提交 e8ced39d 编写于 作者: M Mingming Cao 提交者: Theodore Ts'o

percpu_counter: new function percpu_counter_sum_and_set

Delayed allocation need to check free blocks at every write time.
percpu_counter_read_positive() is not quit accurate. delayed
allocation need a more accurate accounting, but using
percpu_counter_sum_positive() is frequently is quite expensive.

This patch added a new function to update center counter when sum
per-cpu counter, to increase the accurate rate for next
percpu_counter_read() and require less calling expensive
percpu_counter_sum().
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 64769240
...@@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_has_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, ...@@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_has_free_blocks(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (free_blocks - root_blocks < FBC_BATCH) if (free_blocks - root_blocks < FBC_BATCH)
free_blocks = free_blocks =
percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter); percpu_counter_sum_and_set(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
#endif #endif
if (free_blocks - root_blocks < nblocks) if (free_blocks - root_blocks < nblocks)
return free_blocks - root_blocks; return free_blocks - root_blocks;
......
...@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount); ...@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc); void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount); void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch); void __percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch);
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc); s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set);
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount) static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{ {
...@@ -44,13 +44,19 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount) ...@@ -44,13 +44,19 @@ static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc) static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{ {
s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc); s64 ret = __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret; return ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
} }
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_and_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{
return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 1);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc) static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
{ {
return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc); return __percpu_counter_sum(fbc, 0);
} }
static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc) static inline s64 percpu_counter_read(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
......
...@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add); ...@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__percpu_counter_add);
* Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate * Add up all the per-cpu counts, return the result. This is a more accurate
* but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive() * but much slower version of percpu_counter_read_positive()
*/ */
s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc) s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc, int set)
{ {
s64 ret; s64 ret;
int cpu; int cpu;
...@@ -62,7 +62,12 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc) ...@@ -62,7 +62,12 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu); s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
ret += *pcount; ret += *pcount;
if (set)
*pcount = 0;
} }
if (set)
fbc->count = ret;
spin_unlock(&fbc->lock); spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册