1. 17 9月, 2009 9 次提交
  2. 15 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 12 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Fix initalization of s_flex_groups · 7ad9bb65
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The s_flex_groups array should have been initialized using atomic_add
      to sum up the free counts from the block groups that make up a
      flex_bg.  By using atomic_set, the value of the s_flex_groups array
      was set to the values of the last block group in the flex_bg.  
      
      The impact of this bug is that the block and inode allocation
      algorithms might not pick the best flex_bg for new allocation.
      
      Thanks to Damien Guibouret for pointing out this problem!
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      7ad9bb65
  4. 11 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 10 9月, 2009 4 次提交
  6. 13 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Use bforget() in no journal mode for ext4_journal_{forget,revoke}() · c7acb4c1
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      When ext4 is using a journal, a metadata block which is deallocated
      must be passed into the journal layer so it can be dropped from the
      current transaction and/or revoked.  This is done by calling the
      functions ext4_journal_forget() and ext4_journal_revoke(), which call
      jbd2_journal_forget(), and jbd2_journal_revoke(), respectively.
      
      Since the jbd2_journal_forget() and jbd2_journal_revoke() call
      bforget(), if ext4 is not using a journal, ext4_journal_forget() and
      ext4_journal_revoke() must call bforget() to avoid a dirty metadata
      block overwriting a block after it has been reallocated and reused for
      another inode's data block.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      c7acb4c1
  8. 08 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 06 9月, 2009 3 次提交
  11. 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 06 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 05 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 01 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  15. 30 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 28 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix extent sanity checking code with AGGRESSIVE_TEST · 55ad63bf
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      The extents sanity-checking code depends on the ext4_ext_space_*()
      functions returning the maximum alloable size for eh_max; however,
      when the debugging #ifdef AGGRESSIVE_TEST is enabled to test the
      extent tree handling code, this prevents a normally created ext4
      filesystem from being mounted with the errors:
      
      Aug 26 15:43:50 bsd086 kernel: [   96.070277] EXT4-fs error (device sda8): ext4_ext_check_inode: bad header/extent in inode #8: too large eh_max - magic f30a, entries 1, max 4(3), depth 0(0)
      Aug 26 15:43:50 bsd086 kernel: [   96.070526] EXT4-fs (sda8): no journal found
      
      Bug reported by Akira Fujita.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      55ad63bf
  18. 26 8月, 2009 3 次提交
    • E
      ext4: use ext4_grpblk_t more extensively · a36b4498
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      unsigned  short is potentially too small to track blocks within
      a group; today it is safe due to restrictions in e2fsprogs but
      we have _lo / _hi bits for group blocks with the intent to go
      up to 32 bits, so clean this up now.
      
      There are many more places where we use unsigned/int/unsigned int
      to contain a group block but this should at least fix all the
      short types.
      
      I added a few comments to the struct ext4_group_info definition
      as well.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a36b4498
    • E
      ext4: use variables not types in sizeofs() for allocations · 1927805e
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      Precursor to changing some types; to keep things in sync, it 
      seems better to allocate/memset based on the size of the 
      variables we are using rather than on some disconnected 
      basic type like "unsigned short"
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      1927805e
    • A
      ext4: Add missing unlock_new_inode() call in extent migration code · a8526e84
      Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
      We need to unlock the new inode before iput.  This patch fixes the
      following warning when calling chattr +e to migrate a file to use
      extents.  It also fixes problems in when e4defrag attempts to
      defragment an inode.
      
      [  470.400044] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  470.400065] WARNING: at fs/inode.c:1210 generic_delete_inode+0x65/0x16a()
      [  470.400072] Hardware name: N/A
      .....
      ...
      [  470.400353] Pid: 4451, comm: chattr Not tainted 2.6.31-rc7-red-debug #4
      [  470.400359] Call Trace:
      [  470.400372]  [<ffffffff81037771>] warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0x8f
      [  470.400385]  [<ffffffff81037798>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x11
      [  470.400395]  [<ffffffff810b7f28>] generic_delete_inode+0x65/0x16a
      [  470.400405]  [<ffffffff810b8044>] generic_drop_inode+0x17/0x1bd
      [  470.400413]  [<ffffffff810b7083>] iput+0x61/0x65
      [  470.400455]  [<ffffffffa003b229>] ext4_ext_migrate+0x5eb/0x66a [ext4]
      [  470.400492]  [<ffffffffa002b1f8>] ext4_ioctl+0x340/0x756 [ext4]
      [  470.400507]  [<ffffffff810b1a91>] vfs_ioctl+0x1d/0x82
      [  470.400517]  [<ffffffff810b1ff0>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x483/0x4c9
      [  470.400527]  [<ffffffff81059c30>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
      [  470.400537]  [<ffffffff810b2087>] sys_ioctl+0x51/0x74
      [  470.400549]  [<ffffffff8100ba6b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [  470.400557] ---[ end trace ab85723542352dac ]---
      Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a8526e84
  19. 18 8月, 2009 4 次提交
    • E
      ext4: Add feature set check helper for mount & remount paths · a13fb1a4
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      A user reported that although his root ext4 filesystem was mounting
      fine, other filesystems would not mount, with the:
      
      "Filesystem with huge files cannot be mounted RDWR without CONFIG_LBDAF"
      
      error on his 32-bit box built without CONFIG_LBDAF.  This is because
      the test at mount time for this situation was not being re-checked
      on remount, and the normal boot process makes an ro->rw transition,
      so this was being missed.
      
      Refactor to make a common helper function to test the filesystem
      features against the type of mount request (RO vs. RW) so that we 
      stay consistent.
      
      Addresses Red-Hat-Bugzilla: #517650
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a13fb1a4
    • E
      simplify some logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request · 38877f4e
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      While reading through some of the mballoc code it seems that a couple
      spots in the size normalization function could be streamlined.
      
      The test for non-overlapping PAs can be or'd for the start & end
      conditions, and the tests for adjacent PAs can be else-if'd - 
      it's essentially independently testing:
      
      	if (A + B <= C)
      		...
      	if (A > C)
      		...
      
      These cannot both be true so it seems like the else-if might
      be slightly more efficient and/or informative.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      38877f4e
    • E
      ext4: open-code ext4_mb_update_group_info · 0373130d
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      ext4_mb_update_group_info is only called in one place, and it's
      extremely simple.  There's no reason to have it in a separate function
      in a separate file as far as I can tell, it just obfuscates what's
      really going on.
      
      Perhaps it was intended to keep the grp->bb_* manipulation local to
      mballoc.c but we're already accessing other grp-> fields in balloc.c
      directly so this seems ok.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      0373130d
    • E
      ext4: reject too-large filesystems on 32-bit kernels · bf43d84b
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      ext4 will happily mount a > 16T filesystem on a 32-bit box, but
      this is not safe; writes to the block device will wrap past 16T
      and the page cache can't index past 16T (232 index * 4k pages).
      
      Adding another test to the existing "too many sectors" test
      should do the trick.
      
      Add a comment, a relevant return value, and fix the reference
      to the CONFIG_LBD(AF) option as well.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      bf43d84b