1. 02 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  2. 24 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • D
      keys: Fix dependency loop between construction record and auth key · 72683282
      David Howells 提交于
      [ Upstream commit 822ad64d7e46a8e2c8b8a796738d7b657cbb146d ]
      
      In the request_key() upcall mechanism there's a dependency loop by which if
      a key type driver overrides the ->request_key hook and the userspace side
      manages to lose the authorisation key, the auth key and the internal
      construction record (struct key_construction) can keep each other pinned.
      
      Fix this by the following changes:
      
       (1) Killing off the construction record and using the auth key instead.
      
       (2) Including the operation name in the auth key payload and making the
           payload available outside of security/keys/.
      
       (3) The ->request_key hook is given the authkey instead of the cons
           record and operation name.
      
      Changes (2) and (3) allow the auth key to naturally be cleaned up if the
      keyring it is in is destroyed or cleared or the auth key is unlinked.
      
      Fixes: 7ee02a316600 ("keys: Fix dependency loop between construction record and auth key")
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      72683282
  3. 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • B
      security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t · 074d5898
      Baolin Wang 提交于
      The 'struct key' will use 'time_t' which we try to remove in the
      kernel, since 'time_t' is not year 2038 safe on 32bit systems.
      Also the 'struct keyring_search_context' will use 'timespec' type
      to record current time, which is also not year 2038 safe on 32bit
      systems.
      
      Thus this patch replaces 'time_t' with 'time64_t' which is year 2038
      safe for 'struct key', and replace 'timespec' with 'time64_t' for the
      'struct keyring_search_context', since we only look at the the seconds
      part of 'timespec' variable. Moreover we also change the codes where
      using the 'time_t' and 'timespec', and we can get current time by
      ktime_get_real_seconds() instead of current_kernel_time(), and use
      'TIME64_MAX' macro to initialize the 'time64_t' type variable.
      
      Especially in proc.c file, we have replaced 'unsigned long' and 'timespec'
      type with 'u64' and 'time64_t' type to save the timeout value, which means
      user will get one 'u64' type timeout value by issuing proc_keys_show()
      function.
      Signed-off-by: NBaolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      074d5898
  4. 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Fix race between updating and finding a negative key · 363b02da
      David Howells 提交于
      Consolidate KEY_FLAG_INSTANTIATED, KEY_FLAG_NEGATIVE and the rejection
      error into one field such that:
      
       (1) The instantiation state can be modified/read atomically.
      
       (2) The error can be accessed atomically with the state.
      
       (3) The error isn't stored unioned with the payload pointers.
      
      This deals with the problem that the state is spread over three different
      objects (two bits and a separate variable) and reading or updating them
      atomically isn't practical, given that not only can uninstantiated keys
      change into instantiated or rejected keys, but rejected keys can also turn
      into instantiated keys - and someone accessing the key might not be using
      any locking.
      
      The main side effect of this problem is that what was held in the payload
      may change, depending on the state.  For instance, you might observe the
      key to be in the rejected state.  You then read the cached error, but if
      the key semaphore wasn't locked, the key might've become instantiated
      between the two reads - and you might now have something in hand that isn't
      actually an error code.
      
      The state is now KEY_IS_UNINSTANTIATED, KEY_IS_POSITIVE or a negative error
      code if the key is negatively instantiated.  The key_is_instantiated()
      function is replaced with key_is_positive() to avoid confusion as negative
      keys are also 'instantiated'.
      
      Additionally, barriering is included:
      
       (1) Order payload-set before state-set during instantiation.
      
       (2) Order state-read before payload-read when using the key.
      
      Further separate barriering is necessary if RCU is being used to access the
      payload content after reading the payload pointers.
      
      Fixes: 146aa8b1 ("KEYS: Merge the type-specific data with the payload data")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+
      Reported-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
      363b02da
  5. 25 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • E
      KEYS: prevent creating a different user's keyrings · 237bbd29
      Eric Biggers 提交于
      It was possible for an unprivileged user to create the user and user
      session keyrings for another user.  For example:
      
          sudo -u '#3000' sh -c 'keyctl add keyring _uid.4000 "" @u
                                 keyctl add keyring _uid_ses.4000 "" @u
                                 sleep 15' &
          sleep 1
          sudo -u '#4000' keyctl describe @u
          sudo -u '#4000' keyctl describe @us
      
      This is problematic because these "fake" keyrings won't have the right
      permissions.  In particular, the user who created them first will own
      them and will have full access to them via the possessor permissions,
      which can be used to compromise the security of a user's keys:
      
          -4: alswrv-----v------------  3000     0 keyring: _uid.4000
          -5: alswrv-----v------------  3000     0 keyring: _uid_ses.4000
      
      Fix it by marking user and user session keyrings with a flag
      KEY_FLAG_UID_KEYRING.  Then, when searching for a user or user session
      keyring by name, skip all keyrings that don't have the flag set.
      
