- 23 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
The order of the following three spinlocks should be: dlm_domain_lock < dlm_ctxt->spinlock < dlm_lock_resource->spinlock But dlm_dispatch_assert_master() is called while holding dlm_ctxt->spinlock and dlm_lock_resource->spinlock, and then it calls dlm_grab() which will take dlm_domain_lock. Once another thread (for example, dlm_query_join_handler) has already taken dlm_domain_lock, and tries to take dlm_ctxt->spinlock deadlock happens. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: "Junxiao Bi" <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
Revert commit f83c7b5e ("ocfs2/dlm: use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each"). list_for_each_entry() will dereference its `pos' argument, which can be NULL in dlm_process_recovery_data(). Reported-by: NJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Yiwen Jiang 提交于
The following case will lead to a lockres is freed but is still in use. cat /sys/kernel/debug/o2dlm/locking_state dlm_thread lockres_seq_start -> lock dlm->track_lock -> get resA resA->refs decrease to 0, call dlm_lockres_release, and wait for "cat" unlock. Although resA->refs is already set to 0, increase resA->refs, and then unlock lock dlm->track_lock -> list_del_init() -> unlock -> free resA In such a race case, invalid address access may occurs. So we should delete list res->tracking before resA->refs decrease to 0. Signed-off-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Norton.Zhu 提交于
Currently error handling in dlm_request_join is a little obscure, so optimize it to promote readability. If packet.code is invalid, reset it to JOIN_DISALLOW to keep it meaningful. It only influences the log printing. Signed-off-by: NNorton.Zhu <norton.zhu@huawei.com> Cc: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
Use list_for_each_entry instead of list_for_each to simplify code. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
The last goto statement is unneeded, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
In dlm_register_domain_handlers, if o2hb_register_callback fails, it will call dlm_unregister_domain_handlers to unregister. This will trigger the BUG_ON in o2hb_unregister_callback because hc_magic is 0. So we should call o2hb_setup_callback to initialize hc first. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
__dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_set() is declared but not implemented and used. So remove it. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Junxiao Bi 提交于
There is a race window in dlm_get_lock_resource(), which may return a lock resource which has been purged. This will cause the process to hang forever in dlmlock() as the ast msg can't be handled due to its lock resource not existing. dlm_get_lock_resource { ... spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); tmpres = __dlm_lookup_lockres_full(dlm, lockid, namelen, hash); if (tmpres) { spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >>>>>>>> race window, dlm_run_purge_list() may run and purge the lock resource spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock); ... spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); } } Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 2月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Srinivas Eeda 提交于
A tiny race between BAST and unlock message causes the NULL dereference. A node sends an unlock request to master and receives a response. Before processing the response it receives a BAST from the master. Since both requests are processed by different threads it creates a race. While the BAST is being processed, lock can get freed by unlock code. This patch makes bast to return immediately if lock is found but unlock is pending. The code should handle this race. We also have to fix master node to skip sending BAST after receiving unlock message. Below is the crash stack BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000048 IP: o2dlm_blocking_ast_wrapper+0xd/0x16 dlm_do_local_bast+0x8e/0x97 [ocfs2_dlm] dlm_proxy_ast_handler+0x838/0x87e [ocfs2_dlm] o2net_process_message+0x395/0x5b8 [ocfs2_nodemanager] o2net_rx_until_empty+0x762/0x90d [ocfs2_nodemanager] worker_thread+0x14d/0x1ed [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Rickard Strandqvist 提交于
Remove dlm_joined() that is not used anywhere. This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by: NRickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 alex chen 提交于
Use snprintf format specifier "%lu" instead of "%ld" for argument of type 'unsigned long'. Signed-off-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
