Switch from old ref_node based qgroup to extent based qgroup mechanism
for normal operations.

The new mechanism should hugely reduce the overhead of btrfs quota
system, and further more, the codes and logic should be more clean and
easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Switch rescan to use the new new extent oriented mechanism.

As rescan is also based on extent, new mechanism is just a perfect match
for rescan.

With re-designed internal functions, rescan is quite easy, just call
btrfs_find_all_roots() and then btrfs_qgroup_account_one_extent().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_qgroup_account_extents().

The new btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() function should be called in
btrfs_commit_transaction() and it will update all the qgroup according
to delayed_ref_root->dirty_extent_root.

The new function can handle both normal operation during
commit_transaction() or in rescan in a unified method with clearer
logic.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs_find_all_roots().

Allow btrfs_find_all_roots() to skip all delayed_ref_head lock and tree
lock to do tree search.

This is important for later qgroup implement which will call
find_all_roots() after fs trees are committed.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Add function btrfs_qgroup_prepare_account_extents() to get old_roots
which are needed for qgroup.

We do it in commit_transaction() and before switch_roots(), and only
search commit_root, so it gives a quite accurate view for previous
transaction.

With old_roots from previous transaction, we can use it to do accurate
account with current transaction.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Add hook in add_delayed_ref_head() to record quota-related extent record
into delayed_ref_root->dirty_extent_record rb-tree for later qgroup
accounting.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Add function qgroup_update_counters(), which will update related
qgroups' rfer/excl according to old/new_roots.

This is one of the two core functions for the new qgroup implement.

This is based on btrfs_adjust_coutners() but with clearer logic and
comment.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This function is used to update refcnt for qgroups.
And is one of the two core functions used in the new qgroup implement.

This is based on the old update_old/new_refcnt, but provides a unified
logic and behavior.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs: extent-tree: Use ref_node to replace unneeded parameters in __inc_extent_ref() and __free_extent()

__btrfs_inc_extent_ref() and __btrfs_free_extent() have already had too
many parameters, but three of them can be extracted from
btrfs_delayed_ref_node struct.

So use btrfs_delayed_ref_node struct as a single parameter to replace
the bytenr/num_byte/no_quota parameters.

The real objective of this patch is to allow btrfs_qgroup_record_ref()
get the delayed_ref_node in incoming qgroup patches.

Other functions calling btrfs_qgroup_record_ref() are not affected since
the rest will only add/sub exclusive extents, where node is not used.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Use inline functions to do such things, to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Cleanup the rb_tree merge/insert/update functions, since now we use list
instead of rb_tree now.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This patch replace the rbtree used in ref_head to list.
This has the following advantage:
1) Easier merge logic.
With the new list implement, we only need to care merging the tail
ref_node with the new ref_node.
And this can be done quite easy at insert time, no need to do a
indicated merge at run_delayed_refs().
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old __merge_refs() in backref.c will even merge refs whose root_id are
different, which makes qgroup gives wrong result.

Fix it by checking ref_for_same_block() before any mode specific works.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

lockdep report following warning in test:
 [25176.843958] =================================
 [25176.844519] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 [25176.845047] 4.1.0-rc3 #22 Tainted: G        W
 [25176.845591] ---------------------------------
 [25176.846153] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
 [25176.846713] fsstress/26661 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 [25176.847246]  (&wr_ctx->wr_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa04cdc6d>] scrub_free_ctx+0x2d/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [25176.847838] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
 [25176.848396]   [<ffffffff810bf460>] __lock_acquire+0x6a0/0xe10
 [25176.848955]   [<ffffffff810bfd1e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
 [25176.849491]   [<ffffffff816489af>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x410
 [25176.850029]   [<ffffffffa04d04ff>] scrub_stripe+0x4df/0x1080 [btrfs]
 [25176.850575]   [<ffffffffa04d11b1>] scrub_chunk.isra.19+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
 [25176.851110]   [<ffffffffa04d144c>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x27c/0x510 [btrfs]
 [25176.851660]   [<ffffffffa04d3b87>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1c7/0x6c0 [btrfs]
 [25176.852189]   [<ffffffffa04e918e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x36e/0x450 [btrfs]
 [25176.852771]   [<ffffffffa04a98e0>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1e10/0x2d20 [btrfs]
 [25176.853315]   [<ffffffff8121c5b8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
 [25176.853868]   [<ffffffff8121c851>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
 [25176.854406]   [<ffffffff8164da17>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
 [25176.854935] irq event stamp: 51506
 [25176.855511] hardirqs last  enabled at (51506): [<ffffffff810d4ce5>] vprintk_emit+0x225/0x5e0
 [25176.856059] hardirqs last disabled at (51505): [<ffffffff810d4b77>] vprintk_emit+0xb7/0x5e0
 [25176.856642] softirqs last  enabled at (50886): [<ffffffff81067a23>] __do_softirq+0x363/0x640
 [25176.857184] softirqs last disabled at (50949): [<ffffffff8106804d>] irq_exit+0x10d/0x120
 [25176.857746]
 other info that might help us debug this:
 [25176.858845]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
 [25176.859981]        CPU0
 [25176.860537]        ----
 [25176.861059]   lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.861705]   <Interrupt>
 [25176.862272]     lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.862881]
  *** DEADLOCK ***

