- 29 5月, 2018 39 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The device replace is paused by unmount or read only remount, and resumed on next mount or write remount. The exclusive status should be checked properly as it's a global invariant and we must not allow 2 operations run. In this case, the balance can be also paused and resumed under same conditions. It's always checked first so dev-replace could see the EXCL_OP already taken, BUT, the ioctl would never let start both at the same time. Replace the WARN_ON with message and return 0, indicating no error as this is purely theoretical and the user will be informed. Resolving that manually should be possible by waiting for the other operation to finish or cancel the paused state. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Make the clearning visible in the callers so we can pair it with the test_and_set part. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Move locking and unlocking next to the BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP bit manipulation so it's obvious that the two happen at the same time. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The function logically belongs there and there's only a single caller, no need to export it. No code changes. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The function will be used outside of volumes.c, the allocation btrfs_alloc_device is also exported. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
This is a preparatory cleanup that will make clear that the only successful way out of btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev will also set the device_out to a valid pointer. With this guarantee, the callers can be simplified. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The function is called once and is fairly small, we can merge it with the caller. Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
This function uses fs_info::fs_devices number of time, however we declare and use it only at the end, instead do it in the beginning of the function and use it. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
find_device() declares struct list_head *head pointer and used only once, instead just use it directly. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
__btrfs_open_devices() is un-exported drop __ prefix and rename it to open_fs_devices(). Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
__btrfs_close_devices() is un-exported, drop the __ prefix and rename it to close_fs_devices(). Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
__btrfs_open_devices() declares struct list_head *head, however head is used only once, instead use btrfs_fs_devices::devices directly. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_fs_devices::list is the list of BTRFS fsid in the kernel, a generic name 'list' makes it's search very difficult, rename it to fs_list. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It's provided by the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It's provided by the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It's provided by the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is called from only 1 place and is effectively a wrapper over wait_completion/kfree. It doesn't really bring any value having those two calls in a separate function. Just open code it and remove it. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It can be directly referenced from the passed address_space so do that. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
list_empty_careful usually is a signal of something tricky going on. Its usage in btrfs is actually not needed since both lists it's used on are local to a function and cannot be modified concurrently. So switch to plain list_empty. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is called only from btrfs_readpage and is already passed the mapping. Simplify its signature by moving the code obtaining reference to the extent tree in the function. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It's not used in the function so just remove it. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function already gets the page from which the two extent trees are referenced. Simplify its signature by moving the code getting the trees inside the function. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
Change the behavior of rmdir(2) and allow it to delete an empty subvolume by using btrfs_delete_subvolume() which is used by btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(). This is a change in behaviour and has been requested by users. Deleting the subvolume by ioctl requires root permissions while the rmdir way does works with standard tools and syscalls for all users that can access the subvolume. The main usecase is to allow 'rm -rf /path/with/subvols' to simply work. We were not able to find any nasty usability surprises, the intention is to do the destructive rm. Without allowing rmdir, this would have to be followed by the ioctl subvolume deletion, which is more of an annoyance. Implementation details: The required lock for @dir and inode of @dentry is already acquired in vfs layer. We need some check before deleting a subvolume. Permission check is done in vfs layer, emptiness check is in btrfs_rmdir() and additional check (i.e. neither the subvolume is a default subvolume nor send is in progress) is in btrfs_delete_subvolume(). Note that in btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy(), d_delete() is called after btrfs_delete_subvolume(). For rmdir(2), d_delete() is called in vfs layer later. Tested-by: NGoffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it> Signed-off-by: NTomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ enhance changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
Factor out the second half of btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() as btrfs_delete_subvolume(), which performs some subvolume specific checks before deletion: 1. send is not in progress 2. the subvolume is not the default subvolume 3. the subvolume does not contain other subvolumes and actual deletion process. btrfs_delete_subvolume() requires inode_lock for both @dir and inode of @dentry. The remaining part of btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() is mainly permission checks. Note that call of d_delete() is not included in btrfs_delete_subvolume() as this function will also be used by btrfs_rmdir() to delete an empty subvolume and in that case d_delete() is called in VFS layer. As a result, btrfs_unlink_subvol() and may_destroy_subvol() become static functions. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NTomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor comment updates ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Misono Tomohiro 提交于
This is a preparation work to refactor btrfs_ioctl_snap_destroy() and to allow rmdir(2) to delete an empty subvolume. Signed-off-by: NTomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor update of the function comment ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Howard McLauchlan 提交于
With commit b18253ec57c0 ("btrfs: optimize free space tree bitmap conversion"), there are no more callers to le_test_bit(). This patch removes le_test_bit(). Signed-off-by: NHoward McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Howard McLauchlan 提交于
Presently, convert_free_space_to_extents() does a linear scan of the bitmap. We can speed this up with find_next_{bit,zero_bit}_le(). This patch replaces the linear scan with find_next_{bit,zero_bit}_le(). Testing shows a 20-33% decrease in execution time for convert_free_space_to_extents(). Since we change bitmap to be unsigned long, we have to do some casting for the bitmap cursor. In le_bitmap_set() it makes sense to use u8, as we are doing bit operations. Everywhere else, we're just using it for pointer arithmetic and not directly accessing it, so char seems more appropriate. Suggested-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NHoward McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Howard McLauchlan 提交于
le_bitmap_set() is only used by free-space-tree, so move it there and make it static. le_bitmap_clear() is not used, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NHoward McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We really want to know to which filesystem the extent map events belong, but as it cannot be reached from the extent_map pointers, we need to pass it down the callchain. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Preparatory work to pass fs_info to btrfs_add_extent_mapping so we can get a better tracepoint message. Extent maps do not need fs_info for anything so we only add a dummy one without any other initialization. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Most of the strings are prefixed by the UUID of the filesystem that generates the message, however there are a few events that still opencode the macro magic and can be converted to the common macros. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The preferred style is to avoid spaces between key and value and no commas between key=values. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The (unsigned long long) casts are not necessary since long ago. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
For consistency, use the %llu form. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The size of ino_t depends on 32/64bit architecture type. Btrfs stores the full 64bit inode anyway so we should use it. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The second if is really a subcase of ret being less than 0. So introduce a generic if (ret < 0) check, and inside have another if which explicitly handles the -ENOSPC and any other errors. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Locks should generally be released in the oppposite order they are acquired. Generally lock acquisiton ordering is used to ensure deadlocks don't happen. However, as becomes more complicated it's best to also maintain proper unlock order so as to avoid possible dead locks. This was found by code inspection and doesn't necessarily lead to a deadlock scenario. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Currently __endio_write_update_ordered uses labels to implement what is essentially a simple while loop. This makes the code more cumbersome to follow than it actually has to be. No functional changes. No xfstest regressions were found during testing. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Adds comments about BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP to existing comments about the device locks. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor updates ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 28 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It's used to print its pointer in a debug statement but doesn't really bring any useful information to the error message. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-