- 17 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Davydov 提交于
If the current process is exiting, lingering on socket close will make it unkillable, so we should avoid it. Reproducer: #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #define BTPROTO_L2CAP 0 #define BTPROTO_SCO 2 #define BTPROTO_RFCOMM 3 int main() { int fd; struct linger ling; fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_STREAM, BTPROTO_RFCOMM); //or: fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_DGRAM, BTPROTO_L2CAP); //or: fd = socket(PF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_SEQPACKET, BTPROTO_SCO); ling.l_onoff = 1; ling.l_linger = 1000000000; setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, &ling, sizeof(ling)); return 0; } Signed-off-by: NVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 12 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Several spots in the kernel perform a sequence like: skb_queue_tail(&sk->s_receive_queue, skb); sk->sk_data_ready(sk, skb->len); But at the moment we place the SKB onto the socket receive queue it can be consumed and freed up. So this skb->len access is potentially to freed up memory. Furthermore, the skb->len can be modified by the consumer so it is possible that the value isn't accurate. And finally, no actual implementation of this callback actually uses the length argument. And since nobody actually cared about it's value, lots of call sites pass arbitrary values in such as '0' and even '1'. So just remove the length argument from the callback, that way there is no confusion whatsoever and all of these use-after-free cases get fixed as a side effect. Based upon a patch by Eric Dumazet and his suggestion to audit this issue tree-wide. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We should let user space request the peer address also in the pending connect states, i.e. BT_CONNECT and BT_CONNECT2. There is existing user space code that tries to do this and will fail without extending the set of allowed states for the peer address information. This patch adds the two states to the allowed ones in the L2CAP and RFCOMM sock_getname functions, thereby preventing ENOTCONN from being returned. Reported-by: NAndrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Tested-by: NAndrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrzej Kaczmarek 提交于
When binding RFCOMM socket with non-zero channel we're checking if there is already any other socket which has the same channel number assigned and then fail. This check does not consider situation where we have another socket connected to remote device on given channel number in which case we still should be able to bind local socket. This patch changes __rfcomm_get_sock_by_addr() to return only sockets in either BT_BOUND or BT_LISTEN states, also name is updated to better describe what this function does now. Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@tieto.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
When we're not connected the peer address information is undefined. This patch fixes the remote address getting to return a proper error in case the sate is anything else than BT_CONNECTED. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the introduction of security level 4, the RFCOMM sockets need to be made aware of this new level. This change ensures that the pairing requirements are set correctly for these connections. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 21 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hannes Frederic Sowa 提交于
This patch now always passes msg->msg_namelen as 0. recvmsg handlers must set msg_namelen to the proper size <= sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage) to return msg_name to the user. This prevents numerous uninitialized memory leaks we had in the recvmsg handlers and makes it harder for new code to accidentally leak uninitialized memory. Optimize for the case recvfrom is called with NULL as address. We don't need to copy the address at all, so set it to NULL before invoking the recvmsg handler. We can do so, because all the recvmsg handlers must cope with the case a plain read() is called on them. read() also sets msg_name to NULL. Also document these changes in include/linux/net.h as suggested by David Miller. Changes since RFC: Set msg->msg_name = NULL if user specified a NULL in msg_name but had a non-null msg_namelen in verify_iovec/verify_compat_iovec. This doesn't affect sendto as it would bail out earlier while trying to copy-in the address. It also more naturally reflects the logic by the callers of verify_iovec. With this change in place I could remove " if (!uaddr || msg_sys->msg_namelen == 0) msg->msg_name = NULL ". This change does not alter the user visible error logic as we ignore msg_namelen as long as msg_name is NULL. Also remove two unnecessary curly brackets in ___sys_recvmsg and change comments to netdev style. Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Suggested-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The commit 94a86df0 seem to have uncovered a long standing bug that did not trigger so far. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000009dd503502 IP: [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 PGD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: ath5k ath mac80211 cfg80211 CPU: 2 PID: 1459 Comm: bluetoothd Not tainted 3.11.0-133163-gcebd830 #2 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P6T DELUXE V2, BIOS 1202 12/22/2010 task: ffff8803304106a0 ti: ffff88033046a000 task.ti: ffff88033046a000 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff815b1868>] [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 RSP: 0018:ffff88033046bed8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 00000009dd503502 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fffa2ed5548 RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000012 RDI: ffff88032fd37480 RBP: ffff88033046bf28 R08: 00007fffa2ed554c R09: ffff88032f5707d8 R10: 00007fffa2ed5548 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: ffff880330bbd000 R13: 00007fffa2ed5548 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 00007fffa2ed554c FS: 00007fc44cfac700(0000) GS:ffff88033fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000009dd503502 CR3: 00000003304c2000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 Stack: ffff88033046bf28 ffffffff815b0f2f ffff88033046bf18 0002ffff81105ef6 0000000600000000 ffff88032fd37480 0000000000000012 00007fffa2ed5548 0000000000000003 00007fffa2ed554c ffff88033046bf78 ffffffff814c0380 Call Trace: [<ffffffff815b0f2f>] ? rfcomm_sock_setsockopt+0x5f/0x190 [<ffffffff814c0380>] SyS_getsockopt+0x60/0xb0 [<ffffffff815e0852>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 02 00 00 00 0f 47 d0 4c 89 ef e8 74 13 cd ff 83 f8 01 19 c9 f7 d1 83 e1 f2 e9 4b ff ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 8b 84 24 70 02 00 00 <4c> 8b 30 4c 89 c0 e8 2d 19 cd ff 85 c0 49 89 d7 b9 f2 ff ff ff RIP [<ffffffff815b1868>] rfcomm_sock_getsockopt+0x128/0x200 RSP <ffff88033046bed8> CR2: 00000009dd503502 It triggers in the following segment of the code: 0x1313 is in rfcomm_sock_getsockopt (net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:743). 