Reason:
 Above warning is caused by:
 Interrupt
 -> bio_endio()
 -> ...
 -> scrub_put_ctx()
 -> scrub_free_ctx() *1
 -> ...
 -> mutex_lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);

 scrub_put_ctx() is allowed to be called in end_bio interrupt, but
 in code design, it will never call scrub_free_ctx(sctx) in interrupe
 context(above *1), because btrfs_scrub_dev() get one additional
 reference of sctx->refs, which makes scrub_free_ctx() only called
 withine btrfs_scrub_dev().

 Now the code runs out of our wish, because free sequence in
 scrub_pending_bio_dec() have a gap.

 Current code:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
 -> scrub_free_ctx()                |
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

 We expected:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
                                    | -> scrub_free_ctx()
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

Fix:
 Move scrub_pending_bio_dec() to a workqueue, to avoid this function run
 in interrupt context.
 Tested by check tracelog in debug.

Changelog v1->v2:
 Use workqueue instead of adjust function call sequence in v1,
 because v1 will introduce a bug pointed out by:
 Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The extent-same code rejects requests with an unaligned length. This
poses a problem when we want to dedupe the tail extent of files as we
skip cloning the portion between i_size and the extent boundary.

If we don't clone the entire extent, it won't be deleted. So the
combination of these behaviors winds up giving us worst-case dedupe on
many files.

We can fix this by allowing a length that extents to i_size and
internally aligining those to the end of the block. This is what
btrfs_ioctl_clone() so we can just copy that check over.
Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

max_to_defrag represents the number of pages to defrag rather than the last
page of the file range to be defragged.

Consider a file having 10 4k blocks (i.e. blocks in the range [0 - 9]). If the
defrag ioctl was invoked for the block range [3 - 6], then max_to_defrag
should actually have the value 4. Instead in the current code we end up
setting it to 6.

Now, this does not (yet) cause an issue since the first part of the while loop
condition in btrfs_defrag_file() (i.e. "i <= last_index") causes the control
to flow out of the while loop before any buggy behavior is actually caused. So
the patch just makes sure that max_to_defrag ends up having the right value
rather than fixing a bug. I did run the xfstests suite to make sure that the
code does not regress.

Changelog: v1->v2:
Provide a much descriptive commit message.
Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Read-ahead is done for the pages in the range [ra_index, ra_index + cluster -
1]. So the next read-ahead should be starting from the page at index 'ra_index
+ cluster' (unless we deemed that the extent at 'ra_index + cluster' as
non-defraggable) rather than from the page at index 'ra_index +
max_cluster'. This patch fixes this. I did run the xfstests suite to make sure
that the code does not regress.
Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When allocating a new chunk or removing one we need to update num_devs
device items and insert or remove a chunk item in the chunk tree, so
in the worst case the space needed in the chunk space_info is:

  btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(chunk_root, num_devs) +
     btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(chunk_root, 1)

