Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 2月, 2012 3 次提交
  3. 19 2月, 2012 6 次提交
  5. 17 2月, 2012 9 次提交
  7. 15 2月, 2012 7 次提交
    • J
      Bluetooth: Implement Read Supported Commands commands for mgmt · e70bb2e8
      由 Johan Hedberg 提交于 
      This patch implements the Read Supported Commands mgmt command which was
recently added to the API specification. It returns a list of supported
commands and events to user space.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      e70bb2e8
    • U
      Bluetooth: Remove usage of __cancel_delayed_work() · 6de32750
      由 Ulisses Furquim 提交于 
      __cancel_delayed_work() is being used in some paths where we cannot
sleep waiting for the delayed work to finish. However, that function
might return while the timer is running and the work will be queued
again. Replace the calls with safer cancel_delayed_work() version
which spins until the timer handler finishes on other CPUs and
cancels the delayed work.
Signed-off-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      6de32750
    • A
      Bluetooth: Fix potential deadlock · a51cd2be
      由 Andre Guedes 提交于 
      We don't need to use the _sync variant in hci_conn_hold and
hci_conn_put to cancel conn->disc_work delayed work. This way
we avoid potential deadlocks like this one reported by lockdep.

======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
3.2.0+ #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u:1/17 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]

but task is already holding lock:
 ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}:
       [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
       [<ffffffff81034ed1>] wait_on_work+0x3d/0xaa
       [<ffffffff81035b54>] __cancel_work_timer+0xac/0xef
       [<ffffffff81035ba4>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0xd/0xf
       [<ffffffffa00554b0>] smp_chan_create+0xde/0xe6 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa0056160>] smp_conn_security+0xa3/0x12d [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa0053640>] l2cap_connect_cfm+0x237/0x2e8 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa004239c>] hci_proto_connect_cfm+0x2d/0x6f [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa0046ea5>] hci_event_packet+0x29d1/0x2d60 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa003dde3>] hci_rx_work+0xd0/0x2e1 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
       [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
       [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
       [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10

-> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP){+.+...}:
       [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
       [<ffffffff812e553a>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x36/0x6a
       [<ffffffff81244d56>] lock_sock_nested+0x24/0x7f
       [<ffffffffa004d96f>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa0052906>] l2cap_chan_connect+0xa9/0x26f [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffffa00545f8>] l2cap_sock_connect+0xb3/0xff [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff81243b48>] sys_connect+0x69/0x8a
       [<ffffffff812e6579>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

-> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff81056d06>] __lock_acquire+0xa80/0xd74
       [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
       [<ffffffff812e3870>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x38e
       [<ffffffff812e3c75>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
       [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
       [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
       [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
       [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
       [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &hdev->lock --> slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP --> (&(&conn->disc_work)->work)

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock((&(&conn->disc_work)->work));
                               lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_L2CAP);
                               lock((&(&conn->disc_work)->work));
  lock(&hdev->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kworker/u:1/17:
 #0:  (hdev->name){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
 #1:  ((&(&conn->disc_work)->work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81035751>] process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf

stack backtrace:
Pid: 17, comm: kworker/u:1 Not tainted 3.2.0+ #1
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff812e06c6>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
 [<ffffffff81056d06>] __lock_acquire+0xa80/0xd74
 [<ffffffff81021ef2>] ? arch_local_irq_restore+0x6/0xd
 [<ffffffff81022bc7>] ? vprintk+0x3f9/0x41e
 [<ffffffff81057444>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
 [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
 [<ffffffff812e3870>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x38e
 [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
 [<ffffffff81190fd6>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x6d/0x6f
 [<ffffffffa0041155>] ? hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
 [<ffffffff8105320f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
 [<ffffffff812e3c75>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
 [<ffffffffa0041155>] hci_conn_timeout+0x62/0x158 [bluetooth]
 [<ffffffff810357af>] process_one_work+0x178/0x2bf
 [<ffffffff81035751>] ? process_one_work+0x11a/0x2bf
 [<ffffffff81055af3>] ? lock_acquired+0x1d0/0x1df
 [<ffffffffa00410f3>] ? hci_acl_disconn+0x65/0x65 [bluetooth]
 [<ffffffff81036178>] worker_thread+0xce/0x152
 [<ffffffff810407ed>] ? finish_task_switch+0x45/0xc5
 [<ffffffff810360aa>] ? manage_workers.isra.25+0x16a/0x16a
 [<ffffffff81039a03>] kthread+0x95/0x9d
 [<ffffffff812e7754>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff812e5db4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
 [<ffffffff8103996e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
 [<ffffffff812e7750>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
Signed-off-by: NAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org>
Signed-off-by: NVinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
Reviewed-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulisses@profusion.mobi>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      a51cd2be
    • O
      Bluetooth: silence lockdep warning · b5a30dda
      由 Octavian Purdila 提交于 
      Since bluetooth uses multiple protocols types, to avoid lockdep
warnings, we need to use different lockdep classes (one for each
protocol type).

