- 01 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick Bellasi 提交于
[ Upstream commit c469933e772132aad040bd6a2adc8edf9ad6f825 ] A ~10% regression has been reported for UnixBench's execl throughput test by Aaron Lu and Ye Xiaolong: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/30/765 That test is pretty simple, it does a "recursive" execve() syscall on the same binary. Starting from the syscall, this sequence is possible: do_execve() do_execveat_common() __do_execve_file() sched_exec() select_task_rq_fair() <==| Task already enqueued find_idlest_cpu() find_idlest_group() capacity_spare_wake() <==| Functions not called from cpu_util_wake() | the wakeup path which means we can end up calling cpu_util_wake() not only from the "wakeup path", as its name would suggest. Indeed, the task doing an execve() syscall is already enqueued on the CPU we want to get the cpu_util_wake() for. The estimated utilization for a CPU computed in cpu_util_wake() was written under the assumption that function can be called only from the wakeup path. If instead the task is already enqueued, we end up with a utilization which does not remove the current task's contribution from the estimated utilization of the CPU. This will wrongly assume a reduced spare capacity on the current CPU and increase the chances to migrate the task on execve. The regression is tracked down to: commit d519329f ("sched/fair: Update util_est only on util_avg updates") because in that patch we turn on by default the UTIL_EST sched feature. However, the real issue is introduced by: commit f9be3e59 ("sched/fair: Use util_est in LB and WU paths") Let's fix this by ensuring to always discount the task estimated utilization from the CPU's estimated utilization when the task is also the current one. The same benchmark of the bug report, executed on a dual socket 40 CPUs Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz machine, reports these "Execl Throughput" figures (higher the better): mainline : 48136.5 lps mainline+fix : 55376.5 lps which correspond to a 15% speedup. Moreover, since {cpu_util,capacity_spare}_wake() are not really only used from the wakeup path, let's remove this ambiguity by using a better matching name: {cpu_util,capacity_spare}_without(). Since we are at that, let's also improve the existing documentation. Reported-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Reported-by: NYe Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> Tested-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPatrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Fixes: f9be3e59 (sched/fair: Use util_est in LB and WU paths) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181025093100.GB13236@e110439-lin/Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 27 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Valentin Schneider 提交于
[ Upstream commit 40fa3780bac2b654edf23f6b13f4e2dd550aea10 ] When running on linux-next (8c60c36d0b8c ("Add linux-next specific files for 20181019")) + CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y on a big.LITTLE system (e.g. Juno or HiKey960), we get the following report: [ 0.748225] Call trace: [ 0.750685] lockdep_assert_cpus_held+0x30/0x40 [ 0.755236] static_key_enable_cpuslocked+0x20/0xc8 [ 0.760137] build_sched_domains+0x1034/0x1108 [ 0.764601] sched_init_domains+0x68/0x90 [ 0.768628] sched_init_smp+0x30/0x80 [ 0.772309] kernel_init_freeable+0x278/0x51c [ 0.776685] kernel_init+0x10/0x108 [ 0.780190] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 The static_key in question is 'sched_asym_cpucapacity' introduced by commit: df054e8445a4 ("sched/topology: Add static_key for asymmetric CPU capacity optimizations") In this particular case, we enable it because smp_prepare_cpus() will end up fetching the capacity-dmips-mhz entry from the devicetree, so we already have some asymmetry detected when entering sched_init_smp(). This didn't get detected in tip/sched/core because we were missing: commit cb538267ea1e ("jump_label/lockdep: Assert we hold the hotplug lock for _cpuslocked() operations") Calls to build_sched_domains() post sched_init_smp() will hold the hotplug lock, it just so happens that this very first call is a special case. As stated by a comment in sched_init_smp(), "There's no userspace yet to cause hotplug operations" so this is a harmless warning. However, to both respect the semantics of underlying callees and make lockdep happy, take the hotplug lock in sched_init_smp(). This also satisfies the comment atop sched_init_domains() that says "Callers must hold the hotplug lock". Reported-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Tested-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1540301851-3048-1-git-send-email-valentin.schneider@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 16 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Song Muchun 提交于
The comment and the code around the update_min_vruntime() call in dequeue_entity() are not in agreement. From commit: b60205c7 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking") I think that we want to update min_vruntime when a task is sleeping/migrating. So, the check is inverted there - fix it. Signed-off-by: NSong Muchun <smuchun@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: b60205c7 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181014112612.2614-1-smuchun@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Phil Auld 提交于
With a very low cpu.cfs_quota_us setting, such as the minimum of 1000, distribute_cfs_runtime may not empty the throttled_list before it runs out of runtime to distribute. In that case, due to the change from c06f04c7 to put throttled entries at the head of the list, later entries on the list will starve. Essentially, the same X processes will get pulled off the list, given CPU time and then, when expired, get put back on the head of the list where distribute_cfs_runtime will give runtime to the same set of processes leaving the rest. Fix the issue by setting a bit in struct cfs_bandwidth when distribute_cfs_runtime is running, so that the code in throttle_cfs_rq can decide to put the throttled entry on the tail or the head of the list. The bit is set/cleared by the callers of distribute_cfs_runtime while they hold cfs_bandwidth->lock. This is easy to reproduce with a handful of CPU consumers. I use 'crash' on the live system. In some cases you can simply look at the throttled list and see the later entries are not changing: crash> list cfs_rq.throttled_list -H 0xffff90b54f6ade40 -s cfs_rq.runtime_remaining | paste - - | awk '{print $1" "$4}' | pr -t -n3 1 ffff90b56cb2d200 -976050 2 ffff90b56cb2cc00 -484925 3 ffff90b56cb2bc00 -658814 4 ffff90b56cb2ba00 -275365 5 ffff90b166a45600 -135138 6 ffff90b56cb2da00 -282505 7 ffff90b56cb2e000 -148065 8 ffff90b56cb2fa00 -872591 9 ffff90b56cb2c000 -84687 10 ffff90b56cb2f000 -87237 11 ffff90b166a40a00 -164582 crash> list cfs_rq.throttled_list -H 0xffff90b54f6ade40 -s cfs_rq.runtime_remaining | paste - - | awk '{print $1" "$4}' | pr -t -n3 1 ffff90b56cb2d200 -994147 2 ffff90b56cb2cc00 -306051 3 ffff90b56cb2bc00 -961321 4 ffff90b56cb2ba00 -24490 5 ffff90b166a45600 -135138 6 ffff90b56cb2da00 -282505 7 ffff90b56cb2e000 -148065 8 ffff90b56cb2fa00 -872591 9 ffff90b56cb2c000 -84687 10 ffff90b56cb2f000 -87237 11 ffff90b166a40a00 -164582 Sometimes it is easier to see by finding a process getting starved and looking at the sched_info: crash> task ffff8eb765994500 sched_info PID: 7800 TASK: ffff8eb765994500 CPU: 16 COMMAND: "cputest" sched_info = { pcount = 8, run_delay = 697094208, last_arrival = 240260125039, last_queued = 240260327513 }, crash> task ffff8eb765994500 sched_info PID: 7800 TASK: ffff8eb765994500 CPU: 16 COMMAND: "cputest" sched_info = { pcount = 8, run_delay = 697094208, last_arrival = 240260125039, last_queued = 240260327513 }, Signed-off-by: NPhil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c06f04c7 ("sched: Fix potential near-infinite distribute_cfs_runtime() loop") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181008143639.GA4019@pauld.bos.csbSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 02 10月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
Automatic NUMA Balancing uses a multi-stage pass to decide whether a page should migrate to a local node. This filter avoids excessive ping-ponging if a page is shared or used by threads that migrate cross-node frequently. Threads inherit both page tables and the preferred node ID from the parent. This means that threads can trigger hinting faults earlier than a new task which delays scanning for a number of seconds. As it can be load balanced very early in its lifetime there can be an unnecessary delay before it starts migrating thread-local data. This patch migrates private pages faster early in the lifetime of a thread using the sequence counter as an identifier of new tasks. With this patch applied, STREAM performance is the same as 4.17 even though processes are not spread cross-node prematurely. Other workloads showed a mix of minor gains and losses. This is somewhat expected most workloads are not very sensitive to the starting conditions of a process. 4.19.0-rc5 4.19.0-rc5 4.17.0 numab-v1r1 fastmigrate-v1r1 vanilla MB/sec copy 43298.52 ( 0.00%) 47335.46 ( 9.32%) 47219.24 ( 9.06%) MB/sec scale 30115.06 ( 0.00%) 32568.12 ( 8.15%) 32527.56 ( 8.01%) MB/sec add 32825.12 ( 0.00%) 36078.94 ( 9.91%) 35928.02 ( 9.45%) MB/sec triad 32549.52 ( 0.00%) 35935.94 ( 10.40%) 35969.88 ( 10.51%) Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181001100525.29789-3-mgorman@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