That is, in the worst case we need to cow num_devs paths and cow 1 other
path that can result in splitting every node and leaf, and each path
consisting of BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 nodes and 1 leaf. We were requiring
some additional chunk_root->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_devs bytes,
which were unnecessary since updating the existing device items does
not result in splitting the nodes and leaf since after updating them
they remain with the same size.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We don't need to attach ordered extents that have completed to the current
transaction. Doing so only makes us hold memory for longer than necessary
and delaying the iput of the inode until the transaction is committed (for
each created ordered extent we do an igrab and then schedule an asynchronous
iput when the ordered extent's reference count drops to 0), preventing the
inode from being evictable until the transaction commits.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Commit 3a8b36f3 ("Btrfs: fix data loss in the fast fsync path") added
a performance regression for that causes an unnecessary sync of the log
trees (fs/subvol and root log trees) when 2 consecutive fsyncs are done
against a file, without no writes or any metadata updates to the inode in
between them and if a transaction is committed before the second fsync is
called.

Huang Ying reported this to lkml (https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/99)
after a test sysbench test that measured a -62% decrease of file io
requests per second for that tests' workload.

The test is:

  echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
  echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
  echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
  echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
  mkfs -t btrfs /dev/sda2
  mount -t btrfs /dev/sda2 /fs/sda2
  cd /fs/sda2
  for ((i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do fallocate -l 67108864 testfile.$i; done
  sysbench --test=fileio --max-requests=0 --num-threads=4 --max-time=600 \
    --file-test-mode=rndwr --file-total-size=68719476736 --file-io-mode=sync \
    --file-num=1024 run

A test on kvm guest, running a debug kernel gave me the following results:

Without 3a8b36f3:             16.01 reqs/sec
With 3a8b36f3:                 3.39 reqs/sec
With 3a8b36f3 and this patch: 16.04 reqs/sec
Reported-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: NHuang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Merge branch 'send_fixes_4.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fdmanana/linux into for-linus-4.2

Zygo Blaxell and other users have reported occasional hangs while an
inode is being evicted, leading to traces like the following:

[ 5281.972322] INFO: task rm:20488 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 5281.973836]       Not tainted 4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[ 5281.974818] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 5281.976364] rm              D ffff8800724cfc38     0 20488   7747 0x00000000
[ 5281.977506]  ffff8800724cfc38 ffff8800724cfc38 ffff880065da5c50 0000000000000001
[ 5281.978461]  ffff8800724cffd8 ffff8801540a5f50 0000000000000008 ffff8801540a5f78
[ 5281.979541]  ffff8801540a5f50 ffff8800724cfc58 ffffffff8143107e 0000000000000123
[ 5281.981396] Call Trace:
[ 5281.982066]  [<ffffffff8143107e>] schedule+0x74/0x83
[ 5281.983341]  [<ffffffffa03b33cf>] wait_on_state+0xac/0xcd [btrfs]
[ 5281.985127]  [<ffffffff81075cd6>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[ 5281.986715]  [<ffffffffa03b4b71>] wait_extent_bit.constprop.32+0x7c/0xde [btrfs]
[ 5281.988680]  [<ffffffffa03b540b>] lock_extent_bits+0x5d/0x88 [btrfs]
[ 5281.990200]  [<ffffffffa03a621d>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x24e/0x5be [btrfs]
[ 5281.991781]  [<ffffffff8116964d>] evict+0xa0/0x148
[ 5281.992735]  [<ffffffff8116a43d>] iput+0x18f/0x1e5
[ 5281.993796]  [<ffffffff81160d4a>] do_unlinkat+0x15b/0x1fa
[ 5281.994806]  [<ffffffff81435b54>] ? ret_from_sys_call+0x1d/0x58
[ 5281.996120]  [<ffffffff8107d314>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x18f/0x1ab
[ 5281.997562]  [<ffffffff8123960b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 5281.998815]  [<ffffffff81161a16>] SyS_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b
[ 5281.999920]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[ 5282.001299] 1 lock held by rm/20488:
[ 5282.002066]  #0:  (sb_writers#12){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8116dd81>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x4b

This happens when we have readahead, which calls readpages(), happening
right before the inode eviction handler is invoked. So the reason is
essentially:

