- 02 10月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
migrate_task_rq_fair() resets the scan rate for NUMA balancing on every cross-node migration. In the event of excessive load balancing due to saturation, this may result in the scan rate being pegged at maximum and further overloading the machine. This patch only resets the scan if NUMA balancing is active, a preferred node has been selected and the task is being migrated from the preferred node as these are the most harmful. For example, a migration to the preferred node does not justify a faster scan rate. Similarly, a migration between two nodes that are not preferred is probably bouncing due to over-saturation of the machine. In that case, scanning faster and trapping more NUMA faults will further overload the machine. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203370 205332 0.964744 1 328431 319785 -2.63252 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 206070 206585 0.249915 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188386 189162 0.41192 1 201566 213760 6.04963 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 59157.4 58736.8 -0.710985 1 105495 105419 -0.0720413 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,825,492 14,285,708 migrations 1,152,509 1,180,621 faults 371,948 339,114 cache-misses 55,654,206,041 55,205,631,894 sched:sched_move_numa 1,856 843 sched:sched_stick_numa 4 6 sched:sched_swap_numa 428 219 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 898 365 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 57146 26907 numa_hint_faults_local 51612 24279 numa_hit 238164 239771 numa_huge_pte_updates 16 0 numa_interleave 63 68 numa_local 238085 239688 numa_other 79 83 numa_pages_migrated 883 363 numa_pte_updates 67540 27415 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,288,525 3,202,779 migrations 38,652 37,186 faults 111,678 106,076 cache-misses 12,111,197,376 12,024,873,744 sched:sched_move_numa 900 931 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 5 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 714 637 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18572 17409 numa_hint_faults_local 14850 14367 numa_hit 73197 73953 numa_huge_pte_updates 11 20 numa_interleave 25 25 numa_local 73138 73892 numa_other 59 61 numa_pages_migrated 712 668 numa_pte_updates 24021 27276 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,451,543 8,474,013 migrations 202,804 254,934 faults 310,024 320,506 cache-misses 253,522,507 110,580,458 sched:sched_move_numa 213 725 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 7 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 88 145 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11830 22797 numa_hint_faults_local 11301 21539 numa_hit 90038 89308 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 855 865 numa_local 89796 88955 numa_other 242 353 numa_pages_migrated 88 149 numa_pte_updates 12039 22930 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,049,153 2,195,628 migrations 11,405 11,179 faults 162,309 149,656 cache-misses 7,203,343 8,117,515 sched:sched_move_numa 22 49 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1 5 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 1693 3577 numa_hint_faults_local 1669 3476 numa_hit 25177 26142 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 194 358 numa_local 24993 26042 numa_other 184 100 numa_pages_migrated 1 5 numa_pte_updates 1577 3587 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 94,515,937 100,602,296 migrations 4,203,554 4,135,630 faults 832,697 789,256 cache-misses 226,248,698,331 226,160,621,058 sched:sched_move_numa 1,730 1,366 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 16 sched:sched_swap_numa 432 374 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,398 1,350 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 80079 47857 numa_hint_faults_local 68620 39768 numa_hit 241187 240165 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 241186 240165 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 1347 1224 numa_pte_updates 80729 48354 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 63,704,961 58,515,496 migrations 573,404 564,845 faults 230,878 245,807 cache-misses 76,568,222,781 73,603,757,976 sched:sched_move_numa 509 996 sched:sched_stick_numa 31 10 sched:sched_swap_numa 182 193 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 541 646 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 8501 13422 numa_hint_faults_local 2960 5619 numa_hit 35526 36118 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35526 36116 numa_other 0 2 numa_pages_migrated 539 616 numa_pte_updates 8433 13374 Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently task scan rate is reset when NUMA balancer migrates the task to a different node. If NUMA balancer initiates a swap, reset is only applicable to the task that initiates the swap. Similarly no scan rate reset is done if the task is migrated across nodes by traditional load balancer. Instead move the scan reset to the migrate_task_rq. This ensures the task moved out of its preferred node, either gets back to its preferred node quickly or finds a new preferred node. Doing so, would be fair to all tasks migrating across nodes. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200668 203370 1.3465 1 321791 328431 2.06345 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 204848 206070 0.59654 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188098 188386 0.153112 1 200351 201566 0.606436 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 58145.9 59157.4 1.73959 1 103798 105495 1.63491 Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,912,183 13,825,492 migrations 1,155,931 1,152,509 faults 367,139 371,948 cache-misses 54,240,196,814 55,654,206,041 sched:sched_move_numa 1,571 1,856 sched:sched_stick_numa 9 4 sched:sched_swap_numa 463 428 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 703 898 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 50155 57146 numa_hint_faults_local 45264 51612 numa_hit 239652 238164 numa_huge_pte_updates 36 16 numa_interleave 68 63 numa_local 239576 238085 numa_other 76 79 numa_pages_migrated 680 883 numa_pte_updates 71146 67540 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,156,720 3,288,525 migrations 30,354 38,652 faults 97,261 111,678 cache-misses 12,400,026,826 12,111,197,376 sched:sched_move_numa 4 900 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 1 5 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 20 714 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 272 18572 numa_hint_faults_local 186 14850 numa_hit 71362 73197 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 11 numa_interleave 23 25 numa_local 71299 73138 numa_other 63 59 numa_pages_migrated 2 712 numa_pte_updates 0 24021 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,606,824 8,451,543 migrations 155,352 202,804 faults 301,409 310,024 cache-misses 157,759,224 253,522,507 sched:sched_move_numa 168 213 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 3 2 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 125 88 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 4650 11830 numa_hint_faults_local 3946 11301 numa_hit 90489 90038 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 892 855 numa_local 90034 89796 numa_other 455 242 numa_pages_migrated 124 88 numa_pte_updates 4818 12039 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,113,167 2,049,153 migrations 10,533 11,405 faults 142,727 