sched/numa: Fix period_slot recalculation

The original code is as intended and was meant to scale the difference
between the NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD and local/remote ratio when adjusting
the scan period. The period_slot recalculation can be dropped.
Signed-off-by: NWanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386833006-6600-4-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

kernel/sched/fair.c

@@ -1342,7 +1342,6 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
 		 * scanning faster if shared accesses dominate as it may
 		 * simply bounce migrations uselessly
 		 */
-		period_slot = DIV_ROUND_UP(diff, NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS);
 		ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS, (private + shared));
 		diff = (diff * ratio) / NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS;
 	}