Merge branch 'net-bridge-add-support-for-backup-port'
Nikolay Aleksandrov says: ==================== net: bridge: add support for backup port This set introduces a new bridge port option that allows any port to have any other port (in the same bridge of course) as its backup and traffic will be forwarded to the backup port when the primary goes down. This is mainly used in MLAG and EVPN setups where we have peerlink path which is a backup of many (or even all) ports and is a participating bridge port itself. There's more detailed information in patch 02. Patch 01 just prepares the port sysfs code for options that take raw value. The main issues that this set solves are scalability and fallback latency. We have used similar code for over 6 months now to bring the fallback latency of the backup peerlink down and avoid fdb notification storms. Also due to the nature of master devices such setup is currently not possible, and last but not least having tens of thousands of fdbs require thousands of calls to switch. I've also CCed our MLAG experts that have been using similar option. Roopa also adds: "Two switches acting in a MLAG pair are connected by the peerlink interface which is a bridge port. the config on one of the switches looks like the below. The other switch also has a similar config. eth0 is connected to one port on the server. And the server is connected to both switches. br0 -- team0---eth0 | -- switch-peerlink switch-peerlink becomes the failover/backport port when say team0 to the server goes down. Today, when team0 goes down, control plane has to withdraw all the fdb entries pointing to team0 and re-install the fdb entries pointing to switch-peerlink...and restore the fdb entries when team0 comes back up again. and this is the problem we are trying to solve. This also becomes necessary when multihoming is implemented by a standard like E-VPN https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8365#section-8 where the 'switch-peerlink' is an overlay vxlan port (like nikolay mentions in his patch commit). In these implementations, the fdb scale can be much larger. On why bond failover cannot be used here ?: the point that nikolay was alluding to is, switch-peerlink in the above example is a bridge port and is a failover/backport port for more than one or all ports in the bridge br0. And you cannot enslave switch-peerlink into a second level team with other bridge ports. Hence a multi layered team device is not an option (FWIW, switch-peerlink is also a teamed interface to the peer switch)." v3: Added Roopa's explanation and diagram v2: In patch 01 use kstrdup/kfree to avoid casting the const buf. In order to avoid using GFP_ATOMIC or always allocating I kept the spinlock inside each branch. ==================== Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录