- 20 5月, 2016 38 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Appears to more closely match what RM does. For GM20B, now also copying bit 12 from NV_PFB_MMU_CTRL as upcoming changes will require it. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
These are specified by PTOP on Maxwell GPUs. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
It appears these don't map to PBDMAs (at least on Kepler, it may or may be valid for Fermi - this hasn't been checked), but to runlists. This drops the NVKM_ENGINE_FIFO data from the entries too, as resetting all of PFIFO is *not* the way to handle such faults. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
These are now specified directly in the MC subdev. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Engine fields have been removed, as they're specified by PTOP. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
With the addition of PTOP-specified reset bits, it makes more sense to move the definitions here rather than in individual subdev implementations. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This will be later extended to handle PTOP-specified reset masks as well as the hardcoded ones. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This will also be used to define NV_PMC_ENABLE <-> subdev mappings in an upcoming commit. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Ported from the code currently in engine/fifo/gk104.c. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
v2: rename ina209/ina219 read function Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
v2: add list_del call, reword error message Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
v2: add list_del calls Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Karol Herbst 提交于
When we start communicating with the pmu a bit more, the current code is a real issue. I encountered a dead lock here, while testing my dynamic reclocking code Signed-off-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
In case of successful suspend, devinit will have to be run and this is the behavior currently hardcoded. However, as FD bug 94725 suggests, there might be cases where runtime suspend leaves the GPU powered, and in such cases devinit should not be run on resume. On GF100+ we have a reliable way to know whether we need to run devinit. Use it instead of blindly trusting the flag set by nvkm_devinit_fini(). The code around the NvForcePost also needs to be slightly reworked in order to keep working. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Suggested-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Suggested-by: NKarol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 22 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 06 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GM20B requires an extra clock compared to GK20A. Add that information into the platform data and acquire and enable this clock if necessary. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-