Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 158
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 02 4月, 2010 6 次提交
    • Y
      ibft, x86: Change reserve_ibft_region() to find_ibft_region() · 042be38e
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      This allows arch code could decide the way to reserve the ibft.

And we should reserve ibft as early as possible, instead of BOOTMEM
stage, in case the table is in RAM range and is not reserved by BIOS
(this will often be the case.)

Move to just after find_smp_config().

Also when CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y, We will not have reserve_bootmem() anymore.

-v2: fix typo about ibft pointed by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4BB510FB.80601@kernel.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      042be38e
    • A
      x86, hpet: Fix bug in RTC emulation · b4a5e8a1
      由 Alok Kataria 提交于 
      We think there exists a bug in the HPET code that emulates the RTC.

In the normal case, when the RTC frequency is set, the rtc driver tells
the hpet code about it here:

int hpet_set_periodic_freq(unsigned long freq)
{
        uint64_t clc;

        if (!is_hpet_enabled())
                return 0;

        if (freq <= DEFAULT_RTC_INT_FREQ)
                hpet_pie_limit = DEFAULT_RTC_INT_FREQ / freq;
        else {
                clc = (uint64_t) hpet_clockevent.mult * NSEC_PER_SEC;
                do_div(clc, freq);
                clc >>= hpet_clockevent.shift;
                hpet_pie_delta = (unsigned long) clc;
        }
        return 1;
}

If freq is set to 64Hz (DEFAULT_RTC_INT_FREQ) or lower, then
hpet_pie_limit (a static) is set to non-zero.  Then, on every one-shot
HPET interrupt, hpet_rtc_timer_reinit is called to compute the next
timeout.  Well, that function has this logic:

        if (!(hpet_rtc_flags & RTC_PIE) || hpet_pie_limit)
                delta = hpet_default_delta;
        else
                delta = hpet_pie_delta;

Since hpet_pie_limit is not 0, hpet_default_delta is used.  That
corresponds to 64Hz.

Now, if you set a different rtc frequency, you'll take the else path
through hpet_set_periodic_freq, but unfortunately no one resets
hpet_pie_limit back to 0.

Boom....now you are stuck with 64Hz RTC interrupts forever.

The patch below just resets the hpet_pie_limit value when requested freq
is greater than DEFAULT_RTC_INT_FREQ, which we think fixes this problem.
Signed-off-by: NAlok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
LKML-Reference: <201003112200.o2BM0Hre012875@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      b4a5e8a1
    • P
      x86, hpet: Erratum workaround for read after write of HPET comparator · 8da854cb
      由 Pallipadi, Venkatesh 提交于 
      On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:37:04PM -0800, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Again, on the Intel DP55KG board:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux host 2.6.33 #1 SMP Wed Feb 24 18:31:00 EST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> [    1.237600] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    1.237890] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c:404 hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80()
> [    1.238221] Hardware name:
> [    1.238504] hpet: compare register read back failed.
> [    1.238793] Modules linked in:
> [    1.239315] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.33 #1
> [    1.239605] Call Trace:
> [    1.239886]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81056c13>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [    1.240409]  [<ffffffff81079608>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x38/0xc0
> [    1.240699]  [<ffffffff81056cb0>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [    1.240992]  [<ffffffff81079608>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x38/0xc0
> [    1.241281]  [<ffffffff81041ad0>] ? hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80
> [    1.241573]  [<ffffffff81079608>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x38/0xc0
> [    1.241859]  [<ffffffff81078e32>] ? tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast+0xe2/0x100
> [    1.246533]  [<ffffffff8102a67a>] ? timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x30
> [    1.246826]  [<ffffffff81085499>] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x39/0xd0
> [    1.247118]  [<ffffffff81087368>] ? handle_edge_irq+0xb8/0x160
> [    1.247407]  [<ffffffff81029f55>] ? handle_irq+0x15/0x20
> [    1.247689]  [<ffffffff810294a2>] ? do_IRQ+0x62/0xe0
> [    1.247976]  [<ffffffff8146be53>] ? ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
> [    1.248262]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8102f277>] ? mwait_idle+0x57/0x80
> [    1.248796]  [<ffffffff8102645c>] ? cpu_idle+0x5c/0xb0
> [    1.249080] ---[ end trace db7f668fb6fef4e1 ]---
>
> Is this something Intel has to fix or is it a bug in the kernel?

This is a chipset erratum.

Thomas: You mentioned we can retain this check only for known-buggy and
hpet debug kind of options. But here is the simple workaround patch for
this particular erratum.