162,309 cache-misses 5,594,192 7,203,343 sched:sched_move_numa 10 22 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 1 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 744 1693 numa_hint_faults_local 584 1669 numa_hit 25551 25177 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 263 194 numa_local 25302 24993 numa_other 249 184 numa_pages_migrated 6 1 numa_pte_updates 744 1577 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 101,227,352 94,515,937 migrations 4,151,829 4,203,554 faults 745,233 832,697 cache-misses 224,669,561,766 226,248,698,331 sched:sched_move_numa 617 1,730 sched:sched_stick_numa 2 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 187 432 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 316 1,398 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 24195 80079 numa_hint_faults_local 21639 68620 numa_hit 238331 241187 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 238331 241186 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 204 1347 numa_pte_updates 24561 80729 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 62,738,978 63,704,961 migrations 562,702 573,404 faults 228,465 230,878 cache-misses 75,778,067,952 76,568,222,781 sched:sched_move_numa 648 509 sched:sched_stick_numa 13 31 sched:sched_swap_numa 137 182 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 733 541 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 10281 8501 numa_hint_faults_local 3242 2960 numa_hit 36338 35526 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 36338 35526 numa_other 0 0 numa_pages_migrated 706 539 numa_pte_updates 10176 8433 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
This additional parameter (new_cpu) is used later for identifying if task migration is across nodes. No functional change. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 203353 200668 -1.32036 1 328205 321791 -1.95427 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 214384 204848 -4.44809 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 188553 188098 -0.241311 1 196273 200351 2.07772 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 57581.2 58145.9 0.980702 1 103468 103798 0.318939 Brings out the variance between different specjbb2005 runs. Some events stats before and after applying the patch. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,941,377 13,912,183 migrations 1,157,323 1,155,931 faults 382,175 367,139 cache-misses 54,993,823,500 54,240,196,814 sched:sched_move_numa 2,005 1,571 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 9 sched:sched_swap_numa 529 463 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,573 703 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 67099 50155 numa_hint_faults_local 58456 45264 numa_hit 240416 239652 numa_huge_pte_updates 18 36 numa_interleave 65 68 numa_local 240339 239576 numa_other 77 76 numa_pages_migrated 1574 680 numa_pte_updates 77182 71146 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,176,453 3,156,720 migrations 30,238 30,354 faults 87,869 97,261 cache-misses 12,544,479,391 12,400,026,826 sched:sched_move_numa 23 4 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 6 1 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 10 20 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 236 272 numa_hint_faults_local 201 186 numa_hit 72293 71362 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 26 23 numa_local 72233 71299 numa_other 60 63 numa_pages_migrated 8 2 numa_pte_updates 0 0 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,478,820 8,606,824 migrations 171,323 155,352 faults 307,499 301,409 cache-misses 240,353,599 157,759,224 sched:sched_move_numa 214 168 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 4 3 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 89 125 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 5301 4650 numa_hint_faults_local 4745 3946 numa_hit 92943 90489 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 899 892 numa_local 92345 90034 numa_other 598 455 numa_pages_migrated 88 124 numa_pte_updates 5505 4818 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,066,172 2,113,167 migrations 11,076 10,533 faults 149,544 142,727 cache-misses 10,398,067 5,594,192 sched:sched_move_numa 43 10 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 6 6 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 3552 744 numa_hint_faults_local 3347 584 numa_hit 25611 25551 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 213 263 numa_local 25583 25302 numa_other 28 249 numa_pages_migrated 6 6 numa_pte_updates 3535 744 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 99,358,136 101,227,352 migrations 4,041,607 4,151,829 faults 749,653 745,233 cache-misses 225,562,543,251 224,669,561,766 sched:sched_move_numa 771 617 sched:sched_stick_numa 14 2 sched:sched_swap_numa 204 187 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,180 316 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 27409 24195 numa_hint_faults_local 20677 21639 numa_hit 239988 238331 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 239983 238331 numa_other 5 0 numa_pages_migrated 1016 204 numa_pte_updates 27916 24561 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 60,899,307 62,738,978 migrations 544,668 562,702 faults 270,834 228,465 cache-misses 74,543,455,635 75,778,067,952 sched:sched_move_numa 735 648 sched:sched_stick_numa 25 13 sched:sched_swap_numa 174 137 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 816 733 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11059 10281 numa_hint_faults_local 4733 3242 numa_hit 41384 36338 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 41383 36338 numa_other 1 0 numa_pages_migrated 815 706 numa_pte_updates 11323 10176 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Task migration under NUMA balancing can happen in parallel. More than one task might choose to migrate to the same CPU at the same time. This can result in: - During task swap, choosing a task that was not part of the evaluation. - During task swap, task which just got moved into its preferred node, moving to a completely different node. - During task swap, task failing to move to the preferred node, will have to wait an extra interval for the next migrate opportunity. - During task movement, multiple task movements can cause load imbalance. This problem is more likely if there are more cores per node or more nodes in the system. Use a per run-queue variable to check if NUMA-balance is active on the run-queue. Specjbb2005 results (8 warehouses) Higher bops are better 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 200194 203353 1.57797 1 311331 328205 5.41995 2 Socket - 4 Node Power8 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 1 197654 214384 8.46429 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV JVMS Prev Current %Change 4 192605 188553 -2.10379 1 213402 196273 -8.02664 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM JVMS Prev Current %Change 8 52227.1 57581.2 10.2516 1 102529 103468 0.915838 There is a regression on power 9 box. If we look at the details, that box has a sudden jump in cache-misses with this patch. All other parameters seem to be pointing towards NUMA consolidation. perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 13,345,784 13,941,377 migrations 1,127,820 1,157,323 faults 374,736 382,175 cache-misses 55,132,054,603 54,993,823,500 sched:sched_move_numa 1,923 2,005 sched:sched_stick_numa 52 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 