提交 fc1a5d21 编写于 作者: P Pavel Begunkov 提交者: Shile Zhang

io_uring: Use submit info inlined into req

commit 50585b9a07367b92382c1e975265344daeba78cd upstream.

Stack allocated struct sqe_submit is passed down to the submission path
along with a request (a.k.a. struct io_kiocb), and will be copied into
req->submit for async requests.

As space for it is already allocated, fill req->submit in the first
place instead of using on-stack one. As a result:

1. sqe->submit is the only place for sqe_submit and is always valid,
so we don't need to track which one to use.
2. don't need to copy in case of async
3. allows to simplify the code by not carrying it as an argument all
the way down
4. allows to reduce number of function arguments / potentially improve
spilling

The downside is that stack is most probably be cached, that's not true
for just allocated memory for a request. Another concern is cache
pollution. Though, a request would be touched and fetched along with
req->submit at some point anyway, so shouldn't be a problem.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NXiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
上级 f674c942
......@@ -2456,7 +2456,6 @@ static int __io_queue_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
sqe_copy = kmemdup(s->sqe, sizeof(*sqe_copy), GFP_KERNEL);
if (sqe_copy) {
s->sqe = sqe_copy;
memcpy(&req->submit, s, sizeof(*s));
if (req->work.flags & IO_WQ_WORK_NEEDS_FILES) {
ret = io_grab_files(ctx, req);
if (ret) {
......@@ -2591,13 +2590,11 @@ static void io_submit_sqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req,
}
s->sqe = sqe_copy;
memcpy(&req->submit, s, sizeof(*s));
trace_io_uring_link(ctx, req, prev);
list_add_tail(&req->list, &prev->link_list);
} else if (s->sqe->flags & IOSQE_IO_LINK) {
req->flags |= REQ_F_LINK;
memcpy(&req->submit, s, sizeof(*s));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->link_list);
*link = req;
} else {
......@@ -2702,8 +2699,8 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
}
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
struct sqe_submit s;
struct io_kiocb *req;
unsigned int sqe_flags;
req = io_get_req(ctx, statep);
if (unlikely(!req)) {
......@@ -2711,12 +2708,12 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
submitted = -EAGAIN;
break;
}
if (!io_get_sqring(ctx, &s)) {
if (!io_get_sqring(ctx, &req->submit)) {
__io_free_req(req);
break;
}
if (io_sqe_needs_user(s.sqe) && !*mm) {
if (io_sqe_needs_user(req->submit.sqe) && !*mm) {
mm_fault = mm_fault || !mmget_not_zero(ctx->sqo_mm);
if (!mm_fault) {
use_mm(ctx->sqo_mm);
......@@ -2724,7 +2721,9 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
}
}
if (link && (s.sqe->flags & IOSQE_IO_DRAIN)) {
sqe_flags = req->submit.sqe->flags;
if (link && (sqe_flags & IOSQE_IO_DRAIN)) {
if (!shadow_req) {
shadow_req = io_get_req(ctx, NULL);
if (unlikely(!shadow_req))
......@@ -2732,24 +2731,25 @@ static int io_submit_sqes(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int nr,
shadow_req->flags |= (REQ_F_IO_DRAIN | REQ_F_SHADOW_DRAIN);
refcount_dec(&shadow_req->refs);
}
shadow_req->sequence = s.sequence;
shadow_req->sequence = req->submit.sequence;
}
out:
s.ring_file = ring_file;
s.ring_fd = ring_fd;
s.has_user = *mm != NULL;
s.in_async = async;
s.needs_fixed_file = async;
trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, s.sqe->user_data, true, async);
io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, &s, statep, &link);
req->submit.ring_file = ring_file;
req->submit.ring_fd = ring_fd;
req->submit.has_user = *mm != NULL;
req->submit.in_async = async;
req->submit.needs_fixed_file = async;
trace_io_uring_submit_sqe(ctx, req->submit.sqe->user_data,
true, async);
io_submit_sqe(ctx, req, &req->submit, statep, &link);
submitted++;
/*
* If previous wasn't linked and we have a linked command,
* that's the end of the chain. Submit the previous link.
*/
if (!(s.sqe->flags & IOSQE_IO_LINK) && link) {
if (!(sqe_flags & IOSQE_IO_LINK) && link) {
io_queue_link_head(ctx, link, &link->submit, shadow_req);
link = NULL;
shadow_req = NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册