提交 ff2ef902 编写于 作者: H Hannes Eder 提交者: David S. Miller

drivers/net/sfc: fix sparse warnings: Should it be static?

Impact: Include the header file.  If CONFIG_SFC_MTD is not defined
then the functions 'efx_mtd_remove' and 'efx_mtd_rename' are defined
'static inline' with an empty function body in the header file, but
the the whole file mtd.c is not built in this case.

Fix this sparse warnings:
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:204:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_remove' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:221:6: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_rename' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/net/sfc/mtd.c:230:5: warning: symbol 'efx_mtd_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NHannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 39754f44
......@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#define EFX_DRIVER_NAME "sfc_mtd"
#include "net_driver.h"
#include "spi.h"
#include "efx.h"
#define EFX_SPI_VERIFY_BUF_LEN 16
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册