1) readpages() is called while a reference on the inode is held, so
   eviction can not be triggered before readpages() returns. It also
   locks one or more ranges in the inode's io_tree (which is done at
   extent_io.c:__do_contiguous_readpages());

2) readpages() submits several read bios, all with an end io callback
   that runs extent_io.c:end_bio_extent_readpage() and that is executed
   by other task when a bio finishes, corresponding to a work queue
   (fs_info->end_io_workers) worker kthread. This callback unlocks
   the ranges in the inode's io_tree that were previously locked in
   step 1;

3) readpages() returns, the reference on the inode is dropped;

4) One or more of the read bios previously submitted are still not
   complete (their end io callback was not yet invoked or has not
   yet finished execution);

5) Inode eviction is triggered (through an unlink call for example).
   The inode reference count was not incremented before submitting
   the read bios, therefore this is possible;

6) The eviction handler starts executing and enters the loop that
   iterates over all extent states in the inode's io_tree;

7) The loop picks one extent state record and uses its ->start and
   ->end fields, after releasing the inode's io_tree spinlock, to
   call lock_extent_bits() and clear_extent_bit(). The call to lock
   the range [state->start, state->end] blocks because the whole
   range or a part of it was locked by the previous call to
   readpages() and the corresponding end io callback, which unlocks
   the range was not yet executed;

8) The end io callback for the read bio is executed and unlocks the
   range [state->start, state->end] (or a superset of that range).
   And at clear_extent_bit() the extent_state record state is used
   as a second argument to split_state(), which sets state->start to
   a larger value;

9) The task executing the eviction handler is woken up by the task
   executing the bio's end io callback (through clear_state_bit) and
   the eviction handler locks the range
   [old value for state->start, state->end]. Shortly after, when
   calling clear_extent_bit(), it unlocks the range
   [new value for state->start, state->end], so it ends up unlocking
   only part of the range that it locked, leaving an extent state
   record in the io_tree that represents the unlocked subrange;

10) The eviction handler loop, in its next iteration, gets the
    extent_state record for the subrange that it did not unlock in the
    previous step and then tries to lock it, resulting in an hang.

So fix this by not using the ->start and ->end fields of an existing
extent_state record. This is a simple solution, and an alternative
could be to bump the inode's reference count before submitting each
read bio and having it dropped in the bio's end io callback. But that
would be a more invasive/complex change and would not protect against
other possible places that are not holding a reference on the inode
as well. Something to consider in the future.

Many thanks to Zygo Blaxell for reporting, in the mailing list, the
issue, a set of scripts to trigger it and testing this fix.
Reported-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Tested-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The return value of read_tree_block() can confuse callers as it always
returns NULL for either -ENOMEM or -EIO, so it's likely that callers
parse it to a wrong error, for instance, in btrfs_read_tree_root().

This fixes the above issue.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

read_tree_block may take a reference on the 'eb', a following
free_extent_buffer is necessary.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

After commit 8407f553
("Btrfs: fix data corruption after fast fsync and writeback error"),
during wait_ordered_extents(), we wait for ordered extent setting
BTRFS_ORDERED_IO_DONE or BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR, at which point we've
already got checksum information, so we don't need to check
(csum_bytes_left == 0) in the whole logging path.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Unlike when attempting to allocate a new block group, where we check
that we have enough space in the system space_info to update the device
items and insert a new chunk item in the chunk tree, we were not checking
if the system space_info had enough space for updating the device items
and deleting the chunk item in the chunk tree. This often lead to -ENOSPC
error when attempting to allocate blocks for the chunk tree (during btree
node/leaf COW operations) while updating the device items or deleting the
chunk item, which resulted in the current transaction being aborted and
turning the filesystem into read-only mode.