Some chipsets have a erratum due to which read immediately following a
write of HPET comparator returns old comparator value instead of most
recently written value.

Erratum 15 in
"Intel I/O Controller Hub 9 (ICH9) Family Specification Update"
(http://www.intel.com/assets/pdf/specupdate/316973.pdf)

Workaround for the errata is to read the comparator twice if the first
one fails.
Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100225185348.GA9674@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      8da854cb
    • Y
      bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on node 0 · aa235fc7
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      When 32bit numa is used, free_all_bootmem() will still only go over with
node id 0.

If node 0 doesn't have RAM installed, the lowest populated node
becomes low RAM.

This one fixes BOOTMEM path by iterating over the bdata_list.

-v3: add more comments, and fix bootmem path too.
-v4: seperate from one big patch
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4BB416D7.6090203@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      aa235fc7
    • Y
      nobootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on node 0 · 33799858
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      On one system without RAM on node0, got following boot dump with a 32
bit NUMA kernel:

early_node_map[4] active PFN ranges
    1: 0x00000010 -> 0x00000099
    1: 0x00000100 -> 0x0007da00
    1: 0x0007e800 -> 0x0007ffa0
    1: 0x0007ffae -> 0x0007ffb0
...
Subtract (29 early reservations)
  #000 [0000001000 - 0000002000]
  #001 [0000089000 - 000008f000]
  #002 [0000091000 - 0000093500]
...
  #027 [007cbfef40 - 007e800000]
  #028 [007e9ca000 - 007ff95000]
(0 free memory ranges)
Initializing HighMem for node 0 (00000000:00000000)
Initializing HighMem for node 1 (00000000:00000000)
Memory: 0k/2096832k available (6662k kernel code, 2096300k reserved, 4829k data, 484k init, 0k highmem)
...
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok.
swapper: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x0
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-tip-03818-g4b1ea6c-dirty #35
Call Trace:
 [<4087a5dc>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
 [<40286728>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x417/0x487
 [<402a9ce1>] new_slab+0xe2/0x1fe
 [<402aa5b2>] kmem_cache_open+0x185/0x358
 [<402abbc0>] T.954+0x1c/0x60
 [<40d52a29>] kmem_cache_init+0x24/0x113
 [<40d39738>] start_kernel+0x166/0x2e4
 [<40d3940e>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x18e
 [<40d390ce>] i386_start_kernel+0xce/0xd5
Mem-Info:
Node 1 DMA per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
Node 1 Normal per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
active_anon:0 inactive_anon:0 isolated_anon:0
 active_file:0 inactive_file:0 isolated_file:0
 unevictable:0 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0
 free:0 slab_reclaimable:0 slab_unreclaimable:0
 mapped:0 shmem:0 pagetables:0 bounce:0

When 32bit NUMA is used, free_all_bootmem() will still only go over with
node id 0.

If node 0 doesn't have RAM installed, We need to go with node1
because early_node_map still use 1 for all ranges, and ram from node1
become low ram.

Use MAX_NUMNODES like 64-bit NUMA does.

Note: BOOTMEM path has the same problem.
      this bug exist before We have NO_BOOTMEM support.

-v3: add more comments, and fix bootmem path too.
-v4: seperate bootmem path fix
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4BB41689.9090502@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      33799858
    • A
      x86: Handle overlapping mptables · 909fc87b
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      We found a system where the MP table MPC and MPF structures overlap.

That doesn't really matter because the mptable is not used anyways with ACPI,
but it leads to a panic in the early allocator due to the overlapping
reservations in 2.6.33.

Earlier kernels handled this without problems.

Simply change these reservations to reserve_early_overlap_ok to avoid
the panic.
Reported-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Tested-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100329074111.GA22821@basil.fritz.box>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      909fc87b
  3. 01 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • Y
      x86: Make e820_remove_range to handle all covered case · 9f3a5f52
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      Rusty found on lguest with trim_bios_range, max_pfn is not right anymore, and
looks e820_remove_range does not work right.

[    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[    0.000000]  LGUEST: 0000000000000000 - 0000000004000000 (usable)
[    0.000000] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU or disabled in BIOS!
[    0.000000] DMI not present or invalid.
[    0.000000] last_pfn = 0x3fa0 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000
[    0.000000] init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-0000000003fa0000

root cause is: the e820_remove_range doesn't handle the all covered
case.  e820_remove_range(BIOS_START, BIOS_END - BIOS_START, ...)
produces a bogus range as a result.

