1. 11 7月, 2007 36 次提交
  2. 10 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 09 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 08 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 06 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • J
      [NETPOLL]: Fixups for 'fix soft lockup when removing module' · 25442caf
      Jarek Poplawski 提交于
      >From my recent patch:
      
      > >    #1
      > >    Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
      > >    required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
      > >    delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
      > >    this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
      > >    require this, so here it's only for uniformity.
      
      But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> found:
      
      > But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
      > 
      > In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
      ...
      
      His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1.
      Signed-off-by: NJarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      25442caf