提交 ef864c95 编写于 作者: O Oleg Nesterov 提交者: Thomas Gleixner

posix-timers: sys_timer_create: cleanup the error handling

Cleanup.

- sys_timer_create() is big and complicated. The code above the "out:"
  label relies on the fact that "error" must be == 0. This is not very
  robust, make the code more explicit. Remove the unneeded initialization
  of error.

- If idr_get_new() succeeds (as it normally should), we check the returned
  value twice. Move the "-EAGAIN" check under "if (error)".
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
上级 717835d9
......@@ -454,9 +454,8 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_clock,
struct sigevent __user *timer_event_spec,
timer_t __user * created_timer_id)
{
int error = 0;
struct k_itimer *new_timer;
int new_timer_id;
int error, new_timer_id;
struct task_struct *process;
sigevent_t event;
int it_id_set = IT_ID_NOT_SET;
......@@ -478,9 +477,9 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_clock,
error = idr_get_new(&posix_timers_id, (void *) new_timer,
&new_timer_id);
spin_unlock_irq(&idr_lock);
if (error == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
else if (error) {
if (error) {
if (error == -EAGAIN)
goto retry;
/*
* Weird looking, but we return EAGAIN if the IDR is
* full (proper POSIX return value for this)
......@@ -541,6 +540,8 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_clock,
new_timer->it_process = process;
list_add(&new_timer->list, &current->signal->posix_timers);
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
return 0;
/*
* In the case of the timer belonging to another task, after
* the task is unlocked, the timer is owned by the other task
......@@ -548,9 +549,7 @@ sys_timer_create(const clockid_t which_clock,
* new_timer after the unlock call.
*/
out:
if (error)
release_posix_timer(new_timer, it_id_set);
release_posix_timer(new_timer, it_id_set);
return error;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册