Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 7月, 2007 2 次提交
    • M
      [IPV6] MIP6: Kill unnecessary ifdefs. · 136ebf08
      由 Masahide NAKAMURA 提交于 
      Kill unnecessary CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6.

o It is redundant for RAW socket to keep MH out with the config then
  it can handle any protocol.
o Clean-up at AH.
Signed-off-by: NMasahide NAKAMURA <nakam@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      136ebf08
    • J
      bonding / ipv6: no addrconf for slaves separately from master · c2edacf8
      由 Jay Vosburgh 提交于 
      	At present, when a device is enslaved to bonding, if ipv6 is
active then addrconf will be initated on the slave (because it is closed
then opened during the enslavement processing).  This causes DAD and RS
packets to be sent from the slave.  These packets in turn can confuse
switches that perform ipv6 snooping, causing them to incorrectly update
their forwarding tables (if, e.g., the slave being added is an inactve
backup that won't be used right away) and direct traffic away from the
active slave to a backup slave (where the incoming packets will be
dropped).

	This patch alters the behavior so that addrconf will only run on
the master device itself.  I believe this is logically correct, as it
prevents slaves from having an IPv6 identity independent from the
master.  This is consistent with the IPv4 behavior for bonding.

	This is accomplished by (a) having bonding set IFF_SLAVE sooner
in the enslavement processing than currently occurs (before open, not
after), and (b) having ipv6 addrconf ignore UP and CHANGE events on
slave devices.

	The eql driver also uses the IFF_SLAVE flag.  I inspected eql,
and I believe this change is reasonable for its usage of IFF_SLAVE, but
I did not test it.
Signed-off-by: NJay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
      c2edacf8
  3. 23 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 15 6月, 2007 1 次提交
    • H
      [IPV6] addrconf: Fix IPv6 on tuntap tunnels · 74235a25
      由 Herbert Xu 提交于 
      The recent patch that added ipv6_hwtype is broken on tuntap tunnels.
Indeed, it's broken on any device that does not pass the ipv6_hwtype
test.

The reason is that the original test only applies to autoconfiguration,
not IPv6 support.  IPv6 support is allowed on any device.  In fact,
even with the ipv6_hwtype patch applied you can still add IPv6 addresses
to any interface that doesn't pass thw ipv6_hwtype test provided that
they have a sufficiently large MTU.  This is a serious problem because
come deregistration time these devices won't be cleaned up properly.

I've gone back and looked at the rationale for the patch.  It appears
that the real problem is that we were creating IPv6 devices even if the
MTU was too small.  So here's a patch which fixes that and reverts the
ipv6_hwtype stuff.

Thanks to Kanru Chen for reporting this issue.
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      74235a25
  7. 13 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 08 6月, 2007 3 次提交
  11. 04 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  13. 31 5月, 2007 4 次提交
  15. 25 5月, 2007 2 次提交
    • D
      [XFRM]: Allow packet drops during larval state resolution. · 14e50e57
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      The current IPSEC rule resolution behavior we have does not work for a
lot of people, even though technically it's an improvement from the
-EAGAIN buisness we had before.

Right now we'll block until the key manager resolves the route.  That
works for simple cases, but many folks would rather packets get
silently dropped until the key manager resolves the IPSEC rules.

We can't tell these folks to "set the socket non-blocking" because
they don't have control over the non-block setting of things like the
sockets used to resolve DNS deep inside of the resolver libraries in
libc.

With that in mind I coded up the patch below with some help from
Herbert Xu which provides packet-drop behavior during larval state
resolution, controllable via sysctl and off by default.

This lays the framework to either:

1) Make this default at some point or...

2) Move this logic into xfrm{4,6}_policy.c and implement the
   ARP-like resolution queue we've all been dreaming of.
   The idea would be to queue packets to the policy, then
   once the larval state is resolved by the key manager we
   re-resolve the route and push the packets out.  The
   packets would timeout if the rule didn't get resolved
   in a certain amount of time.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      14e50e57
    • O
      [IPV6]: Ignore ipv6 events on non-IPV6 capable devices. · bbb711e6
      由 Oliver Hartkopp 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NOliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: NUrs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bbb711e6
  17. 14 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  19. 11 5月, 2007 5 次提交
  21. 09 5月, 2007 2 次提交
  23. 04 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  25. 03 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  27. 29 4月, 2007 2 次提交
  29. 27 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  31. 26 4月, 2007 12 次提交