (*, *)
             Actual: connect(::1, 6666) from (::6, 39315)
  ### SUCCESS
  # egrep 'connect\(.*AF_INET' connect.trace | \
  > egrep -vw 'htons\(1025\)' | fold -b -s -w 72
  502   connect(7, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(4040),
  sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.254")}, 128) = 0
  502   connect(8, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(4040),
  sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.254")}, 128) = 0
  502   connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(6060),
  inet_pton(AF_INET6, "face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd", &sin6_addr),
  sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 128) = 0
  502   connect(10, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(6060),
  inet_pton(AF_INET6, "face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd", &sin6_addr),
  sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 128) = 0
  # fg
  tcpdump -pn -i lo -w connect.pcap 2> /dev/null
  # tcpdump -r connect.pcap -n tcp | cut -c 1-72
  reading from file connect.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
  17:57:40.383533 IP 127.0.0.4.56068 > 127.0.0.1.4444: Flags [S], seq 1333
  17:57:40.383566 IP 127.0.0.1.4444 > 127.0.0.4.56068: Flags [S.], seq 112
  17:57:40.383589 IP 127.0.0.4.56068 > 127.0.0.1.4444: Flags [.], ack 1, w
  17:57:40.384578 IP 127.0.0.1.4444 > 127.0.0.4.56068: Flags [R.], seq 1,
  17:57:40.403327 IP6 ::6.37458 > ::1.6666: Flags [S], seq 406513443, win
  17:57:40.403357 IP6 ::1.6666 > ::6.37458: Flags [S.], seq 2448389240, ac
  17:57:40.403376 IP6 ::6.37458 > ::1.6666: Flags [.], ack 1, win 342, opt
  17:57:40.404263 IP6 ::1.6666 > ::6.37458: Flags [R.], seq 1, ack 1, win
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      622adafb
    • A
      selftests/bpf: Selftest for sys_bind hooks · e50b0a6f
      由 Andrey Ignatov 提交于 
      Add selftest to work with bpf_sock_addr context from
`BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR` programs.

Try to bind(2) on IP:port and apply:
* loads to make sure context can be read correctly, including narrow
  loads (byte, half) for IP and full-size loads (word) for all fields;
* stores to those fields allowed by verifier.

All combination from IPv4/IPv6 and TCP/UDP are tested.

Both scenarios are tested:
* valid programs can be loaded and attached;
* invalid programs can be neither loaded nor attached.

Test passes when expected data can be read from context in the
BPF-program, and after the call to bind(2) socket is bound to IP:port
pair that was written by BPF-program to the context.

Example:
  # ./test_sock_addr
  Attached bind4 program.
  Test case #1 (IPv4/TCP):
          Requested: bind(192.168.1.254, 4040) ..
             Actual: bind(127.0.0.1, 4444)
  Test case #2 (IPv4/UDP):
          Requested: bind(192.168.1.254, 4040) ..
             Actual: bind(127.0.0.1, 4444)
  Attached bind6 program.
  Test case #3 (IPv6/TCP):
          Requested: bind(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) ..
             Actual: bind(::1, 6666)
  Test case #4 (IPv6/UDP):
          Requested: bind(face:b00c:1234:5678::abcd, 6060) ..
             Actual: bind(::1, 6666)
  ### SUCCESS
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      e50b0a6f
    • A
      libbpf: Support expected_attach_type at prog load · d7be143b
      由 Andrey Ignatov 提交于 
      Support setting `expected_attach_type` at prog load time in both
`bpf/bpf.h` and `bpf/libbpf.h`.

Since both headers already have API to load programs, new functions are
added not to break backward compatibility for existing ones:
* `bpf_load_program_xattr()` is added to `bpf/bpf.h`;
* `bpf_prog_load_xattr()` is added to `bpf/libbpf.h`.

Both new functions accept structures, `struct bpf_load_program_attr` and
`struct bpf_prog_load_attr` correspondingly, where new fields can be
added in the future w/o changing the API.

Standard `_xattr` suffix is used to name the new API functions.

Since `bpf_load_program_name()` is not used as heavily as
`bpf_load_program()`, it was removed in favor of more generic
`bpf_load_program_xattr()`.
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      d7be143b
  9. 29 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 20 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  13. 21 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 17 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  17. 16 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  19. 09 2月, 2018 2 次提交
    • J
      tools/libbpf: handle issues with bpf ELF objects containing .eh_frames · e3d91b0c
      由 Jesper Dangaard Brouer 提交于 
      V3: More generic skipping of relo-section (suggested by Daniel)

If clang >= 4.0.1 is missing the option '-target bpf', it will cause
llc/llvm to create two ELF sections for "Exception Frames", with
section names '.eh_frame' and '.rel.eh_frame'.

The BPF ELF loader library libbpf fails when loading files with these
sections.  The other in-kernel BPF ELF loader in samples/bpf/bpf_load.c,
handle this gracefully. And iproute2 loader also seems to work with these
"eh" sections.

The issue in libbpf is caused by bpf_object__elf_collect() skipping
some sections, and later when performing relocation it will be
pointing to a skipped section, as these sections cannot be found by
bpf_object__find_prog_by_idx() in bpf_object__collect_reloc().

This is a general issue that also occurs for other sections, like
debug sections which are also skipped and can have relo section.

As suggested by Daniel.  To avoid keeping state about all skipped
sections, instead perform a direct qlookup in the ELF object.  Lookup
the section that the relo-section points to and check if it contains
executable machine instructions (denoted by the sh_flags
SHF_EXECINSTR).  Use this check to also skip irrelevant relo-sections.