595 529 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,932 1,573 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 60605 67099 numa_hint_faults_local 51804 58456 numa_hit 239945 240416 numa_huge_pte_updates 14 18 numa_interleave 60 65 numa_local 239865 240339 numa_other 80 77 numa_pages_migrated 1931 1574 numa_pte_updates 67823 77182 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After cs 3,016,467 3,176,453 migrations 37,326 30,238 faults 115,342 87,869 cache-misses 11,692,155,554 12,544,479,391 sched:sched_move_numa 965 23 sched:sched_stick_numa 8 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 35 6 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,168 10 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Haswell - X86 Event Before After numa_hint_faults 16286 236 numa_hint_faults_local 11863 201 numa_hit 112482 72293 numa_huge_pte_updates 33 0 numa_interleave 20 26 numa_local 112419 72233 numa_other 63 60 numa_pages_migrated 1144 8 numa_pte_updates 32859 0 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 8,629,724 8,478,820 migrations 221,052 171,323 faults 308,661 307,499 cache-misses 135,574,913 240,353,599 sched:sched_move_numa 147 214 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 2 4 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 64 89 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 11481 5301 numa_hint_faults_local 10968 4745 numa_hit 89773 92943 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 1116 899 numa_local 89220 92345 numa_other 553 598 numa_pages_migrated 62 88 numa_pte_updates 11694 5505 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After cs 2,272,887 2,066,172 migrations 12,206 11,076 faults 163,704 149,544 cache-misses 4,801,186 10,398,067 sched:sched_move_numa 44 43 sched:sched_stick_numa 0 0 sched:sched_swap_numa 0 0 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 17 6 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 2 Socket - 2 Node Power9 - PowerNV Event Before After numa_hint_faults 2261 3552 numa_hint_faults_local 1993 3347 numa_hit 25726 25611 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 239 213 numa_local 25498 25583 numa_other 228 28 numa_pages_migrated 17 6 numa_pte_updates 2266 3535 perf stats 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 117,980,962 99,358,136 migrations 3,950,220 4,041,607 faults 736,979 749,653 cache-misses 224,976,072,879 225,562,543,251 sched:sched_move_numa 504 771 sched:sched_stick_numa 50 14 sched:sched_swap_numa 239 204 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 1,260 1,180 vmstat 8th warehouse Multi JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 18293 27409 numa_hint_faults_local 11969 20677 numa_hit 240854 239988 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 240851 239983 numa_other 3 5 numa_pages_migrated 1190 1016 numa_pte_updates 18106 27916 perf stats 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After cs 61,053,158 60,899,307 migrations 551,586 544,668 faults 244,174 270,834 cache-misses 74,326,766,973 74,543,455,635 sched:sched_move_numa 344 735 sched:sched_stick_numa 24 25 sched:sched_swap_numa 140 174 migrate:mm_migrate_pages 568 816 vmstat 8th warehouse Single JVM 4 Socket - 4 Node Power7 - PowerVM Event Before After numa_hint_faults 6461 11059 numa_hint_faults_local 2283 4733 numa_hit 35661 41384 numa_huge_pte_updates 0 0 numa_interleave 0 0 numa_local 35661 41383 numa_other 0 1 numa_pages_migrated 568 815 numa_pte_updates 6518 11323 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1537552141-27815-2-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 10 9月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc warning for missing 'flags' parameter description: ../kernel/sched/fair.c:3371: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'attach_entity_load_avg' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: ea14b57e ("sched/cpufreq: Provide migration hint") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cdda0d42-880d-4229-a9f7-5899c977a063@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
It can happen that load_balance() finds a busiest group and then a busiest rq but the calculated imbalance is in fact 0. In such situation, detach_tasks() returns immediately and lets the flag LBF_ALL_PINNED set. The busiest CPU is then wrongly assumed to have pinned tasks and removed from the load balance mask. then, we redo a load balance without the busiest CPU. This creates wrong load balance situation and generates wrong task migration. If the calculated imbalance is 0, it's useless to try to find a busiest rq as no task will be migrated and we can return immediately. This situation can happen with heterogeneous system or smp system when RT tasks are decreasing the capacity of some CPUs. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: jhugo@codeaurora.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1536306664-29827-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Since commit: 523e979d ("sched/core: Use PELT for scale_rt_capacity()") scale_rt_capacity() returns the remaining capacity and not a scale factor to apply on cpu_capacity_orig. arch_scale_cpu() is directly called by scale_rt_capacity() so we must take the sched_domain argument. Reported-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 523e979d ("sched/core: Use PELT for scale_rt_capacity()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180904093626.GA23936@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Steve Muckle 提交于
When a task which previously ran on a given CPU is remotely queued to wake up on that same CPU, there is a period where the task's state is TASK_WAKING and its vruntime is not normalized. This is not accounted for in vruntime_normalized() which will cause an error in the task's vruntime if it is switched from the fair class during this time. For example if it is boosted to RT priority via rt_mutex_setprio(), rq->min_vruntime will not be subtracted from the task's vruntime but it will be added again when the task returns to the fair class. The task's vruntime will have been erroneously doubled and the effective priority of the task will be reduced. Note this will also lead to inflation of all vruntimes since the doubled vruntime value will become the rq's min_vruntime when other tasks leave the rq. This leads to repeated doubling of the vruntime and priority penalty. Fix this by recognizing a WAKING task's vruntime as normalized only if sched_remote_wakeup is true. This indicates a migration, in which case the vruntime would have been normalized in migrate_task_rq_fair(). Based on a similar patch from John Dias <joaodias@google.com>. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com> Cc: John Dias <joaodias@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@google.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Patrick Bellasi <Patrick.Bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: kernel-team@android.com Fixes: b5179ac7 ("sched/fair: Prepare to fix fairness problems on migration") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831224217.169476-1-smuckle@google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