When the recovery master is down, the owner of $RECOVERY calls dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() to prune any $RECOVERY entries for dead nodes. The lock is in the granted list and the refcount must be 2. We should put twice to remove this lock. Otherwise, it will lead to a memory leak. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reported-by: Nyangwenfang <vicky.yangwenfang@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
In dlm_process_recovery_data, only when dlm_new_lock failed the ret will be set to -ENOMEM. And in this case, newlock is definitely NULL. So test newlock is meaningless, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
Commit ac4fef4d ("ocfs2/dlm: do not purge lockres that is queued for assert master") may have the following possible race case: dlm_dispatch_assert_master dlm_wq ======================================================================== queue_work(dlm->quedlm_worker, &dlm->dispatched_work); dispatch work, dlm_lockres_drop_inflight_worker *BUG_ON(res->inflight_assert_workers == 0)* dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_worker inflight_assert_workers++ So ensure inflight_assert_workers to be increased first. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NXue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 12月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
In commit 1faf2894 ("ocfs2_dlm: disallow a domain join if node maps mismatch") we introduced a new earlier NULL check so this one is not needed. Also static checkers complain because we dereference it first and then check for NULL. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Srinivas Eeda 提交于
Node A sends master query request to node B which is the master. At this time lockres happens to be on purgelist. dlm_master_request_handler gets the dlm spinlock, finds the resource and releases the dlm spin lock. Right at this dlm_thread on this node could purge the lockres. dlm_master_request_handler can then acquire lockres spinlock and reply to Node A that node B is the master even though lockres on node B is purged. The above scenario will now make node A falsely think node B is the master which is inconsistent. Further if another node C tries to master the same resource, every node will respond they are not the master. Node C then masters the resource and sends assert master to all nodes. This will now make node A crash with the following message. dlm_assert_master_handler:1831 ERROR: DIE! Mastery assert from 9, but current owner is 10! Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Reviewed-by: NWengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> Tested-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
Do not BUG() if GFP_ATOMIC allocation fails in dlm_dispatch_assert_master. Instead, return -ENOMEM to the sender and then retry. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 10月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
The following case may lead to o2net_wq and o2hb thread deadlock on o2hb_callback_sem. Currently there are 2 nodes say N1, N2 in the cluster. And N2 down, at the same time, N3 tries to join the cluster. So N1 will handle node down (N2) and join (N3) simultaneously. o2hb o2net_wq ->o2hb_do_disk_heartbeat ->o2hb_check_slot ->o2hb_run_event_list ->o2hb_fire_callbacks ->down_write(&o2hb_callback_sem) ->o2net_hb_node_down_cb ->flush_workqueue(o2net_wq) ->o2net_process_message ->dlm_query_join_handler ->o2hb_check_node_heartbeating ->o2hb_fill_node_map ->down_read(&o2hb_callback_sem) No need to take o2hb_callback_sem in dlm_query_join_handler, o2hb_live_lock is enough to protect live node map. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: xMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Rob Jones 提交于
Reduce boilerplate code by using seq_open_private() instead of seq_open() Signed-off-by: NRob Jones <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
Remove the branch that free res->lockname.name because the condition is never satisfied when jump to label error. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 alex chen 提交于
dlm_lockres_put() should be called without &res->spinlock, otherwise a deadlock case may happen. spin_lock(&res->spinlock) ... dlm_lockres_put ->dlm_lockres_release ->dlm_print_one_lock_resource ->spin_lock(&res->spinlock) Signed-off-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
Refactoring error handling in dlm_alloc_ctxt to simplify code. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 alex chen 提交于
