netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero refcnt
With this patch, the conntrack refcount is initially set to zero and it is bumped once it is added to any of the list, so we fulfill Eric's golden rule which is that all released objects always have a refcount that equals zero. Andrey Vagin reports that nf_conntrack_free can't be called for a conntrack with non-zero ref-counter, because it can race with nf_conntrack_find_get(). A conntrack slab is created with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. Non-zero ref-counter says that this conntrack is used. So when we release a conntrack with non-zero counter, we break this assumption. CPU1 CPU2 ____nf_conntrack_find() nf_ct_put() destroy_conntrack() ... init_conntrack __nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1) atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->use) (use = 2) if (!l4proto->new(ct, skb, dataoff, timeouts)) nf_conntrack_free(ct); (use = 2 !!!) ... __nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1) if (!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone)) nf_ct_put(ct); (use = 0) destroy_conntrack() /* continue to work with CT */ After applying the path "[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get" another bug was triggered in destroy_conntrack(): <4>[67096.759334] ------------[ cut here ]------------ <2>[67096.759353] kernel BUG at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:211! ... <4>[67096.759837] Pid: 498649, comm: atdd veid: 666 Tainted: G C --------------- 2.6.32-042stab084.18 #1 042stab084_18 /DQ45CB <4>[67096.759932] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03d99ac>] [<ffffffffa03d99ac>] destroy_conntrack+0x15c/0x190 [nf_conntrack] <4>[67096.760255] Call Trace: <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814844a7>] nf_conntrack_destroy+0x17/0x30 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa03d9bb5>] nf_conntrack_find_get+0x85/0x130 [nf_conntrack] <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa03d9fb2>] nf_conntrack_in+0x352/0xb60 [nf_conntrack] <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa048c771>] ipv4_conntrack_local+0x51/0x60 [nf_conntrack_ipv4] <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81484419>] nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814845d4>] nf_hook_slow+0x74/0x110 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b66d5>] raw_sendmsg+0x775/0x910 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8104c5a8>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814c136a>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81444e93>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x13/0x140 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81444f97>] sock_sendmsg+0x117/0x140 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8102e299>] ? native_smp_send_reschedule+0x49/0x60 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81519beb>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x1b/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8109d930>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814960f0>] ? do_ip_setsockopt+0x90/0xd80 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814457c9>] sys_sendto+0x139/0x190 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff810efa77>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff810ef7c5>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81474daf>] compat_sys_socketcall+0x13f/0x210 <4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8104dea3>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5 I have reused the original title for the RFC patch that Andrey posted and most of the original patch description. Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com> Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Reported-by: NAndrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录