Also skip the message unless bitmap IO took longer than 5 ms.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

This should silence a warning about an empty statement. Thanks to Fabian
Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> who sent a patch I modified to be smaller and
avoids an additional indent level.
Signed-off-by: NRoland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

This contains various cosmetic fixes ranging from simple typos to
const-ifying, and using booleans properly.

Original commit messages from Fabian's patch set:
drbd: debugfs: constify drbd_version_fops
drbd: use seq_put instead of seq_print where possible
drbd: include linux/uaccess.h instead of asm/uaccess.h
drbd: use const char * const for drbd strings
drbd: kerneldoc warning fix in w_e_end_data_req()
drbd: use unsigned for one bit fields
drbd: use bool for peer is_ states
drbd: fix typo
drbd: use | for bitmask combination
drbd: use true/false for bool
drbd: fix drbd_bm_init() comments
drbd: introduce peer state union
drbd: fix maybe_pull_ahead() locking comments
drbd: use bool for growing
drbd: remove redundant declarations
drbd: replace if/BUG by BUG_ON
Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: NRoland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Scenario, starting with normal operation
 Connected Primary/Secondary UpToDate/UpToDate
 NetworkFailure Primary/Unknown UpToDate/DUnknown (frozen)
 ... more failures happen, secondary loses it's disk,
 but eventually is able to re-establish the replication link ...
 Connected Primary/Secondary UpToDate/Diskless (resumed; needs to bump uuid!)

We used to just resume/resent suspended requests,
without bumping the UUID.

Which will lead to problems later, when we want to re-attach the disk on
the peer, without first disconnecting, or if we experience additional
failures, because we now have diverging data without being able to
recognize it.

Make sure we also bump the current data generation UUID,
if we notice "peer disk unknown" -> "peer disk known bad".
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

We already serialize connection state changes,
and other, non-connection state changes (role changes)
while we are establishing a connection.

But if we have an established connection,
then trigger a resync handshake (by primary --force or similar),
until now we just had to be "lucky".

Consider this sequence (e.g. deployment scenario):
create-md; up;
  -> Connected Secondary/Secondary Inconsistent/Inconsistent
then do a racy primary --force on both peers.

 block drbd0: drbd_sync_handshake:
 block drbd0: self 0000000000000004:0000000000000000:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
 block drbd0: peer 0000000000000004:0000000000000000:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
 block drbd0: peer( Unknown -> Secondary ) conn( WFReportParams -> Connected ) pdsk( DUnknown -> Inconsistent )
 block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Primary ) pdsk( Inconsistent -> UpToDate )
  *** HERE things go wrong. ***
 block drbd0: role( Secondary -> Primary )
 block drbd0: drbd_sync_handshake:
 block drbd0: self 0000000000000005:0000000000000000:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
 block drbd0: peer C90D2FC716D232AB:0000000000000004:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
 block drbd0: Becoming sync target due to disk states.
 block drbd0: Writing the whole bitmap, full sync required after drbd_sync_handshake.
 block drbd0: Remote failed to finish a request within 6007ms > ko-count (2) * timeout (30 * 0.1s)
 drbd s0: peer( Primary -> Unknown ) conn( Connected -> Timeout ) pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown )

The problem here is that the local promotion happens before the sync handshake
triggered by the remote promotion was completed.  Some assumptions elsewhere
become wrong, and when the expected resync handshake is then received and
processed, we get stuck in a deadlock, which can only be recovered by reboot :-(

Fix: if we know the peer has good data,
and our own disk is present, but NOT good,
and there is no resync going on yet,
we expect a sync handshake to happen "soon".
So reject a racy promotion with SS_IN_TRANSIENT_STATE.

