提交 ed2c7da3 编写于 作者: J John Johansen 提交者: James Morris

apparmor: fix bad lock balance when introspecting policy

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235977

The profile introspection seq file has a locking bug when policy is viewed
from a virtual root (task in a policy namespace), introspection from the
real root is not affected.

The test for root
    while (parent) {
is correct for the real root, but incorrect for tasks in a policy namespace.
This allows the task to walk backup the policy tree past its virtual root
causing it to be unlocked before the virtual root should be in the p_stop
fn.

This results in the following lockdep back trace:
[   78.479744] [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
[   78.479792] 3.11.0-11-generic #17 Not tainted
[   78.479838] -------------------------------------
[   78.479885] grep/2223 is trying to release lock (&ns->lock) at:
[   78.479952] [<ffffffff817bf3be>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[   78.480002] but there are no more locks to release!
[   78.480037]
[   78.480037] other info that might help us debug this:
[   78.480037] 1 lock held by grep/2223:
[   78.480037]  #0:  (&p->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812111bd>] seq_read+0x3d/0x3d0
[   78.480037]
[   78.480037] stack backtrace:
[   78.480037] CPU: 0 PID: 2223 Comm: grep Not tainted 3.11.0-11-generic #17
[   78.480037] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[   78.480037]  ffffffff817bf3be ffff880007763d60 ffffffff817b97ef ffff8800189d2190
[   78.480037]  ffff880007763d88 ffffffff810e1c6e ffff88001f044730 ffff8800189d2190
[   78.480037]  ffffffff817bf3be ffff880007763e00 ffffffff810e5bd6 0000000724fe56b7
[   78.480037] Call Trace:
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817b97ef>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff810e1c6e>] print_unlock_imbalance_bug+0xee/0x100
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff810e5bd6>] lock_release_non_nested+0x226/0x300
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf2fe>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xce/0x180
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf3be>] ? mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff810e5d5c>] lock_release+0xac/0x310
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf2b3>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x83/0x180
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817bf3be>] mutex_unlock+0xe/0x10
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff81376c91>] p_stop+0x51/0x90
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff81211408>] seq_read+0x288/0x3d0
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff811e9d9e>] vfs_read+0x9e/0x170
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff811ea8cc>] SyS_read+0x4c/0xa0
[   78.480037]  [<ffffffff817ccc9d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
Signed-off-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
上级 5cb3e91e
...@@ -580,15 +580,13 @@ static struct aa_namespace *__next_namespace(struct aa_namespace *root, ...@@ -580,15 +580,13 @@ static struct aa_namespace *__next_namespace(struct aa_namespace *root,
/* check if the next ns is a sibling, parent, gp, .. */ /* check if the next ns is a sibling, parent, gp, .. */
parent = ns->parent; parent = ns->parent;
while (parent) { while (ns != root) {
mutex_unlock(&ns->lock); mutex_unlock(&ns->lock);
next = list_entry_next(ns, base.list); next = list_entry_next(ns, base.list);
if (!list_entry_is_head(next, &parent->sub_ns, base.list)) { if (!list_entry_is_head(next, &parent->sub_ns, base.list)) {
mutex_lock(&next->lock); mutex_lock(&next->lock);
return next; return next;
} }
if (parent == root)
return NULL;
ns = parent; ns = parent;
parent = parent->parent; parent = parent->parent;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册