Make it match e820_update_range() by handling that case too.
Reported-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Tested-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LKML-Reference: <4BB18E55.6090903@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      9f3a5f52
  5. 31 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      x86-32, resume: do a global tlb flush in S4 resume · 8ae06d22
      由 Shaohua Li 提交于 
      Colin King reported a strange oops in S4 resume code path (see below). The test
system has i5/i7 CPU. The kernel doesn't open PAE, so 4M page table is used.
The oops always happen a virtual address 0xc03ff000, which is mapped to the
last 4k of first 4M memory. Doing a global tlb flush fixes the issue.

EIP: 0060:[<c0493a01>] EFLAGS: 00010086 CPU: 0
EIP is at copy_loop+0xe/0x15
EAX: 36aeb000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000400 EDX: f55ad46c
ESI: 0f800000 EDI: c03ff000 EBP: f67fbec4 ESP: f67fbea8
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
...
...
CR2: 00000000c03ff000
Tested-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100305005932.GA22675@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      8ae06d22
  7. 30 3月, 2010 3 次提交
    • I
      x86: Do not free zero sized per cpu areas · eed63519
      由 Ian Campbell 提交于 
      This avoids an infinite loop in free_early_partial().

Add a warning to free_early_partial() to catch future problems.

-v5: put back start > end back into WARN_ONCE()
-v6: use one line for warning, suggested by Linus
-v7: more tests
-v8: remove the function name as suggested by Johannes
     WARN_ONCE() will print out that function name.
Signed-off-by: NIan Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Tested-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <1269830604-26214-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      eed63519
    • Y
      x86: Make sure free_init_pages() frees pages on page boundary · c967da6a
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      When CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y, it could use memory more effiently, or
in a more compact fashion.

Example:

 Allocated new RAMDISK: 00ec2000 - 0248ce57
 Move RAMDISK from 000000002ea04000 - 000000002ffcee56 to 00ec2000 - 0248ce56

The new RAMDISK's end is not page aligned.
Last page could be shared with other users.

When free_init_pages are called for initrd or .init, the page
could be freed and we could corrupt other data.

code segment in free_init_pages():

 |        for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
 |                ClearPageReserved(virt_to_page(addr));
 |                init_page_count(virt_to_page(addr));
 |                memset((void *)(addr & ~(PAGE_SIZE-1)),
 |                        POISON_FREE_INITMEM, PAGE_SIZE);
 |                free_page(addr);
 |                totalram_pages++;
 |        }

last half page could be used as one whole free page.

So page align the boundaries.

-v2: make the original initramdisk to be aligned, according to
     Johannes, otherwise we have the chance to lose one page.
     we still need to keep initrd_end not aligned, otherwise it could
     confuse decompressor.
-v3: change to WARN_ON instead, suggested by Johannes.
-v4: use PAGE_ALIGN, suggested by Johannes.
     We may fix that macro name later to PAGE_ALIGN_UP, and PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN
     Add comments about assuming ramdisk start is aligned
     in relocate_initrd(), change to re get ramdisk_image instead of save it
     to make diff smaller. Add warning for wrong range, suggested by Johannes.
-v6: remove one WARN()
     We need to align beginning in free_init_pages()
     do not copy more than ramdisk_size, noticed by Johannes
Reported-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <1269830604-26214-3-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c967da6a
    • Y
      x86: Make smp_locks end with page alignment · 596b711e
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      Fix:

 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/init.c:342 free_init_pages+0x4c/0xfa()
 free_init_pages: range [0x40daf000, 0x40db5c24] is not aligned
 Modules linked in:
 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted
 2.6.34-rc2-tip-03946-g4f16b23-dirty #50 Call Trace:
  [<40232e9f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
  [<4021c9f0>] ? free_init_pages+0x4c/0xfa
  [<40881434>] ? _etext+0x0/0x24
  [<40232eea>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
  [<4021c9f0>] free_init_pages+0x4c/0xfa
  [<40881434>] ? _etext+0x0/0x24
  [<40d3f4bd>] alternative_instructions+0xf6/0x100
  [<40d3fe4f>] check_bugs+0xbd/0xbf
  [<40d398a7>] start_kernel+0x2d5/0x2e4
  [<40d390ce>] i386_start_kernel+0xce/0xd5
 ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---

Comments in vmlinux.lds.S already said:

 |        /*
 |         * smp_locks might be freed after init
 |         * start/end must be page aligned
 |         */
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <1269830604-26214-2-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      596b711e
  9. 27 3月, 2010 13 次提交
  11. 26 3月, 2010 14 次提交
  13. 25 3月, 2010 2 次提交