提交 f9feb1e6 编写于 作者: D David Vrabel 提交者: David S. Miller

xen-netfront: call netif_carrier_off() only once when disconnecting

In xennet_disconnect_backend(), netif_carrier_off() was called once
per queue when it needs to only be called once.

The queue locking around the netif_carrier_off() call looked very
odd. I think they were supposed to synchronize any NAPI instances with
the expectation that no further NAPI instances would be scheduled
because of the carrier being off (see the check in
xennet_rx_interrupt()).  But I can't easily tell if this works
correctly.

Instead, add a napi_synchronize() call after disabling the interrupts.
This is obviously correct as with no Rx interrupts, no further NAPI
instances will be scheduled.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 f50b4076
......@@ -1439,16 +1439,11 @@ static void xennet_disconnect_backend(struct netfront_info *info)
unsigned int i = 0;
unsigned int num_queues = info->netdev->real_num_tx_queues;
netif_carrier_off(info->netdev);
for (i = 0; i < num_queues; ++i) {
struct netfront_queue *queue = &info->queues[i];
/* Stop old i/f to prevent errors whilst we rebuild the state. */
spin_lock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
spin_lock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
netif_carrier_off(queue->info->netdev);
spin_unlock_irq(&queue->tx_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rx_lock);
if (queue->tx_irq && (queue->tx_irq == queue->rx_irq))
unbind_from_irqhandler(queue->tx_irq, queue);
if (queue->tx_irq && (queue->tx_irq != queue->rx_irq)) {
......@@ -1458,6 +1453,8 @@ static void xennet_disconnect_backend(struct netfront_info *info)
queue->tx_evtchn = queue->rx_evtchn = 0;
queue->tx_irq = queue->rx_irq = 0;
napi_synchronize(&queue->napi);
/* End access and free the pages */
xennet_end_access(queue->tx_ring_ref, queue->tx.sring);
xennet_end_access(queue->rx_ring_ref, queue->rx.sring);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册