You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
- 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
If an architecture has futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() implemented and there is no runtime check necessary, allow to skip the test within futex_init(). This allows to get rid of some code which would always give the same result, and also allows the compiler to optimize a couple of if statements away. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140302120947.GA3641@osirisSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 16 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
"futexes: Increase hash table size for better performance" introduces a new alloc_large_system_hash() call. alloc_large_system_hash() however may allocate less memory than requested, e.g. limited by MAX_ORDER. Hence pass a pointer to alloc_large_system_hash() which will contain the hash shift when the function returns. Afterwards correctly set futex_hashsize. Fixes a crash on s390 where the requested allocation size was 4MB but only 1MB was allocated. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140116135450.GA4345@osirisSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Turn the pi-chains from plist to rb-tree, in the rt_mutex code, and provide a proper comparison function for -deadline and -priority tasks. This is done mainly because: - classical prio field of the plist is just an int, which might not be enough for representing a deadline; - manipulating such a list would become O(nr_deadline_tasks), which might be to much, as the number of -deadline task increases. Therefore, an rb-tree is used, and tasks are queued in it according to the following logic: - among two -priority (i.e., SCHED_BATCH/OTHER/RR/FIFO) tasks, the one with the higher (lower, actually!) prio wins; - among a -priority and a -deadline task, the latter always wins; - among two -deadline tasks, the one with the earliest deadline wins. Queueing and dequeueing functions are changed accordingly, for both the list of a task's pi-waiters and the list of tasks blocked on a pi-lock. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: NJuri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-again-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-10-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
In futex_wake() there is clearly no point in taking the hb->lock if we know beforehand that there are no tasks to be woken. While the hash bucket's plist head is a cheap way of knowing this, we cannot rely 100% on it as there is a racy window between the futex_wait call and when the task is actually added to the plist. To this end, we couple it with the spinlock check as tasks trying to enter the critical region are most likely potential waiters that will be added to the plist, thus preventing tasks sleeping forever if wakers don't acknowledge all possible waiters. Furthermore, the futex ordering guarantees are preserved, ensuring that waiters either observe the changed user space value before blocking or is woken by a concurrent waker. For wakers, this is done by relying on the barriers in get_futex_key_refs() -- for archs that do not have implicit mb in atomic_inc(), we explicitly add them through a new futex_get_mm function. For waiters we rely on the fact that spin_lock calls already update the head counter, so spinners are visible even if the lock hasn't been acquired yet. For more details please refer to the updated comments in the code and related discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/556 Special thanks to tglx for careful review and feedback. Suggested-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389569486-25487-5-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
That's essential, if you want to hack on futexes. Reviewed-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389569486-25487-4-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
Currently, the futex global hash table suffers from its fixed, smallish (for today's standards) size of 256 entries, as well as its lack of NUMA awareness. Large systems, using many futexes, can be prone to high amounts of collisions; where these futexes hash to the same bucket and lead to extra contention on the same hb->lock. Furthermore, cacheline bouncing is a reality when we have multiple hb->locks residing on the same cacheline and different futexes hash to adjacent buckets. This patch keeps the current static size of 16 entries for small systems, or otherwise, 256 * ncpus (or larger as we need to round the number to a power of 2). Note that this number of CPUs accounts for all CPUs that can ever be available in the system, taking into consideration things like hotpluging. While we do impose extra overhead at bootup by making the hash table larger, this is a one time thing, and does not shadow the benefits of this patch. Furthermore, as suggested by tglx, by cache aligning the hash buckets we can avoid access across cacheline boundaries and also avoid massive cache line bouncing if multiple cpus are hammering away at different hash buckets which happen to reside in the same cache line. Also, similar to other core kernel components (pid, dcache, tcp), by using