Result:
 ... as above ...
 block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Primary ) pdsk( Inconsistent -> UpToDate )
  *** local promotion being postponed until ... ***
 block drbd0: drbd_sync_handshake:
 block drbd0: self 0000000000000004:0000000000000000:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
 block drbd0: peer 77868BDA836E12A5:0000000000000004:0000000000000000:0000000000000000 bits:25590 flags:0
  ...
 block drbd0: conn( WFBitMapT -> WFSyncUUID )
 block drbd0: updated sync uuid 85D06D0E8887AD44:0000000000000000:0000000000000000:0000000000000000
 block drbd0: conn( WFSyncUUID -> SyncTarget )
  *** ... after the resync handshake ***
 block drbd0: role( Secondary -> Primary )
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

If in a two-primary scenario, we lost our peer, freeze IO,
and are still frozen (no UUID rotation) when the peer comes back
as Secondary after a hard crash, we will see identical UUIDs.

The "rule_nr = 40" chose to use the "CRASHED_PRIMARY" bit as
arbitration, but that would cause the still running (but frozen) Primary
to become SyncTarget (which it typically refuses), and the handshake is
declined.

Fix: check current roles.
If we have *one* current primary, the Primary wins.
(rule_nr = 41)

Since that is a protocol change, use the newly introduced DRBD_FF_WSAME
to determine if rule_nr = 41 can be applied.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

We will support WRITE_SAME, if
 * all peers support WRITE_SAME (both in kernel and DRBD version),
 * all peer devices support WRITE_SAME
 * logical_block_size is identical on all peers.

We may at some point introduce a fallback on the receiving side
for devices/kernels that do not support WRITE_SAME,
by open-coding a submit loop. But not yet.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Even if discard_zeroes_data != 0,
if discard_zeroes_if_aligned is set, we assume we can reliably
zero-out/discard using the drbd_issue_peer_discard() helper.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

When re-attaching the local backend device to a C_STANDALONE D_DISKLESS
R_PRIMARY with OND_SUSPEND_IO, we may only resume IO if we recognize the
backend that is being attached as D_UP_TO_DATE.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

If DRBD lost all path to good data,
and the on-no-data-accessible policy is OND_SUSPEND_IO,
all pending and new IO requests are suspended (will block).

If that setting is OND_IO_ERROR, IO will still be completed.
READ to "clean" areas (e.g. on an D_INCONSISTENT device,
and bitmap indicates a block is already in sync) will succeed.
READ to "unclean" areas (bitmap indicates block is out-of-sync),
will return EIO.

If we are already D_DISKLESS (or D_FAILED), we also return EIO.

Unfortunately, on a former R_PRIMARY C_SYNC_TARGET D_INCONSISTENT,
after replication link loss, new WRITE requests still went through OK.

The would also set the "out-of-sync" bit on their way, so READ after
WRITE would still return EIO. Also, the data generation UUIDs had not
been bumped, we would cause data divergence, without being able to
detect it on the next sync handshake, given the right sequence of events
in a multiple error scenario and "improper" order of recovery actions.

The right thing to do is to return EIO for all new writes,
unless we have access to good, current, D_UP_TO_DATE data.

The "established best practices" way to avoid these situations in the
first place is to set OND_SUSPEND_IO, or even do a hard-reset from
the pri-on-incon-degr policy helper hook.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Possibly sequence of events:
SyncTarget is made Primary, then loses replication link
(only path to good data on SyncSource).

Behavior is then controlled by the on-no-data-accessible policy,
which defaults to OND_IO_ERROR (may be set to OND_SUSPEND_IO).

If OND_IO_ERROR is in fact the current policy, we clear the susp_fen
(IO suspended due to fencing policy) flag, do NOT set the susp_nod
(IO suspended due to no data) flag.

But we forgot to call the IO error completion for all pending,
suspended, requests.

While at it, also add a race check for a theoretically possible
race with a new handshake (network hickup), we may be able to
re-send requests, and can avoid passing IO errors up the stack.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

When resync is finished, we already call the "after-resync-target"
handler (on the former sync target, obviously), once per volume.

Paired with the before-resync-target handler, you can create snapshots,
before the resync causes the volumes to become inconsistent,
and discard those snapshots again, once they are no longer needed.

It was also overloaded to be paired with the "fence-peer" handler,
to "unfence" once the volumes are up-to-date and known good.

This has some disadvantages, though: we call "fence-peer" for the whole
connection (once for the group of volumes), but would call unfence as
side-effect of after-resync-target once for each volume.

