1. 14 7月, 2017 5 次提交
  2. 21 4月, 2017 5 次提交
  3. 02 12月, 2016 2 次提交
  4. 08 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 18 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  7. 08 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  8. 01 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 29 12月, 2015 3 次提交
  10. 14 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 18 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  12. 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 27 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  14. 01 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 18 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  16. 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  18. 04 2月, 2015 6 次提交
  19. 17 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  20. 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • W
      NFS: fix subtle change in COMMIT behavior · cb1410c7
      Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
      Recent work in the pgio layer made it possible for there to be more than one
      request per page. This caused a subtle change in commit behavior, because
      write.c:nfs_commit_unstable_pages compares the number of *pages* waiting for
      writeback against the number of requests on a commit list to choose when to
      send a COMMIT in a non-blocking flush.
      
      This is probably hard to hit in normal operation - you have to be using
      rsize/wsize < PAGE_SIZE, or pnfs with lots of boundaries that are not page
      aligned to have a noticeable change in behavior.
      Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@primarydata.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      cb1410c7
  21. 13 10月, 2014 1 次提交