738 739 static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) 740 { 741 struct sock *sk = sock->sk; 742 struct rfcomm_conninfo cinfo; 743 struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->conn; 744 int len, err = 0; 745 u32 opt; 746 747 BT_DBG("sk %p", sk); The l2cap_pi(sk) is wrong here since it should have been rfcomm_pi(sk), but that socket of course does not contain the low-level connection details requested here. Tracking down the actual offending commit, it seems that this has been introduced when doing some L2CAP refactoring: commit 8c1d787b Author: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> Date: Wed Apr 13 20:23:55 2011 -0300 @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __u struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sock *l2cap_sk; struct rfcomm_conninfo cinfo; + struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->conn; int len, err = 0; u32 opt; @@ -787,8 +788,8 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_getsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __u l2cap_sk = rfcomm_pi(sk)->dlc->session->sock->sk; - cinfo.hci_handle = l2cap_pi(l2cap_sk)->conn->hcon->handle; - memcpy(cinfo.dev_class, l2cap_pi(l2cap_sk)->conn->hcon->dev_class, 3); + cinfo.hci_handle = conn->hcon->handle; + memcpy(cinfo.dev_class, conn->hcon->dev_class, 3); The l2cap_sk got accidentally mixed into the sk (which is RFCOMM) and now causing a problem within getsocketopt() system call. To fix this, just re-introduce l2cap_sk and make sure the right socket is used for the low-level connection details. Reported-by: NFabio Rossi <rossi.f@inwind.it> Reported-by: NJanusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@gmail.com> Tested-by: NJanusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Make sure to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL for checking the existing of the root debugfs dentry bt_debugfs. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 14 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The address information of RFCOMM sockets should be stored in its own socket structure. Trying to generalize them is not helpful since different transports have different address types. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 19 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
In the case of blocking sockets we should not proceed with sendmsg() if the socket has the BT_SK_SUSPEND flag set. So far the code was only ensuring that POLLOUT doesn't get set for non-blocking sockets using poll() but there was no code in place to ensure that blocking sockets do the right thing when writing to them. This patch adds a new bt_sock_wait_ready helper function to sleep in the sendmsg call if the BT_SK_SUSPEND flag is set, and wake up as soon as it is unset. It also updates the L2CAP and RFCOMM sendmsg callbacks to take advantage of this new helper function. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mathias Krause 提交于
If RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP is set in the flags, rfcomm_sock_recvmsg() returns early with 0 without updating the possibly set msg_namelen member. This, in turn, leads to a 128 byte kernel stack leak in net/socket.c. Fix this by updating msg_namelen in this case. For all other cases it will be handled in bt_sock_stream_recvmsg(). Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Herrmann 提交于
After we successfully registered a socket via bt_sock_register() there is no reason to ever check the return code of bt_sock_unregister(). If bt_sock_unregister() fails, it means the socket _is_ already unregistered so we have what we want, don't we? Also, to get bt_sock_unregister() to fail, another part of the kernel has to unregister _our_ socket. This is sooo _wrong_ that it will break way earlier than when we unregister our socket. Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sasha Levin 提交于
I'm not sure why, but the hlist for each entry iterators were conceived list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member) The hlist ones were greedy and wanted an extra parameter: hlist_for_each_entry(tpos, pos, head, member) Why did they need an extra pos parameter? I'm not quite sure. Not only they don't really need it, it also prevents the iterator from looking exactly like the list iterator, which is unfortunate. Besides the semantic patch, there was some manual work required: - Fix up the actual hlist iterators in linux/list.h - Fix up the declaration of other iterators based on the hlist ones. - A very small amount of places were using the 'node' parameter, this was modified to use 'obj->member' instead. - Coccinelle didn't handle the hlist_for_each_entry_safe iterator properly, so those had to be fixed up manually. The semantic patch which is mostly the work of Peter Senna Tschudin is here: @@ iterator name hlist_for_each_entry, hlist_for_each_entry_continue, hlist_for_each_entry_from, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh, for_each_busy_worker, ax25_uid_for_each, ax25_for_each, inet_bind_bucket_for_each, sctp_for_each_hentry, sk_for_each, sk_for_each_rcu, sk_for_each_from, sk_for_each_safe, sk_for_each_bound, hlist_for_each_entry_safe, hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu, nr_neigh_for_each, nr_neigh_for_each_safe, nr_node_for_each, nr_node_for_each_safe, for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp, for_each_gfn_sp, for_each_host; type