If NUMA improvement from the task migration is going to be very minimal, then avoid task migration. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 198512 205910 3.72673 1 313559 318491 1.57291 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 74761.9 74935.9 0.232739 1 214874 226796 5.54837 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 180536 189780 5.12031 1 210281 205695 -2.18089 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 56511.4 60370 6.828 1 104899 108100 3.05151 1/7 cases is regressing, if we look at events migrate_pages seem to vary the most especially in the regressing case. Also some amount of variance is expected between different runs of Specjbb2005. Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,818,546 13,801,554 migrations 1,149,960 1,151,541 faults 385,583 433,246 cache-misses 55,259,546,768 55,168,691,835 sched:sched_move_numa 2,257 2,551 sched:sched_stick_numa 9 24 sched:sched_swap_numa 512 904 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 2,225 1,571 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 72692 113682 numa_hint_faults_local 62270 102163 numa_hit 238762 240181 numa_huge_pte_updates 48 36 numa_interleave 75 64 numa_local 238676 240103 numa_other 86 78 numa_pages_migrated 2225 1564 numa_pte_updates 98557 134080 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,173,490 3,079,150 migrations 36,966 31,455 faults 108,776 99,081 cache-misses 12,200,075,320 11,588,126,740 sched:sched_move_numa 1,264 1 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 899 36 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 21109 430 numa_hint_faults_local 17120 77 numa_hit 72934 71277 numa_huge_pte_updates 42 0 numa_interleave 33 22 numa_local 72866 71218 numa_other 68 59 numa_pages_migrated 915 23 numa_pte_updates 42326 0 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,312,022 8,707,565 migrations 231,705 171,342 faults 310,242 310,820 cache-misses 402,324,573 136,115,400 sched:sched_move_numa 193 215 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 6 sched:sched_swap_numa 3 24 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 93 162 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11838 8985 numa_hint_faults_local 11216 8154 numa_hit 90689 93819 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 1579 882 numa_local 89634 93496 numa_other 1055 323 numa_pages_migrated 92 169 numa_pte_updates 12109 9217 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,170,481 2,152,072 migrations 10,126 10,704 faults 160,962 164,376 cache-misses 10,834,845 3,818,437 sched:sched_move_numa 10 16 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 7 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 2 199 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 403 2248 numa_hint_faults_local 358 1666 numa_hit 25898 25704 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 207 200 numa_local 25860 25679 numa_other 38 25 numa_pages_migrated 2 197 numa_pte_updates 400 2234 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 110,339,633 93,330,595 migrations 4,139,812 4,122,061 faults 863,622 865,979 cache-misses 231,838,045,660 225,395,083,479 sched:sched_move_numa 2,196 2,372 sched:sched_stick_numa 33 24 sched:sched_swap_numa 544 769 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 2,469 1,677 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 85748 91638 numa_hint_faults_local 66831 78096 numa_hit 242213 242225 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 2 numa_local 242211 242219 numa_other 2 6 numa_pages_migrated 2376 1515 numa_pte_updates 86233 92274 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 59,331,057 51,487,271 migrations 552,019 537,170 faults 266,586 256,921 cache-misses 73,796,312,990 70,073,831,187 sched:sched_move_numa 981 576 sched:sched_stick_numa 54 24 sched:sched_swap_numa 286 327 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 713 726 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 14807 12000 numa_hint_faults_local 5738 5024 numa_hit 36230 36470 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 36228 36465 numa_other 2 5 numa_pages_migrated 703 726 numa_pte_updates 14742 11930 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-7-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
migrate_task_rq_fair() resets the scan rate for NUMA balancing on every cross-node migration. In the event of excessive load balancing due to saturation, this may result in the scan rate being pegged at maximum and further overloading the machine. This patch only resets the scan if NUMA balancing is active, a preferred node has been selected and the task is being migrated from the preferred node as these are the most harmful. For example, a migration to the preferred node does not justify a faster scan rate. Similarly, a migration between two nodes that are not preferred is probably bouncing due to over-saturation of the machine. In that case, scanning faster and trapping more NUMA faults will further overload the machine. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203370 205332 0.964744 1 328431 319785 -2.63252 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 206070 206585 0.249915 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188386 189162 0.41192 1 201566 213760 6.04963 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 59157.4 58736.8 -0.710985 1 105495 105419 -0.0720413 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,825,492 14,285,708 migrations 1,152,509 1,180,621 faults 371,948 339,114 cache-misses 55,654,206,041 55,205,631,894 sched:sched_move_numa 1,856 843 sched:sched_stick_numa 4 6 sched:sched_swap_numa 428 219 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 898 365 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 57146 26907 numa_hint_faults_local 51612 24279 numa_hit 238164 239771 numa_huge_pte_updates 16 0 numa_interleave 63 68 numa_local 238085 239688 numa_other 79 83 numa_pages_migrated 883 363 numa_pte_updates 67540 27415 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,288,525 3,202,779 migrations 38,652 37,186 faults 111,678 106,076 cache-misses 12,111,197,376 12,024,873,744 sched:sched_move_numa 900 931 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 5 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 714 637 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18572 17409 numa_hint_faults_local 14850 14367 numa_hit 73197 73953 numa_huge_pte_updates 11 20 numa_interleave 25 25 numa_local 73138 73892 numa_other 59 61 numa_pages_migrated 712 668 numa_pte_updates 24021 27276 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,451,543 8,474,013 migrations 202,804 254,934 faults 310,024 320,506 cache-misses 253,522,507 110,580,458 sched:sched_move_numa 213 725 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 7 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 88 145 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11830 22797 numa_hint_faults_local 11301 21539 numa_hit 90038 89308 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 855 865 numa_local 89796 88955 numa_other 242 353 numa_pages_migrated 88 149 numa_pte_updates 12039 22930 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,049,153 2,195,628 migrations 11,405 11,179 faults 162,309 149,656 cache-misses 7,203,343 8,117,515 sched:sched_move_numa 22 49 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1 5 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 1693 3577 numa_hint_faults_local 1669 3476 numa_hit 25177 26142 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 194 358 numa_local 24993 26042 numa_other 184 100 numa_pages_migrated 1 5 numa_pte_updates 1577 3587 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 94,515,937 100,602,296 migrations 4,203,554 4,135,630 faults 832,697 789,256 cache-misses 226,248,698,331 226,160,621,058 sched:sched_move_numa 1,730 1,366 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 16 sched:sched_swap_numa 432 374 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,398 1,350 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 80079 47857 numa_hint_faults_local 68620 39768 numa_hit 241187 240165 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 241186 240165 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 1347 1224 numa_pte_updates 80729 48354 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 63,704,961 58,515,496 migrations 573,404 564,845 faults 230,878 245,807 cache-misses 76,568,222,781 73,603,757,976 sched:sched_move_numa 509 996 sched:sched_stick_numa 31 10 sched:sched_swap_numa 182 193 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 541 646 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 8501 13422 numa_hint_faults_local 2960 5619 numa_hit 35526 36118 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35526 36116 numa_other 0 2 numa_pages_migrated 539 616 numa_pte_updates 8433 13374 Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently task scan rate is reset when NUMA balancer migrates the task to a different node. If NUMA balancer initiates a swap, reset is only applicable to the task that initiates the swap. Similarly no scan rate reset is done if the task is migrated across nodes by traditional load balancer. Instead move the scan reset to the migrate_task_rq. This ensures the task moved out of its preferred node, either gets back to its preferred node quickly or finds a new preferred node. Doing so, would be fair to all tasks migrating across nodes. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200668 203370 1.3465 1 321791 328431 2.06345 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 204848 206070 0.59654 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188098 188386 0.153112 1 200351 201566 0.606436 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 58145.9 59157.4 1.73959 1 103798 105495 1.63491 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,912,183 13,825,492 migrations 1,155,931 1,152,509 faults 367,139 371,948 cache-misses 54,240,196,814 55,654,206,041 sched:sched_move_numa 1,571 1,856 sched:sched_stick_numa 9 4 sched:sched_swap_numa 463 428 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 703 898 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 50155 57146 numa_hint_faults_local 45264 51612 numa_hit 239652 238164 numa_huge_pte_updates 36 16 numa_interleave 68 63 numa_local 239576 238085 numa_other 76 79 numa_pages_migrated 680 883 numa_pte_updates 71146 67540 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,156,720 3,288,525 migrations 30,354 38,652 faults 97,261 111,678 cache-misses 12,400,026,826 12,111,197,376 sched:sched_move_numa 4 900 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 1 5 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 20 714 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 272 18572 numa_hint_faults_local 186 14850 numa_hit 71362 73197 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 11 numa_interleave 23 25 numa_local 71299 73138 numa_other 63 59 numa_pages_migrated 2 712 numa_pte_updates 0 24021 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,606,824 8,451,543 migrations 155,352 202,804 faults 301,409 310,024 cache-misses 157,759,224 253,522,507 sched:sched_move_numa 168 213 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 3 2 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 125 88 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 4650 11830 numa_hint_faults_local 3946 11301 numa_hit 90489 90038 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 892 855 numa_local 90034 89796 numa_other 455 242 numa_pages_migrated 124 88 numa_pte_updates 4818 12039 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,113,167 2,049,153 migrations 10,533 11,405 faults 142,727 162,309 cache-misses 5,594,192 7,203,343 sched:sched_move_numa 10 22 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 1 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 744 1693 numa_hint_faults_local 584 1669 numa_hit 25551 25177 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 263 194 numa_local 25302 24993 numa_other 249 184 numa_pages_migrated 6 1 numa_pte_updates 744 1577 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 101,227,352 94,515,937 migrations 4,151,829 4,203,554 faults 745,233 832,697 cache-misses 224,669,561,766 226,248,698,331 sched:sched_move_numa 617 1,730 sched:sched_stick_numa 2 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 187 432 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 316 1,398 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 24195 80079 numa_hint_faults_local 21639 68620 numa_hit 238331 241187 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 238331 241186 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 204 1347 numa_pte_updates 24561 80729 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 62,738,978 63,704,961 migrations 562,702 573,404 faults 228,465 230,878 cache-misses 75,778,067,952 76,568,222,781 sched:sched_move_numa 648 509 sched:sched_stick_numa 13 31 sched:sched_swap_numa 137 182 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 733 541 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 10281 8501 numa_hint_faults_local 3242 2960 numa_hit 36338 35526 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 36338 35526 numa_other 0 0 numa_pages_migrated 706 539 numa_pte_updates 10176 8433 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
This additional parameter (new_cpu) is used later for identifying if task migration is across nodes. No functional change. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203353 200668 -1.32036 1 328205 321791 -1.95427 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 214384 204848 -4.44809 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188553 188098 -0.241311 1 196273 200351 2.07772 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 57581.2 58145.9 0.980702 1 103468 103798 0.318939 Brings out the variance between different specjbb2005 runs. Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,941,377 13,912,183 migrations 1,157,323 1,155,931 faults 382,175 367,139 cache-misses 54,993,823,500 54,240,196,814 sched:sched_move_numa 2,005 1,571 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 9 sched:sched_swap_numa 529 463 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,573 703 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 67099 50155 numa_hint_faults_local 58456 45264 numa_hit 240416 239652 numa_huge_pte_updates 18 36 numa_interleave 65 68 numa_local 240339 239576 numa_other 77 76 numa_pages_migrated 1574 680 numa_pte_updates 77182 71146 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,176,453 3,156,720 migrations 30,238 30,354 faults 87,869 97,261 cache-misses 12,544,479,391 12,400,026,826 sched:sched_move_numa 23 4 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 6 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 10 20 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 236 272 numa_hint_faults_local 201 186 numa_hit 72293 71362 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 26 23 numa_local 72233 71299 numa_other 60 63 numa_pages_migrated 8 2 numa_pte_updates 0 0 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,478,820 8,606,824 migrations 171,323 155,352 faults 307,499 301,409 cache-misses 240,353,599 157,759,224 sched:sched_move_numa 214 168 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 4 3 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 89 125 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 5301 4650 numa_hint_faults_local 4745 3946 numa_hit 92943 90489 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 899 892 numa_local 92345 90034 numa_other 598 455 numa_pages_migrated 88 124 numa_pte_updates 5505 4818 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,066,172 2,113,167 migrations 11,076 10,533 faults 149,544 142,727 cache-misses 10,398,067 5,594,192 sched:sched_move_numa 43 10 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 6 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 3552 744 numa_hint_faults_local 3347 584 numa_hit 25611 25551 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 213 263 numa_local 25583 25302 numa_other 28 249 numa_pages_migrated 6 6 numa_pte_updates 3535 744 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 99,358,136 101,227,352 migrations 4,041,607 4,151,829 faults 749,653 745,233 cache-misses 225,562,543,251 224,669,561,766 sched:sched_move_numa 771 617 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 2 sched:sched_swap_numa 204 187 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,180 316 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 27409 24195 numa_hint_faults_local 20677 21639 numa_hit 239988 238331 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 239983 238331 numa_other 5 0 numa_pages_migrated 1016 204 numa_pte_updates 27916 24561 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 60,899,307 62,738,978 migrations 544,668 562,702 faults 270,834 228,465 cache-misses 74,543,455,635 75,778,067,952 sched:sched_move_numa 735 648 sched:sched_stick_numa 25 13 sched:sched_swap_numa 174 137 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 816 733 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11059 10281 numa_hint_faults_local 4733 3242 numa_hit 41384 36338 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 41383 36338 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 815 706 numa_pte_updates 11323 10176 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Task migration under NUMA balancing can happen in parallel. More than one task might choose to migrate to the same CPU at the same time. This can result in: - During task swap, choosing a task that was not part of the evaluation. - During task swap, task which just got moved into its preferred node, moving to a completely different node. - During task swap, task failing to move to the preferred node, will have to wait an extra interval for the next migrate opportunity. - During task movement, multiple task movements can cause load imbalance. This problem is more likely if there are more cores per node or more nodes in the system. Use a per run-queue variable to check if NUMA-balance is active on the run-queue. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200194 203353 1.57797 1 311331 328205 5.41995 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 197654 214384 8.46429 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 192605 188553 -2.10379 1 213402 196273 -8.02664 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 52227.1 57581.2 10.2516 1 102529 103468 0.915838 There is a regression on power 9 box. If we look at the details, that box has a sudden jump in cache-misses with this patch. All other parameters seem to be pointing towards NUMA consolidation. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,345,784 13,941,377 migrations 1,127,820 1,157,323 faults 374,736 382,175 cache-misses 55,132,054,603 54,993,823,500 sched:sched_move_numa 1,923 2,005 sched:sched_stick_numa 52 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 595 529 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,932 1,573 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 60605 67099 numa_hint_faults_local 51804 58456 numa_hit 239945 240416 numa_huge_pte_updates 14 18 numa_interleave 60 65 numa_local 239865 240339 numa_other 80 77 numa_pages_migrated 1931 1574 numa_pte_updates 67823 77182 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,016,467 3,176,453 migrations 37,326 30,238 faults 115,342 87,869 cache-misses 11,692,155,554 12,544,479,391 sched:sched_move_numa 965 23 sched:sched_stick_numa 8 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 35 6 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,168 10 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 16286 236 numa_hint_faults_local 11863 201 numa_hit 112482 72293 numa_huge_pte_updates 33 0 numa_interleave 20 26 numa_local 112419 72233 numa_other 63 60 numa_pages_migrated 1144 8 numa_pte_updates 32859 0 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,629,724 8,478,820 migrations 221,052 171,323 faults 308,661 307,499 cache-misses 135,574,913 240,353,599 sched:sched_move_numa 147 214 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 4 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 64 89 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11481 5301 numa_hint_faults_local 10968 4745 numa_hit 89773 92943 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 1116 899 numa_local 89220 92345 numa_other 553 598 numa_pages_migrated 62 88 numa_pte_updates 11694 5505 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,272,887 2,066,172 migrations 12,206 11,076 faults 163,704 149,544 cache-misses 4,801,186 10,398,067 sched:sched_move_numa 44 43 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 17 6 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 2261 3552 numa_hint_faults_local 1993 3347 numa_hit 25726 25611 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 239 213 numa_local 25498 25583 numa_other 228 28 numa_pages_migrated 17 6 numa_pte_updates 2266 3535 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 117,980,962 99,358,136 migrations 3,950,220 4,041,607 faults 736,979 749,653 cache-misses 224,976,072,879 225,562,543,251 sched:sched_move_numa 504 771 sched:sched_stick_numa 50 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 239 204 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,260 1,180 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18293 27409 numa_hint_faults_local 11969 20677 numa_hit 240854 239988 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 240851 239983 numa_other 3 5 numa_pages_migrated 1190 1016 numa_pte_updates 18106 27916 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 61,053,158 60,899,307 migrations 551,586 544,668 faults 244,174 270,834 cache-misses 74,326,766,973 74,543,455,635 sched:sched_move_numa 344 735 sched:sched_stick_numa 24 25 sched:sched_swap_numa 140 174 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 568 816 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 6461 11059 numa_hint_faults_local 2283 4733 numa_hit 35661 41384 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35661 41383 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 568 815 numa_pte_updates 6518 11323 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-2-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc warning for missing 'flags' parameter description: ../kernel/sched/fair.c:3371: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'attach_entity_load_avg' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: ea14b57e ("sched/cpufreq: Provide migration hint") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cdda0d42-880d-4229-a9f7-5899c977a063@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
It can happen that load_balance() finds a busiest group and then a busiest rq but the calculated imbalance is in fact 0. In such situation, detach_tasks() returns immediately and lets the flag LBF_ALL_PINNED set. The busiest CPU is then wrongly assumed to have pinned tasks and removed from the load balance mask. then, we redo a load balance without the busiest CPU. This creates wrong load balance situation and generates wrong task migration. If the calculated imbalance is 0, it's useless to try to find a busiest rq as no task will be migrated and we can return immediately. This situation can happen with heterogeneous system or smp system when RT tasks are decreasing the capacity of some CPUs. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: jhugo@codeaurora.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536306664-29827-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Since commit: 523e979d ("sched/core: Use PELT for scale_rt_capacity()") scale_rt_capacity() returns the remaining capacity and not a scale factor to apply on cpu_capacity_orig. arch_scale_cpu() is directly called by scale_rt_capacity() so we must take the sched_domain argument. Reported-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 523e979d ("sched/core: Use PELT for scale_rt_capacity()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180904093626.GA23936@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Steve Muckle 提交于
When a task which previously ran on a given CPU is remotely queued to wake up on that same CPU, there is a period where the task's state is TASK_WAKING and its vruntime is not normalized. This is not accounted for in vruntime_normalized() which will cause an error in the task's vruntime if it is switched from the fair class during this time. For example if it is boosted to RT priority via rt_mutex_setprio(), rq->min_vruntime will not be subtracted from the task's vruntime but it will be added again when the task returns to the fair class. The task's vruntime will have been erroneously doubled and the effective priority of the task will be reduced. Note this will also lead to inflation of all vruntimes since the doubled vruntime value will become the rq's min_vruntime when other tasks leave the rq. This leads to repeated doubling of the vruntime and priority penalty. Fix this by recognizing a WAKING task's vruntime as normalized only if sched_remote_wakeup is true. This indicates a migration, in which case the vruntime would have been normalized in migrate_task_rq_fair(). Based on a similar patch from John Dias <joaodias@google.com>. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com> Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@google.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Patrick Bellasi <Patrick.Bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Fixes: b5179ac7 ("sched/fair: Prepare to fix fairness problems on migration") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831224217.169476-1-smuckle@google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
update_blocked_averages() is called to periodiccally decay the stalled load of idle CPUs and to sync all loads before running load balance. When cfs rq is idle, it trigs a load balance during pick_next_task_fair() in order to potentially pull tasks and to use this newly idle CPU. This load balance happens whereas prev task from another class has not been put and its utilization updated yet. This may lead to wrongly account running time as idle time for RT or DL classes. Test that no RT or DL task is running when updating their utilization in update_blocked_averages(). We still update RT and DL utilization instead of simply skipping them to make sure that all metrics are synced when used during load balance. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 371bf427 ("sched/rt: Add rt_rq utilization tracking") Fixes: 3727e0e1 ("sched/dl: Add dl_rq utilization tracking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1535728975-22799-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
With the following commit: 051f3ca0 ("sched/topology: Introduce NUMA identity node sched domain") the scheduler introduced a new NUMA level. However this leads to the NUMA topology on 2 node systems to not be marked as NUMA_DIRECT anymore. After this commit, it gets reported as NUMA_BACKPLANE, because sched_domains_numa_level is now 2 on 2 node systems. Fix this by allowing setting systems that have up to 2 NUMA levels as NUMA_DIRECT. While here remove code that assumes that level can be 0. Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andre Wild <wild@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org> Fixes: 051f3ca0 "Introduce NUMA identity node sched domain" Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533920419-17410-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jiada Wang 提交于