While running fstests generic/038, which stresses allocation of block
groups and removal of unused block groups, with a large scratch device
(750Gb) this happened often, despite more than enough unallocated space,
and resulted in the following trace:

[68663.586604] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1521 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[68663.600407] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[68663.730829] Call Trace:
[68663.732585]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[68663.734334]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[68663.739980]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[68663.757153]  [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.760925]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[68663.762854]  [<ffffffffa03b159d>] ? btrfs_update_device+0x15a/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.764073]  [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.765130]  [<ffffffffa03b3638>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x597/0x5ee [btrfs]
[68663.765998]  [<ffffffffa0384663>] ? btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x245/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.767068]  [<ffffffffa0384676>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x258/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.768227]  [<ffffffff8143527f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x4c
[68663.769081]  [<ffffffffa038b109>] cleaner_kthread+0x13d/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.799485]  [<ffffffffa038afcc>] ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x28/0x28 [btrfs]
[68663.809208]  [<ffffffff8105f367>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
[68663.828795]  [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[68663.844942]  [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.846486]  [<ffffffff81435a88>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[68663.847760]  [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.849503] ---[ end trace 798477c6d6dbaad6 ]---
[68663.850525] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_remove_chunk:2652: errno=-28 No space left

So fix this by verifying that enough space exists in system space_info,
and reserving the space in the chunk block reserve, before attempting to
delete the block group and allocate a new system chunk if we don't have
enough space to perform the necessary updates and delete in the chunk
tree. Like for the block group creation case, we don't error our if we
fail to allocate a new system chunk, since we might end up not needing
it (no node/leaf splits happen during the COW operations and/or we end
up not needing to COW any btree nodes or leafs because they were already
COWed in the current transaction and their writeback didn't start yet).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:

[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323]  [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862]  [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116]  [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593]  [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960]  [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649]  [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092]  [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218]  [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622]  [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642]  [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692]  [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---

This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.

So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.

Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.

The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We should be doing this, it's weird we hadn't been doing this.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Now that we're guaranteed to have a meaningful root dentry, we can just
export seq_dentry() and use it in btrfs_show_options(). The subvolume ID
is easy to get and can also be useful, so put that in there, too.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, mounting a subvolume with subvolid= takes a different code
path than mounting with subvol=. This isn't really a big deal except for
the fact that mounts done with subvolid= or the default subvolume don't
have a dentry that's connected to the dentry tree like in the subvol=
case. To unify the code paths, when given subvolid= or using the default
subvolume ID, translate it into a subvolume name by walking
ROOT_BACKREFs in the root tree and INODE_REFs in the filesystem trees.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

There's nothing to stop a user from passing both subvol= and subvolid=
to mount, but if they don't refer to the same subvolume, someone is
going to be surprised at some point. Error out on this case, but allow
users to pass in both if they do match (which they could, for example,
get out of /proc/mounts).
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In preparation for new functionality in mount_subvol(), give it
ownership of subvol_name and tidy up the error paths.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently, setup_root_args() substitutes 's/subvol=[^,]*/subvolid=0/'.
But, this means that if the user passes both a subvol and subvolid for
some reason, we won't actually mount the top-level when we recursively
mount. For example, consider:

mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
btrfs subvol create /mnt/subvol1 # subvolid=257
btrfs subvol create /mnt/subvol2 # subvolid=258
umount /mnt
mount -osubvol=/subvol1,subvolid=258 /dev/sdb /mnt

In the final mount, subvol=/subvol1,subvolid=258 becomes
subvolid=0,subvolid=258, and the last option takes precedence, so we
mount subvol2 and try to look up subvol1 inside of it, which fails.

So, instead, do a thorough scan through the argument list and remove any
subvol= and subvolid= options, then append subvolid=0 to the end. This
implicitly makes subvol= take precedence over subvolid=, but we're about
to add a stricter check for that. This also makes setup_root_args() more
generic, which we'll need soon.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Since commit 0723a047 ("btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with
different ro/rw options"), when mounting a subvolume read/write when
another subvolume has previously been mounted read-only, we first do a
remount. However, this should be done with the superblock locked, as per
sync_filesystem():

	/*
	 * We need to be protected against the filesystem going from
	 * r/o to r/w or vice versa.
	 */
	WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));

This WARN_ON can easily be hit with:

mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /mnt
btrfs subvol create /mnt/vol1
btrfs subvol create /mnt/vol2
umount /mnt
mount -oro,subvol=/vol1 /dev/vdb /mnt
mount -orw,subvol=/vol2 /dev/vdb /mnt2

Fixes: 0723a047 ("btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with different ro/rw options")
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we clear an extent state's EXTENT_LOCKED bit with clear_extent_bits()
through free_io_failure(), we weren't waking up any tasks waiting for the
extent's state EXTENT_LOCKED bit, leading to an hang.