alloc_large_system_hash() we benefit from its NUMA awareness and thus the table is distributed among the nodes instead of in a single one. For a custom microbenchmark that pounds on the uaddr hashing -- making the wait path fail at futex_wait_setup() returning -EWOULDBLOCK for large amounts of futexes, we can see the following benefits on a 80-core, 8-socket 1Tb server: +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | threads | baseline (ops/sec) | aligned-only (ops/sec) | large table (ops/sec) | large table+aligned (ops/sec) | +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | 512 | 32426 | 50531 (+55.8%) | 255274 (+687.2%) | 292553 (+802.2%) | | 256 | 65360 | 99588 (+52.3%) | 443563 (+578.6%) | 508088 (+677.3%) | | 128 | 125635 | 200075 (+59.2%) | 742613 (+491.1%) | 835452 (+564.9%) | | 80 | 193559 | 323425 (+67.1%) | 1028147 (+431.1%) | 1130304 (+483.9%) | | 64 | 247667 | 443740 (+79.1%) | 997300 (+302.6%) | 1145494 (+362.5%) | | 32 | 628412 | 721401 (+14.7%) | 965996 (+53.7%) | 1122115 (+78.5%) | +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+ Reviewed-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NWaiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389569486-25487-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Jason Low 提交于
- Remove unnecessary head variables. - Delete unused parameter in queue_unlock(). Reviewed-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com> Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@hp.com> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com> Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389569486-25487-2-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 12月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
When debugging the read-only hugepage case, I was confused by the fact that get_futex_key() did an access_ok() only for the non-shared futex case, since the user address checking really isn't in any way specific to the private key handling. Now, it turns out that the shared key handling does effectively do the equivalent checks inside get_user_pages_fast() (it doesn't actually check the address range on x86, but does check the page protections for being a user page). So it wasn't actually a bug, but the fact that we treat the address differently for private and shared futexes threw me for a loop. Just move the check up, so that it gets done for both cases. Also, use the 'rw' parameter for the type, even if it doesn't actually matter any more (it's a historical artifact of the old racy i386 "page faults from kernel space don't check write protections"). Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The hugepage code had the exact same bug that regular pages had in commit 7485d0d3 ("futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()"). The regular page case was fixed by commit 9ea71503 ("futex: Fix regression with read only mappings"), but the transparent hugepage case (added in a5b338f2: "thp: update futex compound knowledge") case remained broken. Found by Dave Jones and his trinity tool. Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@fedoraproject.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org # v2.6.38+ Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-p9ijt8div0hwldexwfm4nlhj@git.kernel.org [ Fixed build failure in kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 26 6月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Cross 提交于
Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in a futex_wait call during suspend and resume by calling a freezable blocking call. Previous patches modified the freezer to avoid sending wakeups to threads that are blocked in freezable blocking calls. This call was selected to be converted to a freezable call because it doesn't hold any locks or release any resources when interrupted that might be needed by another freezing task or a kernel driver during suspend, and is a common site where idle userspace tasks are blocked. Signed-off-by: NColin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: arve@android.com Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1367458508-9133-8-git-send-email-ccross@android.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Zhang Yi 提交于
The futex_keys of process shared futexes are generated from the page offset, the mapping host and the mapping index of the futex user space address. This should result in an unique identifier for each futex. Though this is not true when futexes are located in different subpages of an hugepage. The reason is, that the mapping index for all those futexes evaluates to the index of the base page of the hugetlbfs mapping. So a futex at offset 0 of the hugepage mapping and another one at offset PAGE_SIZE of the same hugepage mapping have identical futex_keys. This happens because the futex code blindly uses page->index. Steps to reproduce the bug: 1. Map a file from hugetlbfs. Initialize pthread_mutex1 at offset 0 and pthread_mutex2 at offset PAGE_SIZE of the hugetlbfs mapping. The mutexes must be initialized as PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED because PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE mutexes are not affected by this issue as their keys solely depend on the user space address. 