The following lockdep report can be triggered by writing to /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 4.18.0-rc6-00152-gcd3f77d7-dirty #18 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ sh/3358 is trying to acquire lock: 000000004ad3989d (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: static_key_enable+0x14/0x30 but task is already holding lock: 00000000c1b31a88 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){+.+.}, at: sched_feat_write+0x160/0x428 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xb8/0x148 down_write+0xac/0x140 start_creating+0x5c/0x168 debugfs_create_dir+0x18/0x220 opp_debug_register+0x8c/0x120 _add_opp_dev+0x104/0x1f8 dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table+0x174/0x340 _of_add_opp_table_v2+0x110/0x760 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table+0x5c/0x240 dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table+0x5c/0x100 cpufreq_init+0x160/0x430 cpufreq_online+0x1cc/0xe30 cpufreq_add_dev+0x78/0x198 subsys_interface_register+0x168/0x270 cpufreq_register_driver+0x1c8/0x278 dt_cpufreq_probe+0xdc/0x1b8 platform_drv_probe+0xb4/0x168 driver_probe_device+0x318/0x4b0 __device_attach_driver+0xfc/0x1f0 bus_for_each_drv+0xf8/0x180 __device_attach+0x164/0x200 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 bus_probe_device+0x110/0x178 device_add+0x6d8/0x908 platform_device_add+0x138/0x3d8 platform_device_register_full+0x1cc/0x1f8 cpufreq_dt_platdev_init+0x174/0x1bc do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x310 kernel_init_freeable+0x4b8/0x56c kernel_init+0x10/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #2 (opp_table_lock){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xb8/0x148 __mutex_lock+0x104/0xf50 mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x28 _of_add_opp_table_v2+0xb4/0x760 dev_pm_opp_of_add_table+0x5c/0x240 dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table+0x5c/0x100 cpufreq_init+0x160/0x430 cpufreq_online+0x1cc/0xe30 cpufreq_add_dev+0x78/0x198 subsys_interface_register+0x168/0x270 cpufreq_register_driver+0x1c8/0x278 dt_cpufreq_probe+0xdc/0x1b8 platform_drv_probe+0xb4/0x168 driver_probe_device+0x318/0x4b0 __device_attach_driver+0xfc/0x1f0 bus_for_each_drv+0xf8/0x180 __device_attach+0x164/0x200 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 bus_probe_device+0x110/0x178 device_add+0x6d8/0x908 platform_device_add+0x138/0x3d8 platform_device_register_full+0x1cc/0x1f8 cpufreq_dt_platdev_init+0x174/0x1bc do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x310 kernel_init_freeable+0x4b8/0x56c kernel_init+0x10/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #1 (subsys mutex#6){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0xb8/0x148 __mutex_lock+0x104/0xf50 mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x28 subsys_interface_register+0xd8/0x270 cpufreq_register_driver+0x1c8/0x278 dt_cpufreq_probe+0xdc/0x1b8 platform_drv_probe+0xb4/0x168 driver_probe_device+0x318/0x4b0 __device_attach_driver+0xfc/0x1f0 bus_for_each_drv+0xf8/0x180 __device_attach+0x164/0x200 device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18 bus_probe_device+0x110/0x178 device_add+0x6d8/0x908 platform_device_add+0x138/0x3d8 platform_device_register_full+0x1cc/0x1f8 cpufreq_dt_platdev_init+0x174/0x1bc do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x310 kernel_init_freeable+0x4b8/0x56c kernel_init+0x10/0x138 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: __lock_acquire+0x203c/0x21d0 lock_acquire+0xb8/0x148 cpus_read_lock+0x58/0x1c8 static_key_enable+0x14/0x30 sched_feat_write+0x314/0x428 full_proxy_write+0xa0/0x138 __vfs_write+0xd8/0x388 vfs_write+0xdc/0x318 ksys_write+0xb4/0x138 sys_write+0xc/0x18 __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> opp_table_lock --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); lock(opp_table_lock); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by sh/3358: #0: 00000000a8c4b363 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x238/0x318 #1: 00000000c1b31a88 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){+.+.}, at: sched_feat_write+0x160/0x428 stack backtrace: CPU: 5 PID: 3358 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.18.0-rc6-00152-gcd3f77d7-dirty #18 Hardware name: Renesas H3ULCB Kingfisher board based on r8a7795 ES2.0+ (DT) Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x288 show_stack+0x14/0x20 dump_stack+0x13c/0x1ac print_circular_bug.isra.10+0x270/0x438 check_prev_add.constprop.16+0x4dc/0xb98 __lock_acquire+0x203c/0x21d0 lock_acquire+0xb8/0x148 cpus_read_lock+0x58/0x1c8 static_key_enable+0x14/0x30 sched_feat_write+0x314/0x428 full_proxy_write+0xa0/0x138 __vfs_write+0xd8/0x388 vfs_write+0xdc/0x318 ksys_write+0xb4/0x138 sys_write+0xc/0x18 __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x4 This is because when loading the cpufreq_dt module we first acquire cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem lock, then in cpufreq_init(), we are taking the &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key lock. But when writing to /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features, the cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem lock depends on the &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key lock. To fix this bug, reverse the lock acquisition order when writing to sched_features, this way cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem no longer depends on &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key. Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NJiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com> Cc: George G. Davis <george_davis@mentor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731121222.26195-1-jiada_wang@mentor.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 23 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Better ensure we actually hold the lock using lockdep than just commenting on it. Due to the various exported _locked interfaces it is far too easy to get the locking wrong. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171214152344.6880-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If the tick has been stopped already, but the governor has not asked to stop it (which it can do sometimes), the idle loop should invoke tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(), to let tick_nohz_stop_tick() take care of this case properly. Fixes: 554c8aa8 (sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick) Cc: 4.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.17+ Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Add a function calculate_sigpending to test to see if any signals are pending for a new task immediately following fork. Signals have to happen either before or after fork. Today our practice is to push all of the signals to before the fork, but that has the downside that frequent or periodic signals can make fork take much much longer than normal or prevent fork from completing entirely. So we need move signals that we can after the fork to prevent that. This updates the code to set TIF_SIGPENDING on a new task if there are signals or other activities that have moved so that they appear to happen after the fork. As the code today restarts if it sees any such activity this won't immediately have an effect, as there will be no reason for it to set TIF_SIGPENDING immediately after the fork. Adding calculate_sigpending means the code in fork can safely be changed to not always restart if a signal is pending. The new calculate_sigpending function sets sigpending if there are pending bits in jobctl, pending signals, the freezer needs to freeze the new task or the live kernel patching framework need the new thread to take the slow path to userspace. I have verified that setting TIF_SIGPENDING does make a new process take the slow path to userspace before it executes it's first userspace instruction. I have looked at the callers of signal_wake_up and the code paths setting TIF_SIGPENDING and I don't see anything else that needs to be handled. The code probably doesn't need to set TIF_SIGPENDING for the kernel live patching as it uses a separate thread flag as well. But at this point it seems safer reuse the recalc_sigpending logic and get the kernel live patching folks to sort out their story later. V2: I have moved the test into schedule_tail where siglock can be grabbed and recalc_sigpending can be reused directly. Further as the last action of setting up a new task this guarantees that TIF_SIGPENDING will be properly set in the new process. The helper calculate_sigpending takes the siglock and uncontitionally sets TIF_SIGPENDING and let's recalc_sigpending clear TIF_SIGPENDING if it is unnecessary. This allows reusing the existing code and keeps maintenance of the conditions simple. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> suggested the movement and pointed out the need to take siglock if this code was going to be called while the new task is discoverable. Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Fernandes (Google) 提交于
This patch detaches the preemptirq tracepoints from the tracers and keeps it separate. Advantages: * Lockdep and irqsoff event can now run in parallel since they no longer have their own calls. * This unifies the usecase of adding hooks to an irqsoff and irqson event, and a preemptoff and preempton event. 3 users of the events exist: - Lockdep - irqsoff and preemptoff tracers - irqs and preempt trace events The unification cleans up several ifdefs and makes the code in preempt tracer and irqsoff tracers simpler. It gets rid of all the horrific ifdeferry around PROVE_LOCKING and makes configuration of the different users of the tracepoints more easy and understandable. It also gets rid of the time_* function calls from the lockdep hooks used to call into the preemptirq tracer which is not needed anymore. The negative delta in lines of code in this patch is quite large too. In the patch we introduce a new CONFIG option PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS as a single point for registering probes onto the tracepoints. With this, the web of config options for preempt/irq toggle tracepoints and its users becomes: PREEMPT_TRACER PREEMPTIRQ_EVENTS IRQSOFF_TRACER PROVE_LOCKING | | \ | | \ (selects) / \ \ (selects) / TRACE_PREEMPT_TOGGLE ----> TRACE_IRQFLAGS \ / \ (depends on) / PREEMPTIRQ_TRACEPOINTS Other than the performance tests mentioned in the previous patch, I also ran the locking API test suite. I verified that all tests cases are passing. I also injected issues by not registering lockdep probes onto the tracepoints and I see failures to confirm that the probes are indeed working. This series + lockdep probes not registered (just to inject errors): [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21:FAILED|FAILED| ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | With this series + lockdep probes registered, all locking tests pass: [ 0.000000] hard-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-irqs-on + irq-safe-A/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] sirq-safe-A => hirqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/12: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + irqs-on/21: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] hard-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | [ 0.000000] soft-safe-A + unsafe-B #1/123: ok | ok | ok | Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730222423.196630-4-joel@joelfernandes.orgAcked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJoel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> -