      Fixes: 69664cf1 ("keys: don't generate user and user session keyrings unless they're accessed")
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[v2.6.26+]
      Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      237bbd29
  6. 09 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 18 4月, 2017 1 次提交
    • E
      KEYS: fix keyctl_set_reqkey_keyring() to not leak thread keyrings · c9f838d1
      Eric Biggers 提交于
      This fixes CVE-2017-7472.
      
      Running the following program as an unprivileged user exhausts kernel
      memory by leaking thread keyrings:
      
      	#include <keyutils.h>
      
      	int main()
      	{
      		for (;;)
      			keyctl_set_reqkey_keyring(KEY_REQKEY_DEFL_THREAD_KEYRING);
      	}
      
      Fix it by only creating a new thread keyring if there wasn't one before.
      To make things more consistent, make install_thread_keyring_to_cred()
      and install_process_keyring_to_cred() both return 0 if the corresponding
      keyring is already present.
      
      Fixes: d84f4f99 ("CRED: Inaugurate COW credentials")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.29+
      Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      c9f838d1
  8. 03 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  10. 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 12 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Add a facility to restrict new links into a keyring · 5ac7eace
      David Howells 提交于
      Add a facility whereby proposed new links to be added to a keyring can be
      vetted, permitting them to be rejected if necessary.  This can be used to
      block public keys from which the signature cannot be verified or for which
      the signature verification fails.  It could also be used to provide
      blacklisting.
      
      This affects operations like add_key(), KEYCTL_LINK and KEYCTL_INSTANTIATE.
      
      To this end:
      
       (1) A function pointer is added to the key struct that, if set, points to
           the vetting function.  This is called as:
      
      	int (*restrict_link)(struct key *keyring,
      			     const struct key_type *key_type,
      			     unsigned long key_flags,
      			     const union key_payload *key_payload),
      
           where 'keyring' will be the keyring being added to, key_type and
           key_payload will describe the key being added and key_flags[*] can be
           AND'ed with KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED.
      
           [*] This parameter will be removed in a later patch when
           	 KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED is removed.
      
           The function should return 0 to allow the link to take place or an
           error (typically -ENOKEY, -ENOPKG or -EKEYREJECTED) to reject the
           link.
      
           The pointer should not be set directly, but rather should be set
           through keyring_alloc().
      
           Note that if called during add_key(), preparse is called before this
           method, but a key isn't actually allocated until after this function
           is called.
      
       (2) KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION is added.  This can be passed to
           key_create_or_update() or key_instantiate_and_link() to bypass the
           restriction check.
      
       (3) KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED_ONLY is removed.  The entire contents of a keyring
           with this restriction emplaced can be considered 'trustworthy' by
           virtue of being in the keyring when that keyring is consulted.
      
       (4) key_alloc() and keyring_alloc() take an extra argument that will be
           used to set restrict_link in the new key.  This ensures that the
           pointer is set before the key is published, thus preventing a window
           of unrestrictedness.  Normally this argument will be NULL.
      
       (5) As a temporary affair, keyring_restrict_trusted_only() is added.  It
           should be passed to keyring_alloc() as the extra argument instead of
           setting KEY_FLAG_TRUSTED_ONLY on a keyring.  This will be replaced in
           a later patch with functions that look in the appropriate places for
           authoritative keys.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      5ac7eace
  12. 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • Y
      KEYS: Fix keyring ref leak in join_session_keyring() · 23567fd0
      Yevgeny Pats 提交于
      This fixes CVE-2016-0728.
      
      If a thread is asked to join as a session keyring the keyring that's already
      set as its session, we leak a keyring reference.
      
      This can be tested with the following program:
      
      	#include <stddef.h>
      	#include <stdio.h>
      	#include <sys/types.h>
      	#include <keyutils.h>
      
      	int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
      	{
      		int i = 0;
      		key_serial_t serial;
      
      		serial = keyctl(KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING,
      				"leaked-keyring");
      		if (serial < 0) {
      			perror("keyctl");
      			return -1;
      		}
      
      		if (keyctl(KEYCTL_SETPERM, serial,
      			   KEY_POS_ALL | KEY_USR_ALL) < 0) {
      			perror("keyctl");
      			return -1;
      		}
      
      		for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
      			serial = keyctl(KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING,
      					"leaked-keyring");
      			if (serial < 0) {
      				perror("keyctl");
      				return -1;
      			}
      		}
      
      		return 0;
      	}
      
      If, after the program has run, there something like the following line in
      /proc/keys:
      
      3f3d898f I--Q---   100 perm 3f3f0000     0     0 keyring   leaked-keyring: empty
      
      with a usage count of 100 * the number of times the program has been run,
      then the kernel is malfunctioning.  If leaked-keyring has zero usages or
      has been garbage collected, then the problem is fixed.
      Reported-by: NYevgeny Pats <yevgeny@perception-point.io>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NJarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      23567fd0
  13. 21 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Merge the type-specific data with the payload data · 146aa8b1
      David Howells 提交于
      Merge the type-specific data with the payload data into one four-word chunk
      as it seems pointless to keep them separate.
      