Note, for samples/bpf/ the '-target bpf' parameter to clang cannot be used
due to incompatibility with asm embedded headers, that some of the samples
include. This is explained in more details by Yonghong Song in bpf_devel_QA.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      e3d91b0c
    • J
      tools/libbpf: improve the pr_debug statements to contain section numbers · 077c066a
      由 Jesper Dangaard Brouer 提交于 
      While debugging a bpf ELF loading issue, I needed to correlate the
ELF section number with the failed relocation section reference.
Thus, add section numbers/index to the pr_debug.

In debug mode, also print section that were skipped.  This helped
me identify that a section (.eh_frame) was skipped, and this was
the reason the relocation section (.rel.eh_frame) could not find
that section number.

The section numbers corresponds to the readelf tools Section Headers [Nr].
Signed-off-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      077c066a
  21. 08 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 07 2月, 2018 2 次提交
    • C
      lib: optimize cpumask_next_and() · 0ade34c3
      由 Clement Courbet 提交于 
      We've measured that we spend ~0.6% of sys cpu time in cpumask_next_and().
It's essentially a joined iteration in search for a non-zero bit, which is
currently implemented as a lookup join (find a nonzero bit on the lhs,
lookup the rhs to see if it's set there).

Implement a direct join (find a nonzero bit on the incrementally built
join).  Also add generic bitmap benchmarks in the new `test_find_bit`
module for new function (see `find_next_and_bit` in [2] and [3] below).

For cpumask_next_and, direct benchmarking shows that it's 1.17x to 14x
faster with a geometric mean of 2.1 on 32 CPUs [1].  No impact on memory
usage.  Note that on Arm, the new pure-C implementation still outperforms
the old one that uses a mix of C and asm (`find_next_bit`) [3].

[1] Approximate benchmark code:

```
  unsigned long src1p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern1};
  unsigned long src2p[nr_cpumask_longs] = {pattern2};
  for (/*a bunch of repetitions*/) {
    for (int n = -1; n <= nr_cpu_ids; ++n) {
      asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src1p)); // prevent any optimization
      asm volatile("" : "+rm"(src2p));
      unsigned long result = cpumask_next_and(n, src1p, src2p);
      asm volatile("" : "+rm"(result));
    }
  }
```

Results:
pattern1    pattern2     time_before/time_after
0x0000ffff  0x0000ffff   1.65
0x0000ffff  0x00005555   2.24
0x0000ffff  0x00001111   2.94
0x0000ffff  0x00000000   14.0
0x00005555  0x0000ffff   1.67
0x00005555  0x00005555   1.71
0x00005555  0x00001111   1.90
0x00005555  0x00000000   6.58
0x00001111  0x0000ffff   1.46
0x00001111  0x00005555   1.49
0x00001111  0x00001111   1.45
0x00001111  0x00000000   3.10
0x00000000  0x0000ffff   1.18
0x00000000  0x00005555   1.18
0x00000000  0x00001111   1.17
0x00000000  0x00000000   1.25
-----------------------------
               geo.mean  2.06

[2] test_find_next_bit, X86 (skylake)

 [ 3913.477422] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
 [ 3913.477847] find_next_bit: 160868 cycles, 16484 iterations
 [ 3913.477933] find_next_zero_bit: 169542 cycles, 16285 iterations
 [ 3913.478036] find_last_bit: 201638 cycles, 16483 iterations
 [ 3913.480214] find_first_bit: 4353244 cycles, 16484 iterations
 [ 3913.480216] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
 bitmap
 [ 3913.481074] find_next_and_bit: 89604 cycles, 8216 iterations
 [ 3913.481075] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
 [ 3913.481078] find_next_bit: 2536 cycles, 66 iterations
 [ 3913.481252] find_next_zero_bit: 344404 cycles, 32703 iterations
 [ 3913.481255] find_last_bit: 2006 cycles, 66 iterations
 [ 3913.481265] find_first_bit: 17488 cycles, 66 iterations
 [ 3913.481266] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
 [ 3913.481272] find_next_and_bit: 764 cycles, 1 iterations

[3] test_find_next_bit, arm (v7 odroid XU3).

[  267.206928] Start testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap
[  267.214752] find_next_bit: 4474 cycles, 16419 iterations
[  267.221850] find_next_zero_bit: 5976 cycles, 16350 iterations
[  267.229294] find_last_bit: 4209 cycles, 16419 iterations
[  267.279131] find_first_bit: 1032991 cycles, 16420 iterations
[  267.286265] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with random-filled
bitmap
[  267.302386] find_next_and_bit: 2290 cycles, 8140 iterations
[  267.309422] Start testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap
[  267.316054] find_next_bit: 191 cycles, 66 iterations
[  267.322726] find_next_zero_bit: 8758 cycles, 32703 iterations
[  267.329803] find_last_bit: 84 cycles, 66 iterations
[  267.336169] find_first_bit: 4118 cycles, 66 iterations
[  267.342627] Start testing find_next_and_bit() with sparse bitmap
[  267.356919] find_next_and_bit: 91 cycles, 1 iterations

[courbet@google.com: v6]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171129095715.23430-1-courbet@google.com
[geert@linux-m68k.org: m68k/bitops: always include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1512556816-28627-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171128131334.23491-1-courbet@google.comSigned-off-by: NClement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      0ade34c3
    • S
      tools/lib/subcmd/pager.c: do not alias select() params · ad343a98
      由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于 
      Use a separate fd set for select()-s exception fds param to fix the
following gcc warning:

  pager.c:36:12: error: passing argument 2 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 4 [-Werror=restrict]
    select(1, &in, NULL, &in, NULL);
              ^~~        ~~~

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180101105626.7168-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ad343a98
  25. 03 2月, 2018 4 次提交
  27. 17 1月, 2018 14 次提交
  29. 20 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 18 12月, 2017 2 次提交