This is already done in bt_sock_create but it misses a couple of cases
when new connections are created. This patch corrects that to fix the
following warning:

<4>[ 1864.732366] =======================================================
<4>[ 1864.733030] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
<4>[ 1864.733544] 3.0.16-mid3-00007-gc9a0f62 #3
<4>[ 1864.733883] -------------------------------------------------------
<4>[ 1864.734408] t.android.btclc/4204 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[ 1864.734869]  (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.735541]
<4>[ 1864.735549] but task is already holding lock:
<4>[ 1864.736045]  (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1498bf7>] lock_sock+0xa/0xc
<4>[ 1864.736732]
<4>[ 1864.736740] which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4>[ 1864.736750]
<4>[ 1864.737428]
<4>[ 1864.737437] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[ 1864.738016]
<4>[ 1864.738023] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.738549]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.738977]        [<c13d35c1>] lock_sock_nested+0x58/0x68
<4>[ 1864.739411]        [<c1493c33>] l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x3e/0x76
<4>[ 1864.739858]        [<c13d06c3>] __sock_sendmsg+0x50/0x59
<4>[ 1864.740279]        [<c13d0ea2>] sock_sendmsg+0x94/0xa8
<4>[ 1864.740687]        [<c13d0ede>] kernel_sendmsg+0x28/0x37
<4>[ 1864.741106]        [<c14969ca>] rfcomm_send_frame+0x30/0x38
<4>[ 1864.741542]        [<c1496a2a>] rfcomm_send_ua+0x58/0x5a
<4>[ 1864.741959]        [<c1498447>] rfcomm_run+0x441/0xb52
<4>[ 1864.742365]        [<c104f095>] kthread+0x63/0x68
<4>[ 1864.742742]        [<c14d5182>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
<4>[ 1864.743187]
<4>[ 1864.743193] -> #0 (rfcomm_mutex){+.+.+.}:
<4>[ 1864.743667]        [<c1061ada>] __lock_acquire+0x988/0xc00
<4>[ 1864.744100]        [<c1062273>] lock_acquire+0x104/0x140
<4>[ 1864.744519]        [<c14d2c70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x3b/0x33f
<4>[ 1864.744975]        [<c14d303e>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2d/0x36
<4>[ 1864.745412]        [<c14970ea>] rfcomm_dlc_close+0x15/0x30
<4>[ 1864.745842]        [<c14990d9>] __rfcomm_sock_close+0x5f/0x6b
<4>[ 1864.746288]        [<c1499114>] rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x2f/0x62
<4>[ 1864.746737]        [<c13d275d>] sys_socketcall+0x1db/0x422
<4>[ 1864.747165]        [<c14d42f0>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      b5a30dda
    • V
      Bluetooth: Fix using an absolute timeout on hci_conn_put() · 33166063
      由 Vinicius Costa Gomes 提交于 
      queue_delayed_work() expects a relative time for when that work
should be scheduled.
Signed-off-by: NVinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@openbossa.org>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      33166063
    • A
      Bluetooth: l2cap_set_timer needs jiffies as timeout value · 6e1da683
      由 Andrzej Kaczmarek 提交于 
      After moving L2CAP timers to workqueues l2cap_set_timer expects timeout
value to be specified in jiffies but constants defined in miliseconds
are used. This makes timeouts unreliable when CONFIG_HZ is not set to
1000.

__set_chan_timer macro still uses jiffies as input to avoid multiple
conversions from/to jiffies for sk_sndtimeo value which is already
specified in jiffies.
Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@tieto.com>
Ackec-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
      6e1da683
    • J
      Bluetooth: Remove bogus inline declaration from l2cap_chan_connect · 4aa832c2
      由 Johan Hedberg 提交于 
      As reported by Dan Carpenter this function causes a Sparse warning and
shouldn't be declared inline:

include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h:837:30 error: marked inline, but without a
definition"
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      4aa832c2
  9. 13 2月, 2012 15 次提交