- 15 6月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Alter the dynroot mount so that cells created by manipulation of /proc/fs/afs/cells and /proc/fs/afs/rootcell and by specification of a root cell as a module parameter will cause directories for those cells to be created in the dynamic root superblock for the network namespace[*]. To this end: (1) Only one dynamic root superblock is now created per network namespace and this is shared between all attempts to mount it. This makes it easier to find the superblock to modify. (2) When a dynamic root superblock is created, the list of cells is walked and directories created for each cell already defined. (3) When a new cell is added, if a dynamic root superblock exists, a directory is created for it. (4) When a cell is destroyed, the directory is removed. (5) These directories are created by calling lookup_one_len() on the root dir which automatically creates them if they don't exist. [*] Inasmuch as network namespaces are currently supported here. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Remove the restriction on DNS lookup upcalls that prevents ipv6 addresses from being looked up. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Show all of a server's addresses in /proc/fs/afs/servers, placing the second plus addresses on padded lines of their own. The current address is marked with a star. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The AFS filesystem depends at the moment on /proc for configuration and also presents information that way - however, this causes a compilation failure if procfs is disabled. Fix it so that the procfs bits aren't compiled in if procfs is disabled. This means that you can't configure the AFS filesystem directly, but it is still usable provided that an up-to-date keyutils is installed to look up cells by SRV or AFSDB DNS records. Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make calculation of the size of the inline name in struct proc_dir_entry automatic, rather than having to manually encode the numbers and failing to allow for lockdep. Require a minimum inline name size of 33+1 to allow for names that look like two hex numbers with a dash between. Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
backmerge AFS fixes that went into mainline and deal with the conflict in fs/afs/fsclient.c Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 23 5月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Implement network namespacing within AFS, but don't yet let mounts occur outside the init namespace. An additional patch will be required propagate the network namespace across automounts. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The afs_net::ws_cell member is sometimes used under RCU conditions from within an seq-readlock. It isn't, however, marked __rcu and it isn't set using the proper RCU barrier-imposing functions. Fix this by annotating it with __rcu and using appropriate barriers to make sure accesses are correctly ordered. Without this, the code can produce the following warning: >> fs/afs/proc.c:151:24: sparse: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces) Fixes: f044c884 ("afs: Lay the groundwork for supporting network namespaces") Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Sparse doesn't appear able to handle the conditionally-taken locks in xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus(), even though the lock and unlock are both contingent on the same unvarying function argument. Deal with this by interpolating a wrapper function that takes the lock if needed and calls xdr_decode_AFSFetchStatus() on two separate branches, one with the lock held and one without. This allows Sparse to work out the locking. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Provide two extra functions, proc_create_net_data_write() and proc_create_net_single_write() that act like their non-write versions but also set a write method in the proc_dir_entry struct. An internal simple write function is provided that will copy its buffer and hand it to the pde->write() method if available (or give an error if not). The buffer may be modified by the write method. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rearrange fs/afs/proc.c to get rid of all the remaining predeclarations. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rearrange fs/afs/proc.c to move the show routines up to the top of each block so the order is show, iteration, ops, file ops, fops. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rearrange fs/afs/proc.c by moving fops and open functions down so as to remove predeclarations. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In fs/afs/proc.c, move functions that create and remove /proc files to the end of the source file as a first stage in getting rid of all the forward declarations. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Fixes: 2cd1f0dd ("isdn: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show") Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 5月, 2018 25 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This makes Alexey happy and Al groan. Based on a patch from Alexey Dobriyan. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Just set up the show callback in the tty_operations, and use proc_create_single_data to create the file without additional boilerplace code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Just set up the show callback in the tty_operations, and use proc_create_single_data to create the file without additional boilerplace code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The driver proc file hasn't been writeable for a long time, so this is just dead code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And switch to proc_create_single_data. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And remove proc boilerplate code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Also don't bother handling proc_create* failures - the driver works perfectly fine without the proc files, and the cleanup will handle missing files gracefully. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use proc private data directly instead of doing a detour through seq->private and private state. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And remove proc boilerplate code. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use proc private data directly instead of doing a detour through seq->private. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use proc private data directly instead of doing a detour through seq->private. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use proc private data directly instead of doing a detour through seq->private. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use proc private data directly instead of doing a detour through seq->private. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And stop trying to get a reference on the submodule, procfs code deals with release after an unloaded module and thus removed proc entry. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And stop messing with try_module_get on THIS_MODULE, which doesn't make any sense here. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
And use the root resource directly from the proc private data. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_single where applicable. Also don't bother handling proc_create* failures - the driver works perfectly fine without the proc files, and the cleanup will handle missing files gracefully. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Also don't bother handling proc_create* failures - the driver works perfectly fine without the proc files, and the cleanup will handle missing files gracefully. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_single. Also don't bother handling proc_create* failures - the driver works perfectly fine without the proc files, and the cleanup will handle missing files gracefully. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use proc_create_seq where applicable. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Variant of proc_create_data that directly take a seq_file show callback and deals with network namespaces in ->open and ->release. All callers of proc_create + single_open_net converted over, and single_{open,release}_net are removed entirely. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-