update_blocked_averages() is called to periodiccally decay the stalled load of idle CPUs and to sync all loads before running load balance. When cfs rq is idle, it trigs a load balance during pick_next_task_fair() in order to potentially pull tasks and to use this newly idle CPU. This load balance happens whereas prev task from another class has not been put and its utilization updated yet. This may lead to wrongly account running time as idle time for RT or DL classes. Test that no RT or DL task is running when updating their utilization in update_blocked_averages(). We still update RT and DL utilization instead of simply skipping them to make sure that all metrics are synced when used during load balance. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 371bf427 ("sched/rt: Add rt_rq utilization tracking") Fixes: 3727e0e1 ("sched/dl: Add dl_rq utilization tracking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1535728975-22799-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 25 7月, 2018 12 次提交
-
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
numa_migrate_preferred() is called periodically or when task preferred node changes. Preferred node evaluations happen once per scan sequence. If the scan completion happens just after the periodic NUMA migration, then we try to migrate to the preferred node and the preferred node might change, needing another node migration. Avoid this by checking for scan sequence completion only when checking for periodic migration. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25862.6 26158.1 1.14258 1 74357 72725 -2.19482 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 117019 113992 -2.58 1 179095 174947 -2.31 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 449.46 770.77 615.22 101.70 numa01.sh Sys: 132.72 208.17 170.46 24.96 numa01.sh User: 39185.26 60290.89 50066.76 6807.84 numa02.sh Real: 60.85 61.79 61.28 0.37 numa02.sh Sys: 15.34 24.71 21.08 3.61 numa02.sh User: 5204.41 5249.85 5231.21 17.60 numa03.sh Real: 785.50 916.97 840.77 44.98 numa03.sh Sys: 108.08 133.60 119.43 8.82 numa03.sh User: 61422.86 70919.75 64720.87 3310.61 numa04.sh Real: 429.57 587.37 480.80 57.40 numa04.sh Sys: 240.61 321.97 290.84 33.58 numa04.sh User: 34597.65 40498.99 37079.48 2060.72 numa05.sh Real: 392.09 431.25 414.65 13.82 numa05.sh Sys: 229.41 372.48 297.54 53.14 numa05.sh User: 33390.86 34697.49 34222.43 556.42 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 424.63 566.18 498.12 59.26 23.50% numa01.sh Sys: 160.19 256.53 208.98 37.02 -18.4% numa01.sh User: 37320.00 46225.58 42001.57 3482.45 19.20% numa02.sh Real: 60.17 62.47 60.91 0.85 0.607% numa02.sh Sys: 15.30 22.82 17.04 2.90 23.70% numa02.sh User: 5202.13 5255.51 5219.08 20.14 0.232% numa03.sh Real: 823.91 844.89 833.86 8.46 0.828% numa03.sh Sys: 130.69 148.29 140.47 6.21 -14.9% numa03.sh User: 62519.15 64262.20 63613.38 620.05 1.740% numa04.sh Real: 515.30 603.74 548.56 30.93 -12.3% numa04.sh Sys: 459.73 525.48 489.18 21.63 -40.5% numa04.sh User: 40561.96 44919.18 42047.87 1526.85 -11.8% numa05.sh Real: 396.58 454.37 421.13 19.71 -1.53% numa05.sh Sys: 208.72 422.02 348.90 73.60 -14.7% numa05.sh User: 33124.08 36109.35 34846.47 1089.74 -1.79% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-20-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
On NUMA_BACKPLANE and NUMA_GLUELESS_MESH systems, tasks/memory should be consolidated to the closest group of nodes. In such a case, relying on group_fault metric may not always help to consolidate. There can always be a case where a node closer to the preferred node may have lesser faults than a node further away from the preferred node. In such a case, moving to node with more faults might avoid numa consolidation. Using group_weight would help to consolidate task/memory around the preferred_node. While here, to be on the conservative side, don't override migrate thread degrades locality logic for CPU_NEWLY_IDLE load balancing. Note: Similar problems exist with should_numa_migrate_memory and will be dealt separately. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25645.4 25960 1.22 1 72142 73550 1.95 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 110199 120071 8.958 1 176303 176249 -0.03 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 490.04 774.86 596.26 96.46 numa01.sh Sys: 151.52 242.88 184.82 31.71 numa01.sh User: 41418.41 60844.59 48776.09 6564.27 numa02.sh Real: 60.14 62.94 60.98 1.00 numa02.sh Sys: 16.11 30.77 21.20 5.28 numa02.sh User: 5184.33 5311.09 5228.50 44.24 numa03.sh Real: 790.95 856.35 826.41 24.11 numa03.sh Sys: 114.93 118.85 117.05 1.63 numa03.sh User: 60990.99 64959.28 63470.43 1415.44 numa04.sh Real: 434.37 597.92 504.87 59.70 numa04.sh Sys: 237.63 397.40 289.74 55.98 numa04.sh User: 34854.87 41121.83 38572.52 2615.84 numa05.sh Real: 386.77 448.90 417.22 22.79 numa05.sh Sys: 149.23 379.95 303.04 79.55 numa05.sh User: 32951.76 35959.58 34562.18 1034.05 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 493.19 672.88 597.51 59.38 -0.20% numa01.sh Sys: 150.09 245.48 207.76 34.26 -11.0% numa01.sh User: 41928.51 53779.17 48747.06 3901.39 0.059% numa02.sh Real: 60.63 62.87 61.22 0.83 -0.39% numa02.sh Sys: 16.64 27.97 20.25 4.06 4.691% numa02.sh User: 5222.92 5309.60 5254.03 29.98 -0.48% numa03.sh Real: 821.52 902.15 863.60 32.41 -4.30% numa03.sh Sys: 112.04 130.66 118.35 7.08 -1.09% numa03.sh User: 62245.16 69165.14 66443.04 2450.32 -4.47% numa04.sh Real: 414.53 519.57 476.25 37.00 6.009% numa04.sh Sys: 181.84 335.67 280.41 54.07 3.327% numa04.sh User: 33924.50 39115.39 37343.78 1934.26 3.290% numa05.sh Real: 408.30 441.45 417.90 12.05 -0.16% numa05.sh Sys: 233.41 381.60 295.58 57.37 2.523% numa05.sh User: 33301.31 35972.50 34335.19 938.94 0.661% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-16-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
The metrics for updating scan periods are local or task specific. Currently this update happens under the numa_group lock, which seems unnecessary. Hence move this update outside the lock. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25355.9 25645.4 1.141 1 72812 72142 -0.92 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-15-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
task_numa_find_cpu() helps to find the CPU to swap/move the task to. It's guarded by numa_has_capacity(). However node not having capacity shouldn't deter a task swapping if it helps NUMA placement. Further load_too_imbalanced(), which evaluates possibilities of move/swap, provides similar checks as numa_has_capacity. Hence remove numa_has_capacity() to enhance possibilities of task swapping even if load is imbalanced. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25657.9 25804.1 0.569 1 74435 73413 -1.37 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-13-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
There are checks in migrate_swap_stop() that check if the task/CPU combination is as per migrate_swap_arg before migrating. However atleast one of the two tasks to be swapped by migrate_swap() could have migrated to a completely different CPU before updating the migrate_swap_arg. The new CPU where the task is currently running could be a different node too. If the task has migrated, numa balancer might end up placing a task in a wrong node. Instead of achieving node consolidation, it may end up spreading the load across nodes. To avoid that pass the CPUs as additional parameters. While here, place migrate_swap under CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25377.3 25226.6 -0.59 1 72287 73326 1.437 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-10-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