In dlm_assert_master_handler, the mle is get in dlm_find_mle, should be put when goto kill, otherwise, this mle will never be released. Signed-off-by: NAlex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
There is a deadlock case which reported by Guozhonghua: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2014-September/010079.html This case is caused by &res->spinlock and &dlm->master_lock misordering in different threads. It was introduced by commit 8d400b81 ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap helpers"). Since lockres is new, it doesn't not require the &res->spinlock. So remove it. Fixes: 8d400b81 ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap helpers") Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reported-by: NGuozhonghua <guozhonghua@h3c.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tariq Saeed 提交于
Orabug: 19074140 When umount is issued during recovery on the new master that has not finished remastering locks, it triggers BUG() in dlm_send_mig_lockres_msg(). Here is the situation: 1) node A has a lock on resource X mastered by node B. 2) node B dies -> node A sets recovering flag for res X 3) Node C becomes the new master for resources owned by the dead node and is remastering locks of the dead node but has not finished the remastering process yet. 4) umount is issued on node C. 5) During processing of umount, ignoring unfished recovery, node C attempts to migrate resource X to node A. 6) node A finds res X in DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING state, considers it a logic error and sends back -EFAULT. 7) node C asserts BUG() upon seeing EFAULT resp from node B. Fix is to delay migrating res X till remastering is finished at which point recovering flag will be cleared on both A and C. Signed-off-by: NTariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
The unit of total_backoff is msecs not jiffies, so no need to do the conversion. Otherwise, the join timeout is not 90 sec. Signed-off-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 6月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
When workqueue is delayed, it may occur that a lockres is purged while it is still queued for master assert. it may trigger BUG() as follows. N1 N2 dlm_get_lockres() ->dlm_do_master_requery is the master of lockres, so queue assert_master work dlm_thread() start running and purge the lockres dlm_assert_master_worker() send assert master message to other nodes receiving the assert_master message, set master to N2 dlmlock_remote() send create_lock message to N2, but receive DLM_IVLOCKID, if it is RECOVERY lockres, it triggers the BUG(). Another BUG() is triggered when N3 become the new master and send assert_master to N1, N1 will trigger the BUG() because owner doesn't match. So we should not purge lockres when it is queued for assert master. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 jiangyiwen 提交于
The following case may lead to endless loop during umount. node A node B node C node D umount volume, migrate lockres1 to B want to lock lockres1, send MASTER_REQUEST_MSG to C init block mle send MIGRATE_REQUEST_MSG to C find a block mle, and then return DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF to B set C in refmap umount successfully try to umount, endless loop occurs when migrate lockres1 since C is in refmap So we can fix this endless loop case by only returning DLM_MIGRATE_RESPONSE_MASTERY_REF if it has a mastery mle when receiving MIGRATE_REQUEST_MSG. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Njiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Xue jiufei <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
When a lockres in purge list but is still in use, it should be moved to the tail of purge list. dlm_thread will continue to check next lockres in purge list. However, code list_move_tail(&dlm->purge_list, &lockres->purge) will do *no* movements, so dlm_thread will purge the same lockres in this loop again and again. If it is in use for a long time, other lockres will not be processed. Signed-off-by: NYiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Tariq Saeed 提交于
