Tracking struct inode * rather than the inode number eliminates the
repeated ext4_xattr_inode_iget() call later. The second call cannot
fail in practice but still requires explanation when it wants to ignore
the return value. Avoid the trouble and make things simple.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Both ext4_set_acl() and ext4_set_context() need to be made aware of
ea_inode feature when it comes to credits calculation.

Also add a sufficient credits check in ext4_xattr_set_handle() right
after xattr write lock is grabbed. Original credits calculation is done
outside the lock so there is a possiblity that the initially calculated
credits are not sufficient anymore.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In a few places the function returns without trying to pass the actual
error code to the caller. Fix those.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it
doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to
store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline
area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block.

This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the
sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored
in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than
EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits
calculation is wrong.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not
available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using
value offset.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries
that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because
value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be
read from its external inode.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline
space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode
the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in
the inline area. Change the function to take this into account.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new
xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is
stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to
just assume that they are not equal.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using
le32_to_cpu().
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful
return from ext4_xattr_inode_get().  On error return, the callers ignore
the output value so there is no need to update it.

Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread().  If the actual xattr inode
size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may
return NULL which would indicate data corruption.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return
values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves
the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused.
Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in
ext4 redundant. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether
the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list
addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r
we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below.

"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day..."
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ea_inode contents are treated as metadata, that's why it is journaled
during initial writes. Failing to call revoke during freeing could cause
user data to be overwritten with original ea_inode contents during journal
replay.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the
xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the
parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for
xattr block and regular data block writes.
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

In data=ordered mode jinode needs to be attached to the xattr inode when
writing data to it. Attachment normally occurs during file open for regular
files. Since we are not using file interface to write to the xattr inode,
the jinode attach needs to be done manually.

Otherwise the following crash occurs in data=ordered mode.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
 IP: jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 PGD 13b3c0067
 P4D 13b3c0067
 PUD 137660067
 PMD 0

 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 CPU: 3 PID: 1877 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #749
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff88010e368980 task.stack: ffffc90000374000
 RIP: 0010:jbd2_journal_file_inode+0x37/0x110
 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000377980 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880123b06230 RCX: 0000000000280000
 RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88012c8585d0
 RBP: ffffc900003779b0 R08: 0000000000000202 R09: 0000000000000001
 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000400 R12: ffff8801111f81c0
 R13: ffff88013b2b6800 R14: ffffc90000377ab0 R15: 0000000000000001
 FS:  00007f0c99b77740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000136d91000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  jbd2_journal_inode_add_write+0xe/0x10
  ext4_map_blocks+0x59e/0x620
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x501/0x7d0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.

Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.

  =============================================
  [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
  4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
  ---------------------------------------------
  python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
    lock(&ei->xattr_sem);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  3 locks held by python/1894:
   #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
   #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
   #2:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x67/0x99
   __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
   lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
   down_read+0x2f/0x60
   ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
   ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
   get_acl+0x72/0xf0
   posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
   ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
   __ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
   ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
   ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
   ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
   ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
   ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
   __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
   __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
   vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
   setxattr+0x129/0x160
   path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
   SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
   entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_orphan_add() requires caller to be holding the inode lock.
Add missing lock statements.

 WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1806 at fs/ext4/namei.c:2731 ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 CPU: 3 PID: 1806 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #746
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 task: ffff880135d466c0 task.stack: ffffc900014b0000
 RIP: 0010:ext4_orphan_add+0x4e/0x240
 RSP: 0018:ffffc900014b3d50 EFLAGS: 00010246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801348fe1f0 RCX: ffffc900014b3c64
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8801348fe1f0 RDI: ffff8801348fe1f0
 RBP: ffffc900014b3da0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff80e82025
 R10: 0000000000004692 R11: 000000000000468d R12: ffff880137598000
 R13: ffff880137217000 R14: ffff880134ac58d0 R15: 0000000000000000
 FS:  00007fc50f09e740(0000) GS:ffff88013fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 00000000008bc2e0 CR3: 00000001375ac000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
 Call Trace:
  ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add.constprop.19+0x9d/0xf0
  ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0x1c4/0x2f0
  ext4_evict_inode+0x15a/0x7f0
  evict+0xc0/0x1a0
  iput+0x16a/0x270
  do_unlinkat+0x172/0x290
  SyS_unlink+0x11/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents
to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode
along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because
xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is
restricted.

Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock.

 ============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 python/1822 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 4 locks held by python/1822:
  #0:  (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
  #2:  (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420
  #3:  (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
  __lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750
  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
  down_write+0x2c/0x60
  ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
  ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
  ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
  ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
  ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
  __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
  __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
  vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
  setxattr+0x12e/0x150
  path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
  SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Large xattr support is implemented for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE.

If the size of an xattr value is larger than will fit in a single
external block, then the xattr value will be saved into the body
of an external xattr inode.

The also helps support a larger number of xattr, since only the headers
will be stored in the in-inode space or the single external block.

The inode is referenced from the xattr header via "e_value_inum",
which was formerly "e_value_block", but that field was never used.
The e_value_size still contains the xattr size so that listing
xattrs does not need to look up the inode if the data is not accessed.

struct ext4_xattr_entry {
        __u8    e_name_len;     /* length of name */
        __u8    e_name_index;   /* attribute name index */
        __le16  e_value_offs;   /* offset in disk block of value */
        __le32  e_value_inum;   /* inode in which value is stored */
        __le32  e_value_size;   /* size of attribute value */
        __le32  e_hash;         /* hash value of name and value */
        char    e_name[0];      /* attribute name */
};

The xattr inode is marked with the EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag and also
holds a back-reference to the owning inode in its i_mtime field,
allowing the ext4/e2fsck to verify the correct inode is accessed.

[ Applied fix by Dan Carpenter to avoid freeing an ERR_PTR. ]

Lustre-Jira: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-80
Lustre-bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424Signed-off-by: NKalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

This INCOMPAT_LARGEDIR feature allows larger directories to be created
in ldiskfs, both with directory sizes over 2GB and and a maximum htree
depth of 3 instead of the current limit of 2. These features are needed
in order to exceed the current limit of approximately 10M entries in a
single directory.

This patch was originally written by Yang Sheng to support the Lustre server.

[ Bumped the credits needed to update an indexed directory -- tytso ]
Signed-off-by: NLiang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Sheng <yang.sheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>

Currently, extent manipulation operations such as hole punch, range
zeroing, or extent shifting do not record the fact that file data has
changed and thus fdatasync(2) has a work to do. As a result if we crash
e.g. after a punch hole and fdatasync, user can still possibly see the
punched out data after journal replay. Test generic/392 fails due to
these problems.

Fix the problem by properly marking that file data has changed in these
operations.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a4bb6b64Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

mpage_submit_page() can race with another process growing i_size and
writing data via mmap to the written-back page. As mpage_submit_page()
samples i_size too early, it may happen that ext4_bio_write_page()
zeroes out too large tail of the page and thus corrupts user data.

Fix the problem by sampling i_size only after the page has been
write-protected in page tables by clear_page_dirty_for_io() call.
Reported-by: NMichael Zimmer <michael@swarm64.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: cb20d518Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When ext4_map_blocks() is called with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO to zero-out
allocated blocks and these blocks are actually converted from unwritten
extent the following race can happen:

CPU0					CPU1

page fault				page fault
...					...
ext4_map_blocks()
  ext4_ext_map_blocks()
    ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()
      ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized()
	- zero out converted extent
	ext4_zeroout_es()
	  - inserts extent as initialized in status tree

					ext4_map_blocks()
					  ext4_es_lookup_extent()
					    - finds initialized extent
					write data
  ext4_issue_zeroout()
    - zeroes out new extent overwriting data

This problem can be reproduced by generic/340 for the fallocated case
for the last block in the file.

Fix the problem by avoiding zeroing out the area we are mapping with
ext4_map_blocks() in ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized(). It is pointless
to zero out this area in the first place as the caller asked us to
convert the area to initialized because he is just going to write data
there before the transaction finishes. To achieve this we delete the
special case of zeroing out full extent as that will be handled by the
cases below zeroing only the part of the extent that needs it. We also
instruct ext4_split_extent() that the middle of extent being split
contains data so that ext4_split_extent_at() cannot zero out full extent
in case of ENOSPC.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 12735f88Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

ext4_xattr_block_set() calls dquot_alloc_block() to charge for an xattr
block when new references are made. However if dquot_initialize() hasn't
been called on an inode, request for charging is effectively ignored
because ext4_inode_info->i_dquot is not initialized yet.

