Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

On architectures for which access to GPU memory is non-coherent,
caches need to be flushed and invalidated explicitly when BO control
changes between CPU and GPU.

This patch adds buffer synchronization functions which invokes the
correct API (PCI or DMA) to ensure synchronization is effective.

Based on the TTM DMA cache helper patches by Lucas Stach.
Signed-off-by: NLucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Specify TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED when allocating GPFIFOs and fences to
allow them to be safely accessed by the kernel without being synced
on non-coherent architectures.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Allow nouveau_bo_new() to recognize the TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED flag, which
means that we want the allocated BO to be perfectly coherent between the
CPU and GPU. This is useful on non-coherent architectures for which we
do not want to manually sync some rarely-accessed buffers: typically,
fences and pushbuffers.

A TTM BO allocated with the TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED on a non-coherent
architecture will be populated using the DMA API, and accesses to it
performed using the coherent mapping performed by dma_alloc_coherent().
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Add a function allowing us to know whether a device is CPU-coherent,
i.e. accesses performed by the CPU on GPU-mapped buffers will
be immediately visible on the GPU side and vice-versa.

For now, a device is considered to be coherent if it uses the PCI bus on
a non-ARM architecture.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Pinned BOs are supposed to remain in their current location until
unpinned. Display a warning for the supposedly-erroneous case where we
are trying to move such objects.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

V2: fix whitespace errors in memx.fuc
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

No code changes.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Probably missing something here, doesn't make a lot of sense to write
or+link data into a register whose offset is calculated by the same
or+link info..

This is the all I've witnessed the binary driver and vbios doing so
far, so it'll do.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The binary driver has been doing this since GF119, and we've somehow
gotten away with it.  But, TMDS that hasn't been initialised already
by the x86 vbios code is distorted without it on GM204.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Not entirely sure why this got bumped at all yet.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Left-over from before a rework a while back.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Logging at trace level, rather than as en error, as it seems conceivable
that failure could be normal under certain circumstances (new bios,
older sink that doesn't support a particular DPCD address)
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>