提交 e7eda91f 编写于 作者: B Barry Song

ARM: prima2: move to generic reset controller driver framework

this moves to generic IP module reset framework, and make other drivers
use common device_reset() API.

Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Signed-off-by: NBarry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: NBin Shi <Bin.Shi@csr.com>
Acked-by: NPhilipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
上级 951ec090
CSR SiRFSoC Reset Controller
======================================
Please also refer to reset.txt in this directory for common reset
controller binding usage.
Required properties:
- compatible: Should be "sirf,prima2-rstc" or "sirf,marco-rstc"
- reg: should be register base and length as documented in the
datasheet
- #reset-cells: 1, see below
example:
rstc: reset-controller@88010000 {
compatible = "sirf,prima2-rstc";
reg = <0x88010000 0x1000>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
Specifying reset lines connected to IP modules
==============================================
The reset controller(rstc) manages various reset sources. This module provides
reset signals for most blocks in system. Those device nodes should specify the
reset line on the rstc in their resets property, containing a phandle to the
rstc device node and a RESET_INDEX specifying which module to reset, as described
in reset.txt.
For SiRFSoC, RESET_INDEX is just reset_bit defined in SW_RST0 and SW_RST1 registers.
For modules whose rest_bit is in SW_RST0, its RESET_INDEX is 0~31. For modules whose
rest_bit is in SW_RST1, its RESET_INDEX is 32~63.
example:
vpp@90020000 {
compatible = "sirf,prima2-vpp";
reg = <0x90020000 0x10000>;
interrupts = <31>;
clocks = <&clks 35>;
resets = <&rstc 6>;
};
......@@ -65,9 +65,10 @@
#clock-cells = <1>;
};
reset-controller@88010000 {
rstc: reset-controller@88010000 {
compatible = "sirf,prima2-rstc";
reg = <0x88010000 0x1000>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
rsc-controller@88020000 {
......
......@@ -58,9 +58,10 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0xc2000000 0xc2000000 0x1000000>;
reset-controller@c2000000 {
rstc: reset-controller@c2000000 {
compatible = "sirf,marco-rstc";
reg = <0xc2000000 0x10000>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
};
......
......@@ -76,9 +76,10 @@
#clock-cells = <1>;
};
reset-controller@88010000 {
rstc: reset-controller@88010000 {
compatible = "sirf,prima2-rstc";
reg = <0x88010000 0x1000>;
#reset-cells = <1>;
};
rsc-controller@88020000 {
......
config ARCH_SIRF
bool "CSR SiRF" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
select ARCH_HAS_RESET_CONTROLLER
select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
......
......@@ -13,57 +13,36 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
#define SIRFSOC_RSTBIT_NUM 64
void __iomem *sirfsoc_rstc_base;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(rstc_lock);
static struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "sirf,prima2-rstc" },
{ .compatible = "sirf,marco-rstc" },
{},
};
static int __init sirfsoc_of_rstc_init(void)
{
struct device_node *np;
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, rstc_ids);
if (!np) {
pr_err("unable to find compatible sirf rstc node in dtb\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
sirfsoc_rstc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!sirfsoc_rstc_base)
panic("unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
of_node_put(np);
return 0;
}
early_initcall(sirfsoc_of_rstc_init);
int sirfsoc_reset_device(struct device *dev)
static int sirfsoc_reset_module(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
unsigned long sw_reset_idx)
{
u32 reset_bit;
u32 reset_bit = sw_reset_idx;
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "reset-bit", &reset_bit))
if (reset_bit >= SIRFSOC_RSTBIT_NUM)
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&rstc_lock);
if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "sirf,prima2-rstc")) {
if (of_device_is_compatible(rcdev->of_node, "sirf,prima2-rstc")) {
/*
* Writing 1 to this bit resets corresponding block. Writing 0 to this
* bit de-asserts reset signal of the corresponding block.
* datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear
* of reset bit. it could be shorter if tests pass.
*/
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) | reset_bit,
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) | (1 << reset_bit),
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4);
msleep(10);
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) & ~reset_bit,
writel(readl(sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4) & ~(1 << reset_bit),
sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 4);
} else {
/*
......@@ -73,9 +52,9 @@ int sirfsoc_reset_device(struct device *dev)
* datasheet doesn't require explicit delay between the set and clear
* of reset bit. it could be shorter if tests pass.
*/
writel(reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8);
writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8);
msleep(10);
writel(reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8 + 4);
writel(1 << reset_bit, sirfsoc_rstc_base + (reset_bit / 32) * 8 + 4);
}
mutex_unlock(&rstc_lock);
......@@ -83,6 +62,52 @@ int sirfsoc_reset_device(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
static struct reset_control_ops sirfsoc_rstc_ops = {
.reset = sirfsoc_reset_module,
};
static struct reset_controller_dev sirfsoc_reset_controller = {
.ops = &sirfsoc_rstc_ops,
.nr_resets = SIRFSOC_RSTBIT_NUM,
};
static int sirfsoc_rstc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
sirfsoc_rstc_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!sirfsoc_rstc_base) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to map rstc cpu registers\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
sirfsoc_reset_controller.of_node = np;
reset_controller_register(&sirfsoc_reset_controller);
return 0;
}
static const struct of_device_id rstc_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "sirf,prima2-rstc" },
{ .compatible = "sirf,marco-rstc" },
{},
};
static struct platform_driver sirfsoc_rstc_driver = {
.probe = sirfsoc_rstc_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "sirfsoc_rstc",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = rstc_ids,
},
};
static int __init sirfsoc_rstc_init(void)
{
return platform_driver_register(&sirfsoc_rstc_driver);
}
subsys_initcall(sirfsoc_rstc_init);
#define SIRFSOC_SYS_RST_BIT BIT(31)
void sirfsoc_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册