- 09 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
irq_enabled is only ever 0 or 1, so make it a bool. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
drm_vblank_init() is too ugly. Make it a bit easier on the eye by collecting all the per-crtc vblank counters, timestamps etc. to a structure and just allocate an array of those. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
vblank_enabled is only ever 0 or 1, so make it a bool. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
- 11 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Archit Taneja 提交于
The omapdrm driver currently takes a config/module arg to figure out the number of crtcs it needs to create. We could create as many crtcs as there are overlay managers in the DSS hardware, but we don't do that because each crtc eats up one DSS overlay, and that reduces the number of planes we can attach to a single crtc. Since the number of crtcs may be lesser than the number of hardware overlay managers, we need to figure out which overlay managers to use for our crtcs. The current approach is to use pipe2chan(), which returns a higher numbered manager for the crtc. The problem with this approach is that it assumes that the overlay managers we choose will connect to the encoders the platform's panels are going to use, this isn't true, an overlay manager connects only to a few outputs/encoders, and choosing any overlay manager for our crtc might lead to a situation where the encoder cannot connect to any of the crtcs we have chosen. For example, an omap5-panda board has just one hdmi output. If num_crtc is set to 1, with the current approach, pipe2chan will pick up the LCD2 overlay manager, which cannot connect to the hdmi encoder at all. The only manager that could have connected to hdmi was the TV overlay manager. Therefore, there is a need to choose our overlay managers keeping in mind the panels we have on that platform. The new approach iterates through all the available panels, creates encoders and connectors for them, and then tries to get a suitable overlay manager to create a crtc which can connect to the encoders. We use the dispc_channel field in omap_dss_output to retrieve the desired overlay manager's channel number, we then check whether the manager had already been assigned to a crtc or not. If it was already assigned to a crtc, we assume that out of all the encoders which intend use this crtc, only one will run at a time. If the overlay manager wan't assigned to a crtc till then, we create a new crtc and link it with the overlay manager. This approach just looks for the best dispc_channel for each encoder. On DSS HW, some encoders can connect to multiple overlay managers. Since we don't try looking for alternate overlay managers, there is a greater possibility that 2 or more encoders end up asking for the same crtc, causing only one encoder to run at a time. Also, this approach isn't the most optimal one, it can do either good or bad depending on the sequence in which the panels/outputs are parsed. The optimal way would be some sort of back tracking approach, where we improve the set of managers we use as we iterate through the list of panels/encoders. That's something left for later. Signed-off-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NTomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Clark 提交于
Now that the omapdss interface has been reworked so that omapdrm can use dispc directly, we have been able to fix the remaining functional kms issues with omapdrm. And in the mean time the PM sequencing and many other of that open issues have been solved. So I think it makes sense to finally move omapdrm out of staging. Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
-
- 08 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rob Clark 提交于
This patch changes the omapdrm KMS to bypass the omapdss "compat" layer and use the core omapdss API directly. This solves some layering issues that would cause unpin confusion vs GO bit status, because we would not know whether a particular pageflip or overlay update has hit the screen or not. Now instead we explicitly manage the GO bits in dispc and handle the vblank/framedone interrupts ourself so that we always know which buffers are being scanned out at any given time, and so on. As an added bonus, we no longer leave the last overlay buffer pinned when the display is disabled, and have been able to add the previously missing vblank event handling. v1: original v2: rebased on latest staging-next and omapdss patches from Tomi and review comments from Archit Taneja Signed-off-by: NRob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NArchit Taneja <archit@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-