PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,

[ 1226.649039] =========================================================
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1226.652955]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
[ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
[ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
run to this.

The above lock chain comes from
btrfs_commit_transaction
  ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
    ...
    ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
      ...
      ->__btrfs_cow_block
         ...
         ->find_free_extent
            ->cache_block_group
              ->load_free_space_cache
                ->btrfs_readpages
                  ->submit_one_bio
                    ...
                    ->__btrfs_map_block
                      ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock

However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
to

[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700

delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
to a ABBA deadlock.

To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.

With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

No visible change.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We can safely use GFP_KERNEL in the functions called from the ioctl
handlers.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This reverts commit 14e46e04.

This ends up doing sysfs operations from deep in balance (where we
should be GFP_NOFS) and under heavy balance load, we're making races
against sysfs internals.

Revert it for now while we figure things out.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The files under /sys/fs/UUID/features get out of sync with the actual
incompat bits set for the filesystem if they change after mount (eg. the
LZO compression).

Synchronize the feature bits with the sysfs files representing them
right after we set/clear them.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Old code used bbio->raid_map to determine whether in raid56
write/recover operation, because we didn't't have bbio->map_type.

Now we have direct way for this condition, rid of using
the function-relative data, and make the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

1: Adjust condition in loop to make less TAB
2: Move btrfs_put_bbio()'s line for combine, and makes logic clean.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Enhance chunk validation:
1) Num_stripes
   We already have such check but it's only in super block sys chunk
   array.
   Now check all on-disk chunks.

2) Chunk logical
   It should be aligned to sector size.
   This behavior should be *DOUBLE CHECKED* for 64K sector size like
   PPC64 or AArch64.
   Maybe we can found some hidden bugs.

3) Chunk length
   Same as chunk logical, should be aligned to sector size.

4) Stripe length
   It should be power of 2.

5) Chunk type
   Any bit out of TYPE_MAS | PROFILE_MASK is invalid.

With all these much restrict rules, several fuzzed image reported in
mail list should no longer cause kernel panic.
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance"
(already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users:
metatdata -> metadata.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

duplicate const is redundant so remove it
Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I managed to trigger this:
| INFO: trying to register non-static key.
| the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
| turning off the locking correctness validator.
| CPU: 1 PID: 781 Comm: systemd-gpt-aut Not tainted 4.4.0-rt2+ #14
| Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
| [<80307cec>] (dump_stack)
| [<80070e98>] (__lock_acquire)
| [<8007184c>] (lock_acquire)
| [<80287800>] (btrfs_ioctl)
| [<8012a8d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl)
| [<8012ac14>] (SyS_ioctl)

so I think that btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is not invoked behind
a macro somewhere.

Fixes: 7cc8e58d ("Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine")
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Overloading extent_map->bdev to struct map_lookup * might have started out
as a means to an end, but it's a pattern that's used all over the place
now. Let's get rid of the casting and just add a union instead.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

As of the 4.3 kernel release, the fitrim ioctl can now discard any region
of a disk that is not allocated to any chunk/block group, including the
first megabyte which is used for our primary superblock and by the boot
loader (grub for example).

Fix this by not allowing to trim/discard any region in the device starting
with an offset not greater than min(alloc_start_mount_option, 1Mb), just
as it was not possible before 4.3.

A reproducer test case for xfstests follows.

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"
  tmp=/tmp/$$
  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      cd /
      rm -f $tmp.*
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _need_to_be_root
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1

  # Write to the [0, 64Kb[ and [68Kb, 1Mb[ ranges of the device. These ranges are
  # reserved for a boot loader to use (GRUB for example) and btrfs should never
  # use them - neither for allocating metadata/data nor should trim/discard them.
  # The range [64Kb, 68Kb[ is used for the primary superblock of the filesystem.
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 0 64K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 68K 956K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io

  # Now mount the filesystem and perform a fitrim against it.
  _scratch_mount
  _require_batched_discard $SCRATCH_MNT
  $FSTRIM_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT

  # Now unmount the filesystem and verify the content of the ranges was not
  # modified (no trim/discard happened on them).
  _scratch_unmount
  echo "Content of the ranges [0, 64Kb] and [68Kb, 1Mb[ after fitrim:"
  od -t x1 -N $((64 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV
  od -t x1 -j $((68 * 1024)) -N $((956 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV

  status=0
  exit
Reported-by: NVincent Petry  <PVince81@yahoo.fr>
Reported-by: NAndrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109341
Fixes: 499f377f (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode
is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning
when:
-dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=single
Signed-off-by: NSam Tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk>
[ minor message reformatting ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Replace the integers by enums for better readability. The value 2 does
not have any meaning since a7175319
"Btrfs: do less aggressive btree readahead" (2009-01-22).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We use many constants to represent size and offset value.  And to make
code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to
represent '256MB'.  However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB'
which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'.