2. Lock mutex1 and mutex2 3. Create thread1 and in the thread function lock mutex1, which results in thread1 blocking on the locked mutex1. 4. Create thread2 and in the thread function lock mutex2, which results in thread2 blocking on the locked mutex2. 5. Unlock mutex2. Despite the fact that mutex2 got unlocked, thread2 still blocks on mutex2 because the futex_key points to mutex1. To solve this issue we need to take the normal page index of the page which contains the futex into account, if the futex is in an hugetlbfs mapping. In other words, we calculate the normal page mapping index of the subpage in the hugetlbfs mapping. Mappings which are not based on hugetlbfs are not affected and still use page->index. Thanks to Mel Gorman who provided a patch for adding proper evaluation functions to the hugetlbfs code to avoid exposing hugetlbfs specific details to the futex code. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: NZhang Yi <zhang.yi20@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: NJiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn> Tested-by: NMa Chenggong <ma.chenggong@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by: N'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: N'Darren Hart' <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/000101ce71a6%24a83c5880%24f8b50980%24@comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Cross 提交于
Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in a futex_wait call during suspend and resume by calling a freezable blocking call. Previous patches modified the freezer to avoid sending wakeups to threads that are blocked in freezable blocking calls. This call was selected to be converted to a freezable call because it doesn't hold any locks or release any resources when interrupted that might be needed by another freezing task or a kernel driver during suspend, and is a common site where idle userspace tasks are blocked. Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NColin Cross <ccross@android.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 13 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix kernel-doc warning in futex.c and convert 'Returns' to the new Return: kernel-doc notation format. Warning(kernel/futex.c:2286): Excess function parameter 'clockrt' description in 'futex_wait_requeue_pi' Fix one spello. Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 19 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
This reverts commit ec0c4274. get_robust_list() is in use and a removal would break existing user space. With the permission checks in place it's not longer a security hole. Remove the deprecation warnings. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com Cc: davej@redhat.com Cc: keescook@chromium.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com
-
- 08 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Clark Williams 提交于
Move rt scheduler definitions out of include/linux/sched.h into new file include/linux/sched/rt.h Signed-off-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130207094707.7b9f825f@riff.lanSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darren Hart 提交于
Dave Jones reported a bug with futex_lock_pi() that his trinity test exposed. Sometime between queue_me() and taking the q.lock_ptr, the lock_ptr became NULL, resulting in a crash. While futex_wake() is careful to not call wake_futex() on futex_q's with a pi_state or an rt_waiter (which are either waiting for a futex_unlock_pi() or a PI futex_requeue()), futex_wake_op() and futex_requeue() do not perform the same test. Update futex_wake_op() and futex_requeue() to test for q.pi_state and q.rt_waiter and abort with -EINVAL if detected. To ensure any future breakage is caught, add a WARN() to wake_futex() if the same condition is true. This fix has seen 3 hours of testing with "trinity -c futex" on an x86_64 VM with 4 CPUS. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tidy up the WARN()] Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 01 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Siddhesh analyzed a failure in the take over of pi futexes in case the owner died and provided a workaround. See: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14076 The detailed problem analysis shows: Futex F is initialized with PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT and PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST_NP attributes. T1 lock_futex_pi(F); T2 lock_futex_pi(F); --> T2 blocks on the futex and creates pi_state which is associated to T1. T1 exits --> exit_robust_list() runs --> Futex F userspace value TID field is set to 0 and FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit is set. T3 lock_futex_pi(F); --> Succeeds due to the check for F's userspace TID field == 0 --> Claims ownership of the futex and sets its own TID into the userspace TID field of futex F --> returns to user space T1 --> exit_pi_state_list() --> Transfers pi_state to waiter T2 and wakes T2 via rt_mutex_unlock(&pi_state->mutex) T2 --> acquires pi_state->mutex and gains real ownership of the pi_state --> Claims ownership of the futex and sets its own TID into the userspace TID field of futex F --> returns to user space T3 --> observes inconsistent state This problem is independent of UP/SMP, preemptible/non preemptible kernels, or process shared vs. private. The only difference is that certain configurations are more likely to expose it. So as Siddhesh correctly analyzed the following check in futex_lock_pi_atomic() is the culprit: if (unlikely(ownerdied || !