由 Pavel Tatashin 提交于
sched_clock_init() used be called early during boot when interrupts were still disabled. After the recent changes to utilize sched clock early the sched_clock_init() call happens when interrupts are already enabled, which triggers the following warning: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/time/sched_clock.c:180 sched_clock_register+0x44/0x278 [<c001a13c>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c052367c>] (sched_clock_register+0x44/0x278) [<c052367c>] (sched_clock_register) from [<c05238d8>] (generic_sched_clock_init+0x28/0x88) [<c05238d8>] (generic_sched_clock_init) from [<c0521a00>] (sched_clock_init+0x54/0x74) [<c0521a00>] (sched_clock_init) from [<c0519c18>] (start_kernel+0x310/0x3e4) [<c0519c18>] (start_kernel) from [<00000000>] ( (null)) Disable IRQs for the duration of generic_sched_clock_init(). Fixes: 857baa87 ("sched/clock: Enable sched clock early") Signed-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Reported-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180730135252.24599-1-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
-
- 25 7月, 2018 17 次提交
-
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
numa_migrate_preferred() is called periodically or when task preferred node changes. Preferred node evaluations happen once per scan sequence. If the scan completion happens just after the periodic NUMA migration, then we try to migrate to the preferred node and the preferred node might change, needing another node migration. Avoid this by checking for scan sequence completion only when checking for periodic migration. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25862.6 26158.1 1.14258 1 74357 72725 -2.19482 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 117019 113992 -2.58 1 179095 174947 -2.31 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 449.46 770.77 615.22 101.70 numa01.sh Sys: 132.72 208.17 170.46 24.96 numa01.sh User: 39185.26 60290.89 50066.76 6807.84 numa02.sh Real: 60.85 61.79 61.28 0.37 numa02.sh Sys: 15.34 24.71 21.08 3.61 numa02.sh User: 5204.41 5249.85 5231.21 17.60 numa03.sh Real: 785.50 916.97 840.77 44.98 numa03.sh Sys: 108.08 133.60 119.43 8.82 numa03.sh User: 61422.86 70919.75 64720.87 3310.61 numa04.sh Real: 429.57 587.37 480.80 57.40 numa04.sh Sys: 240.61 321.97 290.84 33.58 numa04.sh User: 34597.65 40498.99 37079.48 2060.72 numa05.sh Real: 392.09 431.25 414.65 13.82 numa05.sh Sys: 229.41 372.48 297.54 53.14 numa05.sh User: 33390.86 34697.49 34222.43 556.42 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 424.63 566.18 498.12 59.26 23.50% numa01.sh Sys: 160.19 256.53 208.98 37.02 -18.4% numa01.sh User: 37320.00 46225.58 42001.57 3482.45 19.20% numa02.sh Real: 60.17 62.47 60.91 0.85 0.607% numa02.sh Sys: 15.30 22.82 17.04 2.90 23.70% numa02.sh User: 5202.13 5255.51 5219.08 20.14 0.232% numa03.sh Real: 823.91 844.89 833.86 8.46 0.828% numa03.sh Sys: 130.69 148.29 140.47 6.21 -14.9% numa03.sh User: 62519.15 64262.20 63613.38 620.05 1.740% numa04.sh Real: 515.30 603.74 548.56 30.93 -12.3% numa04.sh Sys: 459.73 525.48 489.18 21.63 -40.5% numa04.sh User: 40561.96 44919.18 42047.87 1526.85 -11.8% numa05.sh Real: 396.58 454.37 421.13 19.71 -1.53% numa05.sh Sys: 208.72 422.02 348.90 73.60 -14.7% numa05.sh User: 33124.08 36109.35 34846.47 1089.74 -1.79% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-20-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
On NUMA_BACKPLANE and NUMA_GLUELESS_MESH systems, tasks/memory should be consolidated to the closest group of nodes. In such a case, relying on group_fault metric may not always help to consolidate. There can always be a case where a node closer to the preferred node may have lesser faults than a node further away from the preferred node. In such a case, moving to node with more faults might avoid numa consolidation. Using group_weight would help to consolidate task/memory around the preferred_node. While here, to be on the conservative side, don't override migrate thread degrades locality logic for CPU_NEWLY_IDLE load balancing. Note: Similar problems exist with should_numa_migrate_memory and will be dealt separately. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25645.4 25960 1.22 1 72142 73550 1.95 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 110199 120071 8.958 1 176303 176249 -0.03 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 490.04 774.86 596.26 96.46 numa01.sh Sys: 151.52 242.88 184.82 31.71 numa01.sh User: 41418.41 60844.59 48776.09 6564.27 numa02.sh Real: 60.14 62.94 60.98 1.00 numa02.sh Sys: 16.11 30.77 21.20 5.28 numa02.sh User: 5184.33 5311.09 5228.50 44.24 numa03.sh Real: 790.95 856.35 826.41 24.11 numa03.sh Sys: 114.93 118.85 117.05 1.63 numa03.sh User: 60990.99 64959.28 63470.43 1415.44 numa04.sh Real: 434.37 597.92 504.87 59.70 numa04.sh Sys: 237.63 397.40 289.74 55.98 numa04.sh User: 34854.87 41121.83 38572.52 2615.84 numa05.sh Real: 386.77 448.90 417.22 22.79 numa05.sh Sys: 149.23 379.95 303.04 79.55 numa05.sh User: 32951.76 35959.58 34562.18 1034.05 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 493.19 672.88 597.51 59.38 -0.20% numa01.sh Sys: 150.09 245.48 207.76 34.26 -11.0% numa01.sh User: 41928.51 53779.17 48747.06 3901.39 0.059% numa02.sh Real: 60.63 62.87 61.22 0.83 -0.39% numa02.sh Sys: 16.64 27.97 20.25 4.06 4.691% numa02.sh User: 5222.92 5309.60 5254.03 29.98 -0.48% numa03.sh Real: 821.52 902.15 863.60 32.41 -4.30% numa03.sh Sys: 112.04 130.66 118.35 7.08 -1.09% numa03.sh User: 62245.16 69165.14 66443.04 2450.32 -4.47% numa04.sh Real: 414.53 519.57 476.25 37.00 6.009% numa04.sh Sys: 181.84 335.67 280.41 54.07 3.327% numa04.sh User: 33924.50 39115.39 37343.78 1934.26 3.290% numa05.sh Real: 408.30 441.45 417.90 12.05 -0.16% numa05.sh Sys: 233.41 381.60 295.58 57.37 2.523% numa05.sh User: 33301.31 35972.50 34335.19 938.94 0.661% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-16-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
The metrics for updating scan periods are local or task specific. Currently this update happens under the numa_group lock, which seems unnecessary. Hence move this update outside the lock. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25355.9 25645.4 1.141 1 72812 72142 -0.92 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-15-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
task_numa_find_cpu() helps to find the CPU to swap/move the task to. It's guarded by numa_has_capacity(). However node not having capacity shouldn't deter a task swapping if it helps NUMA placement. Further load_too_imbalanced(), which evaluates possibilities of move/swap, provides similar checks as numa_has_capacity. Hence remove numa_has_capacity() to enhance possibilities of task swapping even if load is imbalanced. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25657.9 25804.1 0.569 1 74435 73413 -1.37 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-13-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
There are checks in migrate_swap_stop() that check if the task/CPU combination is as per migrate_swap_arg before migrating. However atleast one of the two tasks to be swapped by migrate_swap() could have migrated to a completely different CPU before updating the migrate_swap_arg. The new CPU where the task is currently running could be a different node too. If the task has migrated, numa balancer might end up placing a task in a wrong node. Instead of achieving node consolidation, it may end up spreading the load across nodes. To avoid that pass the CPUs as additional parameters. While here, place migrate_swap under CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25377.3 25226.6 -0.59 1 72287 73326 1.437 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-10-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
The task_capacity field in 'struct numa_stats' is redundant. Also move nr_running for better packing within the struct. No functional changes. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25308.6 25377.3 0.271 1 72964 72287 -0.92 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-9-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