T; expression a,c,d,e; identifier b; statement S; @@ -T b; <+... when != b ( hlist_for_each_entry(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_from(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh(a, - b, c, d) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh(a, - b, c) S | for_each_busy_worker(a, c, - b, d) S | ax25_uid_for_each(a, - b, c) S | ax25_for_each(a, - b, c) S | inet_bind_bucket_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sctp_for_each_hentry(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_rcu(a, - b, c) S | sk_for_each_from -(a, b) +(a) S + sk_for_each_from(a) S | sk_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | sk_for_each_bound(a, - b, c) S | hlist_for_each_entry_safe(a, - b, c, d, e) S | hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_neigh_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | nr_node_for_each(a, - b, c) S | nr_node_for_each_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_sp(a, c, d) S | - for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d, b) S + for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(a, c, d) S | for_each_host(a, - b, c) S | for_each_host_safe(a, - b, c, d) S | for_each_mesh_entry(a, - b, c, d) S ) ...+> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus change from net/ipv4/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: drop bogus hunk from net/ipv6/raw.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] [akpm@linux-foudnation.org: redo intrusive kvm changes] Tested-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo Padovan 提交于
This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm connections: [ 228.165378] ============================================= [ 228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4a #120 Tainted: G W [ 228.165378] --------------------------------------------- [ 228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0000aa0>] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] but task is already holding lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0205118>] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 228.165378] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] CPU0 [ 228.165378] ---- [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] May be due to missing lock nesting notation Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 28 9月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrei Emeltchenko 提交于
Instead of old unsafe batostr function use %pMR print specifier for printing Bluetooth addresses in sprintf and seq_printf statements. Signed-off-by: NAndrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
由 Andrei Emeltchenko 提交于
Instead of old unsafe batostr function use %pMR print specifier for printing Bluetooth addresses in debug and error statements. Signed-off-by: NAndrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 16 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mathias Krause 提交于
The RFCOMM code fails to initialize the trailing padding byte of struct sockaddr_rc added for alignment. It that for leaks one byte kernel stack via the getsockname() syscall. Add an explicit memset(0) before filling the structure to avoid the info leak. Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Mathias Krause 提交于
The RFCOMM code fails to initialize the key_size member of struct bt_security before copying it to userland -- that for leaking one byte kernel stack. Initialize key_size with 0 to avoid the info leak. Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masatake YAMATO 提交于
Added /proc/net/rfcomm via bt_procfs_init(). Signed-off-by: NMasatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
-
- 05 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo Padovan 提交于
Most of the include were unnecessary or already included by some other header. Replace module.h by export.h where possible. Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo Padovan 提交于
defer_setup and suspended are now flags into bt_sk(). Signed-off-by: NGustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h preparatory to splitting and killing it. Performed with the following command: perl -p -i -e 's!^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>.*\n!!' `grep -Irl '^#\s*include\s*<asm/system[.]h>' *` Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each protocol type). This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the following warning: <4>[ 1864.732366] ======================================================= <4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] <4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3 <4>[ 1864.733883] ------------------------------------------------------- <4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock: <4>[ 1864.734869] (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.735541] <4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock: <4>[ 1864.736045] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc <4>[ 1864.736732] <4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4>[ 1864.736750] <4>[ 1864.737428] <4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4>[ 1864.738016] <4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.738549] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.738977] [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68 <4>[ 1864.739411] [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76 <4>[ 1864.739858] [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59 <4>[ 1864.740279] [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8 <4>[ 1864.740687] [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37 <4>[ 1864.741106] [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38 <4>[ 1864.741542] [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a <4>[ 1864.741959] [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52 <4>[ 1864.742365] [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68 <4>[ 1864.742742] [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd <4>[ 1864.743187] <4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.743667] [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00 <4>[ 1864.744100] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.744519] [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f <4>[ 1864.744975] [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36 <4>[ 1864.745412] [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.745842] [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b <4>[ 1864.746288] [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62 <4>[ 1864.746737] [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422 <4>[ 1864.747165] [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Octavian Purdila 提交于
Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each protocol type). This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the following warning: <4>[ 1864.732366] ======================================================= <4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] <4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3 <4>[ 1864.733883] ------------------------------------------------------- <4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock: <4>[ 1864.734869] (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.735541] <4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock: <4>[ 1864.736045] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc <4>[ 1864.736732] <4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4>[ 1864.736750] <4>[ 1864.737428] <4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4>[ 1864.738016] <4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.738549] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.738977] [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68 <4>[ 1864.739411] [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76 <4>[ 1864.739858] [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59 <4>[ 1864.740279] [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8 <4>[ 1864.740687] [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37 <4>[ 1864.741106] [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38 <4>[ 1864.741542] [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a <4>[ 1864.741959] [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52 <4>[ 1864.742365] [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68 <4>[ 1864.742742] [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd <4>[ 1864.743187] <4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}: <4>[ 1864.743667] [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00 <4>[ 1864.744100] [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140 <4>[ 1864.744519] [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f <4>[ 1864.744975] [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36 <4>[ 1864.745412] [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30 <4>[ 1864.745842] [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b <4>[ 1864.746288] [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62 <4>[ 1864.746737] [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422 <4>[ 1864.747165] [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
Code now run in process context, does not need to disable interrupt anymore. Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 08 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luiz Augusto von Dentz 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 19 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Moore 提交于
The Bluetooth stack has internal connection handlers for all of the various Bluetooth protocols, and unfortunately, they are currently lacking the LSM hooks found in the core network stack's connection handlers. I say unfortunately, because this can cause problems for users who have have an LSM enabled and are using certain Bluetooth devices. See one problem report below: * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741703 In order to keep things simple at this point in time, this patch fixes the problem by cloning the parent socket's LSM attributes to the newly created child socket. If we decide we need a more elaborate LSM marking mechanism for Bluetooth (I somewhat doubt this) we can always revisit this decision in the future. Reported-by: NJames M. Cape <jcape@ignore-your.tv> Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Fix race conditions which can cause lost wakeups (or missed signals) while waiting to accept an rfcomm socket connection. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 10 6月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filip Palian 提交于
Structures "l2cap_conninfo" and "rfcomm_conninfo" have one padding byte each. This byte in "cinfo" is copied to userspace uninitialized. Signed-off-by: NFilip Palian <filip.palian@pjwstk.edu.pl> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Stephen Boyd 提交于
Enabling DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS causes the following warning: In function 'copy_from_user', inlined from 'rfcomm_sock_setsockopt' at net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c:705: arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h:65: warning: call to 'copy_from_user_overflow' declared with attribute warning: copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct presumably due to buf_size being signed causing GCC to fail to see that buf_size can't become negative. Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 09 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 28 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
There is no need to the socket deal directly with the channel, most of the time it cares about the channel only. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 02 12月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrei Emeltchenko 提交于
Remove extra spaces, assignments in if statement, zeroing static variables, extra braces. Fix includes. Signed-off-by: NAndrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
rfcomm_get_sock_by_channel() was the only user of this function, so I merged both into rfcomm_get_sock_by_channel(). The socket lock now should be hold outside of rfcomm_get_sock_by_channel() once we hold and release it inside the same function now. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 12 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mat Martineau 提交于
To reduce code duplication, have rfcomm_sock_recvmsg() call bt_sock_stream_recvmsg(). The common bt_sock_stream_recvmsg() code is nearly identical, with the RFCOMM-specific functionality for deferred setup and connection unthrottling left in rfcomm_sock_recvmsg(). Signed-off-by: NMat Martineau <mathewm@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 30 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