The task_capacity field in 'struct numa_stats' is redundant. Also move nr_running for better packing within the struct. No functional changes. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25308.6 25377.3 0.271 1 72964 72287 -0.92 Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-9-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
When comparing two nodes at a distance of 'hoplimit', we should consider nodes only up to 'hoplimit'. Currently we also consider nodes at 'oplimit' distance too. Hence two nodes at a distance of 'hoplimit' will have same groupweight. Fix this by skipping nodes at hoplimit. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25375.3 25308.6 -0.26 1 72617 72964 0.477 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 113372 108750 -4.07684 1 177403 183115 3.21979 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 414.64 819.20 556.08 147.70 -7.36% numa01.sh Sys: 77.52 205.04 139.40 52.05 67.10% numa01.sh User: 37043.24 61757.88 45517.48 9290.38 -5.06% numa02.sh Real: 60.80 63.32 61.63 0.88 -1.37% numa02.sh Sys: 17.35 39.37 25.71 7.33 -19.5% numa02.sh User: 5213.79 5374.73 5268.90 55.09 -0.62% numa03.sh Real: 780.09 948.64 831.43 63.02 -3.05% numa03.sh Sys: 104.96 136.92 116.31 11.34 4.591% numa03.sh User: 60465.42 73339.78 64368.03 4700.14 -2.72% numa04.sh Real: 412.60 681.92 521.29 96.64 -7.36% numa04.sh Sys: 210.32 314.10 251.77 37.71 41.74% numa04.sh User: 34026.38 45581.20 38534.49 4198.53 2.825% numa05.sh Real: 394.79 439.63 411.35 16.87 6.140% numa05.sh Sys: 238.32 330.09 292.31 38.32 -9.04% numa05.sh User: 33456.45 34876.07 34138.62 609.45 2.741% While there is a regression with this change, this change is needed from a correctness perspective. Also it helps consolidation as seen from perf bench output. Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-8-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
When numa_group faults are available, task_numa_placement only uses numa_group faults to evaluate preferred node. However it still accounts task faults and even evaluates the preferred node just based on task faults just to discard it in favour of preferred node chosen on the basis of numa_group. Instead use task faults only if numa_group is not set. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25549.6 25215.7 -1.30 1 73190 72107 -1.47 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 113437 113372 -0.05 1 196130 177403 -9.54 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 478.45 565.90 515.11 30.87 16.29% numa01.sh Sys: 207.79 271.04 232.94 21.33 -15.8% numa01.sh User: 39763.93 47303.12 43210.73 2644.86 14.04% numa02.sh Real: 60.00 61.46 60.78 0.49 0.871% numa02.sh Sys: 15.71 25.31 20.69 3.42 17.35% numa02.sh User: 5175.92 5265.86 5235.97 32.82 0.464% numa03.sh Real: 776.42 834.85 806.01 23.22 -7.47% numa03.sh Sys: 114.43 128.75 121.65 5.49 -19.5% numa03.sh User: 60773.93 64855.25 62616.91 1576.39 -5.36% numa04.sh Real: 456.93 511.95 482.91 20.88 2.930% numa04.sh Sys: 178.09 460.89 356.86 94.58 -11.3% numa04.sh User: 36312.09 42553.24 39623.21 2247.96 0.246% numa05.sh Real: 393.98 493.48 436.61 35.59 0.677% numa05.sh Sys: 164.49 329.15 265.87 61.78 38.92% numa05.sh User: 33182.65 36654.53 35074.51 1187.71 3.368% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-6-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently preferred node is set to dst_nid which is the last node in the iteration whose group weight or task weight is greater than the current node. However it doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the numa capacity to move. It also doesn't guarantee that dst_nid has the best_cpu which is the CPU/node ideal for node migration. Lets consider faults on a 4 node system with group weight numbers in different nodes being in 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 proportion. Consider the task is running on 3 and 0 is its preferred node but its capacity is full. Consider nodes 1, 2 and 3 have capacity. Then the task should be migrated to node 1. Currently the task gets moved to node 2. env.dst_nid points to the last node whose faults were greater than current node. Modify to set the preferred node based of best_cpu. Earlier setting preferred node was skipped if nr_active_nodes is 1. This could result in the task being moved out of the preferred node to a random node during regular load balancing. Also while modifying task_numa_migrate(), use sched_setnuma to set preferred node. This ensures out numa accounting is correct. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25122.9 25549.6 1.698 1 73850 73190 -0.89 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 105930 113437 7.08676 1 178624 196130 9.80047 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 506.35 794.46 599.06 104.26 -10.76% numa01.sh Sys: 150.37 223.56 195.99 24.94 -25.55% numa01.sh User: 43450.69 61752.04 49281.50 6635.33 -11.43% numa02.sh Real: 60.33 62.40 61.31 0.90 -0.195% numa02.sh Sys: 18.12 31.66 24.28 5.89 -21.49% numa02.sh User: 5203.91 5325.32 5260.29 49.98 -0.513% numa03.sh Real: 696.47 853.62 745.80 57.28 4.6339% numa03.sh Sys: 85.68 123.71 97.89 13.48 7.3347% numa03.sh User: 55978.45 66418.63 59254.94 3737.97 1.5323% numa04.sh Real: 444.05 514.83 497.06 26.85 -2.464% numa04.sh Sys: 230.39 375.79 316.23 48.58 5.8343% numa04.sh User: 35403.12 41004.10 39720.80 2163.08 -1.153% numa05.sh Real: 423.09 460.41 439.57 13.92 -1.428% numa05.sh Sys: 287.38 480.15 369.37 68.52 -7.964% numa05.sh User: 34732.12 38016.80 36255.85 1070.51 -1.704% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-5-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
Currently load_too_imbalance() cares about the slope of imbalance. It doesn't care of the direction of the imbalance. However this may not work if nodes that are being compared have dissimilar capacities. Few nodes might have more cores than other nodes in the system. Also unlike traditional load balance at a NUMA sched domain, multiple requests to migrate from the same source node to same destination node may run in parallel. This can cause huge load imbalance. This is specially true on a larger machines with either large cores per node or more number of nodes in the system. Hence allow move/swap only if the imbalance is going to reduce. Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25058.2 25122.9 0.25 1 72950 73850 1.23 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32 numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58 numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48 numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63 numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85 numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04 numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45 numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58 numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69 numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12 numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83 numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26 numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59 numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78 numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 435.78 653.81 534.58 83.20 38.39% numa01.sh Sys: 121.93 187.18 145.90 23.47 21.79% numa01.sh User: 37082.81 51402.80 43647.60 5409.75 31.03% numa02.sh Real: 60.64 61.63 61.19 0.40 0.637% numa02.sh Sys: 14.72 25.68 19.06 4.03 11.22% numa02.sh User: 5210.95 5266.69 5233.30 20.82 0.608% numa03.sh Real: 746.51 808.24 780.36 23.88 1.972% numa03.sh Sys: 97.26 108.48 105.07 4.28 4.197% numa03.sh User: 58956.30 61397.05 60162.95 1050.82 2.661% numa04.sh Real: 465.97 519.27 484.81 19.62 9.385% numa04.sh Sys: 304.43 359.08 334.68 20.64 -14.6% numa04.sh User: 37544.16 41186.15 39262.44 1314.91 2.478% numa05.sh Real: 411.57 457.20 433.29 16.58 0.380% numa05.sh Sys: 230.05 435.48 339.95 67.58 -17.9% numa05.sh User: 33325.54 36896.31 35637.84 1222.64 -2.12% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-4-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
