- 24 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Elfring 提交于
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Link: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LCJ16-Refactor_Strings-WSang_0.pdfSigned-off-by: NMarkus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
When the inline threshold size is set to large values (say, 32KB) any NFSv4.1 CB request from the server gets a reply with status NFS4ERR_RESOURCE. Looks like there are some upper layer assumptions about the maximum size of a reply (for example, in process_op). Cap the size of the NFSv4 client's reply resources at a page. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 10 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
An RPC Call message that is sent inline but that has a data payload (ie, one or more items in rq_snd_buf's page list) must be "pulled up:" - call_allocate has to reserve enough RPC Call buffer space to accommodate the data payload - call_transmit has to memcopy the rq_snd_buf's page list and tail into its head iovec before it is sent As the inline threshold is increased beyond its current 1KB default, however, this means data payloads of more than a few KB are copied by the host CPU. For example, if the inline threshold is increased just to 4KB, then NFS WRITE requests up to 4KB would involve a memcpy of the NFS WRITE's payload data into the RPC Call buffer. This is an undesirable amount of participation by the host CPU. The inline threshold may be much larger than 4KB in the future, after negotiation with a peer server. Instead of copying the components of rq_snd_buf into its head iovec, construct a gather list of these components, and send them all in place. The same approach is already used in the Linux server's RPC-over-RDMA reply path. This mechanism also eliminates the need for rpcrdma_tail_pullup, which is used to manage the XDR pad and trailing inline content when a Read list is present. This requires that the pages in rq_snd_buf's page list be DMA-mapped during marshaling, and unmapped when a data-bearing RPC is completed. This is slightly less efficient for very small I/O payloads, but significantly more efficient as data payload size and inline threshold increase past a kilobyte. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Most of the fields in each send_wr do not vary. There is no need to initialize them before each ib_post_send(). This removes a large-ish data structure from the stack. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. Since commit fc664485 ("xprtrdma: Split the completion queue"), rpcrdma_ep_post_recv() no longer uses the "ep" argument. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently, each regbuf is allocated and DMA mapped at the same time. This is done during transport creation. When a device driver is unloaded, every DMA-mapped buffer in use by a transport has to be unmapped, and then remapped to the new device if the driver is loaded again. Remapping will have to be done _after_ the connect worker has set up the new device. But there's an ordering problem: call_allocate, which invokes xprt_rdma_allocate which calls rpcrdma_alloc_regbuf to allocate Send buffers, happens _before_ the connect worker can run to set up the new device. Instead, at transport creation, allocate each buffer, but leave it unmapped. Once the RPC carries these buffers into ->send_request, by which time a transport connection should have been established, check to see that the RPC's buffers have been DMA mapped. If not, map them there. When device driver unplug support is added, it will simply unmap all the transport's regbufs, but it doesn't have to deallocate the underlying memory. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt. Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as soon as it allocates each regbuf. The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double- mapping. Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct rpcrdma_req it goes with. This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA was introduced. I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be considered a clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: there is some XDR initialization logic that is common to the forward channel and backchannel. Move it to an XDR header so it can be shared. rpc_rqst::rq_buffer points to a buffer containing big-endian data. Update its annotation as part of the clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are invoked, so just dereference that directly. RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be removed. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC-over-RDMA transports have a limit on how large a backward direction (backchannel) RPC message can be. Ensure that the NFSv4.x CREATE_SESSION operation advertises this limit to servers. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NSteve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Some NFSv4.1 OPEN requests were hanging waiting for the NFS server to finish recalling delegations. Turns out that each NFSv4.1 CB request on RDMA gets a GARBAGE_ARGS reply from the Linux client. Commit 756b9b37 added a line in bc_svc_process that overwrites the incoming rq_rcv_buf's length with the value in rq_private_buf.len. But rpcrdma_bc_receive_call() does not invoke xprt_complete_bc_request(), thus rq_private_buf.len is not initialized. svc_process_common() is invoked with a zero-length RPC message, and fails. Fixes: 756b9b37 ('SUNRPC: Fix callback channel') Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. Fixes: 63cae470 ('xprtrdma: Handle incoming backward direction') Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. rb_lock critical sections added in rpcrdma_ep_post_extra_recv() should have first been converted to use normal spin_lock now that the reply handler is a work queue. The backchannel set up code should use the appropriate helper instead of open-coding a rb_recv_bufs list add. Problem introduced by glib patch re-ordering on my part. Fixes: f531a5db ('xprtrdma: Pre-allocate backward rpc_rqst') Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
The rpcrdma_create_req() function returns error pointers or success. It never returns NULL. Fixes: f531a5db ('xprtrdma: Pre-allocate backward rpc_rqst and send/receive buffers') Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 03 11月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Forechannel transports get their own "bc_up" method to create an endpoint for the backchannel service. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> [Anna Schumaker: Add forward declaration of struct net to xprt.h] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Introduce a code path in the rpcrdma_reply_handler() to catch incoming backward direction RPC calls and route them to the ULP's backchannel server. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Backward direction RPC replies are sent via the client transport's send_request method, the same way forward direction RPC calls are sent. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Pre-allocate extra send and receive Work Requests needed to handle backchannel receives and sends. The transport doesn't know how many extra WRs to pre-allocate until the xprt_setup_backchannel() call, but that's long after the WRs are allocated during forechannel setup. So, use a fixed value for now. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma's backward direction send and receive buffers are the same size as the forechannel's inline threshold, and must be pre- registered. The consumer has no control over which receive buffer the adapter chooses to catch an incoming backwards-direction call. Any receive buffer can be used for either a forward reply or a backward call. Thus both types of RPC message must all be the same size. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> Tested-By: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-