      Use user_key_payload() for accessing the payloads of overloaded
      user-defined keys.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
      cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
      cc: linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
      146aa8b1
  14. 05 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      capabilities: ambient capabilities · 58319057
      Andy Lutomirski 提交于
      Credit where credit is due: this idea comes from Christoph Lameter with
      a lot of valuable input from Serge Hallyn.  This patch is heavily based
      on Christoph's patch.
      
      ===== The status quo =====
      
      On Linux, there are a number of capabilities defined by the kernel.  To
      perform various privileged tasks, processes can wield capabilities that
      they hold.
      
      Each task has four capability masks: effective (pE), permitted (pP),
      inheritable (pI), and a bounding set (X).  When the kernel checks for a
      capability, it checks pE.  The other capability masks serve to modify
      what capabilities can be in pE.
      
      Any task can remove capabilities from pE, pP, or pI at any time.  If a
      task has a capability in pP, it can add that capability to pE and/or pI.
      If a task has CAP_SETPCAP, then it can add any capability to pI, and it
      can remove capabilities from X.
      
      Tasks are not the only things that can have capabilities; files can also
      have capabilities.  A file can have no capabilty information at all [1].
      If a file has capability information, then it has a permitted mask (fP)
      and an inheritable mask (fI) as well as a single effective bit (fE) [2].
      File capabilities modify the capabilities of tasks that execve(2) them.
      
      A task that successfully calls execve has its capabilities modified for
      the file ultimately being excecuted (i.e.  the binary itself if that
      binary is ELF or for the interpreter if the binary is a script.) [3] In
      the capability evolution rules, for each mask Z, pZ represents the old
      value and pZ' represents the new value.  The rules are:
      
        pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & fI)
        pI' = pI
        pE' = (fE ? pP' : 0)
        X is unchanged
      
      For setuid binaries, fP, fI, and fE are modified by a moderately
      complicated set of rules that emulate POSIX behavior.  Similarly, if
      euid == 0 or ruid == 0, then fP, fI, and fE are modified differently
      (primary, fP and fI usually end up being the full set).  For nonroot
      users executing binaries with neither setuid nor file caps, fI and fP
      are empty and fE is false.
      
      As an extra complication, if you execute a process as nonroot and fE is
      set, then the "secure exec" rules are in effect: AT_SECURE gets set,
      LD_PRELOAD doesn't work, etc.
      
      This is rather messy.  We've learned that making any changes is
      dangerous, though: if a new kernel version allows an unprivileged
      program to change its security state in a way that persists cross
      execution of a setuid program or a program with file caps, this
      persistent state is surprisingly likely to allow setuid or file-capped
      programs to be exploited for privilege escalation.
      
      ===== The problem =====
      
      Capability inheritance is basically useless.
      
      If you aren't root and you execute an ordinary binary, fI is zero, so
      your capabilities have no effect whatsoever on pP'.  This means that you
      can't usefully execute a helper process or a shell command with elevated
      capabilities if you aren't root.
      
      On current kernels, you can sort of work around this by setting fI to
      the full set for most or all non-setuid executable files.  This causes
      pP' = pI for nonroot, and inheritance works.  No one does this because
      it's a PITA and it isn't even supported on most filesystems.
      
      If you try this, you'll discover that every nonroot program ends up with
      secure exec rules, breaking many things.
      
      This is a problem that has bitten many people who have tried to use
      capabilities for anything useful.
      
      ===== The proposed change =====
      
      This patch adds a fifth capability mask called the ambient mask (pA).
      pA does what most people expect pI to do.
      
      pA obeys the invariant that no bit can ever be set in pA if it is not
      set in both pP and pI.  Dropping a bit from pP or pI drops that bit from
      pA.  This ensures that existing programs that try to drop capabilities
      still do so, with a complication.  Because capability inheritance is so
      broken, setting KEEPCAPS, using setresuid to switch to nonroot uids, and
      then calling execve effectively drops capabilities.  Therefore,
      setresuid from root to nonroot conditionally clears pA unless
      SECBIT_NO_SETUID_FIXUP is set.  Processes that don't like this can
      re-add bits to pA afterwards.
      
      The capability evolution rules are changed:
      
        pA' = (file caps or setuid or setgid ? 0 : pA)
        pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & fI) | pA'
        pI' = pI
        pE' = (fE ? pP' : pA')
        X is unchanged
      
      If you are nonroot but you have a capability, you can add it to pA.  If
      you do so, your children get that capability in pA, pP, and pE.  For
      example, you can set pA = CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE, and your children can
      automatically bind low-numbered ports.  Hallelujah!
      
      Unprivileged users can create user namespaces, map themselves to a
      nonzero uid, and create both privileged (relative to their namespace)
      and unprivileged process trees.  This is currently more or less
      impossible.  Hallelujah!
      
      You cannot use pA to try to subvert a setuid, setgid, or file-capped
      program: if you execute any such program, pA gets cleared and the
      resulting evolution rules are unchanged by this patch.
      