task_numa_compare() helps choose the best CPU to move or swap the selected task. To achieve this task_numa_compare() is called for every CPU in the node. Currently it evaluates if the task can be moved/swapped for each of the CPUs. However the move evaluation is mostly independent of the CPU. Evaluating the move logic once per node, provides scope for simplifying task_numa_compare(). Running SPECjbb2005 on a 4 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 16 25705.2 25058.2 -2.51 1 74433 72950 -1.99 Running SPECjbb2005 on a 16 node machine and comparing bops/JVM JVMS LAST_PATCH WITH_PATCH %CHANGE 8 96589.6 105930 9.670 1 181830 178624 -1.76 (numbers from v1 based on v4.17-rc5) Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev numa01.sh Real: 440.65 941.32 758.98 189.17 numa01.sh Sys: 183.48 320.07 258.42 50.09 numa01.sh User: 37384.65 71818.14 60302.51 13798.96 numa02.sh Real: 61.24 65.35 62.49 1.49 numa02.sh Sys: 16.83 24.18 21.40 2.60 numa02.sh User: 5219.59 5356.34 5264.03 49.07 numa03.sh Real: 822.04 912.40 873.55 37.35 numa03.sh Sys: 118.80 140.94 132.90 7.60 numa03.sh User: 62485.19 70025.01 67208.33 2967.10 numa04.sh Real: 690.66 872.12 778.49 65.44 numa04.sh Sys: 459.26 563.03 494.03 42.39 numa04.sh User: 51116.44 70527.20 58849.44 8461.28 numa05.sh Real: 418.37 562.28 525.77 54.27 numa05.sh Sys: 299.45 481.00 392.49 64.27 numa05.sh User: 34115.09 41324.02 39105.30 2627.68 Testcase Time: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change numa01.sh Real: 516.14 892.41 739.84 151.32 2.587% numa01.sh Sys: 153.16 192.99 177.70 14.58 45.42% numa01.sh User: 39821.04 69528.92 57193.87 10989.48 5.435% numa02.sh Real: 60.91 62.35 61.58 0.63 1.477% numa02.sh Sys: 16.47 26.16 21.20 3.85 0.943% numa02.sh User: 5227.58 5309.61 5265.17 31.04 -0.02% numa03.sh Real: 739.07 917.73 795.75 64.45 9.776% numa03.sh Sys: 94.46 136.08 109.48 14.58 21.39% numa03.sh User: 57478.56 72014.09 61764.48 5343.69 8.813% numa04.sh Real: 442.61 715.43 530.31 96.12 46.79% numa04.sh Sys: 224.90 348.63 285.61 48.83 72.97% numa04.sh User: 35836.84 47522.47 40235.41 3985.26 46.26% numa05.sh Real: 386.13 489.17 434.94 43.59 20.88% numa05.sh Sys: 144.29 438.56 278.80 105.78 40.77% numa05.sh User: 33255.86 36890.82 34879.31 1641.98 12.11% Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529514181-9842-3-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Reuse cpu_util_irq() that has been defined for schedutil and set irq util to 0 when !CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING. But the compiler is not able to optimize the sequence (at least with aarch64 GCC 7.2.1): free *= (max - irq); free /= max; when irq is fixed to 0 Add a new inline function scale_irq_capacity() that will scale utilization when irq is accounted. Reuse this funciton in schedutil which applies similar formula. Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1532001606-6689-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 16 7月, 2018 7 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
rt_avg is not used anywhere anymore, so we can remove all related code. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-11-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
The utilization of the CPU by RT, DL and IRQs are now tracked with PELT so we can use these metrics instead of rt_avg to evaluate the remaining capacity available for CFS class. scale_rt_capacity() behavior has been changed and now returns the remaining capacity available for CFS instead of a scaling factor because RT, DL and IRQ provide now absolute utilization value. The same formula as schedutil is used: IRQ util_avg + (1 - IRQ util_avg / max capacity ) * /Sum rq util_avg but the implementation is different because it doesn't return the same value and doesn't benefit of the same optimization. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-10-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
interrupt and steal time are the only remaining activities tracked by rt_avg. Like for sched classes, we can use PELT to track their average utilization of the CPU. But unlike sched class, we don't track when entering/leaving interrupt; Instead, we take into account the time spent under interrupt context when we update rqs' clock (rq_clock_task). This also means that we have to decay the normal context time and account for interrupt time during the update. That's also important to note that because: rq_clock == rq_clock_task + interrupt time and rq_clock_task is used by a sched class to compute its utilization, the util_avg of a sched class only reflects the utilization of the time spent in normal context and not of the whole time of the CPU. The utilization of interrupt gives an more accurate level of utilization of CPU. The CPU utilization is: avg_irq + (1 - avg_irq / max capacity) * /Sum avg_rq Most of the time, avg_irq is small and neglictible so the use of the approximation CPU utilization = /Sum avg_rq was enough. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Similarly to what happens with RT tasks, CFS tasks can be preempted by DL tasks and the CFS's utilization might no longer describes the real utilization level. Current DL bandwidth reflects the requirements to meet deadline when tasks are enqueued but not the current utilization of the DL sched class. We track DL class utilization to estimate the system utilization. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
schedutil governor relies on cfs_rq's util_avg to choose the OPP when CFS tasks are running. When the CPU is overloaded by CFS and RT tasks, CFS tasks are preempted by RT tasks and in this case util_avg reflects the remaining capacity but not what CFS want to use. In such case, schedutil can select a lower OPP whereas the CPU is overloaded. In order to have a more accurate view of the utilization of the CPU, we track the utilization of RT tasks. Only util_avg is correctly tracked but not load_avg and runnable_load_avg which are useless for rt_rq. rt_rq uses rq_clock_task and cfs_rq uses cfs_rq_clock_task but they are the same at the root group level, so the PELT windows of the util_sum are aligned. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
We want to track rt_rq's utilization as a part of the estimation of the whole rq's utilization. This is necessary because rt tasks can steal utilization to cfs tasks and make them lighter than they are. As we want to use the same load tracking mecanism for both and prevent useless dependency between cfs and rt code, PELT code is moved in a dedicated file. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1530200714-4504-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Quentin Perret 提交于