(curval & FUTEX_TID_MASK))) { We check the userspace value for a TID value of 0 and take over the futex unconditionally if that's true. AFAICT this check is there as it is correct for a different corner case of futexes: the WAITERS bit became stale. Now the proposed change - if (unlikely(ownerdied || !(curval & FUTEX_TID_MASK))) { + if (unlikely(ownerdied || + !(curval & (FUTEX_TID_MASK | FUTEX_WAITERS)))) { solves the problem, but it's not obvious why and it wreckages the "stale WAITERS bit" case. What happens is, that due to the WAITERS bit being set (T2 is blocked on that futex) it enforces T3 to go through lookup_pi_state(), which in the above case returns an existing pi_state and therefor forces T3 to legitimately fight with T2 over the ownership of the pi_state (via pi_state->mutex). Probelm solved! Though that does not work for the "WAITERS bit is stale" problem because if lookup_pi_state() does not find existing pi_state it returns -ERSCH (due to TID == 0) which causes futex_lock_pi() to return -ESRCH to user space because the OWNER_DIED bit is not set. Now there is a different solution to that problem. Do not look at the user space value at all and enforce a lookup of possibly available pi_state. If pi_state can be found, then the new incoming locker T3 blocks on that pi_state and legitimately races with T2 to acquire the rt_mutex and the pi_state and therefor the proper ownership of the user space futex. lookup_pi_state() has the correct order of checks. It first tries to find a pi_state associated with the user space futex and only if that fails it checks for futex TID value = 0. If no pi_state is available nothing can create new state at that point because this happens with the hash bucket lock held. So the above scenario changes to: T1 lock_futex_pi(F); T2 lock_futex_pi(F); --> T2 blocks on the futex and creates pi_state which is associated to T1. T1 exits --> exit_robust_list() runs --> Futex F userspace value TID field is set to 0 and FUTEX_OWNER_DIED bit is set. T3 lock_futex_pi(F); --> Finds pi_state and blocks on pi_state->rt_mutex T1 --> exit_pi_state_list() --> Transfers pi_state to waiter T2 and wakes it via rt_mutex_unlock(&pi_state->mutex) T2 --> acquires pi_state->mutex and gains ownership of the pi_state --> Claims ownership of the futex and sets its own TID into the userspace TID field of futex F --> returns to user space This covers all gazillion points on which T3 might come in between T1's exit_robust_list() clearing the TID field and T2 fixing it up. It also solves the "WAITERS bit stale" problem by forcing the take over. Another benefit of changing the code this way is that it makes it less dependent on untrusted user space values and therefor minimizes the possible wreckage which might be inflicted. As usual after staring for too long at the futex code my brain hurts so much that I really want to ditch that whole optimization of avoiding the syscall for the non contended case for PI futexes and rip out the maze of corner case handling code. Unfortunately we can't as user space relies on that existing behaviour, but at least thinking about it helps me to preserve my mental sanity. Maybe we should nevertheless :) Reported-and-tested-by: NSiddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1210232138540.2756@ionosAcked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 24 7月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Darren Hart 提交于
If uaddr == uaddr2, then we have broken the rule of only requeueing from a non-pi futex to a pi futex with this call. If we attempt this, as the trinity test suite manages to do, we miss early wakeups as q.key is equal to key2 (because they are the same uaddr). We will then attempt to dereference the pi_mutex (which would exist had the futex_q been properly requeued to a pi futex) and trigger a NULL pointer dereference. Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ad82bfe7f7d130247fbe2b5b4275654807774227.1342809673.git.dvhart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Darren Hart 提交于
The WARN_ON in futex_wait_requeue_pi() for a NULL q.pi_state was testing the address (&q.pi_state) of the pointer instead of the value (q.pi_state) of the pointer. Correct it accordingly. Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1c85d97f6e5f79ec389a4ead3e367363c74bd09a.1342809673.git.dvhart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Darren Hart 提交于
If fixup_pi_state_owner() faults, pi_mutex may be NULL. Test for pi_mutex != NULL before testing the owner against current and possibly unlocking it. Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dc59890338fc413606f04e5c5b131530734dae3d.1342809673.git.dvhart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 29 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Notify get_robust_list users that the syscall is going away. Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: spender@grsecurity.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120323190855.GA27213@www.outflux.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
