1. 07 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  2. 30 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 26 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 19 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 18 4月, 2013 3 次提交
  6. 14 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 13 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: make sure nbytes are right after log replay · 4bc4bee4
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      While trying to track down a tree log replay bug I noticed that fsck was always
      complaining about nbytes not being right for our fsynced file.  That is because
      the new fsync stuff doesn't wait for ordered extents to complete, so the inodes
      nbytes are not necessarily updated properly when we log it.  So to fix this we
      need to set nbytes to whatever it is on the inode that is on disk, so when we
      replay the extents we can just add the bytes that are being added as we replay
      the extent.  This makes it work for the case that we have the wrong nbytes or
      the case that we logged everything and nbytes is actually correct.  With this
      I'm no longer getting nbytes errors out of btrfsck.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      4bc4bee4
  8. 12 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      kthread: Prevent unpark race which puts threads on the wrong cpu · f2530dc7
      Thomas Gleixner 提交于
      The smpboot threads rely on the park/unpark mechanism which binds per
      cpu threads on a particular core. Though the functionality is racy:
      
      CPU0	       	 	CPU1  	     	    CPU2
      unpark(T)				    wake_up_process(T)
        clear(SHOULD_PARK)	T runs
      			leave parkme() due to !SHOULD_PARK  
        bind_to(CPU2)		BUG_ON(wrong CPU)						    
      
      We cannot let the tasks move themself to the target CPU as one of
      those tasks is actually the migration thread itself, which requires
      that it starts running on the target cpu right away.
      
      The solution to this problem is to prevent wakeups in park mode which
      are not from unpark(). That way we can guarantee that the association
      of the task to the target cpu is working correctly.
      
      Add a new task state (TASK_PARKED) which prevents other wakeups and
      use this state explicitly for the unpark wakeup.
      
      Peter noticed: Also, since the task state is visible to userspace and
      all the parked tasks are still in the PID space, its a good hint in ps
      and friends that these tasks aren't really there for the moment.
      
      The migration thread has another related issue.
      
      CPU0	      	     	 CPU1
      Bring up CPU2
      create_thread(T)
      park(T)
       wait_for_completion()
      			 parkme()
      			 complete()
      sched_set_stop_task()
      			 schedule(TASK_PARKED)
      
      The sched_set_stop_task() call is issued while the task is on the
      runqueue of CPU1 and that confuses the hell out of the stop_task class
      on that cpu. So we need the same synchronizaion before
      sched_set_stop_task().
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Acked-by: NPeter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: dhillf@gmail.com
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1304091635430.21884@ionosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      f2530dc7
  9. 11 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  10. 10 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  11. 06 4月, 2013 3 次提交
    • T
      NFSv4/4.1: Fix bugs in nfs4[01]_walk_client_list · 7b1f1fd1
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      It is unsafe to use list_for_each_entry_safe() here, because
      when we drop the nn->nfs_client_lock, we pin the _current_ list
      entry and ensure that it stays in the list, but we don't do the
      same for the _next_ list entry. Use of list_for_each_entry() is
      therefore the correct thing to do.
      
      Also fix the refcounting in nfs41_walk_client_list().
      