When a new task wakes-up for the first time, its initial utilization is set to half of the spare capacity of its CPU. The current implementation of post_init_entity_util_avg() uses SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE directly as a capacity reference. As a result, on a big.LITTLE system, a new task waking up on an idle little CPU will be given ~512 of util_avg, even if the CPU's capacity is significantly less than that. Fix this by computing the spare capacity with arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). Signed-off-by: NQuentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180612112215.25448-1-quentin.perret@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 03 7月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
When a cfs_rq is throttled, parent cfs_rq->nr_running is decreased and everything happens at cfs_rq level. Currently util_est stays unchanged in such case and it keeps accounting the utilization of throttled tasks. This can somewhat make sense as we don't dequeue tasks but only throttled cfs_rq. If a task of another group is enqueued/dequeued and root cfs_rq becomes idle during the dequeue, util_est will be cleared whereas it was accounting util_est of throttled tasks before. So the behavior of util_est is not always the same regarding throttled tasks and depends of side activity. Furthermore, util_est will not be updated when the cfs_rq is unthrottled as everything happens at cfs_rq level. Main results is that util_est will stay null whereas we now have running tasks. We have to wait for the next dequeue/enqueue of the previously throttled tasks to get an up to date util_est. Remove the assumption that cfs_rq's estimated utilization of a CPU is 0 if there is no running task so the util_est of a task remains until the latter is dequeued even if its cfs_rq has been throttled. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NPatrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 7f65ea42 ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528972380-16268-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Xunlei Pang 提交于
When period gets restarted after some idle time, start_cfs_bandwidth() doesn't update the expiration information, expire_cfs_rq_runtime() will see cfs_rq->runtime_expires smaller than rq clock and go to the clock drift logic, wasting needless CPU cycles on the scheduler hot path. Update the global expiration in start_cfs_bandwidth() to avoid frequent expire_cfs_rq_runtime() calls once a new period begins. Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620101834.24455-2-xlpang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Xunlei Pang 提交于
I noticed that cgroup task groups constantly get throttled even if they have low CPU usage, this causes some jitters on the response time to some of our business containers when enabling CPU quotas. It's very simple to reproduce: mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test cd /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/test echo 100000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us echo $$ > tasks then repeat: cat cpu.stat | grep nr_throttled # nr_throttled will increase steadily After some analysis, we found that cfs_rq::runtime_remaining will be cleared by expire_cfs_rq_runtime() due to two equal but stale "cfs_{b|q}->runtime_expires" after period timer is re-armed. The current condition to judge clock drift in expire_cfs_rq_runtime() is wrong, the two runtime_expires are actually the same when clock drift happens, so this condtion can never hit. The orginal design was correctly done by this commit: a9cf55b2 ("sched: Expire invalid runtime") ... but was changed to be the current implementation due to its locking bug. This patch introduces another way, it adds a new field in both structures cfs_rq and cfs_bandwidth to record the expiration update sequence, and uses them to figure out if clock drift happens (true if they are equal). Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 51f2176d ("sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620101834.24455-1-xlpang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 21 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Li RongQing 提交于
After commit: 82958366 ("sched: Replace update_shares weight distribution with per-entity computation") tg_unthrottle_up() did not update the weight. Signed-off-by: NLi RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1523423816-18322-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The static key sched_smt_present is only updated at boot time when SMT siblings have been detected. Booting with maxcpus=1 and bringing the siblings online after boot rebuilds the scheduling domains correctly but does not update the static key, so the SMT code is not enabled. Let the key be updated in the scheduler CPU hotplug code to fix this. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
The kzalloc() function has a 2-factor argument form, kcalloc(). This patch replaces cases of: kzalloc(a * b, gfp) with: kcalloc(a * b, gfp) as well as handling cases of: kzalloc(a * b * c, gfp) with: kzalloc(array3_size(a, b, c), gfp) as it's slightly less ugly than: kzalloc_array(array_size(a, b), c, gfp) This does, however, attempt to ignore constant size factors like: kzalloc(4 * 1024, gfp) though any constants defined via macros get caught up in the conversion. Any factors with a sizeof() of "unsigned char", "char", and "u8" were dropped, since they're redundant. The Coccinelle script used for this was: // Fix redundant parens around sizeof(). @@ type TYPE; expression THING, E; @@ ( kzalloc( - (sizeof(TYPE)) * E + sizeof(TYPE) * E , ...) | kzalloc( - (sizeof(THING)) * E + sizeof(THING) * E , ...) ) // Drop single-byte sizes and redundant parens. @@ expression COUNT; typedef u8; typedef __u8; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) ) // 2-factor product with sizeof(type/expression) and identifier or constant. @@ type TYPE; expression THING; identifier COUNT_ID; constant COUNT_CONST; @@ ( - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) ) // 2-factor product, only identifiers. @@ identifier SIZE, COUNT; @@ - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - SIZE * COUNT + COUNT, SIZE , ...) // 3-factor product with 1 sizeof(type) or sizeof(expression), with // redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING; identifier STRIDE, COUNT; type TYPE; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product with 2 sizeof(variable), with redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING1, THING2; identifier COUNT; type TYPE1, TYPE2; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(TYPE2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product, only identifiers, with redundant parens removed. @@ identifier STRIDE, SIZE, COUNT; @@ ( kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) ) // Any remaining multi-factor products, first at least 3-factor products, // when they're not all constants... @@ expression E1, E2, E3; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * (E3) + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - E1 * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) ) // And then all remaining 2 factors products when they're not all constants, // keeping sizeof() as the second factor argument. @@ expression THING, E1, E2; type TYPE; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(sizeof(THING) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(sizeof(TYPE) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2, ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * E2 + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * E2 + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * (E2) + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - E1 * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) ) Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