So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with
single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is
not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's
more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'.
Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We can handle the special case of num_stripes == 0 directly inside
btrfs_read_sys_array. The BUG_ON in btrfs_chunk_item_size is there to
catch other unhandled cases where we fail to validate external data.

A crafted or corrupted image crashes at mount time:

BTRFS: device fsid 9006933e-2a9a-44f0-917f-514252aeec2c devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0
BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
BUG: failure at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:337/btrfs_chunk_item_size()!
Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.2.5-00657-ge047887-dirty #25
Stack:
 637af890 60062489 602aeb2e 604192ba
 60387961 00000011 637af8a0 6038a835
 637af9c0 6038776b 634ef32b 00000000
Call Trace:
 [<6001c86d>] show_stack+0xfe/0x15b
 [<6038a835>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
 [<6038776b>] panic+0x13e/0x2b3
 [<6020f099>] btrfs_read_sys_array+0x25d/0x2ff
 [<601cfbbe>] open_ctree+0x192d/0x27af
 [<6019c2c1>] btrfs_mount+0x8f5/0xb9a
 [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3
 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a
 [<6019bcb0>] btrfs_mount+0x2e4/0xb9a
 [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3
 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a
 [<600d710b>] do_mount+0xa35/0xbc9
 [<600d7557>] SyS_mount+0x95/0xc8
 [<6001e884>] handle_syscall+0x6b/0x8e
Reported-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# 3.19+
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since we will add support for -d dup for non-mixed filesystem,
kernel need to support converting to this raid-type.

This patch remove limitation of above case.

Tested by following script:
(combination of dup conversion with fsck):

export TEST_DEV='/dev/vdc'
export TEST_DIR='/var/ltf/tester/mnt'

do_dup_test()
{
    local m_from="$1"
    local d_from="$2"
    local m_to="$3"
    local d_to="$4"

    echo "Convert from -m $m_from -d $d_from to -m $m_to -d $d_to"

    umount "$TEST_DIR" &>/dev/null
    ./mkfs.btrfs -f -m "$m_from" -d "$d_from" "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null || return 1
    mount "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1

    cp -a /sbin/* "$TEST_DIR"

    [[ "$m_from" != "$m_to" ]] && {
        ./btrfs balance start -f -mconvert="$m_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    }

    [[ "$d_from" != "$d_to" ]] && {
	local opt=()
	[[ "$d_to" == single ]] && opt+=("-f")
        ./btrfs balance start "${opt[@]}" -dconvert="$d_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    }

    umount "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    ./btrfsck "$TEST_DEV" || return 1
    echo

    return 0
}

test_all()
{
    for m_from in single dup; do
    for d_from in single dup; do
    for m_to in single dup; do
    for d_to in single dup; do
    do_dup_test "$m_from" "$d_from" "$m_to" "$d_to" || return 1
    done
    done
    done
    done
}

test_all
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

map->num_stripes really can't be zero, but just in case.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

During the final phase of a device replace operation, I ran into a
transaction abort that resulted in the following trace:

[23919.655368] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 30175 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9843 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]()
[23919.664742] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[23919.665749] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 parport psmouse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_core evdev microcode pcspkr button serio_raw ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic ata_piix virtio_pci floppy virtio_ring libata e1000 virtio scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[23919.679442] CPU: 10 PID: 30175 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[23919.682392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[23919.689151]  0000000000000000 ffff8804020cbb50 ffffffff812566f4 ffff8804020cbb98
[23919.692604]  ffff8804020cbb88 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa03eea69 ffff88041b678a48
[23919.694230]  ffff88042ac38000 ffff88041b678930 00000000fffffffe ffff8804020cbbf0
[23919.696716] Call Trace:
[23919.698669]  [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[23919.700597]  [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8
[23919.701958]  [<ffffffffa03eea69>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.703612]  [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50
[23919.705047]  [<ffffffffa03eea69>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.706967]  [<ffffffffa0402097>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x2dd [btrfs]
[23919.708611]  [<ffffffffa0402300>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[23919.710099]  [<ffffffffa03ef0b8>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x121/0x28b [btrfs]
[23919.711970]  [<ffffffffa0413025>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7d3/0xc6d [btrfs]
[23919.713602]  [<ffffffff8108b78f>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[23919.714756]  [<ffffffff81086dbc>] ? percpu_down_read+0x51/0x78
[23919.716155]  [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.718918]  [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.724170]  [<ffffffff8116b579>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[23919.725482]  [<ffffffff8117c1d7>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[23919.726790]  [<ffffffff8117c5ef>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x406/0x4e6
[23919.728428]  [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[23919.729642]  [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[23919.730782]  [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[23919.731847]  [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[23919.733330] ---[ end trace 166ef301a335832a ]---