      Users with nonzero pA are unlikely to unintentionally leak that
      capability.  If they run programs that try to drop privileges, dropping
      privileges will still work.
      
      It's worth noting that the degree of paranoia in this patch could
      possibly be reduced without causing serious problems.  Specifically, if
      we allowed pA to persist across executing non-pA-aware setuid binaries
      and across setresuid, then, naively, the only capabilities that could
      leak as a result would be the capabilities in pA, and any attacker
      *already* has those capabilities.  This would make me nervous, though --
      setuid binaries that tried to privilege-separate might fail to do so,
      and putting CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH or CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE into pA could have
      unexpected side effects.  (Whether these unexpected side effects would
      be exploitable is an open question.) I've therefore taken the more
      paranoid route.  We can revisit this later.
      
      An alternative would be to require PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS before setting
      ambient capabilities.  I think that this would be annoying and would
      make granting otherwise unprivileged users minor ambient capabilities
      (CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE or CAP_NET_RAW for example) much less useful than
      it is with this patch.
      
      ===== Footnotes =====
      
      [1] Files that are missing the "security.capability" xattr or that have
      unrecognized values for that xattr end up with has_cap set to false.
      The code that does that appears to be complicated for no good reason.
      
      [2] The libcap capability mask parsers and formatters are dangerously
      misleading and the documentation is flat-out wrong.  fE is *not* a mask;
      it's a single bit.  This has probably confused every single person who
      has tried to use file capabilities.
      
      [3] Linux very confusingly processes both the script and the interpreter
      if applicable, for reasons that elude me.  The results from thinking
      about a script's file capabilities and/or setuid bits are mostly
      discarded.
      
      Preliminary userspace code is here, but it needs updating:
      https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/util-linux-playground.git/commit/?h=cap_ambient&id=7f5afbd175d2
      
      Here is a test program that can be used to verify the functionality
      (from Christoph):
      
      /*
       * Test program for the ambient capabilities. This program spawns a shell
       * that allows running processes with a defined set of capabilities.
       *
       * (C) 2015 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
       * Released under: GPL v3 or later.
       *
       *
       * Compile using:
       *
       *	gcc -o ambient_test ambient_test.o -lcap-ng
       *
       * This program must have the following capabilities to run properly:
       * Permissions for CAP_NET_RAW, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_NICE
       *
       * A command to equip the binary with the right caps is:
       *
       *	setcap cap_net_raw,cap_net_admin,cap_sys_nice+p ambient_test
       *
       *
       * To get a shell with additional caps that can be inherited by other processes:
       *
       *	./ambient_test /bin/bash
       *
       *
       * Verifying that it works:
       *
       * From the bash spawed by ambient_test run
       *
       *	cat /proc/$$/status
       *
       * and have a look at the capabilities.
       */
      
      #include <stdlib.h>
      #include <stdio.h>
      #include <errno.h>
      #include <cap-ng.h>
      #include <sys/prctl.h>
      #include <linux/capability.h>
      
      /*
       * Definitions from the kernel header files. These are going to be removed
       * when the /usr/include files have these defined.
       */
      #define PR_CAP_AMBIENT 47
      #define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_IS_SET 1
      #define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_RAISE 2
      #define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_LOWER 3
      #define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_CLEAR_ALL 4
      
      static void set_ambient_cap(int cap)
      {
      	int rc;
      
      	capng_get_caps_process();
      	rc = capng_update(CAPNG_ADD, CAPNG_INHERITABLE, cap);
      	if (rc) {
      		printf("Cannot add inheritable cap\n");
      		exit(2);
      	}
      	capng_apply(CAPNG_SELECT_CAPS);
      
      	/* Note the two 0s at the end. Kernel checks for these */
      	if (prctl(PR_CAP_AMBIENT, PR_CAP_AMBIENT_RAISE, cap, 0, 0)) {
      		perror("Cannot set cap");
      		exit(1);
      	}
      }
      
      int main(int argc, char **argv)
      {
      	int rc;
      
      	set_ambient_cap(CAP_NET_RAW);
      	set_ambient_cap(CAP_NET_ADMIN);
      	set_ambient_cap(CAP_SYS_NICE);
      
      	printf("Ambient_test forking shell\n");
      	if (execv(argv[1], argv + 1))
      		perror("Cannot exec");
      
      	return 0;
      }
      
      Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> # Original author
      Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
      Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Cc: Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
      Cc: Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>
      Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      58319057
  15. 17 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  16. 26 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 24 9月, 2013 3 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Define a __key_get() wrapper to use rather than atomic_inc() · ccc3e6d9
      David Howells 提交于
      Define a __key_get() wrapper to use rather than atomic_inc() on the key usage
      count as this makes it easier to hook in refcount error debugging.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      ccc3e6d9
    • D
      KEYS: Introduce a search context structure · 4bdf0bc3
      David Howells 提交于
      Search functions pass around a bunch of arguments, each of which gets copied
      with each call.  Introduce a search context structure to hold these.
      