Also, we fence on a (current, or about to become) Primary,
which will later become the sync-source.

Calling unfence only as a side effect of the after-resync-target
handler opens a race window, between a new fence on the Primary
(SyncTarget) and the unfence on the SyncTarget, which is difficult to
close without some kind of "cluster wide lock" in those handlers.

We would not need those handlers if we could still communicate.
Which makes trying to aquire a cluster wide lock from those handlers
seem like a very bad idea.

This introduces the "unfence-peer" handler, which will be called
per connection (once for the group of volumes), just like the fence
handler, only once all volumes are back in sync, and on the SyncSource.

Which is expected to be the node that previously called "fence", the
node that is currently allowed to be Primary, and thus the only node
that could trigger a new "fence" that could race with this unfence.

Which makes us not need any cluster wide synchronization here,
serializing two scripts running on the same node is trivial.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

If the replication link breaks exactly during "resync finished" detection,
finishing too early on the sync source could again lead to UUIDs rotated
too fast, and potentially a spurious full resync on next handshake.

Always wait for explicit resync finished state change notification from
the sync target.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Make sure we have at least 67 (> AL_UPDATES_PER_TRANSACTION)
al-extents available, and allow up to half of that to be
discarded in one bio.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

For consistency, also zero-out partial unaligned chunks of discard
requests on the local backend.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Now that we have the discard_zeroes_if_aligned setting, we should also
check it when setting up our queue parameters on the primary,
not only on the receiving side.

We announce discard support,
UNLESS

 * we are connected to a peer that does not support TRIM
   on the DRBD protocol level.  Otherwise, it would either discard, or
   do a fallback to zero-out, depending on its backend and configuration.

 * our local backend does not support discards,
   or (discard_zeroes_data=0 AND discard_zeroes_if_aligned=no).
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

We can avoid spurious data divergence caused by partially-ignored
discards on certain backends with discard_zeroes_data=0, if we
translate partial unaligned discard requests into explicit zero-out.

The relevant use case is LVM/DM thin.

If on different nodes, DRBD is backed by devices with differing
discard characteristics, discards may lead to data divergence
(old data or garbage left over on one backend, zeroes due to
unmapped areas on the other backend). Online verify would now
potentially report tons of spurious differences.

While probably harmless for most use cases (fstrim on a file system),
DRBD cannot have that, it would violate our promise to upper layers
that our data instances on the nodes are identical.

To be correct and play safe (make sure data is identical on both copies),
we would have to disable discard support, if our local backend (on a
Primary) does not support "discard_zeroes_data=true".

We'd also have to translate discards to explicit zero-out on the
receiving (typically: Secondary) side, unless the receiving side
supports "discard_zeroes_data=true".

Which both would allocate those blocks, instead of unmapping them,
in contrast with expectations.

LVM/DM thin does set discard_zeroes_data=0,
because it silently ignores discards to partial chunks.

We can work around this by checking the alignment first.
For unaligned (wrt. alignment and granularity) or too small discards,
we zero-out the initial (and/or) trailing unaligned partial chunks,
but discard all the aligned full chunks.

At least for LVM/DM thin, the result is effectively "discard_zeroes_data=1".

Arguably it should behave this way internally, by default,
and we'll try to make that happen.

But our workaround is still valid for already deployed setups,
and for other devices that may behave this way.

Setting discard-zeroes-if-aligned=yes will allow DRBD to use
discards, and to announce discard_zeroes_data=true, even on
backends that announce discard_zeroes_data=false.

Setting discard-zeroes-if-aligned=no will cause DRBD to always
fall-back to zero-out on the receiving side, and to not even
announce discard capabilities on the Primary, if the respective
backend announces discard_zeroes_data=false.

We used to ignore the discard_zeroes_data setting completely.
To not break established and expected behaviour, and suddenly
cause fstrim on thin-provisioned LVs to run out-of-space,
instead of freeing up space, the default value is "yes".
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

To maintain write-order fidelity accros all volumes in a DRBD resource,
the receiver of a P_BARRIER needs to issue flushes to all volumes.
We used to do this by calling blkdev_issue_flush(), synchronously,
one volume at a time.