When receiving a rfcomm connection with the old dund deamon a inconsistent lock state happens. That's because interrupts were already disabled by l2cap_conn_start() when rfcomm_sk_state_change() try to lock the spin_lock. As result we may have a inconsistent lock state for l2cap_conn_start() after rfcomm_sk_state_change() calls bh_lock_sock() and disable interrupts as well. [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] ================================= [ 2833.151999] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 2833.151999] 2.6.36-rc3 #2 [ 2833.151999] --------------------------------- [ 2833.151999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage. [ 2833.151999] krfcommd/2306 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: [ 2833.151999] (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at: [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81094346>] __lock_acquire+0x5b6/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a5092>] l2cap_conn_start+0x92/0x640 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a6a3f>] l2cap_sig_channel+0x6bf/0x1320 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a9173>] l2cap_recv_frame+0x133/0x770 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00a997b>] l2cap_recv_acldata+0x1cb/0x390 [l2cap] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa000db4b>] hci_rx_task+0x2ab/0x450 [bluetooth] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b22b>] tasklet_action+0xcb/0xe0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b91e>] __do_softirq+0xae/0x150 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102ddb5>] do_softirq+0x75/0xb0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8106b56d>] irq_exit+0x8d/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8104484b>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6b/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102b6d3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81029dfa>] cpu_idle+0x5a/0xb0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81381ded>] rest_init+0xad/0xc0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817ebc4d>] start_kernel+0x2dd/0x2e8 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817eb2e6>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xf6/0xfa [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff817eb3ce>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb [ 2833.151999] irq event stamp: 731 [ 2833.151999] hardirqs last enabled at (731): [<ffffffff8106b762>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xe0 [ 2833.151999] hardirqs last disabled at (729): [<ffffffff8106b93e>] __do_softirq+0xce/0x150 [ 2833.151999] softirqs last enabled at (730): [<ffffffff8106b96e>] __do_softirq+0xfe/0x150 [ 2833.151999] softirqs last disabled at (711): [<ffffffff8102bc0c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2833.151999] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2306: [ 2833.151999] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bb744>] rfcomm_run+0x174/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] #1: (&(&d->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00b9223>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x53/0x100 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [ 2833.151999] stack backtrace: [ 2833.151999] Pid: 2306, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc3 #2 [ 2833.151999] Call Trace: [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810928e1>] print_usage_bug+0x171/0x180 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810936c3>] mark_lock+0x333/0x400 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810943ca>] __lock_acquire+0x63a/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff810948b5>] ? __lock_acquire+0xb25/0x1560 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8109534a>] lock_acquire+0x5a/0x70 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81392b6c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] ? rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bcb56>] rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x46/0x170 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00b9239>] rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x69/0x100 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00b9a49>] rfcomm_check_accept+0x59/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bacab>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x9fb/0x1320 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813932bb>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3b/0x60 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81093acd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81093b1d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bb7f1>] rfcomm_run+0x221/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813905e7>] ? schedule+0x287/0x780 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffffa00bb5d0>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0xb20 [rfcomm] [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81081026>] kthread+0x96/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bb14>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff813936bc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff81080f90>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 2833.151999] [<ffffffff8102bb10>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10 Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
-
- 28 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo F. Padovan 提交于
Those annotation save memory and space on the binary. __init code is discarded just after execute and __exit code is discarded if the module is built into the kernel image or unload of modules is not allowed. Signed-off-by: NGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 21 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Define a new function to return the waitqueue of a "struct sock". static inline wait_queue_head_t *sk_sleep(struct sock *sk) { return sk->sk_sleep; } Change all read occurrences of sk_sleep by a call to this function. Needed for a future RCU conversion. sk_sleep wont be a field directly available. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-