      Whilst we're at it, create a search flag that indicates whether the search
      should be directly to the description or whether it should iterate through all
      keys looking for a non-description match.
      
      This will be useful when keyrings use a generic data struct with generic
      routines to manage their content as the search terms can just be passed
      through to the iterator callback function.
      
      Also, for future use, the data to be supplied to the match function is
      separated from the description pointer in the search context.  This makes it
      clear which is being supplied.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      4bdf0bc3
    • D
      KEYS: Skip key state checks when checking for possession · 61ea0c0b
      David Howells 提交于
      Skip key state checks (invalidation, revocation and expiration) when checking
      for possession.  Without this, keys that have been marked invalid, revoked
      keys and expired keys are not given a possession attribute - which means the
      possessor is not granted any possession permits and cannot do anything with
      them unless they also have one a user, group or other permit.
      
      This causes failures in the keyutils test suite's revocation and expiration
      tests now that commit 96b5c8fe reduced the
      initial permissions granted to a key.
      
      The failures are due to accesses to revoked and expired keys being given
      EACCES instead of EKEYREVOKED or EKEYEXPIRED.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      61ea0c0b
  18. 12 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      keys: fix race with concurrent install_user_keyrings() · 0da9dfdd
      David Howells 提交于
      This fixes CVE-2013-1792.
      
      There is a race in install_user_keyrings() that can cause a NULL pointer
      dereference when called concurrently for the same user if the uid and
      uid-session keyrings are not yet created.  It might be possible for an
      unprivileged user to trigger this by calling keyctl() from userspace in
      parallel immediately after logging in.
      
      Assume that we have two threads both executing lookup_user_key(), both
      looking for KEY_SPEC_USER_SESSION_KEYRING.
      
      	THREAD A			THREAD B
      	===============================	===============================
      					==>call install_user_keyrings();
      	if (!cred->user->session_keyring)
      	==>call install_user_keyrings()
      					...
      					user->uid_keyring = uid_keyring;
      	if (user->uid_keyring)
      		return 0;
      	<==
      	key = cred->user->session_keyring [== NULL]
      					user->session_keyring = session_keyring;
      	atomic_inc(&key->usage); [oops]
      
      At the point thread A dereferences cred->user->session_keyring, thread B
      hasn't updated user->session_keyring yet, but thread A assumes it is
      populated because install_user_keyrings() returned ok.
      
      The race window is really small but can be exploited if, for example,
      thread B is interrupted or preempted after initializing uid_keyring, but
      before doing setting session_keyring.
      
      This couldn't be reproduced on a stock kernel.  However, after placing
      systemtap probe on 'user->session_keyring = session_keyring;' that
      introduced some delay, the kernel could be crashed reliably.
      
      Fix this by checking both pointers before deciding whether to return.
      Alternatively, the test could be done away with entirely as it is checked
      inside the mutex - but since the mutex is global, that may not be the best
      way.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Reported-by: NMateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      0da9dfdd
  19. 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      userns: Stop oopsing in key_change_session_keyring · ba0e3427
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> writes:
      > Just hit this on Linus' current tree.
      >
      > [   89.621770] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000c8
      > [   89.623111] IP: [<ffffffff810784b0>] commit_creds+0x250/0x2f0
      > [   89.624062] PGD 122bfd067 PUD 122bfe067 PMD 0
      > [   89.624901] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      > [   89.625678] Modules linked in: caif_socket caif netrom bridge hidp 8021q garp stp mrp rose llc2 af_rxrpc phonet af_key binfmt_misc bnep l2tp_ppp can_bcm l2tp_core pppoe pppox can_raw scsi_transport_iscsi ppp_generic slhc nfnetlink can ipt_ULOG ax25 decnet irda nfc rds x25 crc_ccitt appletalk atm ipx p8023 psnap p8022 llc lockd sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_conntrack nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables btusb bluetooth snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_pcm vhost_net snd_page_alloc snd_timer tun macvtap usb_debug snd rfkill microcode macvlan edac_core pcspkr serio_raw kvm_amd soundcore kvm r8169 mii
      > [   89.637846] CPU 2
      > [   89.638175] Pid: 782, comm: trinity-main Not tainted 3.8.0+ #63 Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78GM-S2H/GA-MA78GM-S2H
      > [   89.639850] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810784b0>]  [<ffffffff810784b0>] commit_creds+0x250/0x2f0
      > [   89.641161] RSP: 0018:ffff880115657eb8  EFLAGS: 00010207
      > [   89.641984] RAX: 00000000000003e8 RBX: ffff88012688b000 RCX: 0000000000000000
      > [   89.643069] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c32960 RDI: ffff880105839600
      > [   89.644167] RBP: ffff880115657ed8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
      > [   89.645254] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: ffff880105839600
      > [   89.646340] R13: ffff88011beea490 R14: ffff88011beea490 R15: 0000000000000000
      > [   89.647431] FS:  00007f3ac063b740(0000) GS:ffff88012b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      > [   89.648660] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
      > [   89.649548] CR2: 00000000000000c8 CR3: 0000000122bfc000 CR4: 00000000000007e0
      > [   89.650635] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      > [   89.651723] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      > [   89.652812] Process trinity-main (pid: 782, threadinfo ffff880115656000, task ffff88011beea490)
      > [   89.654128] Stack:
      > [   89.654433]  0000000000000000 ffff8801058396a0 ffff880105839600 ffff88011beeaa78
      > [   89.655769]  ffff880115657ef8 ffffffff812c7d9b ffffffff82079be0 0000000000000000
      > [   89.657073]  ffff880115657f28 ffffffff8106c665 0000000000000002 ffff880115657f58
      > [   89.658399] Call Trace:
      > [   89.658822]  [<ffffffff812c7d9b>] key_change_session_keyring+0xfb/0x140
      > [   89.659845]  [<ffffffff8106c665>] task_work_run+0xa5/0xd0
      > [   89.660698]  [<ffffffff81002911>] do_notify_resume+0x71/0xb0
      > [   89.661581]  [<ffffffff816c9a4a>] int_signal+0x12/0x17
      > [   89.662385] Code: 24 90 00 00 00 48 8b b3 90 00 00 00 49 8b 4c 24 40 48 39 f2 75 08 e9 83 00 00 00 48 89 ca 48 81 fa 60 29 c3 81 0f 84 41 fe ff ff <48> 8b 8a c8 00 00 00 48 39 ce 75 e4 3b 82 d0 00 00 00 0f 84 4b
      > [   89.667778] RIP  [<ffffffff810784b0>] commit_creds+0x250/0x2f0
      > [   89.668733]  RSP <ffff880115657eb8>
      > [   89.669301] CR2: 00000000000000c8
      >
      > My fastest trinity induced oops yet!
      >
      >
      > Appears to be..
      >
      >                 if ((set_ns == subset_ns->parent)  &&
      >      850:       48 8b 8a c8 00 00 00    mov    0xc8(%rdx),%rcx
      >
      > from the inlined cred_cap_issubset
      