Add dquot_initialize() to call paths that lead to ext4_xattr_block_set().
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Currently we don't allow direct I/O on encrypted regular files, so in
such cases we return 0 early in ext4_direct_IO().  There was also an
additional BUG_ON() check in ext4_direct_IO_write(), but it can never be
hit because of the earlier check for the exact same condition in
ext4_direct_IO().  There was also no matching check on the read path,
which made the write path specific check seem very ad-hoc.

Just remove the unnecessary BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Gstir <david@sigma-star.at>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Now that we are passing a struct ext4_filename, we do not need to pass
around the original struct qstr too.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

The 'lend' argument of filemap_write_and_wait_range() is inclusive, so
we need to subtract 1 from pos + count.

Note that 'count' is guaranteed to be nonzero since
ext4_file_read_iter() returns early when given a 0 count.

Fixes: 16c54688 ("ext4: Allow parallel DIO reads")
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff() is used to search for offset of hole or
data in page range [index, end] (both inclusive), and the max number
of pages to search should be at least one, if end == index.
Otherwise the only page is missed and no hole or data is found,
which is not correct.

When block size is smaller than page size, this can be demonstrated
by preallocating a file with size smaller than page size and writing
data to the last block. E.g. run this xfs_io command on a 1k block
size ext4 on x86_64 host.

  # xfs_io -fc "falloc 0 3k" -c "pwrite 2k 1k" \
  	    -c "seek -d 0" /mnt/ext4/testfile
  wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 2048
  1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (42.459 MiB/sec and 43478.2609 ops/sec)
  Whence  Result
  DATA    EOF

Data at offset 2k was missed, and lseek(2) returned ENXIO.

This is unconvered by generic/285 subtest 07 and 08 on ppc64 host,
where pagesize is 64k. Because a recent change to generic/285
reduced the preallocated file size to smaller than 64k.
Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

ext4_expand_extra_isize() should clear only space between old and new
size.

Fixes: 6dd4ee7c # v2.6.23
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

I've got another report about breaking ext4 by ENOMEM error returned from
ext4_mb_load_buddy() caused by memory shortage in memory cgroup.
This time inside ext4_discard_preallocations().

This patch replaces ext4_error() with ext4_warning() where errors returned
from ext4_mb_load_buddy() are not fatal and handled by caller:
* ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations() - called before generating ENOSPC,
  we'll try to discard other group or return ENOSPC into user-space.
* ext4_trim_all_free() - just stop trimming and return ENOMEM from ioctl.

Some callers cannot handle errors, thus __GFP_NOFAIL is used for them:
* ext4_discard_preallocations()
* ext4_mb_discard_lg_preallocations()

Fixes: adb7ef60 ("ext4: use __GFP_NOFAIL in ext4_free_blocks()")
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

There is an off-by-one error in loop termination conditions in
ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff() since 'end' may index a page beyond end of
desired range if 'endoff' is page aligned. It doesn't have any visible
effects but still it is good to fix it.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

Currently, SEEK_HOLE implementation in ext4 may both return that there's
a hole at some offset although that offset already has data and skip
some holes during a search for the next hole. The first problem is
demostrated by:

xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "seek -h 0" file
wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
56 KiB, 14 ops; 0.0000 sec (2.054 GiB/sec and 538461.5385 ops/sec)
Whence	Result
HOLE	0

Where we can see that SEEK_HOLE wrongly returned offset 0 as containing
a hole although we have written data there. The second problem can be
demonstrated by:

xfs_io -c "falloc 0 256k" -c "pwrite 0 56k" -c "pwrite 128k 8k"
       -c "seek -h 0" file

wrote 57344/57344 bytes at offset 0
56 KiB, 14 ops; 0.0000 sec (1.978 GiB/sec and 518518.5185 ops/sec)
wrote 8192/8192 bytes at offset 131072
8 KiB, 2 ops; 0.0000 sec (2 GiB/sec and 500000.0000 ops/sec)
Whence	Result
HOLE	139264

Where we can see that hole at offsets 56k..128k has been ignored by the
SEEK_HOLE call.

