- 28 7月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This can show the log (providing it fits in one page) and allows bad blocks to be 'acknowledged' meaning that they have safely been recorded in metadata. Clearing bad blocks is not allowed via sysfs (except for code testing). A bad block can only be cleared when a write to the block succeeds. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This the first step in allowing md to track bad-blocks per-device so that we can fail individual blocks rather than the whole device. This patch just adds a data structure for recording bad blocks, with routines to add, remove, search the list. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When calling bioset_create we pass the size of the front_pad as sizeof(mddev) which looks suspicious as mddev is a pointer and so it looks like a common mistake where sizeof(*mddev) was intended. The size is actually correct as we want to store a pointer in the front padding of the bios created by the bioset, so make the intent more explicit by using sizeof(mddev_t *) Reported-by: NZdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 24 次提交
-
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
This patch causes MD to generate an event (for device-mapper) when the synchronization thread is reaped. This is expected behavior for device-mapper. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
Revert most of commit e384e585 md/bitmap: prepare for storing write-intent-bitmap via dm-dirty-log. MD should not need to use DM's dirty log - we decided to use md's bitmaps instead. Keeping the DIV_ROUND_UP clean-ups that were part of commit e384e585, however. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Jonathan Brassow 提交于
If device-mapper creates a RAID1 array that includes devices to be rebuilt, it will deref a NULL pointer when finished because sysfs is not used by device-mapper instantiated RAID devices. Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
While preparing to write a stripe we keep the parity block or blocks locked (R5_LOCKED) - towards the end of schedule_reconstruction. If the array is discovered to have failed before this write completes we can leave those blocks LOCKED, and init_stripe will notice that a free stripe still has a locked block and will complain. So clear the R5_LOCKED flag in handle_failed_stripe, and demote the 'BUG' to a 'WARN_ON'. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev-> corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable IMHO. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev-> corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable IMHO. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev-> corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable IMHO. Also included a couple of whitespace fixes on sync_page_io(). Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
page_address() returns void pointer, so the casts can be removed. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Normally we would fail a device with a READ error. However if doing so causes the array to fail, it is better to leave the device in place and just return the read error to the caller. The current test for decide if the array will fail is overly simplistic. We have a function 'enough' which can tell if the array is failed or not, so use it to guide the decision. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When we get a read error during recovery, RAID10 previously arranged for the recovering device to appear to fail so that the recovery stops and doesn't restart. This is misleading and wrong. Instead, make use of the new recovery_disabled handling and mark the target device and having recovery disabled. Add appropriate checks in add_disk and remove_disk so that devices are removed and not re-added when recovery is disabled. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
If we hit a read error while recovering a mirror, we want to abort the recovery without necessarily failing the disk - as having a disk this a read error is better than not having an array at all. Currently this is managed with a per-array flag "recovery_disabled" and is only implemented for RAID1. For RAID10 we will need finer grained control as we might want to disable recovery for individual devices separately. So push more of the decision making into the personality. 'recovery_disabled' is now a 'cookie' which is copied when the personality want to disable recovery and is changed when a device is added to the array as this is used as a trigger to 'try recovery again'. This will allow RAID10 to get the control that it needs. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Commit c89a8eee ("Allow faulty devices to be removed from a readonly array.") added some work on ro array in the function, but it couldn't be done since we didn't allow the ro array to be handled from the beginning. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
There are places where sysfs links to rdev are handled in a same way. Add the helper functions to consolidate them. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Christian Dietrich 提交于
As per printk_ratelimit comment, it should not be used. Signed-off-by: NChristian Dietrich <christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
Using __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le() with ignoring its return value can be replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le(). Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() are now virtually identical. So discard one and rename the other to 'analyse_stripe()'. It always returns 0, so change it to 'void' and remove the 'done' variable in handle_stripe(). Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The RAID6 version of this code is usable for RAID5 providing: - we test "conf->max_degraded" rather than "2" as appropriate - we make sure s->failed_num[1] is meaningful (and not '-1') when s->failed > 1 The 'return 1' must become 'goto finish' in the new location. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Apart from 'prexor' which can only be set for RAID5, and 'qd_idx' which can only be meaningful for RAID6, these two chunks of code are nearly the same. So combine them into one adding a test to call either handle_parity_checks5 or handle_parity_checks6 as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