This is due to a race between device replace and chunk allocation, which
the following diagram illustrates:

         CPU 1                                    CPU 2

 btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()

   at this point
    dev_replace->tgtdev->devid ==
    BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID (0ULL)

   ...

   btrfs_start_transaction()
   btrfs_commit_transaction()

                                               btrfs_fallocate()
                                                 btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
                                                   btrfs_join_transaction()
                                                     --> starts a new transaction
                                                   do_chunk_alloc()
                                                     lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
                                                       btrfs_alloc_chunk()
                                                         --> creates extent map for
                                                             the new chunk with
                                                             em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
                                                             == X (X > 0)
                                                         --> extent map is added to
                                                             fs_info->mapping_tree
                                                         --> initial phase of bg A
                                                             allocation completes
                                                     unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex

   lock fs_info->chunk_mutex

   btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree()
     --> iterates fs_info->mapping_tree and
         replaces the device in every extent
         map's map->stripes[] with
         dev_replace->tgtdev, which still has
         an id of 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)

                                                   btrfs_end_transaction()
                                                     btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
                                                       --> starts final phase of
                                                           bg A creation (update device,
                                                           extent, and chunk trees, etc)
                                                       btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()

                                                         btrfs_update_device()
                                                           --> attempts to update a device
                                                               item with ID == 0ULL
                                                               (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
                                                               which is the current ID of
                                                               bg A's
                                                               em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
                                                           --> doesn't find such item
                                                               returns -ENOENT
                                                           --> the device id should have been X
                                                               and not 0ULL

                                                       got -ENOENT from
                                                       btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
                                                       and aborts current transaction

   finishes setting up the target device,
   namely it sets tgtdev->devid to the value
   of srcdev->devid, which is X (and X > 0)

   frees the srcdev

   unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex

So fix this by taking the device list mutex when processing the chunk's
extent map stripes to update the device items. This avoids getting the
wrong device id and use-after-free problems if the task finishing a
chunk allocation grabs the replaced device, which is freed while the
dev replace task is holding the device list mutex.

This happened while running fstest btrfs/071.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>

If we fail to allocate a new data chunk, we were jumping to the error path
without release the transaction handle we got before. Fix this by always
releasing it before doing the jump.

Fixes: 2c9fe835 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit bc309467
(btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that
existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks
are skipped.

After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged
balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not
set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem
was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to
patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing
btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter
function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit.
Signed-off-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Fixes: bc309467 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The test btrfs/011 triggers a rcu warning
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286 Tainted: G        W
-------------------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1977 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
4 locks held by btrfs/28786:

0:  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc785>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x45/0xa00 [btrfs]
1:  (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc84f>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x10f/0xa00 [btrfs]
2:  (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc868>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x128/0xa00 [btrfs]
3:  (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc87d>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x13d/0xa00 [btrfs]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 28786 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W       4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286
Hardware name: Intel Corporation SandyBridge Platform/To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS ASNBCPT1.86C.0031.B00.1006301607 06/30/2010
0000000000000001 ffff8800a07dfb48 ffffffff8141d47b 0000000000000001
0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff8801464a4f00 ffff8800a07dfb78
ffffffff810cd883 ffff880146eb9400 ffff8800a3698600 ffff8800a33fe220
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8141d47b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x74
[<ffffffff810cd883>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x103/0x140
[<ffffffffa0071261>] btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810d354d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff81449536>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0x66/0x80
[<ffffffffa00bcc15>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x4d5/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bc96e>] ? btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x22e/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a8795>] ? btrfs_scrub_dev+0x415/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa003ea69>] ? btrfs_start_transaction+0x9/0x20 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bda79>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x339/0x590 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81196aa5>] ? __might_fault+0x95/0xa0
[<ffffffffa0078638>] btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace+0x118/0x160 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffffa007c914>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x24/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa007ce43>] btrfs_ioctl+0x553/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffff811d6eb1>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811d6f1c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8c/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811e3336>] ? __fget_light+0x86/0xb0
[<ffffffff811e3369>] ? __fdget+0x9/0x20
[<ffffffff811d7451>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x21/0x80
[<ffffffff811d7483>] SyS_ioctl+0x53/0x80
[<ffffffff81b1efd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This is because of unprotected use of rcu_dereference in
btrfs_scratch_superblocks. We can't add rcu locks around the whole
function because we read the superblock.

The fix will use the rcu string buffer directly without the rcu locking.
Thi is safe as the device will not go away in the meantime. We're
holding the device list mutexes.

