提交 f382a0a8 编写于 作者: M Matthew Wilcox 提交者: Jeff Garzik

[netdrvr] atl1e: Don't take the mdio_lock in atl1e_probe

Lockdep warns about the mdio_lock taken with interrupts enabled then later
taken from interrupt context.  Initially, I considered changing these
to spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq, but then I looked at atl1e_phy_init()
and saw that it calls msleep().  Sleeping while holding a spinlock is
not allowed either.

In the probe path, we haven't registered the interrupt handler, so
it can't poke at this card yet.  It's before we call register_netdev(),
so I don't think any other threads can reach this card either.  If I'm
right, we don't need a spinlock at all.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
上级 70666c71
...@@ -2390,9 +2390,7 @@ static int __devinit atl1e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, ...@@ -2390,9 +2390,7 @@ static int __devinit atl1e_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
} }
/* Init GPHY as early as possible due to power saving issue */ /* Init GPHY as early as possible due to power saving issue */
spin_lock(&adapter->mdio_lock);
atl1e_phy_init(&adapter->hw); atl1e_phy_init(&adapter->hw);
spin_unlock(&adapter->mdio_lock);
/* reset the controller to /* reset the controller to
* put the device in a known good starting state */ * put the device in a known good starting state */
err = atl1e_reset_hw(&adapter->hw); err = atl1e_reset_hw(&adapter->hw);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册