When comparing two nodes at a distance of 'hoplimit', we should consider nodes only up to 'hoplimit'. Currently we also consider nodes at 'oplimit' distance too. Hence two nodes at a distance of 'hoplimit' will have same groupweight. Fix this by skipping nodes at hoplimit. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25375.3 25308.6 -0.26 1 72617 72964 0.477 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 113372 108750 -4.07684 1 177403 183115 3.21979 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 414.64 819.20 556.08 147.70 -7.36% numa01.sh Sys: 77.52 205.04 139.40 52.05 67.10% numa01.sh User: 37043.24 61757.88 45517.48 9290.38 -5.06% numa02.sh Real: 60.80 63.32 61.63 0.88 -1.37% numa02.sh Sys: 17.35 39.37 25.71 7.33 -19.5% numa02.sh User: 5213.79 5374.73 5268.90 55.09 -0.62% numa03.sh Real: 780.09 948.64 831.43 63.02 -3.05% numa03.sh Sys: 104.96 136.92 116.31 11.34 4.591% numa03.sh User: 60465.42 73339.78 64368.03 4700.14 -2.72% numa04.sh Real: 412.60 681.92 521.29 96.64 -7.36% numa04.sh Sys: 210.32 314.10 251.77 37.71 41.74% numa04.sh User: 34026.38 45581.20 38534.49 4198.53 2.825% numa05.sh Real: 394.79 439.63 411.35 16.87 6.140% numa05.sh Sys: 238.32 330.09 292.31 38.32 -9.04% numa05.sh User: 33456.45 34876.07 34138.62 609.45 2.741% While there is a regression with this change, this change is needed from a correctness perspective. Also it helps consolidation as seen from perf bench output. Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-8-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Fix the order in which the private and shared numa faults are getting printed. No functional changes. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25215.7 25375.3 0.63 1 72107 72617 0.70 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-7-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
When numa_group faults are available, task_numa_placement only uses numa_group faults to evaluate preferred node. However it still accounts task faults and even evaluates the preferred node just based on task faults just to discard it in favour of preferred node chosen on the basis of numa_group. Instead use task faults only if numa_group is not set. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25549.6 25215.7 -1.30 1 73190 72107 -1.47 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 113437 113372 -0.05 1 196130 177403 -9.54 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 16.29% numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 -15.8% numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 14.04% numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 0.871% numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 17.35% numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 0.464% numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 -7.47% numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 -19.5% numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 -5.36% numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 2.930% numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 -11.3% numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 0.246% numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 0.677% numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 38.92% numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 3.368% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-6-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently preferred node is set to dst_nid which is the last node in the iteration whose group weight or task weight is greater than the current node. However it doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the numa capacity to move. It also doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the best_cpu which is the CPU/node ideal for node migration. Lets consider faults on a 4 node system with group weight numbers in different nodes being in 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 proportion. Consider the task is running on 3 and 0 is its preferred node but its capacity is full. Consider nodes 1, 2 and 3 have capacity. Then the task should be migrated to node 1. Currently the task gets moved to node 2. env.dst_nid points to the last node whose faults were greater than current node. Modify to set the preferred node based of best_cpu. Earlier setting preferred node was skipped if nr_active_nodes is 1. This could result in the task being moved out of the preferred node to a random node during regular load balancing. Also while modifying task_numa_migrate(), use sched_setnuma to set preferred node. This ensures out numa accounting is correct. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25122.9 25549.6 1.698 1 73850 73190 -0.89 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 105930 113437 7.08676 1 178624 196130 9.80047 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 -10.76% numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 -25.55% numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 -11.43% numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 -0.195% numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 -21.49% numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 -0.513% numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 4.6339% numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 7.3347% numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 1.5323% numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 -2.464% numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 5.8343% numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 -1.153% numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 -1.428% numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 -7.964% numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 -1.704% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently load_too_imbalance() cares about the slope of imbalance. It doesn't care of the direction of the imbalance. However this may not work if nodes that are being compared have dissimilar capacities. Few nodes might have more cores than other nodes in the system. Also unlike traditional load balance at a NUMA sched domain, multiple requests to migrate from the same source node to same destination node may run in parallel. This can cause huge load imbalance. This is specially true on a larger machines with either large cores per node or more number of nodes in the system. Hence allow move/swap only if the imbalance is going to reduce. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25058.2 25122.9 0.25 1 72950 73850 1.23 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32 numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58 numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48 numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63 numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85 numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04 numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45 numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58 numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69 numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12 numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83 numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26 numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59 numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78 numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 38.39% numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 21.79% numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 31.03% numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 0.637% numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 11.22% numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 0.608% numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 1.972% numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 4.197% numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 2.661% numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 9.385% numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 -14.6% numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 2.478% numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 0.380% numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 -17.9% numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 -2.12% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
task_numa_compare() helps choose the best CPU to move or swap the selected task. To achieve this task_numa_compare() is called for every CPU in the node. Currently it evaluates if the task can be moved/swapped for each of the CPUs. However the move evaluation is mostly independent of the CPU. Evaluating the move logic once per node, provides scope for simplifying task_numa_compare(). Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25705.2 25058.2 -2.51 1 74433 72950 -1.99 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 96589.6 105930 9.670 1 181830 178624 -1.76 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 440.65 941.32 758.98 189.17 numa01.sh Sys: 183.48 320.07 258.42 50.09 numa01.sh User: 37384.65 71818.14 60302.51 13798.96 numa02.sh Real: 61.24 65.35 62.49 1.49 numa02.sh Sys: 16.83 24.18 21.40 2.60 numa02.sh User: 5219.59 5356.34 5264.03 49.07 numa03.sh Real: 822.04 912.40 873.55 37.35 numa03.sh Sys: 118.80 140.94 132.90 7.60 numa03.sh User: 62485.19 70025.01 67208.33 2967.10 numa04.sh Real: 690.66 872.12 778.49 65.44 numa04.sh Sys: 459.26 563.03 494.03 42.39 numa04.sh User: 51116.44 70527.20 58849.44 8461.28 numa05.sh Real: 418.37 562.28 525.77 54.27 numa05.sh Sys: 299.45 481.00 392.49 64.27 numa05.sh User: 34115.09 41324.02 39105.30 2627.68 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32 2.587% numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58 45.42% numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48 5.435% numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63 1.477% numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85 0.943% numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04 -0.02% numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45 9.776% numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58 21.39% numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69 8.813% numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12 46.79% numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83 72.97% numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26 46.26% numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59 20.88% numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78 40.77% numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98 12.11% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Yun Wang 提交于