      By historical accident we have been reading trying to set new->user_ns
      from new->user_ns.  Which is totally silly as new->user_ns is NULL (as
      is every other field in new except session_keyring at that point).
      
      The intent is clearly to copy all of the fields from old to new so copy
      old->user_ns into  into new->user_ns.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ba0e3427
  20. 21 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Revert one application of "Fix unreachable code" patch · fe9453a1
      David Howells 提交于
      A patch to fix some unreachable code in search_my_process_keyrings() got
      applied twice by two different routes upstream as commits e67eab39
      and b010520a (both "fix unreachable code").
      
      Unfortunately, the second application removed something it shouldn't
      have and this wasn't detected by GIT.  This is due to the patch not
      having sufficient lines of context to distinguish the two places of
      application.
      
      The effect of this is relatively minor: inside the kernel, the keyring
      search routines may search multiple keyrings and then prioritise the
      errors if no keys or negative keys are found in any of them.  With the
      extra deletion, the presence of a negative key in the thread keyring
      (causing ENOKEY) is incorrectly overridden by an error searching the
      process keyring.
      
      So revert the second application of the patch.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fe9453a1
  21. 21 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  22. 26 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 03 10月, 2012 2 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Reduce initial permissions on keys · 96b5c8fe
      David Howells 提交于
      Reduce the initial permissions on new keys to grant the possessor everything,
      view permission only to the user (so the keys can be seen in /proc/keys) and
      nothing else.
      
      This gives the creator a chance to adjust the permissions mask before other
      processes can access the new key or create a link to it.
      
      To aid with this, keyring_alloc() now takes a permission argument rather than
      setting the permissions itself.
      
      The following permissions are now set:
      
       (1) The user and user-session keyrings grant the user that owns them full
           permissions and grant a possessor everything bar SETATTR.
      
       (2) The process and thread keyrings grant the possessor full permissions but
           only grant the user VIEW.  This permits the user to see them in
           /proc/keys, but not to do anything with them.
      
       (3) Anonymous session keyrings grant the possessor full permissions, but only
           grant the user VIEW and READ.  This means that the user can see them in
           /proc/keys and can list them, but nothing else.  Possibly READ shouldn't
           be provided either.
      
       (4) Named session keyrings grant everything an anonymous session keyring does,
           plus they grant the user LINK permission.  The whole point of named
           session keyrings is that others can also subscribe to them.  Possibly this
           should be a separate permission to LINK.
      
       (5) The temporary session keyring created by call_sbin_request_key() gets the
           same permissions as an anonymous session keyring.
      
       (6) Keys created by add_key() get VIEW, SEARCH, LINK and SETATTR for the
           possessor, plus READ and/or WRITE if the key type supports them.  The used
           only gets VIEW now.
      