RAID6 is only allowed to choose 'reconstruct-write' while RAID5 is also allow 'read-modify-write' Apart from this difference, handle_stripe_dirtying[56] are nearly identical. So resolve these differences and create just one function. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Provided that ->failed_num[1] is not a valid device number (which is easily achieved) fetch_block6 provides all the functionality of fetch_block5. So remove the latter and rename the former to simply "fetch_block". Then handle_stripe_fill5 and handle_stripe_fill6 become the same and can similarly be united. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Next patch will unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6. First I want to make the differences a little more clear. For RAID6 if we are writing at all and there is a failed device, then we need to load or compute every block so we can do a reconstruct-write. This case isn't needed for RAID5 - we will do a read-modify-write in that case. So make that test a separate test in fetch_block6 rather than merged with two other tests. Make a similar change in fetch_block5 so the one bit that is not needed for RAID6 is clearly separate. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The difference between the RAID5 and RAID6 code here is easily resolved using conf->max_degraded. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Prior to commit ab69ae12 the code in handle_stripe5 and handle_stripe6 to "Finish reconstruct operations initiated by the expansion process" was identical. That commit added an identical stanza of code to each function, but in different places. That was careless. The raid5 code was correct, so move that out into handle_stripe and remove raid6 version. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This arg is only used to differentiate between RAID5 and RAID6 but that is not needed. For RAID5, raid5_compute_sector will set qd_idx to "~0" so j with certainly not equals qd_idx, so there is no need for a guard on that condition. So remove the guard and remove the arg from the declaration and callers of handle_stripe_expansion. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
By defining the 'stripe_head_state' in 'handle_stripe', we can move some common code out of handle_stripe[56]() and into handle_stripe. The means that all accesses for stripe_head_state in handle_stripe[56] need to be 's->' instead of 's.', but the compiler should inline those functions and just use a direct stack reference, and future patches while hoist most of this code up into handle_stripe() so we will revert to "s.". Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Adding these three fields will allow more common code to be moved to handle_stripe() struct field rearrangement by Namhyung Kim. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
'struct stripe_head_state' stores state about the 'current' stripe that is passed around while handling the stripe. For RAID6 there is an extension structure: r6_state, which is also passed around. There is no value in keeping these separate, so move the fields from the latter into the former. This means that all code now needs to treat s->failed_num as an small array, but this is a small cost. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
There is common code at the start of handle_stripe5 and handle_stripe6. Move it into handle_stripe. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
sh->lock is now mainly used to ensure that two threads aren't running in the locked part of handle_stripe[56] at the same time. That can more neatly be achieved with an 'active' flag which we set while running handle_stripe. If we find the flag is set, we simply requeue the stripe for later by setting STRIPE_HANDLE. For safety we take ->device_lock while examining the state of the stripe and creating a summary in 'stripe_head_state / r6_state'. This possibly isn't needed but as shared fields like ->toread, ->towrite are checked it is safer for now at least. We leave the label after the old 'unlock' called "unlock" because it will disappear in a few patches, so renaming seems pointless. This leaves the stripe 'locked' for longer as we clear STRIPE_ACTIVE later, but that is not a problem. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
Other places that change or follow dev->towrite and dev->written take the device_lock as well as the sh->lock. So it should really be held in these places too. Also, doing so will allow sh->lock to be discarded. with merged fixes by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
This is the start of a series of patches to remove sh->lock. sync_request takes sh->lock before setting STRIPE_SYNCING to ensure there is no race with testing it in handle_stripe[56]. Instead, use a new flag STRIPE_SYNC_REQUESTED and test it early in handle_stripe[56] (after getting the same lock) and perform the same set/clear operations if it was set. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
-
- 18 7月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
In raid5::make_request(), once bio_data_dir(@bi) is detected it never (and couldn't) be changed. Use the result always. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Replace kmem_cache_alloc + memset(,0,) to kmem_cache_zalloc. I think it's not harmful since @conf->slab_cache already knows actual size of struct stripe_head. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
When performing a recovery, only first 2 slots in r10_bio are in use, for read and write respectively. However all of pages in the write bio are never used and just replaced to read bio's when the read completes. Get rid of those unused pages and share read pages properly. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
When normal-write and sync-read/write bio completes, we should find out the disk number the bio belongs to. Factor those common code out to a separate function. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
由 Namhyung Kim 提交于
Variable 'first' is initialized to zero and updated to @rdev->raid_disk only if it is greater than 0. Thus condition '>= first' always implies '>= 0' so the latter is not needed. Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
-
- 16 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
* 'gpio/merge' of git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6: gpio: wm831x: add a missing break in wm831x_gpio_dbg_show
-