提交 e1e992e5 编写于 作者: J Jamal Hadi Salim 提交者: David S. Miller

[NET_SCHED] protect action config/dump from irqs

(with no apologies to C Heston)

On Mon, 2007-10-09 at 21:00 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:11:29PM +0000, Christian Kujau wrote:
> >
> > after upgrading to 2.6.23-rc5 (and applying davem's fix [0]), lockdep
> > was quite noisy when I tried to shape my external (wireless) interface:
> >
> > [ 6400.534545] FahCore_78.exe/3552 just changed the state of lock:
> > [ 6400.534713]  (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}, at: [<c038d595>]
> > netif_receive_skb+0x2d5/0x3c0
> > [ 6400.534941] but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the
> > past:
> > [ 6400.535145]  (police_lock){-.--}
>
> This is a genuine dead-lock.  The police lock can be taken
> for reading with softirqs on.  If a second CPU tries to take
> the police lock for writing, while holding the ingress lock,
> then a softirq on the first CPU can dead-lock when it tries
> to get the ingress lock.
Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Acked-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 4878809f
...@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb, ...@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
int err = 0, index = -1,i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0; int err = 0, index = -1,i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0;
struct rtattr *r ; struct rtattr *r ;
read_lock(hinfo->lock); read_lock_bh(hinfo->lock);
s_i = cb->args[0]; s_i = cb->args[0];
...@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb, ...@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int tcf_dump_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
} }
} }
done: done:
read_unlock(hinfo->lock); read_unlock_bh(hinfo->lock);
if (n_i) if (n_i)
cb->args[0] += n_i; cb->args[0] += n_i;
return n_i; return n_i;
...@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ struct tcf_common *tcf_hash_lookup(u32 index, struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo) ...@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ struct tcf_common *tcf_hash_lookup(u32 index, struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo)
{ {
struct tcf_common *p; struct tcf_common *p;
read_lock(hinfo->lock); read_lock_bh(hinfo->lock);
for (p = hinfo->htab[tcf_hash(index, hinfo->hmask)]; p; for (p = hinfo->htab[tcf_hash(index, hinfo->hmask)]; p;
p = p->tcfc_next) { p = p->tcfc_next) {
if (p->tcfc_index == index) if (p->tcfc_index == index)
break; break;
} }
read_unlock(hinfo->lock); read_unlock_bh(hinfo->lock);
return p; return p;
} }
......
...@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c ...@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c
int err = 0, index = -1, i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0; int err = 0, index = -1, i = 0, s_i = 0, n_i = 0;
struct rtattr *r; struct rtattr *r;
read_lock(&police_lock); read_lock_bh(&police_lock);
s_i = cb->args[0]; s_i = cb->args[0];
...@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c ...@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_walker(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *c
} }
} }
done: done:
read_unlock(&police_lock); read_unlock_bh(&police_lock);
if (n_i) if (n_i)
cb->args[0] += n_i; cb->args[0] += n_i;
return n_i; return n_i;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册