       (7) Keys created by request_key() now get the same as those created by
           add_key().
      Reported-by: NLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
      Reported-by: NStef Walter <stefw@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      96b5c8fe
    • D
      KEYS: Make the session and process keyrings per-thread · 3a50597d
      David Howells 提交于
      Make the session keyring per-thread rather than per-process, but still
      inherited from the parent thread to solve a problem with PAM and gdm.
      
      The problem is that join_session_keyring() will reject attempts to change the
      session keyring of a multithreaded program but gdm is now multithreaded before
      it gets to the point of starting PAM and running pam_keyinit to create the
      session keyring.  See:
      
      	https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49211
      
      The reason that join_session_keyring() will only change the session keyring
      under a single-threaded environment is that it's hard to alter the other
      thread's credentials to effect the change in a multi-threaded program.  The
      problems are such as:
      
       (1) How to prevent two threads both running join_session_keyring() from
           racing.
      
       (2) Another thread's credentials may not be modified directly by this process.
      
       (3) The number of threads is uncertain whilst we're not holding the
           appropriate spinlock, making preallocation slightly tricky.
      
       (4) We could use TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME and key_replace_session_keyring() to get
           another thread to replace its keyring, but that means preallocating for
           each thread.
      
      A reasonable way around this is to make the session keyring per-thread rather
      than per-process and just document that if you want a common session keyring,
      you must get it before you spawn any threads - which is the current situation
      anyway.
      
      Whilst we're at it, we can the process keyring behave in the same way.  This
      means we can clean up some of the ickyness in the creds code.
      
      Basically, after this patch, the session, process and thread keyrings are about
      inheritance rules only and not about sharing changes of keyring.
      Reported-by: NMantas M. <grawity@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NRay Strode <rstrode@redhat.com>
      3a50597d
  24. 28 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 14 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      userns: Convert security/keys to the new userns infrastructure · 9a56c2db
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      - Replace key_user ->user_ns equality checks with kuid_has_mapping checks.
      - Use from_kuid to generate key descriptions
      - Use kuid_t and kgid_t and the associated helpers instead of uid_t and gid_t
      - Avoid potential problems with file descriptor passing by displaying
        keys in the user namespace of the opener of key status proc files.
      
      Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: keyrings@linux-nfs.org
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      9a56c2db
  26. 23 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  27. 24 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • O
      keys: change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add() · 413cd3d9
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      Change keyctl_session_to_parent() to use task_work_add() and move
      key_replace_session_keyring() logic into task_work->func().
      
      Note that we do task_work_cancel() before task_work_add() to ensure that
      only one work can be pending at any time.  This is important, we must not
      allow user-space to abuse the parent's ->task_works list.
      
      The callback, replace_session_keyring(), checks PF_EXITING.  I guess this
      is not really needed but looks better.
      
      As a side effect, this fixes the (unlikely) race.  The callers of
      key_replace_session_keyring() and keyctl_session_to_parent() lack the
      necessary barriers, the parent can miss the request.
      
      Now we can remove task_struct->replacement_session_keyring and related
      code.
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
      Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
      Cc: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
      Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      413cd3d9
  28. 11 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Do LRU discard in full keyrings · 31d5a79d
      David Howells 提交于
      Do an LRU discard in keyrings that are full rather than returning ENFILE.  To
      perform this, a time_t is added to the key struct and updated by the creation
      of a link to a key and by a key being found as the result of a search.  At the
      completion of a successful search, the keyrings in the path between the root of
      the search and the first found link to it also have their last-used times
      updated.
      
      Note that discarding a link to a key from a keyring does not necessarily
      destroy the key as there may be references held by other places.
      
      An alternate discard method that might suffice is to perform FIFO discard from
      the keyring, using the spare 2-byte hole in the keylist header as the index of
      the next link to be discarded.
      
      This is useful when using a keyring as a cache for DNS results or foreign
      filesystem IDs.
      
      
      This can be tested by the following.  As root do:
      
      	echo 1000 >/proc/sys/kernel/keys/root_maxkeys
      
      	kr=`keyctl newring foo @s`
      	for ((i=0; i<2000; i++)); do keyctl add user a$i a $kr; done
      
      Without this patch ENFILE should be reported when the keyring fills up.  With
      this patch, the keyring discards keys in an LRU fashion.  Note that the stored
      LRU time has a granularity of 1s.
      
      After doing this, /proc/key-users can be observed and should show that most of
      the 2000 keys have been discarded:
      
      	[root@andromeda ~]# cat /proc/key-users
      	    0:   517 516/516 513/1000 5249/20000
      
      The "513/1000" here is the number of quota-accounted keys present for this user
      out of the maximum permitted.
      
      In /proc/keys, the keyring shows the number of keys it has and the number of
      slots it has allocated:
      
      	[root@andromeda ~]# grep foo /proc/keys
      	200c64c4 I--Q--     1 perm 3b3f0000     0     0 keyring   foo: 509/509
      
      The maximum is (PAGE_SIZE - header) / key pointer size.  That's typically 509
      on a 64-bit system and 1020 on a 32-bit system.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      31d5a79d
  29. 08 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  30. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 23 8月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: keyctl_get_keyring_ID() should create a session keyring if create flag set · 3ecf1b4f
      David Howells 提交于
      The keyctl call:
      
      	keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 1)
      
      should create a session keyring if the process doesn't have one of its own
      because the create flag argument is set - rather than subscribing to and
      returning the user-session keyring as:
      
      	keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 0)
      
      will do.
      