So make sure clear_extent_bits() ends up waking up any waiters if the
bit EXTENT_LOCKED is supplied by its callers.

Zygo Blaxell was experiencing such hangs at inode eviction time after
file unlinks. Thanks to him for a set of scripts to reproduce the issue.
Reported-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

With commit 1b984508 ("Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction
in case device tree has hole") introduced in the kernel 4.1 merge window,
we end up using part of a device hole for which there are already pending
chunks or pinned chunks. Before that commit we didn't use the hole and
would just move on to the next hole in the device.

However when we adjust the start offset for the chunk allocation and we
have pinned chunks, we set it blindly to the end offset of the pinned
chunk we are currently processing, which is dangerous because we can
have a pending chunk that has a start offset that matches the end offset
of our pinned chunk - leading us to a case where we end up getting two
pending chunks that start at the same physical device offset, which makes
us later abort the current transaction with -EEXIST when finishing the
chunk allocation at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups():

[194737.659017] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[194737.660192] WARNING: CPU: 15 PID: 31111 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[194737.662209] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17)
[194737.663175] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_snapshot dm_bufio dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse
[194737.674015] CPU: 15 PID: 31111 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[194737.675986] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[194737.682999]  0000000000000009 ffff8800564c7a98 ffffffff8142fa46 ffffffff8108b6a2
[194737.684540]  ffff8800564c7ae8 ffff8800564c7ad8 ffffffff81045ea5 ffff8800564c7b78
[194737.686017]  ffffffffa0383aa7 00000000ffffffef ffff88000c7ba000 ffff8801a1f66f40
[194737.687509] Call Trace:
[194737.688068]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[194737.689027]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[194737.690095]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[194737.691198]  [<ffffffffa0383aa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[194737.693789]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[194737.695065]  [<ffffffffa0383aa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[194737.696806]  [<ffffffffa039a3bd>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[194737.698683]  [<ffffffffa03aa433>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[194737.700329]  [<ffffffffa03aa725>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[194737.701924]  [<ffffffffa0394b51>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[194737.703675]  [<ffffffffa03b8ba4>] __btrfs_buffered_write+0x16a/0x4c8 [btrfs]
[194737.705417]  [<ffffffffa03bb502>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x19a/0x431 [btrfs]
[194737.707058]  [<ffffffffa03bb511>] ? btrfs_file_write_iter+0x1a9/0x431 [btrfs]
[194737.708560]  [<ffffffffa03bb68d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x325/0x431 [btrfs]
[194737.710673]  [<ffffffff81067d85>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e
[194737.712076]  [<ffffffff811534c3>] new_sync_write+0x7c/0xa0
[194737.713293]  [<ffffffff81153b58>] vfs_write+0xb2/0x117
[194737.714443]  [<ffffffff81154424>] SyS_pwrite64+0x64/0x82
[194737.715646]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[194737.717175] ---[ end trace f2d5dc04e56d7e48 ]---
[194737.718170] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups:9524: errno=-17 Object already exists

The -EEXIST failure comes from btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc(), called by
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it attempts to insert a
duplicated device extent item via btrfs_alloc_dev_extent().

This issue was reproducible with fstests generic/038 running in a loop for
several hours (it's very hard to hit) and using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard".
Applying Jeff's recent patch titled "btrfs: add missing discards when
unpinning extents with -o discard" makes the issue much easier to reproduce
(usually within 4 to 5 hours), since it pins chunks for longer periods of
time when an unused block group is deleted by the cleaner kthread.

Fix this by making sure that we never adjust the start offset to a lower
value than it currently has.

Fixes: 1b984508 ("Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole"
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

__btrfs_close_devices() would call_rcu to free the device, which is racy with
list_for_each_entry() accessing the memory to retrieve the next device on the
list.
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The INO_LOOKUP ioctl can lookup path for a given inode number and is
thus restricted. As a sideefect it can find the root id of the
containing subvolume and we're using this int the 'btrfs inspect rootid'
command.

