The get_cpu_cap() external function prototype was declared twice
so lose one of them.

Clean up the header guard while at it.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1322594083-14507-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Add a function ptr to struct cpu_dev which is destined to be run only
once on the BSP during boot.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110805180116.GB26217@aftabSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

After uncapping the CPUID level, we need to also re-run the CPU
feature detection code.

This resolves kernel bugzilla 16322.
Reported-by: Nboris64 <bugzilla.kernel.org@boris64.net>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> v2.6.29..2.6.35
LKML-Reference: <tip-@git.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

At least on Intel, adjusting the max CPUID level can expose new CPUID
features, so we need to re-run get_cpu_cap() after changing the CPUID
level.
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>

display_cacheinfo() doesn't display anything anymore and it is used to
detect CPU cache sizes. Rename it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091121130145.GA31357@liondog.tnic>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Impact: cleanup

 - Fix various style issues
Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>

Impact: debuggability and micro-optimization

Putting whatever is possible into the (final) .rodata section increases
the likelihood of catching memory corruption bugs early, and reduces
false cache line sharing.
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
LKML-Reference: <49B90961.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1. add c_x86_vendor into cpu_dev
2. change cpu_devs to static
3. check c_x86_vendor before put that cpu_dev into array
4. remove alignment for 64bit
5. order the sequence in cpu_devs according to link sequence...
   so could put intel at first, then amd...
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

we may need to move some functions to common.c later
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

"Form follows function". Code is now where it belongs to.
Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Also much less code now.
Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Replace the hardcoded list of initialization functions for each CPU
vendor by a list in an ELF section, which is read at initialization in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpu.c to fill the cpu_devs[] array. The ELF
section, named .x86cpuvendor.init, is reclaimed after boot, and
contains entries of type "struct cpu_vendor_dev" which associates a
vendor number with a pointer to a "struct cpu_dev" structure.

This first modification allows to remove all the VENDOR_init_cpu()
functions.

This patch also removes the hardcoded calls to early_init_amd() and
early_init_intel(). Instead, we add a "c_early_init" member to the
cpu_dev structure, which is then called if not NULL by the generic CPU
initialization code. Unfortunately, in early_cpu_detect(), this_cpu is
not yet set, so we have to use the cpu_devs[] array directly.

This patch is part of the Linux Tiny project, and is needed for
further patch that will allow to disable compilation of unused CPU
support code.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

cpu.h was already included everywhere needed.

Fixes following sparse warnings:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:343:12: warning: symbol 'amd_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c:444:12: warning: symbol 'cyrix_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c:456:12: warning: symbol 'nsc_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c:467:12: warning: symbol 'centaur_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/transmeta.c:112:12: warning: symbol 'transmeta_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c:296:12: warning: symbol 'intel_cpu_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/nexgen.c:56:12: warning: symbol 'nexgen_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/umc.c:22:12: warning: symbol 'umc_init_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Need this in the next patch in time_init and that happens early.

This includes a minor fix on i386 where early_intel_workarounds()
[which is now called early_init_intel] really executes early as
the comments say.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

cpu_dev->c_identify is only called from arch/i386/common.c:identify_cpu(), and
this after generic_identify() already has been called. There is no need to call
this function twice and hook it in c_identify - but I may be wrong, please
double check before applying.

This patch also removes generic_identify() from cpu.h to avoid unnecessary
future nesting.
Signed-off-by: NMagnus Damm <magnus@valinux.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!