We now submit all flushes to all volumes in parallel, then wait for all
completions, to reduce worst-case latencies on multi-volume resources.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

The command line parameter the kernel module uses to communicate the
device minor to userland helper is flawed in a way that the device
indentifier "minor-%d" is being truncated to minors with a maximum
of 5 digits.

But DRBD 8.4 allows 2^20 == 1048576 minors,
thus a minimum of 7 digits must be supported.

Reported by Veit Wahlich on drbd-dev.
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Regression introduced with 8.4.5
 drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C

Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch yet) would wait for the full epoch of that
former version to be acknowledged by the peer.

In synchronous and quasi-synchronous protocols C and B,
this may double the latency on overwrites.

With protocol A, which is supposed to be asynchronous and only wait for
local completion, it is even worse: it would make overwrites
quasi-synchronous, they would be hit by the full RTT, which protocol A
was specifically meant to avoid, and possibly the additional time it
takes to drain the buffers first.

Particularly bad for databases, or anything else that
does frequent updates to the same blocks (various file system meta data).

No impact if >= rtt passes between updates to the same block.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

If thinly provisioned volumes are used, during a resync the sync source
tries to find out if a block is deallocated. If it is deallocated, then
the resync target uses block_dev_issue_zeroout() on the range in
question.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

As long as the value is 0 the feature is disabled. With setting
it to a positive value, DRBD limits and aligns its resync requests
to the rs-discard-granularity setting. If the sync source detects
all zeros in such a block, the resync target discards the range
on disk.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

If during resync we read only zeroes for a range of sectors assume
that these secotors can be discarded on the sync target node.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

When leaving resync states because of disconnect,
do the bitmap write-out synchronously in the drbd_disconnected() path.

When leaving resync states because we go back to AHEAD/BEHIND, or
because resync actually finished, or some disk was lost during resync,
trigger the write-out from after_state_ch().

The bitmap write-out for resync -> ahead/behind was missing completely before.

Note that this is all only an optimization to avoid double-resyncs of
already completed blocks in case this node crashes.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

The intention was to only suspend IO if some normal bitmap operation is
supposed to be locked out, not always. If the bulk operation is flaged
as BM_LOCKED_CHANGE_ALLOWED, we do not need to suspend IO.
Signed-off-by: NPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

We want to apply this to Fabrics drivers as well, so move it to common
code.
Reviewed-by: NJay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Tested-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Centralize the check if a given NVMe command reads or writes data.
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: NJay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Some transport drivers may have a lower transfer size than
the controller. So allow the transport to set it in the
controller max_hw_sectors.
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NJames Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Reviewed-by: NJay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Add get_log_page command structure and a corresponding entry in
nvme_command union
Signed-off-by: NArmen Baloyan <armenx.baloyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>
Reviewed--by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

These have been added in NVMe 1.2 and we'll need at least oaes for the
NVMe target driver.
Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Reviewed-by: NJay Freyensee <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

alloc_workqueue replaces deprecated create_workqueue().

Dedicated workqueues have been used since bcache_wq and moving_gc_wq
are workqueues for writes and are being used on a memory reclaim path.
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has been set to ensure forward progress under memory
pressure.
Since there are only a fixed number of work items, explicit concurrency
limit is unnecessary here.
Signed-off-by: NBhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Instead of overloading the discard support with the REQ_SECURE flag.
Use the opportunity to rename the queue flag as well, and remove the
dead checks for this flag in the RAID 1 and RAID 10 drivers that don't
claim support for secure erase.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

Because we define WRITE/READ as REQ_OPs, we cannot do
switch (rq_data_dir(request))
case READ
....
case WRITE
...

without getting warnings about handling other REQ_OPs.

This just has mq_disk do a if/else like it does in other
places.
Signed-off-by: NMike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

In case of the active namespace list scanning method, a namespace that
is detached is not removed from the host if it was the last entry in
the list. Fix this by adding a scan to validate namespaces greater than
the value of prev.

This also handles the case of removing namespaces whose value exceed
the device's reported number of namespaces.
Signed-off-by: NSunad Bhandary S <sunad.s@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>