      Finally, ensure that the nfs_client has finished being initialised
      and, in the case of NFSv4.1, that the session is set up.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= 3.7]
      7b1f1fd1
    • T
      NFSv4: Fix a memory leak in nfs4_discover_server_trunking · b193d59a
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      When we assign a new rpc_client to clp->cl_rpcclient, we need to destroy
      the old one.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>=3.7]
      b193d59a
    • B
      GFS2: Issue discards in 512b sectors · b2c87cae
      Bob Peterson 提交于
      This patch changes GFS2's discard issuing code so that it calls
      function sb_issue_discard rather than blkdev_issue_discard. The
      code was calling blkdev_issue_discard and specifying the correct
      sector offset and sector size, but blkdev_issue_discard expects
      these values to be in terms of 512 byte sectors, even if the native
      sector size for the device is different. Calling sb_issue_discard
      with the BLOCK size instead ensures the correct block-to-512b-sector
      translation. I verified that "minlen" is specified in blocks, so
      comparing it to a number of blocks is correct.
      Signed-off-by: NBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      b2c87cae
  12. 04 4月, 2013 5 次提交
  13. 02 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use · c1681bf8
      Anatol Pomozov 提交于
      struct block_device lifecycle is defined by its inode (see fs/block_dev.c) -
      block_device allocated first time we access /dev/loopXX and deallocated on
      bdev_destroy_inode. When we create the device "losetup /dev/loopXX afile"
      we want that block_device stay alive until we destroy the loop device
      with "losetup -d".
      
      But because we do not hold /dev/loopXX inode its counter goes 0, and
      inode/bdev can be destroyed at any moment. Usually it happens at memory
      pressure or when user drops inode cache (like in the test below). When later in
      loop_clr_fd() we want to use bdev we have use-after-free error with following
      stack:
      
      BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000280
        bd_set_size+0x10/0xa0
        loop_clr_fd+0x1f8/0x420 [loop]
        lo_ioctl+0x200/0x7e0 [loop]
        lo_compat_ioctl+0x47/0xe0 [loop]
        compat_blkdev_ioctl+0x341/0x1290
        do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
        compat_sys_ioctl+0xc1/0xf20
        do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0
        sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x1a
      
      To prevent use-after-free we need to grab the device in loop_set_fd()
      and put it later in loop_clr_fd().
      
      The issue is reprodusible on current Linus head and v3.3. Here is the test:
      
        dd if=/dev/zero of=loop.file bs=1M count=1
        while [ true ]; do
          losetup /dev/loop0 loop.file
          echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
          losetup -d /dev/loop0
        done
      
      [ Doing bdgrab/bput in loop_set_fd/loop_clr_fd is safe, because every
        time we call loop_set_fd() we check that loop_device->lo_state is
        Lo_unbound and set it to Lo_bound If somebody will try to set_fd again
        it will get EBUSY.  And if we try to loop_clr_fd() on unbound loop
        device we'll get ENXIO.
      
        loop_set_fd/loop_clr_fd (and any other loop ioctl) is called under
        loop_device->lo_ctl_mutex. ]
      Signed-off-by: NAnatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c1681bf8
  14. 30 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 29 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 28 3月, 2013 9 次提交
  17. 27 3月, 2013 2 次提交
    • E
      userns: Restrict when proc and sysfs can be mounted · 87a8ebd6
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Only allow unprivileged mounts of proc and sysfs if they are already
      mounted when the user namespace is created.
      
      proc and sysfs are interesting because they have content that is
      per namespace, and so fresh mounts are needed when new namespaces
      are created while at the same time proc and sysfs have content that
      is shared between every instance.
      
      Respect the policy of who may see the shared content of proc and sysfs
      by only allowing new mounts if there was an existing mount at the time
      the user namespace was created.
      
      In practice there are only two interesting cases: proc and sysfs are
      mounted at their usual places, proc and sysfs are not mounted at all
      (some form of mount namespace jail).
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      87a8ebd6
    • E
      vfs: Carefully propogate mounts across user namespaces · 132c94e3
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      As a matter of policy MNT_READONLY should not be changable if the
      original mounter had more privileges than creator of the mount
      namespace.
      
      Add the flag CL_UNPRIVILEGED to note when we are copying a mount from
      a mount namespace that requires more privileges to a mount namespace
      that requires fewer privileges.
      
      When the CL_UNPRIVILEGED flag is set cause clone_mnt to set MNT_NO_REMOUNT
      if any of the mnt flags that should never be changed are set.
      
      This protects both mount propagation and the initial creation of a less
      privileged mount namespace.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      Reported-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      132c94e3