- 25 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick Bellasi 提交于
When a task is enqueued the estimated utilization of a CPU is updated to better support the selection of the required frequency. However, schedutil is (implicitly) updated by update_load_avg() which always happens before util_est_{en,de}queue(), thus potentially introducing a latency between estimated utilization updates and frequency selections. Let's update util_est at the beginning of enqueue_task_fair(), which will ensure that all schedutil updates will see the most updated estimated utilization value for a CPU. Reported-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPatrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com> Fixes: 7f65ea42 ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180524141023.13765-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 14 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rohit Jain 提交于
sched/core: Distinguish between idle_cpu() calls based on desired effect, introduce available_idle_cpu() In the following commit: 247f2f6f ("sched/core: Don't schedule threads on pre-empted vCPUs") ... we distinguish between idle_cpu() when the vCPU is not running for scheduling threads. However, the idle_cpu() function is used in other places for actually checking whether the state of the CPU is idle or not. Hence split the use of that function based on the desired return value, by introducing the available_idle_cpu() function. This fixes a (slight) regression in that initial vCPU commit, because some code paths (like the load-balancer) don't care and shouldn't care if the vCPU is preempted or not, they just want to know if there's any tasks on the CPU. Signed-off-by: NRohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dhaval.giani@oracle.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com Cc: subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525883988-10356-1-git-send-email-rohit.k.jain@oracle.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
Threads share an address space and each can change the protections of the same address space to trap NUMA faults. This is redundant and potentially counter-productive as any thread doing the update will suffice. Potentially only one thread is required but that thread may be idle or it may not have any locality concerns and pick an unsuitable scan rate. This patch uses independent scan period but they are staggered based on the number of address space users when the thread is created. The intent is that threads will avoid scanning at the same time and have a chance to adapt their scan rate later if necessary. This reduces the total scan activity early in the lifetime of the threads. The different in headline performance across a range of machines and workloads is marginal but the system CPU usage is reduced as well as overall scan activity. The following is the time reported by NAS Parallel Benchmark using unbound openmp threads and a D size class: 4.17.0-rc1 4.17.0-rc1 vanilla stagger-v1r1 Time bt.D 442.77 ( 0.00%) 419.70 ( 5.21%) Time cg.D 171.90 ( 0.00%) 180.85 ( -5.21%) Time ep.D 33.10 ( 0.00%) 32.90 ( 0.60%) Time is.D 9.59 ( 0.00%) 9.42 ( 1.77%) Time lu.D 306.75 ( 0.00%) 304.65 ( 0.68%) Time mg.D 54.56 ( 0.00%) 52.38 ( 4.00%) Time sp.D 1020.03 ( 0.00%) 903.77 ( 11.40%) Time ua.D 400.58 ( 0.00%) 386.49 ( 3.52%) Note it's not a universal win but we have no prior knowledge of which thread matters but the number of threads created often exceeds the size of the node when the threads are not bound. However, there is a reducation of overall system CPU usage: 4.17.0-rc1 4.17.0-rc1 vanilla stagger-v1r1 sys-time-bt.D 48.78 ( 0.00%) 48.22 ( 1.15%) sys-time-cg.D 25.31 ( 0.00%) 26.63 ( -5.22%) sys-time-ep.D 1.65 ( 0.00%) 0.62 ( 62.42%) sys-time-is.D 40.05 ( 0.00%) 24.45 ( 38.95%) sys-time-lu.D 37.55 ( 0.00%) 29.02 ( 22.72%) sys-time-mg.D 47.52 ( 0.00%) 34.92 ( 26.52%) sys-time-sp.D 119.01 ( 0.00%) 109.05 ( 8.37%) sys-time-ua.D 51.52 ( 0.00%) 45.13 ( 12.40%) NUMA scan activity is also reduced: NUMA alloc local 1042828 1342670 NUMA base PTE updates 140481138 93577468 NUMA huge PMD updates 272171 180766 NUMA page range updates 279832690 186129660 NUMA hint faults 1395972 1193897 NUMA hint local faults 877925 855053 NUMA hint local percent 62 71 NUMA pages migrated 12057909 9158023 Similar observations are made for other thread-intensive workloads. System CPU usage is lower even though the headline gains in performance tend to be small. For example, specjbb 2005 shows almost no difference in performance but scan activity is reduced by a third on a 4-socket box. I didn't find a workload (thread intensive or otherwise) that suffered badly. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504154109.mvrha2qo5wdl65vr@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 12 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
This reverts commit 7347fc87. Srikar Dronamra pointed out that while the commit in question did show a performance improvement on ppc64, it did so at the cost of disabling active CPU migration by automatic NUMA balancing which was not the intent. The issue was that a serious flaw in the logic failed to ever active balance if SD_WAKE_AFFINE was disabled on scheduler domains. Even when it's enabled, the logic is still bizarre and against the original intent. Investigation showed that fixing the patch in either the way he suggested, using the correct comparison for jiffies values or introducing a new numa_migrate_deferred variable in task_struct all perform similarly to a revert with a mix of gains and losses depending on the workload, machine and socket count. The original intent of the commit was to handle a problem whereby wake_affine, idle balancing and automatic NUMA balancing disagree on the appropriate placement for a task. This was particularly true for cases where a single task was a massive waker of tasks but where wake_wide logic did not apply. This was particularly noticeable when a futex (a barrier) woke all worker threads and tried pulling the wakees to the waker nodes. In that specific case, it could be handled by tuning MPI or openMP appropriately, but the behavior is not illogical and was worth attempting to fix. However, the approach was wrong. Given that we're at rc4 and a fix is not obvious, it's better to play safe, revert this commit and retry later. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: efault@gmx.de Cc: ggherdovich@suse.cz Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509163115.6fnnyeg4vdm2ct4v@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 04 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Call sync_entity_load_avg() directly from find_idlest_cpu() instead of select_task_rq_fair(), as that's where we need to use task's utilization value. And call sync_entity_load_avg() only after making sure sched domain spans over one of the allowed CPUs for the task. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cd019d1753824c81130eae7b43e2bbcec47cc1ad.1524738578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Rearrange select_task_rq_fair() a bit to avoid executing some conditional statements in few specific code-paths. That gets rid of the goto as well. This shouldn't result in any functional changes. Tested-by: NRohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NValentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20831b8d237bf3a20e4e328286f678b425ff04c9.1524738578.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-