ocfs2: fix deadlock when two nodes are converting same lock from PR to EX and idletimeout closes conn Orabug: 18639535 Two node cluster and both nodes hold a lock at PR level and both want to convert to EX at the same time. Master node 1 has sent BAST and then closes the connection due to idletime out. Node 0 receives BAST, sends unlock req with cancel flag but gets error -ENOTCONN. The problem is this error is ignored in dlm_send_remote_unlock_request() on the **incorrect** assumption that the master is dead. See NOTE in comment why it returns DLM_NORMAL. Upon getting DLM_NORMAL, node 0 proceeds to sends convert (without cancel flg) which fails with -ENOTCONN. waits 5 sec and resends. This time gets DLM_IVLOCKID from the master since lock not found in grant, it had been moved to converting queue in response to conv PR->EX req. No way out. Node 1 (master) Node 0 ============== ====== lock mode PR PR convert PR -> EX mv grant -> convert and que BAST ... <-------- convert PR -> EX convert que looks like this: ((node 1, PR -> EX) (node 0, PR -> EX)) ... BAST (want PR -> NL) ------------------> ... idle timout, conn closed ... In response to BAST, sends unlock with cancel convert flag gets -ENOTCONN. Ignores and sends remote convert request gets -ENOTCONN, waits 5 Sec, retries ... reconnects <----------------- convert req goes through on next try does not find lock on grant que status DLM_IVLOCKID ------------------> ... No way out. Fix is to keep retrying unlock with cancel flag until it succeeds or the master dies. Signed-off-by: NTariq Saeed <tariq.x.saeed@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
dlm_recovery_ctxt.received is unused. ocfs2_should_refresh_lock_res() can only return 0 or 1, so the error handling code in ocfs2_super_lock() is unneeded. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
We found a race situation when dlm recovery and node joining occurs simultaneously if the network state is bad. N1 N4 start joining dlm and send query join to all live nodes set joining node to N1, return OK send query join to other live nodes and it may take a while call dlm_send_join_assert() to send assert join message when N2 is down, so keep trying to send message to N2 until find N2 is down send assert join message to N3, but connection is down with N3, so it may take a while become the recovery master for N2 and send begin reco message to other nodes in domain map but no N1 connection with N3 is rebuild, then send assert join to N4 call dlm_assert_joined_handler(), add N1 to domain_map dlm recovery done, send finalize message to nodes in domain map, including N1 receiving finalize message, trigger the BUG() because recovery master mismatch. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Xue jiufei 提交于
We found there is a conversion deadlock when the owner of lockres happened to crash before send DLM_PROXY_AST_MSG for a downconverting lock. The situation is as follows: Node1 Node2 Node3 the owner of lockresA lock_1 granted at EX mode and call ocfs2_cluster_unlock to decrease ex_holders. converting lock_3 from NL to EX send DLM_PROXY_AST_MSG to Node1, asking Node 1 to downconvert. receiving DLM_PROXY_AST_MSG, thread ocfs2dc send DLM_CONVERT_LOCK_MSG to Node2 to downconvert lock_1(EX->NL). lock_1 can be granted and put it into pending_asts list, return DLM_NORMAL. then something happened and Node2 crashed. received DLM_NORMAL, waiting for DLM_PROXY_AST_MSG. selected as the recovery master, receving migrate lock from Node1, queue lock_1 to the tail of converting list. After dlm recovery, converting list in the master of lockresA(Node3) will be: converting list head <-> lock_3(NL->EX) <->lock_1(EX<->NL). Requested mode of lock_3 is not compatible with the granted mode of lock_1, so it can not be granted. and lock_1 can not downconvert because covnerting queue is strictly FIFO. So a deadlock is created. We think function dlm_process_recovery_data() should queue_ast for lock_1 or alter the order of lock_1 and lock_3, so dlm_thread can process lock_1 first. And if there are multiple downconverting locks, they must convert form PR to NL, so no need to sort them. Signed-off-by: Njoyce.xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
Static values are automatically initialized to NULL. Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joseph Qi 提交于
In dlm_init, if create dlm_lockname_cache failed in dlm_init_master_caches, it will destroy dlm_lockres_cache which created before twice. And this will cause system die when loading modules. Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Zhonghua Guo 提交于
In dlm_query_region_handler(), once kmalloc failed, it will unlock dlm_domain_lock without lock first, then deadlock happens. Signed-off-by: NZhonghua Guo <guozhonghua@h3c.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NSrinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Tested-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Junxiao Bi 提交于