It was possible to extract the robust list head address from a setuid process if it had used set_robust_list(), allowing an ASLR info leak. This changes the permission checks to be the same as those used for similar info that comes out of /proc. Running a setuid program that uses robust futexes would have had: cred->euid != pcred->euid cred->euid == pcred->uid so the old permissions check would allow it. I'm not aware of any setuid programs that use robust futexes, so this is just a preventative measure. (This patch is based on changes from grsecurity.) Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Cc: spender@grsecurity.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120319231253.GA20893@www.outflux.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
No need to assign ret in each case and break. Simply return the result of the handler function directly. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Some of the newer futex PI opcodes do not check the cmpxchg enabled variable and call unconditionally into the handling functions. Cover all PI opcodes in a separate check. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
It was found (by Sasha) that if you use a futex located in the gate area we get stuck in an uninterruptible infinite loop, much like the ZERO_PAGE issue. While looking at this problem, PeterZ realized you'll get into similar trouble when hitting any install_special_pages() mapping. And are there still drivers setting up their own special mmaps without page->mapping, and without special VM or pte flags to make get_user_pages fail? In most cases, if page->mapping is NULL, we do not need to retry at all: Linus points out that even /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches poses no problem, because it ends up using remove_mapping(), which takes care not to interfere when the page reference count is raised. But there is still one case which does need a retry: if memory pressure called shmem_writepage in between get_user_pages_fast dropping page table lock and our acquiring page lock, then the page gets switched from filecache to swapcache (and ->mapping set to NULL) whatever the refcount. Fault it back in to get the page->mapping needed for key->shared.inode. Reported-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 31 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
The changed files were only including linux/module.h for the EXPORT_SYMBOL infrastructure, and nothing else. Revector them onto the isolated export header for faster compile times. Nothing to see here but a whole lot of instances of: -#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/export.h> This commit is only changing the kernel dir; next targets will probably be mm, fs, the arch dirs, etc. Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 15 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bart Van Assche 提交于
Change a single occurrence of "unlcoked" into "unlocked". Signed-off-by: NBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
由 Vitaliy Ivanov 提交于
The variables here are really not used uninitialized. kernel/futex.c: In function 'fixup_pi_state_owner.clone.17': kernel/futex.c:1582:6: warning: 'curval' may be used uninitialized in this function kernel/futex.c: In function 'handle_futex_death': kernel/futex.c:2486:6: warning: 'nval' may be used uninitialized in this function kernel/futex.c: In function 'do_futex': kernel/futex.c:863:11: warning: 'curval' may be used uninitialized in this function kernel/futex.c:828:6: note: 'curval' was declared here kernel/futex.c:898:5: warning: 'oldval' may be used uninitialized in this function kernel/futex.c:890:6: note: 'oldval' was declared here Signed-off-by: NVitaliy Ivanov <vitalivanov@gmail.com> Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shawn Bohrer 提交于
commit 7485d0d3 (futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()) in 2.6.33 fixed two problems: First, It prevented a loop when encountering a ZERO_PAGE. Second, it fixed RW MAP_PRIVATE futex operations by forcing the COW to occur by unconditionally performing a write access get_user_pages_fast() to get the page. The commit also introduced a user-mode regression in that it broke futex operations on read-only memory maps. For example, this breaks workloads that have one or more reader processes doing a FUTEX_WAIT on a futex within a read only shared file mapping, and a writer processes that has a writable mapping issuing the FUTEX_WAKE. This fixes the regression for valid futex operations on RO mappings by trying a RO get_user_pages_fast() when the RW get_user_pages_fast() fails. This change makes it necessary to also check for invalid use cases, such as anonymous RO mappings (which can never change) and the ZERO_PAGE which the commit referenced above was written to address. This patch does restore the original behavior with RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings, which have inherent user-mode usage problems and don't really make sense. With this patch performing a FUTEX_WAIT within