- 06 7月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
To make remoteproc's API more intuitive for developers, we adopt the driver core's naming, i.e. alloc -> add -> del -> put. We'll also add register/unregister when their first user shows up. Otherwise - there's no functional change here. Suggested by Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>. Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com> Cc: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com> Reviewed-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Simplify the unregister/free interfaces, and make them easier to understand and use, by moving to a symmetric and consistent alloc() -> register() -> unregister() -> free() flow. To create and register an rproc instance, one needed to invoke rproc_alloc() followed by rproc_register(). To unregister and free an rproc instance, one now needs to invoke rproc_unregister() followed by rproc_free(). Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
For each registered rproc, maintain a generic remoteproc device whose parent is the low level platform-specific device (commonly a pdev, but it may certainly be any other type of device too). With this in hand, the resulting device hierarchy might then look like: omap-rproc.0 | - remoteproc0 <---- new ! | - virtio0 | - virtio1 | - rpmsg0 | - rpmsg1 | - rpmsg2 Where: - omap-rproc.0 is the low level device that's bound to the driver which invokes rproc_register() - remoteproc0 is the result of this patch, and will be added by the remoteproc framework when rproc_register() is invoked - virtio0 and virtio1 are vdevs that are registered by remoteproc when it realizes that they are supported by the firmware of the physical remote processor represented by omap-rproc.0 - rpmsg0, rpmsg1 and rpmsg2 are rpmsg devices that represent rpmsg channels, and are registerd by the rpmsg bus when it gets notified about their existence Technically, this patch: - changes 'struct rproc' to contain this generic remoteproc.x device - creates a new "remoteproc" type, to which this new generic remoteproc.x device belong to. - adds a super simple enumeration method for the indices of the remoteproc.x devices - updates all dev_* messaging to use the generic remoteproc.x device instead of the low level platform-specific device - updates all dma_* allocations to use the parent of remoteproc.x (where the platform-specific memory pools, most commonly CMA, are to be found) Adding this generic device has several merits: - we can now add remoteproc runtime PM support simply by hooking onto the new "remoteproc" type - all remoteproc log messages will now carry a common name prefix instead of having a platform-specific one - having a device as part of the rproc struct makes it possible to simplify refcounting (see subsequent patch) Thanks to Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> for suggesting and discussing these ideas in one of the remoteproc review threads and to Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com> for trying them out with the (upcoming) runtime PM support for remoteproc. Cc: Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
- 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Now that remoteproc supports any number of virtio devices, the previous sanity check in omap_rproc_mbox_callback doesn't make sense anymore. Remove that so we can start supporting multiple vdevs. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com> Cc: Iliyan Malchev <malchev@google.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Mark Grosen <mgrosen@ti.com> Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@stericsson.com> Cc: Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@stericsson.com> Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@linaro.org> Cc: Guzman Lugo Fernando <fernando.lugo@ti.com> Cc: Anna Suman <s-anna@ti.com> Cc: Clark Rob <rob@ti.com> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org> Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieranbingham@gmail.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Ditch some boilerplate code by employing the module_platform_driver helper. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
-
由 Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
Add a remoteproc driver for OMAP4, so we can boot the dual-M3 and and DSP subsystems. Use the omap_device_* API to control the hardware state, and utilize the OMAP mailbox to interrupt the remote processor when a new message is pending (the mailbox payload is used to tell it which virtqueue was the message placed in). Conversely, when an inbound mailbox message arrives, tell the remoteproc core which virtqueue is triggered. Later we will also use the mailbox payload to signal omap-specific events like remote crashes (which will be used to trigger remoteproc recovery) and power management transitions. At that point we will also extend the remoteproc core to support this. Based on (but now quite far from) work done by Fernando Guzman Lugo <fernando.lugo@ti.com> and Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>. Designed with Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>. Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
-