The restriction is unnecessary in case we set the ioctl args
 args::treeid    = 0
 args::objectid  = 256 (BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)

Then the path will be empty and the treeid is filled with the root id of
the inode on which the ioctl is called. This behaviour is unchanged,
after the root restriction is removed.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we create a block group we add it to the rbtree of block groups
before setting its ->space_info field (while it's NULL). This is
problematic since other tasks can access the block group from the
rbtree and attempt to use its ->space_info before it is set by
btrfs_make_block_group().

This can happen for example when a concurrent fitrim ioctl operation
is ongoing, which produces a trace like the following when
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is set.

[11509.604369] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000018
[11509.606373] IP: [<ffffffff8107d675>] __lock_acquire+0xb4/0xf02
[11509.608179] PGD 2296a8067 PUD 22f4a2067 PMD 0
[11509.608179] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[11509.608179] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_piix4 psmou
[11509.608179] CPU: 10 PID: 8538 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G        W       4.0.0-rc5-btrfs-next-9+ #2
[11509.608179] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[11509.608179] task: ffff88009f5c46d0 ti: ffff8801b3edc000 task.ti: ffff8801b3edc000
[11509.608179] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8107d675>]  [<ffffffff8107d675>] __lock_acquire+0xb4/0xf02
[11509.608179] RSP: 0018:ffff8801b3edf9e8  EFLAGS: 00010002
[11509.608179] RAX: 0000000000000046 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[11509.608179] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000018
[11509.608179] RBP: ffff8801b3edfaa8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[11509.608179] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff88009f5c4f98 R12: 0000000000000000
[11509.608179] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000018 R15: ffff88009f5c46d0
[11509.608179] FS:  00007f280a10e840(0000) GS:ffff88023ed40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[11509.608179] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[11509.608179] CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 00000002119bc000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[11509.608179] Stack:
[11509.608179]  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000000
[11509.608179]  ffff880100000000 ffffffff00000000 0000000000000001 ffffffff00000000
[11509.608179]  0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff880100000000 00000000000006c4
[11509.608179] Call Trace:
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff8107dc57>] ? __lock_acquire+0x696/0xf02
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff8107e806>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x116
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04cc876>] ? do_trimming+0x51/0x145 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81434f37>] _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x44
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04cc876>] ? do_trimming+0x51/0x145 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04cc876>] do_trimming+0x51/0x145 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04cde7d>] btrfs_trim_block_group+0x201/0x491 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04849e2>] btrfs_trim_fs+0xe0/0x129 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04bb80a>] btrfs_ioctl_fitrim+0x138/0x167 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffffa04c002f>] btrfs_ioctl+0x50d/0x21e8 [btrfs]
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81123bda>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81123bda>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81123bda>] ? might_fault+0x58/0xb5
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81158050>] ? cp_new_stat+0x147/0x15e
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81163041>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81158116>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81435b54>] ? ret_from_sys_call+0x1d/0x58
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff8116314e>] SyS_ioctl+0x5a/0x7f
[11509.608179]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[11509.608179] Code: f4 01 00 0f 85 c0 00 00 00 48 c7 c1 f3 1f 7d 81 48 c7 c2 aa cb 7c 81 be fc 0b 00 00 eb 70 83 3d 61 eb 9c 00 00 0f 84 a5 00 00 00 <49> 81 3e 40 a3 2b 82 b8 00 00 00
[11509.608179] RIP  [<ffffffff8107d675>] __lock_acquire+0xb4/0xf02
[11509.608179]  RSP <ffff8801b3edf9e8>
[11509.608179] CR2: 0000000000000018
[11509.608179] ---[ end trace 570a5c6769f0e49a ]---

Which corresponds to the following access in fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:

  static int do_trimming(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
                         u64 *total_trimmed, u64 start, u64 bytes,
                         u64 reserved_start, u64 reserved_bytes,
                         struct btrfs_trim_range *trim_entry)
  {
       struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = block_group->space_info;
  (...)
       spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
       ^^^^^ - block_group->space_info is NULL...

Fix this by ensuring the block group's ->space_info is set before adding
the block group to the rbtree.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Report missing device when add is successful,
otherwise it would exit as ENOMEM. And add uuid
to the report.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>