There is a race window in dlm_do_recovery() between dlm_remaster_locks() and dlm_reset_recovery() when the recovery master nearly finish the recovery process for a dead node. After the master sends FINALIZE_RECO message in dlm_remaster_locks(), another node may become the recovery master for another dead node, and then send the BEGIN_RECO message to all the nodes included the old master, in the handler of this message dlm_begin_reco_handler() of old master, dlm->reco.dead_node and dlm->reco.new_master will be set to the second dead node and the new master, then in dlm_reset_recovery(), these two variables will be reset to default value. This will cause new recovery master can not finish the recovery process and hung, at last the whole cluster will hung for recovery. old recovery master: new recovery master: dlm_remaster_locks() become recovery master for another dead node. dlm_send_begin_reco_message() dlm_begin_reco_handler() { if (dlm->reco.state & DLM_RECO_STATE_FINALIZE) { return -EAGAIN; } dlm_set_reco_master(dlm, br->node_idx); dlm_set_reco_dead_node(dlm, br->dead_node); } dlm_reset_recovery() { dlm_set_reco_dead_node(dlm, O2NM_INVALID_NODE_NUM); dlm_set_reco_master(dlm, O2NM_INVALID_NODE_NUM); } will hang in dlm_remaster_locks() for request dlm locks info Before send FINALIZE_RECO message, recovery master should set DLM_RECO_STATE_FINALIZE for itself and clear it after the recovery done, this can break the race windows as the BEGIN_RECO messages will not be handled before DLM_RECO_STATE_FINALIZE flag is cleared. A similar race may happen between new recovery master and normal node which is in dlm_finalize_reco_handler(), also fix it. Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NSrinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NWengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Junxiao Bi 提交于
This issue was introduced by commit 800deef3 ("ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry where benefical") in 2007 where it replaced list_for_each with list_for_each_entry. The variable "lock" will point to invalid data if "tmpq" list is empty and a panic will be triggered due to this. Sunil advised reverting it back, but the old version was also not right. At the end of the outer for loop, that list_for_each_entry will also set "lock" to an invalid data, then in the next loop, if the "tmpq" list is empty, "lock" will be an stale invalid data and cause the panic. So reverting the list_for_each back and reset "lock" to NULL to fix this issue. Another concern is that this seemes can not happen because the "tmpq" list should not be empty. Let me describe how. old lock resource owner(node 1): migratation target(node 2): image there's lockres with a EX lock from node 2 in granted list, a NR lock from node x with convert_type EX in converting list. dlm_empty_lockres() { dlm_pick_migration_target() { pick node 2 as target as its lock is the first one in granted list. } dlm_migrate_lockres() { dlm_mark_lockres_migrating() { res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_BLOCK_DIRTY; wait_event(dlm->ast_wq, !dlm_lockres_is_dirty(dlm, res)); //after the above code, we can not dirty lockres any more, // so dlm_thread shuffle list will not run downconvert lock from EX to NR upconvert lock from NR to EX <<< migration may schedule out here, then <<< node 2 send down convert request to convert type from EX to <<< NR, then send up convert request to convert type from NR to <<< EX, at this time, lockres granted list is empty, and two locks <<< in the converting list, node x up convert lock followed by <<< node 2 up convert lock. // will set lockres RES_MIGRATING flag, the following // lock/unlock can not run dlm_lockres_release_ast(dlm, res); } dlm_send_one_lockres() dlm_process_recovery_data() for (i=0; i<mres->num_locks; i++) if (ml->node == dlm->node_num) for (j = DLM_GRANTED_LIST; j <= DLM_BLOCKED_LIST; j++) { list_for_each_entry(lock, tmpq, list) if (lock) break; <<< lock is invalid as grant list is empty. } if (lock->ml.node != ml->node) BUG() >>> crash here } I see the above locks status from a vmcore of our internal bug. Signed-off-by: NJunxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NWengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> Cc: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NSrinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Zongxun Wang 提交于
When mounting an ocfs2 volume, it will firstly generate a file /sys/kernel/debug/o2dlm/<uuid>/dlm_state, and then launch the dlm thread. So the following situation will cause a null pointer dereference. dlm_debug_init -> access file dlm_state which will call dlm_state_print -> dlm_launch_thread Move dlm_debug_init after dlm_launch_thread and dlm_launch_recovery_thread can fix this issue. Signed-off-by: NZongxun Wang <wangzongxun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-