The underlying problem is in the ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff() which is
just buggy. In some cases it fails to update returned offset when it
finds a hole (when no pages are found or when the first found page has
higher index than expected), in some cases conditions for detecting hole
are just missing (we fail to detect a situation where indices of
returned pages are not contiguous).

Fix ext4_find_unwritten_pgoff() to properly detect non-contiguous page
indices and also handle all cases where we got less pages then expected
in one place and handle it properly there.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c8c0df24
CC: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

When a transaction starts, start_this_handle() saves current
PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS value so that it can be restored at journal stop time.
Journal restart is a special case that calls start_this_handle() without
stopping the transaction. start_this_handle() isn't aware that the
original value is already stored so it overwrites it with current value.

For instance, a call sequence like below leaves PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS flag set
at the end:

  jbd2_journal_start()
  jbd2__journal_restart()
  jbd2_journal_stop()

Make jbd2__journal_restart() restore the original value before calling
start_this_handle().

Fixes: 81378da6 ("jbd2: mark the transaction context with the scope GFP_NOFS context")
Signed-off-by: NTahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Quota files have special ranking of i_data_sem lock. We inform lockdep
about it when turning on quotas however when turning quotas off, we
don't clear the lockdep subclass from i_data_sem lock and thus when the
inode gets later reused for a normal file or directory, lockdep gets
confused and complains about possible deadlocks. Fix the problem by
resetting lockdep subclass of i_data_sem on quota off.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: daf647d2Reported-and-tested-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

The code to fetch a 64-bit value from user space was entirely buggered,
and has been since the code was merged in early 2016 in commit
b2f68038 ("x86/mm/32: Add support for 64-bit __get_user() on 32-bit
kernels").

Happily the buggered routine is almost certainly entirely unused, since
the normal way to access user space memory is just with the non-inlined
"get_user()", and the inlined version didn't even historically exist.

The normal "get_user()" case is handled by external hand-written asm in
arch/x86/lib/getuser.S that doesn't have either of these issues.

There were two independent bugs in __get_user_asm_u64():

 - it still did the STAC/CLAC user space access marking, even though
   that is now done by the wrapper macros, see commit 11f1a4b9
   ("x86: reorganize SMAP handling in user space accesses").

   This didn't result in a semantic error, it just means that the
   inlined optimized version was hugely less efficient than the
   allegedly slower standard version, since the CLAC/STAC overhead is
   quite high on modern Intel CPU's.

 - the double register %eax/%edx was marked as an output, but the %eax
   part of it was touched early in the asm, and could thus clobber other
   inputs to the asm that gcc didn't expect it to touch.

   In particular, that meant that the generated code could look like
   this:

        mov    (%eax),%eax
        mov    0x4(%eax),%edx

   where the load of %edx obviously was _supposed_ to be from the 32-bit
   word that followed the source of %eax, but because %eax was
   overwritten by the first instruction, the source of %edx was
   basically random garbage.

The fixes are trivial: remove the extraneous STAC/CLAC entries, and mark
the 64-bit output as early-clobber to let gcc know that no inputs should
alias with the output register.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org   # v4.8+
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Al noticed that unsafe_put_user() had type problems, and fixed them in
commit a7cc722f ("fix unsafe_put_user()"), which made me look more
at those functions.

It turns out that unsafe_get_user() had a type issue too: it limited the
largest size of the type it could handle to "unsigned long".  Which is
fine with the current users, but doesn't match our existing normal
get_user() semantics, which can also handle "u64" even when that does
not fit in a long.

While at it, also clean up the type cast in unsafe_put_user().  We
actually want to just make it an assignment to the expected type of the
pointer, because we actually do want warnings from types that don't
convert silently.  And it makes the code more readable by not having
that one very long and complex line.

[ This patch might become stable material if we ever end up back-porting
  any new users of the unsafe uaccess code, but as things stand now this
  doesn't matter for any current existing uses. ]

Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Pull misc uaccess fixes from Al Viro:
 "Fix for unsafe_put_user() (no callers currently in mainline, but
  anyone starting to use it will step into that) + alpha osf_wait4()
  infoleak fix"

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
  osf_wait4(): fix infoleak
  fix unsafe_put_user()