Restructuring the code to narrow down the rcu section turned out to be
impossible, we need to call filp_open (through update_dev_time) on the
buffer and this could call kmalloc/__might_sleep. We could call kstrdup
with GFP_ATOMIC but it's not absolutely necessary.

Fixes: 12b1c263 (Btrfs: enhance btrfs_scratch_superblock to scratch all superblocks)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We were using only 1 transaction unit when attempting to delete an unused
block group but in reality we need 3 + N units, where N corresponds to the
number of stripes. We were accounting only for the addition of the orphan
item (for the block group's free space cache inode) but we were not
accounting that we need to delete one block group item from the extent
tree, one free space item from the tree of tree roots and N device extent
items from the device tree.

While one unit is not enough, it worked most of the time because for each
single unit we are too pessimistic and assume an entire tree path, with
the highest possible heigth (8), needs to be COWed with eventual node
splits at every possible level in the tree, so there was usually enough
reserved space for removing all the items and adding the orphan item.

However after adding the orphan item, writepages() can by called by the VM
subsystem against the btree inode when we are under memory pressure, which
causes writeback to start for the nodes we COWed before, this forces the
operation to remove the free space item to COW again some (or all of) the
same nodes (in the tree of tree roots). Even without writepages() being
called, we could fail with ENOSPC because these items are located in
multiple trees and one of them might have a higher heigth and require
node/leaf splits at many levels, exhausting all the reserved space before
removing all the items and adding the orphan.

In the kernel 4.0 release, commit 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in
btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group"), we attempted to fix
a BUG_ON due to ENOSPC when trying to add the orphan item by making the
cleaner kthread reserve one transaction unit before attempting to remove
the block group, but this was not enough. We had a couple user reports
still hitting the same BUG_ON after 4.0, like Stefan Priebe's report on
a 4.2-rc6 kernel for example:

    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46070.html

So fix this by reserving all the necessary units of metadata.
Reported-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Fixes: 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Reproduce:
 (In integration-4.3 branch)

 TEST_DEV=(/dev/vdg /dev/vdh)
 TEST_DIR=/mnt/tmp

 umount "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null
 mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 "${TEST_DEV[@]}"

 mount -o nospace_cache "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR"
 btrfs balance start -dusage=0 $TEST_DIR
 btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR

 dd if=/dev/zero of="$TEST_DIR"/file count=100
 btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR

Result:
 We can see "no data chunk" in first "btrfs filesystem usage":
 # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR
 Overall:
    ...
 Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
 Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB
    /dev/vdg      122.88MiB
    /dev/vdh      122.88MiB
 System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        4.00MiB
 System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
    /dev/vdh        8.00MiB
 Unallocated:
    /dev/vdg        1.06GiB
    /dev/vdh        1.07GiB

 And "data chunks changed from raid1 to single" in second
 "btrfs filesystem usage":
 # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR
 Overall:
    ...
 Data,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdh      256.00MiB
 Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
 Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB
    /dev/vdg      122.88MiB
    /dev/vdh      122.88MiB
 System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        4.00MiB
 System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
    /dev/vdh        8.00MiB
 Unallocated:
    /dev/vdg        1.06GiB
    /dev/vdh      841.92MiB

Reason:
 btrfs balance delete last data chunk in case of no data in
 the filesystem, then we can see "no data chunk" by "fi usage"
 command.

 And when we do write operation to fs, the only available data
 profile is 0x0, result is all new chunks are allocated single type.

Fix:
 Allocate a data chunk explicitly to ensure we don't lose the
 raid profile for data.

Test:
 Test by above script, and confirmed the logic by debug output.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd

__GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".

Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
reserves.

This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
__GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
kswapd for background reclaim.

This patch then converts a number of sites

o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
  pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.

o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
  into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
  are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.

o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
  helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
  checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
  positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
  is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
  flag manipulations.

o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
  and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.

The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.

The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Similar to the 'limit' filter, we can enhance the 'usage' filter to
accept a range. The change is backward compatible, the range is applied
only in connection with the BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE flag.

We don't have a usecase yet, the current syntax has been sufficient. The
enhancement should provide parity with other range-like filters.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Balance block groups which have the given number of stripes, defined by
a range min..max. This is useful to selectively rebalance only chunks
that do not span enough devices, applies to RAID0/10/5/6.
Signed-off-by: NGabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel@system.is>
[ renamed bargs members, added to the UAPI, wrote the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for
[min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is
missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of
bytes.

Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max]
range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be
interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set
(BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int
lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field
for future use.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Improve readability by generalizing the profile validity checks.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it
to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(),
instead of complex condition in function.

It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in
future.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>