a RO MAP_PRIVATE mapping will be successfully woken provided another process updates the region of the underlying mapped file. However, the mmap() man page states that for a MAP_PRIVATE mapping: It is unspecified whether changes made to the file after the mmap() call are visible in the mapped region. So user-mode users attempting to use futex operations on RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings are depending on unspecified behavior. Additionally a RO MAP_PRIVATE mapping could fail to wake up in the following case. Thread-A: call futex(FUTEX_WAIT, memory-region-A). get_futex_key() return inode based key. sleep on the key Thread-B: call mprotect(PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, memory-region-A) Thread-B: write memory-region-A. COW happen. This process's memory-region-A become related to new COWed private (ie PageAnon=1) page. Thread-B: call futex(FUETX_WAKE, memory-region-A). get_futex_key() return mm based key. IOW, we fail to wake up Thread-A. Once again doing something like this is just silly and users who do something like this get what they deserve. While RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings are nonsensical, checking for a private mapping requires walking the vmas and was deemed too costly to avoid a userspace hang. This Patch is based on Peter Zijlstra's initial patch with modifications to only allow RO mappings for futex operations that need VERIFY_READ access. Reported-by: NDavid Oliver <david@rgmadvisors.com> Signed-off-by: NShawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Cc: zvonler@rgmadvisors.com Cc: hughd@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1309450892-30676-1-git-send-email-sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
I haven't reproduced it myself but the fail scenario is that on such machines (notably ARM and some embedded powerpc), if you manage to hit that futex path on a writable page whose dirty bit has gone from the PTE, you'll livelock inside the kernel from what I can tell. It will go in a loop of trying the atomic access, failing, trying gup to "fix it up", getting succcess from gup, go back to the atomic access, failing again because dirty wasn't fixed etc... So I think you essentially hang in the kernel. The scenario is probably rare'ish because affected architecture are embedded and tend to not swap much (if at all) so we probably rarely hit the case where dirty is missing or young is missing, but I think Shan has a piece of SW that can reliably reproduce it using a shared writable mapping & fork or something like that. On archs who use SW tracking of dirty & young, a page without dirty is effectively mapped read-only and a page without young unaccessible in the PTE. Additionally, some architectures might lazily flush the TLB when relaxing write protection (by doing only a local flush), and expect a fault to invalidate the stale entry if it's still present on another processor. The futex code assumes that if the "in_atomic()" access -EFAULT's, it can "fix it up" by causing get_user_pages() which would then be equivalent to taking the fault. However that isn't the case. get_user_pages() will not call handle_mm_fault() in the case where the PTE seems to have the right permissions, regardless of the dirty and young state. It will eventually update those bits ... in the struct page, but not in the PTE. Additionally, it will not handle the lazy TLB flushing that can be required by some architectures in the fault case. Basically, gup is the wrong interface for the job. The patch provides a more appropriate one which boils down to just calling handle_mm_fault() since what we are trying to do is simulate a real page fault. The futex code currently attempts to write to user memory within a pagefault disabled section, and if that fails, tries to fix it up using get_user_pages(). This doesn't work on archs where the dirty and young bits are maintained by software, since they will gate access permission in the TLB, and will not be updated by gup(). In addition, there's an expectation on some archs that a spurious write fault triggers a local TLB flush, and that is missing from the picture as well. I decided that adding those "features" to gup() would be too much for this already too complex function, and instead added a new simpler fixup_user_fault() which is essentially a wrapper around handle_mm_fault() which the futex code can call. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix some nits Darren saw, fiddle comment layout] Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Reported-by: NShan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com> Tested-by: NShan Hai <haishan.bai@gmail.com> Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Darren Hart <darren.hart@intel.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dima Zavin 提交于
This was legacy code brought over from the RT tree and is no longer necessary. Signed-off-by: NDima Zavin <dima@android.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310084879-10351-2-git-send-email-dima@android.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 15 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Darren Hart 提交于