      This can be tested by commenting out pam_keyinit in the /etc/pam.d files and
      running the following program a couple of times in a row:
      
      	#include <stdio.h>
      	#include <stdlib.h>
      	#include <keyutils.h>
      	int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      	{
      		key_serial_t uk, usk, sk, nsk;
      		uk  = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING, 0);
      		usk = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_USER_SESSION_KEYRING, 0);
      		sk  = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 0);
      		nsk = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 1);
      		printf("keys: %08x %08x %08x %08x\n", uk, usk, sk, nsk);
      		return 0;
      	}
      
      Without this patch, I see:
      
      	keys: 3975ddc7 119c0c66 119c0c66 119c0c66
      	keys: 3975ddc7 119c0c66 119c0c66 119c0c66
      
      With this patch, I see:
      
      	keys: 2cb4997b 34112878 34112878 17db2ce3
      	keys: 2cb4997b 34112878 34112878 39f3c73e
      
      As can be seen, the session keyring starts off the same as the user-session
      keyring each time, but with the patch a new session keyring is created when
      the create flag is set.
      Reported-by: NGreg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NGreg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      3ecf1b4f
    • D
      KEYS: If install_session_keyring() is given a keyring, it should install it · 99599537
      David Howells 提交于
      If install_session_keyring() is given a keyring, it should install it rather
      than just creating a new one anyway.  This was accidentally broken in:
      
      	commit d84f4f99
      	Author: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      	Date:   Fri Nov 14 10:39:23 2008 +1100
      	Subject: CRED: Inaugurate COW credentials
      
      The impact of that commit is that pam_keyinit no longer works correctly if
      'force' isn't specified against a login process. This is because:
      
      	keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 0)
      
      now always creates a new session keyring and thus the check whether the session
      keyring and the user-session keyring are the same is always false.  This leads
      pam_keyinit to conclude that a session keyring is installed and it shouldn't be
      revoked by pam_keyinit here if 'revoke' is specified.
      
      Any system that specifies 'force' against pam_keyinit in the PAM configuration
      files for login methods (login, ssh, su -l, kdm, etc.) is not affected since
      that bypasses the broken check and forces the creation of a new session keyring
      anyway (for which the revoke flag is not cleared) - and any subsequent call to
      pam_keyinit really does have a session keyring already installed, and so the
      check works correctly there.
      
      Reverting to the previous behaviour will cause the kernel to subscribe the
      process to the user-session keyring as its session keyring if it doesn't have a
      session keyring of its own.  pam_keyinit will detect this and install a new
      session keyring anyway (and won't clear the revert flag).
      
      This can be tested by commenting out pam_keyinit in the /etc/pam.d files and
      running the following program a couple of times in a row:
      
      	#include <stdio.h>
      	#include <stdlib.h>
      	#include <keyutils.h>
      	int main(int argc, char *argv[])
      	{
      		key_serial_t uk, usk, sk;
      		uk = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_USER_KEYRING, 0);
      		usk = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_USER_SESSION_KEYRING, 0);
      		sk = keyctl_get_keyring_ID(KEY_SPEC_SESSION_KEYRING, 0);
      		printf("keys: %08x %08x %08x\n", uk, usk, sk);
      		return 0;
      	}
      
      Without the patch, I see:
      
      	keys: 3884e281 24c4dfcf 22825f8e
      	keys: 3884e281 24c4dfcf 068772be
      
      With the patch, I see:
      
      	keys: 26be9c83 0e755ce0 0e755ce0
      	keys: 26be9c83 0e755ce0 0e755ce0
      
      As can be seen, with the patch, the session keyring is the same as the
      user-session keyring each time; without the patch a new session keyring is
      generated each time.
      Reported-by: NGreg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Tested-by: NGreg Wettstein <greg@enjellic.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      99599537
  32. 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 17 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • D
      KEYS: Improve /proc/keys · 78b7280c
      David Howells 提交于
      Improve /proc/keys by:
      
       (1) Don't attempt to summarise the payload of a negated key.  It won't have
           one.  To this end, a helper function - key_is_instantiated() has been
           added that allows the caller to find out whether the key is positively
           instantiated (as opposed to being uninstantiated or negatively
           instantiated).
      
       (2) Do show keys that are negative, expired or revoked rather than hiding
           them.  This requires an override flag (no_state_check) to be passed to
           search_my_process_keyrings() and keyring_search_aux() to suppress this
           check.
      
           Without this, keys that are possessed by the caller, but only grant
           permissions to the caller if possessed are skipped as the possession check
           fails.
      
           Keys that are visible due to user, group or other checks are visible with
           or without this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      78b7280c