Although we can rely on cpuacct to present the CPU usage of task groups, it is hard to tell how intense the competition is between these groups on CPU resources. Monitoring the wait time or sched_debug of each process could be very expensive, and there is no good way to accurately represent the conflict with these info, we need the wait time on group dimension. Thus we introduce group's wait_sum to represent the resource conflict between task groups, which is simply the sum of the wait time of the group's cfs_rq. The 'cpu.stat' is modified to show the statistic, like: nr_periods 0 nr_throttled 0 throttled_time 0 wait_sum 2035098795584 Now we can monitor the changes of wait_sum to tell how much a a task group is suffering in the fight of CPU resources. For example: (wait_sum - last_wait_sum) * 100 / (nr_cpu * period_ns) == X% means the task group paid X percentage of period on waiting for the CPU. Signed-off-by: NMichael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ff7dae3b-e5f9-7157-1caa-ff02c6b23dc1@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Reuse cpu_util_irq() that has been defined for schedutil and set irq util to 0 when !CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING. But the compiler is not able to optimize the sequence (at least with aarch64 GCC 7.2.1): free *= (max - irq); free /= max; when irq is fixed to 0 Add a new inline function scale_irq_capacity() that will scale utilization when irq is accounted. Reuse this funciton in schedutil which applies similar formula. Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1532001606-6689-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Hailong Liu 提交于
NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is used to prevent a CPU borrow enough runtime with a spin-rt-task. However, if RT_RUNTIME_SHARE feature is enabled and rt_rq has borrowd enough rt_runtime at the beginning, rt_runtime can't be restored to its initial bandwidth rt_runtime after we disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE. E.g. on my PC with 4 cores, procedure to reproduce: 1) Make sure RT_RUNTIME_SHARE is enabled cat /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS START_DEBIT NO_NEXT_BUDDY LAST_BUDDY CACHE_HOT_BUDDY WAKEUP_PREEMPTION NO_HRTICK NO_DOUBLE_TICK LB_BIAS NONTASK_CAPACITY TTWU_QUEUE NO_SIS_AVG_CPU SIS_PROP NO_WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK RT_PUSH_IPI RT_RUNTIME_SHARE NO_LB_MIN ATTACH_AGE_LOAD WA_IDLE WA_WEIGHT WA_BIAS 2) Start a spin-rt-task ./loop_rr & 3) set affinity to the last cpu taskset -p 8 $pid_of_loop_rr 4) Observe that last cpu have borrowed enough runtime. cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime .rt_runtime : 950.000000 .rt_runtime : 900.000000 .rt_runtime : 950.000000 .rt_runtime : 1000.000000 5) Disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE echo NO_RT_RUNTIME_SHARE > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features 6) Observe that rt_runtime can not been restored cat /proc/sched_debug | grep rt_runtime .rt_runtime : 950.000000 .rt_runtime : 900.000000 .rt_runtime : 950.000000 .rt_runtime : 1000.000000 This patch help to restore rt_runtime after we disable RT_RUNTIME_SHARE. Signed-off-by: NHailong Liu <liu.hailong6@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NJiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531874815-39357-1-git-send-email-liu.hailong6@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
Daniel Casini got this warn while running a DL task here at RetisLab: [ 461.137582] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 461.137583] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP [ 461.137599] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2354 at kernel/sched/sched.h:967 assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [a ton of modules] [ 461.137646] CPU: 4 PID: 2354 Comm: label_image Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #3 [ 461.137647] Hardware name: ASUS All Series/Z87-K, BIOS 0801 09/02/2013 [ 461.137649] RIP: 0010:assert_clock_updated.isra.32.part.33+0x17/0x20 [ 461.137649] Code: ff 48 89 83 08 09 00 00 eb c6 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 c7 c7 98 7a 6c a5 c6 05 bc 0d 54 01 01 48 89 e5 e8 a9 84 fb ff <0f> 0b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 83 7e 60 01 74 0a 48 3b [ 461.137673] RSP: 0018:ffffa77e08cafc68 EFLAGS: 00010082 [ 461.137674] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8b3fc1702d80 RCX: 0000000000000006 [ 461.137674] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000096 RDI: ffff8b3fded164b0 [ 461.137675] RBP: ffffa77e08cafc68 R08: 0000000000000026 R09: 0000000000000339 [ 461.137676] R10: ffff8b3fd060d410 R11: 0000000000000026 R12: ffffffffa4e14e20 [ 461.137677] R13: ffff8b3fdec22940 R14: ffff8b3fc1702da0 R15: ffff8b3fdec22940 [ 461.137678] FS: 00007efe43ee5700(0000) GS:ffff8b3fded00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 461.137679] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 461.137680] CR2: 00007efe30000010 CR3: 0000000301744003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [ 461.137680] Call Trace: [ 461.137684] push_dl_task.part.46+0x3bc/0x460 [ 461.137686] task_woken_dl+0x60/0x80 [ 461.137689] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x4f/0x150 [ 461.137690] ttwu_do_activate+0x77/0x80 [ 461.137692] try_to_wake_up+0x1d6/0x4c0 [ 461.137693] wake_up_q+0x32/0x70 [ 461.137696] do_futex+0x7e7/0xb50 [ 461.137698] __x64_sys_futex+0x8b/0x180 [ 461.137701] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 [ 461.137703] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 461.137705] RIP: 0033:0x7efe4918ca26 [ 461.137705] Code: 00 00 00 74 17 49 8b 48 20 44 8b 59 10 41 83 e3 30 41 83 fb 20 74 1e be 85 00 00 00 41 ba 01 00 00 00 41 b9 01 00 00 04 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 1f 31 c0 c3 be 8c 00 00 00 49 89 c8 4d 31 d2 [ 461.137738] RSP: 002b:00007efe43ee4928 EFLAGS: 00000283 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca [ 461.137739] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000005094df0 RCX: 00007efe4918ca26 [ 461.137740] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000085 RDI: 0000000005094e24 [ 461.137741] RBP: 00007efe43ee49c0 R08: 0000000005094e20 R09: 0000000004000001 [ 461.137741] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000283 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 461.137742] R13: 0000000005094df8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000448a10 [ 461.137743] ---[ end trace 187df4cad2bf7649 ]--- This warning happened in the push_dl_task(), because __add_running_bw()->cpufreq_update_util() is getting the rq_clock of the later_rq before its update, which takes place at activate_task(). The fix then is to update the rq_clock before calling add_running_bw(). To avoid double rq_clock_update() call, we set ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK flag to activate_task(). Reported-by: NDaniel Casini <daniel.casini@santannapisa.it> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it> Fixes: e0367b12 sched/deadline: Move CPU frequency selection triggering points Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ca31d073a4788acf0684a8b255f14fea775ccf20.1532077269.git.bristot@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> -
由 Yi Wang 提交于
The 'group' variable in sched_domain_debug_one() is not checked when firstly used in cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_span(group)), but it might be NULL (it is checked later in the following while loop) and may cause NULL pointer dereference. We need to check it before using to avoid NULL dereference. Signed-off-by: NYi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NJiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1532319547-33335-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 20 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
All data required for the 'unstable' sched_clock must be set-up _before_ enabling it -- setting sched_clock_running. This includes the __gtod_offset but also a recent scd stamp. Make the gtod-offset update also set the csd stamp -- it requires the same two clock reads _anyway_. This doesn't hurt in the sched_clock_tick_stable() case and ensures sched_clock_init() gets everything set-up before use. Also switch to unconditional IRQ-disable/enable because the static key stuff already requires this is not ran with IRQs disabled. Fixes: 857baa87 ("sched/clock: Enable sched clock early") Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: prarit@redhat.com Cc: feng.tang@intel.com Cc: pmladek@suse.com Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com Cc: jgross@suse.com Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180720080911.GM2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
-