nfp: remove phys_port_name on flower's vNIC
.ndo_get_phys_port_name was recently extended to support multi-vNIC FWs. These are firmwares which can have more than one vNIC per PF without associated port (e.g. Adaptive Buffer Management FW), therefore we need a way of distinguishing the vNICs. Unfortunately, it's too late to make flower use the same naming. Flower users may depend on .ndo_get_phys_port_name returning -EOPNOTSUPP, for example the name udev gave the PF vNIC was just the bare PCI device-based name before the change, and will have 'nn0' appended after. To ensure flower's vNIC doesn't have phys_port_name attribute, add a flag to vNIC struct and set it in flower code. New projects will not set the flag adhere to the naming scheme from the start. Fixes: 51c1df83 ("nfp: assign vNIC id as phys_port_name of vNICs which are not ports") Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NDirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NSimon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录