The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal. Commit b41277dc in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the setup of the restart block. Restore the originaly behavior. Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922Reported-by: NTim Smith <tsmith201104@yahoo.com> Reported-by: NTorsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/%3Cdaac0eb3af607f72b9a4d3126b2ba8fb5ed3b883.1302820917.git.dvhart%40linux.intel.com%3ESigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Rostedt 提交于
An update of the futex code had a WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr)) But on UP, spin_is_locked() is always false, and will trigger this warning, and even worse, it will exit the function without doing the necessary work. Converting this to a WARN_ON_SMP() fixes the problem. Reported-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Tested-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> LKML-Reference: <20110317192208.682654502@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 24 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Serge E. Hallyn 提交于
CAP_IPC_OWNER and CAP_IPC_LOCK can be checked against current_user_ns(), because the resource comes from current's own ipc namespace. setuid/setgid are to uids in own namespace, so again checks can be against current_user_ns(). Changelog: Jan 11: Use task_ns_capable() in place of sched_capable(). Jan 11: Use nsown_capable() as suggested by Bastian Blank. Jan 11: Clarify (hopefully) some logic in futex and sched.c Feb 15: use ns_capable for ipc, not nsown_capable Feb 23: let copy_ipcs handle setting ipc_ns->user_ns Feb 23: pass ns down rather than taking it from current [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr> Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
handle_futex_death() uses futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() without disabling page faults. That's ok, but totally non obvious. We don't hold locks so we actually can and want to fault here, because the get_user() before futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() does not guarantee a R/W mapping. We could just add a big fat comment to explain this, but actually changing the code so that the functionality is entirely clear is better. Use the helper function which disables page faults around the futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() and handle a fault with a call to fault_in_user_writeable() as all other places in the futex code do as well. Pointed-out-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NDarren Hart <darren@dvhart.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> LKML-Reference: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103141126590.2787@localhost6.localdomain6> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 12 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
The original code uses &plist_node->plist as the fake head of the priority list for plist_del(), these debug locks in the fake head are needed for CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST. But now we always pass the real head to plist_del(), the debug locks in plist_node will not be used, so we remove these assignments. Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> LKML-Reference: <4D10797E.7040803@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-
由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于
Some plist_del()s in kernel/futex.c are passed a faked head of the priority list. It does not fail because the current code does not require the real head in plist_del(). The current code of plist_del() just uses the head for checking, so it will not cause a bad result even when we use a faked head. But it is undocumented usage: /** * plist_del - Remove a @node from plist. * * @node: &struct plist_node pointer - entry to be removed * @head: &struct plist_head pointer - list head */ The document says that the @head is the "list head" head of the priority list. In futex code, several places use "plist_del(&q->list, &q->list.plist);", they pass a fake head. We need to fix them all. Thanks to Darren Hart for many suggestions. Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> LKML-Reference: <4D11984A.5030203@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-
- 11 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Lespinasse 提交于
The cmpxchg_futex_value_locked API was funny in that it returned either the original, user-exposed futex value OR an error code such as -EFAULT. This was confusing at best, and could be a source of livelocks in places that retry the cmpxchg_futex_value_locked after trying to fix the issue by running fault_in_user_writeable(). This change makes the cmpxchg_futex_value_locked API more similar to the get_futex_value_locked one, returning an error code and updating the original value through a reference argument. Signed-off-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> [tile] Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> [ia64] Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> [microblaze] Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> [frv] Cc: Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <20110311024851.GC26122@google.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-